Chennai Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Mangal and Mangal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT Dated :10. 04.2014 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM Tax Case (Appeal) No.968 of 2013 --- Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle, Tiruchirapalli ... Appellant -vs- M/s.Mangal & Mangal, 25, NSC Bose Road, Tiruchirapalli. ... Respondent Tax Case (Appeal) filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal 'A' Bench, Chennai, dated 23.04.2010, in I.T.(SS).No.67/Mds/2008. For petitioner : Mr.M.Swaminathan ORDER (The Order of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, J.) Following questions of law raised by the Revenue seeking admission of the Tax Case (Appeal):- 1.Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in restricting the addition to Rs.39,44,959/- on account of excess stock of silver especially when no objection was raised by the assessee at the time of sear...
Murugadoss Vs. State by Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:10. 04.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE ARUNA JAGADEESAN CRL.A.No.757/2010 Murugadoss Appellant Vs State by Inspector of Police All Women Police Station, Tindivanam Respondent Prayer:- This Criminal Appeal is filed against the judgement dated 06.10.2010 made in SC.No.162/2010 by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram. For Appellant : Mr.V.Bhiman For Respondent : Mr.VMR.Rajendran JUDGEMENT This Criminal Appeal is filed against the judgement dated 6.10.2010 made in SC.No.162/2010 by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram, thereby convicting and sentencing the Appellant/accused for the offence under Section 376(2)(f) read with 511 of IPC to undergo 10 years Rigorous Imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/-, in default to undergo two years Rigorous Imprisonment.2. The case of the Prosecution is as follows:- a. PW.1 the complainant is the mother of PW.5, the victim girl Gayathri, who was studying 5th Standard in ...
Muthuswamy Vs. Collector of Namakkal District
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :10. 04.2014 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T. RAJA W.P. No.5884 of 2011 and M.P. Nos. 1 & 2 of 2011 1. Muthuswamy 2. M. Shanmugam 3. S. Selvamani .. Petitioner Vs.1. The Collector Thiruchengode Taluk Namakkal District Namakkal.2. The Assistant Director of Land Survey and Records Thiruchengode Taluk Namakkal District Namakkal.3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Thiruchengode Taluk Thiruchengode 4. The Commissioner Thiruchengode Municipality Thiruchengode.5. The District Revenue Officer Namakkal District Namakkal 6. P. Senguttuvel 7. M. Jacob Venkatachalapathy 8. M. Ravi 9. K.Ganesan .. Respondents PRAYER: The Writ Petition has been filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records comprised in the proceedings of the 5th respondent in No.Moo.44174/2010 (O-1) dated 23.02.2011 and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents herein not to in any manner interf...
Subbaraya Gounder Vs. Ponnathal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:10. - 04 2014 Coram The Hon'ble TMT. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA Second Appeal No.1162 of 2006 and M.P. No.1 of 2006 1. Subbaraya Gounder 2. Lakshmi .. Appellants vs.1. Ponnathal 2. S. Palanisamy 3. Eswaramoorthy 4. The Superintending Engineer Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Erode 5. The Assistant Executive Engineer Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Arachalur 6. The Assistant Engineer (O&M) Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Kandasamy Palayam Sivagiri .. Respondents Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 24.03.2005 in A.S. No.45 of 2004 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Erode confirming the judgment and decree dated 25.6.2004 made in O.S. No.83 of 2001 on the file of the District Munsif - cum - Judicial Magistrate, Kodumudi. For Appellants : Mr. V. Bharathidasan For RR1to 3 : Mr. V.S. Kesavan For R3: Mr. N. Muthuswami JUDGMENT Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 24...
S.G.P.Exim Private Limited Vs. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:10. .04.2014 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.S. SIVAGNANAM W.P. Nos.28833 & 28834 of 2010 S.G.P.Exim Private Limited, Rep., by its Executive Director, Mr.R.Doraiswami, New No.68, Cathedral Road, Gopalapuram, Chennai 600 086. ... Petitioner in W.P.No.28833/2010 M/s.Waterfall Estate Pvt., Ltd., Rep., by its Director, Mr.R.Doraiswami, New No.68, Cathedral Road, Gopalapuram, Chennai 600 086. ... Petitioner in W.P.No.28834/2010 Vs 1.The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Dr.Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore 18. 2.The Recovery Officer, Employee's Provident Fund, Coimbatore 18. ... Respondents in both W.Ps., Common Prayer :-Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in Prohibitory Orders.No.TN/RO/CBE/651 & 691/RECOVERY/2010, dated 10.12.2010, and dated 14.12.2010; Nos.TN/RO/CBE/691/RECOVERY/2010, dated 07.12.2010 and No.TN/RO/CBE/651/RECOVER...
1.Ashok Kumar Thalreja Vs. 1.G.Mukundan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:10. 04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM C.R.P(PD)(MD)No.638 of 2007 and M.P(MD)No.1 of 2007 1.Ashok Kumar Thalreja 2.Manju 3.Amruth .. Petitioners / Defendants 1 to 3 Vs 1.G.Mukundan 2.N.Veeradharan 3.Kasthuri .. Respondents / Plaintiffs 4.The Commissioner, Tiruchirappalli City Corporation, Promenade Road, Cantonment, Tiruchirappalli-1 5.Tiruchirappalli Planning Authority near Hotel Gajapriya Royal Road, Tiruchirappalli-1 .. Respondents / Defendants 4 & 5. Prayer Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order and decretal order passed in I.A.No.298 of 2004 in O.S.No.1391 of 2002, passed on 27.02.2006, on the file of II Additional District Munsif, Trichirappalli. !For Petitioners :Mr. S.Vinayak For Mr.P.Jayaprakash Narayanan ^For Respondents : Mr.R.A.Mohanram (R1 and R2) :ORDER This Revision is directed against the order passed in I.A.No.298/2004 in O.S.No.1391 ...
Kulanthaivel Vs. the State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.04.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Criminal Revision Case (Md.No.348 of 2013 and M.P.(Md.No.1 of 2013 Kulanthaivel ..Petitioner/Petitioner/Accused 2 versus The State Represented by Inspector of Police, Thenkarai Police Station, Periyakulam, Theni District. (Crime No.129/2011) ..Respondent/Respondent/Complainant PRAYER Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 r/w. 401 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying to call for the records and set aside the order passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Theni District in Cr.M.P.No.54 of 2012 in S.C.No.221 of 2012, dated 13.03.2013 by allowing this Criminal Revision. !For Petitioner ..Mr.D.Selvanayagam ^For Respondent ..Mrs.S.Prabha Government Advocate (Crl. side) *** :ORDER There is a saying, ".Facts are stranger than fiction". but the facts that obtains in this case goes even beyond fiction. The hero of the story line is one Mr.Raja who...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Flothern Engingeers Pvt. Limited
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :10. 04.2014 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM Tax Case (Appeal). No.743 of 2013 The Commissioner of Income Tax Chennai ... Appellant -vs- M/s.Flothern Engingeers Pvt Limited No.14/20 R.K.Eye Centre, Chari Street T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017 ... Respondent Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, dated 21.02.2013 passed in I.T.A.No.916/Mds/2012. For appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar, Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department. For respondent : Mr.V.S.Jayakumar JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, J.) Following are the questions of law raised in the Tax Case (Appeal) filed for the assessment year 2001-02. ".1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in holding that the reassessment order made by the AO u/s.143(3) r...
A.L.Vellaichamy Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:10. .04.2014 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.S. SIVAGNANAM W.P. No.10820 of 2010 A.L.Vellaichamy ... Petitioner Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep., by its Secretary to Government Housing and Urban Development Department, Fort., St., George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Executive Engineer & Administrative Officer, Besant Nagar Division, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, No.48, Dr.Muthulakshmi Salai, Adyar, Chennai 600 020. ... Respondents Prayer :-Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the second respondent in Letter No.HS/4544A/07, dated 06.05.2010, and quash the same and further direct the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 13.05.1998, for reconveyance of the lands belonging to the petitioner situate in Survey Nos.390/4, Shollinganallur Village and pass appropriate orders on the same. For petitioner .. Mr.V.S...
J.E.Sivaramakrishnan Vs. Government of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :10 .04.2014 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.Nos.4449 & 4450 of 2011 & M.P.Nos.1,1,2,2, 3 & 3 of 2011 --- J.E.Sivaramakrishnan ..Petitioner in W.P.No.4449 