Chennai Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
D.Ravi Kumar Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 07.04.2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI W.P.No.16641 of 2007 (O.A.No.3989 of 2003) D.Ravi Kumar ..Petitioner versus 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu represented by the Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-9. 2.The Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-5..Respondents Writ petition, having been transferred from the file of the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.3989 of 2003 is filed to call for the records relating to (i)(a)proceedings bearing No.A.Na.1(1) 22263/97 dated 3.7.98 of the 2nd respondent namely the Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-5 imposing the punishment of removal of the petitioner from service and (b)G.O.Ms.No.547 Rev. (Ser.5(1).Department dated 23.12.2002 of the 1st respondent, namely the secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9 rejecting the petitioner's appeal against the punishment of removal from ...
Capt. Vivek A.Shanbhag Vs. Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:07. 04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.No.4416 of 2014 and M.P.No.2 of 2014 Capt. Vivek A.Shanbhag ... Petitioner -Versus- 1.Union of India, Rep. By its Secretary, Ministry of Civil Aviation, Rajiv Gandhi Bhavan, Safdarjung Airport, New Delhi 110 003. 2.Air India Limited, Airlines House, Gurudwara Rakabganj Road, New Delhi, Rep. By its Chairman and Managing Director 3.The General Manager (Operations), Operations Department, Air India Limited, Meenambakkam Airport, Chennai 600 027. 4.Capt. S.P.S.Suri, Director Operations, Air India Limited, Safdarjung Airport, New Delhi 110 003. 5.Capt.Hemant Yeshwant Samant, 1/4, Satsang Towers, Upper Govind Nagar, Malad East, Mumbai. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records culminating in the order dated 03.02.2014 bearing No.AV.15026/19/2014-AS passed by the 8th respondent representing...
R.Venkatesan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS CORAM DATED :07. 04.2014 THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.Nos.27814 to 27817 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 to 1 of 2011 in W.P.Nos.27814 to 27817 of 2011 1. R.Venkatesan .. Petitioner in W.P.No27814/2011 2.A.Vadivelu .. Petitioner in W.P.No.27815/2011 3.R.Raju .. Petitioner in W.P.No.27816/2011 4.M.G.Ramadas .. Petitioner in W.P.No.27817/2011 Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu rep. By its Secretary Finance (Pension Department), Fort.St.George, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The Director of Co operative Audit, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai - 600 005. .. Respondents in W.P.Nos.27816 & 27817/ 2011 3.The Accountant General, Accountant General Office, Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018. .. Respondent in W.P.Nos.27814, 27815of 2011 Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writs of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the order passed by the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.No.33801/2005/P.N.1, dated 07.10.2011 in (W.P.No.278...
D.Mohan Vs. Tn Civil Supplies Corporation
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 07.04.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI WP.Nos.34602 to 24604, 37941, 26506 to 26510 of 2004, 8084, 21819 & 21820, 22754 to 22756 and 23331 of 2005 and WPMP.Nos.41756 to 41758 of 2004, 23770 & 23771, 24801 to 24803 of 2005 and WVMP.No.442 of 2006 WP.No.34602 of 2004 D.Mohan .petitioner versus 1.The Chairman & Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Kilpauk, Chennai-10. 2.The Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Cuddalore.Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records in Proc.No.BSLA2/108996/2004 dated 14.09.2004 on the file of the fiRs.respondent to quash the same and direct the fiRs.respondent to consider and dispose of the appeal petition dated 27.03.2004, afresh as per the Government Order enhancing the excess loss in Kuruvai 1997 peri...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Smt.Sushila Devi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :07.04.2014 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM Tax Case (Appeal) No.2720 of 2006 Commissioner of Income Tax Chennai. ... Appellant -vs- Smt.Sushila Devi ...Respondent Prayer: Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi ".G". Bench dated 21.03.2006 passed in ITA No.1511/Mds/1999 relating to the assessment year 1994-95. For appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department For respondent : No appearance JUDGMENT (The Judgment of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN.J.,) Revenue is on appeal as against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal relating to the assessment year 1994-95 and the Tax Case (Appeal) is admitted on the following substantial questions of law:1. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appell...
K.C.Bhaskar Vs. R.Siva
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :07. 04.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH S.A.No.538 of 2004 and C.M.P.No.4489 of 2004 K.C.Bhaskar .. Appellant Vs. R.Siva .. Respondent Prayer:- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and decree dated 09.12.2003 made in A.S.No.75 of 2003 on the file of Principal District Court, Vellore confirming the judgment and decree dated 27.06.2003 made in O.S.No.1 of 1996 on the file of Subordinate Court, Ranipet, Vellore District. For Appellant : Mr.R.Subramanian for Mr.G.Jerumiah For Respondent : Mrs.M.R.Sakunthala JUDGMENT The appellant, who is the defendant in the suit filed this Second Appeal against the Judgment and decree dated 09.12.2003 made in A.S.No.75 of 2003 on the file of Principal District Court, Vellore confirming the judgment and decree dated 27.06.2003 made in O.S.No.1 of 1996 on the file of Subordinate Court, Ranipet, Vellore District.2. For the sake of convenience, the d...
M.H.Aahamed HussaIn Vs. Presiding Officer of Labour Court at Pondicher ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 07.04.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI W.P.No.36164 of 2003 M.H.Aahamed Hussain .petitioner versus 1.The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Pondicherry. 2.The General Manager, Swadeshi Cotton Mills, Pondicherry.Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the fiRs.respondent dated 03.04.2003 passed in ID.No.71 of 2001 and to quash the same and direct the 2nd respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service together with backwages and attendant benefits. For Petitioner : M/s.S.Baskaran For Respondents : R1-Court. M/s.R.Parthiban for R2. ORDER The writ petition is filed by the employee against the award passed in ID.No.71 of 2001 by the fiRs.respondent/Labour Court. 2)The few facts which are relevant for consideration herein are as follows : The petitioner was appointed as Jobber in the weav...
Kasi Ammal Vs. S.V.Natesa thevar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :07. 04.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH C.R.P.Nos.777 and 778 of 2009 1. Kasi Ammal 2. Seenivasan 3. Sivakami 4. Mageswari 5. Jothi ... Petitioners in both CRPs Vs. S.V.Natesa Thevar ... Respondent in both CRPs Prayers in both Civil Revision Petitions:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings Lease and Rent Control Act, 1960 against the fair and decreetal orders dated 27.11.2008 passed in Rent Control Appeal Nos.1 and 2 of 2006 on the file of Subordinate Court (Rent Control Appellate Authority), Cheyyar in reversing the fair and decreetal orders dated 25.02.2005 passed in RCOP Nos.5 and 6 of 1993 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court (Rent Controller), Cheyyar. For Petitioners : Mr.P.Mani For Respondent : Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan C O M M O N ORDER The revision petitioners/tenant filed this two Civil Revision Petitions against the fair and decreetal orders dated 27.11.2008 passed in R...
A.Veeramani Vs. Presiding Officer of Central Government Industrial Tri ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :07. 04.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI W.P.No.38591 of 2005 A.Veeramani .. petitioner Vs. 1.The Presiding Officer, The Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Shastri Bhawan, Haddows Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-34. 2.The Indian Overseas Bank, rep by its Chairman & Managing Director, Annasalai, Chennai-6. .. Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the files of the first respondent relating to the award passed in ID.No.51 of 2003 dated 14.02.2005 and to quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with continuity of service, backwages and all other attendant benefits. For Petitioner : M/s.R.Margabandhu For Respondents : R1 - Tribunal M/s.N.G.R.Prasad for R2. ORDER The writ petition is filed against the award made in ID.No.51 o...
M/S. Texcel International (P) Ltd. Vs. Cce, Coimbatore
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
1. The applicant filed this application for condoning the delay of 73 days involved in the filing of the appeal. 2. The learned counsel on behalf of the applicant submits that they received the impugned order on 16.10.2012. He submitted that their Senior Manager Shri Ramakrishnan who was in-charge of the factory had submitted his resignation on 22.6.2012 and thereafter he was under some stress and he was relieved from employment with effect from 19.2.2013. It is submitted that on 24.3.2013, the central excise officers informed them that the impugned order was issued against them. After searching the file, they found that Shri Ramakrishnan had received the order but no step was taken. Ultimately, the appeal was filed on 4.4.2013 with a delay of 73 days. He submits that there is no negligency or inaction on the part of the applicant and the delay was caused due to the Senior Manager had not placed the impugned order before the management. He relied upon the decision of the Tribunal in th...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »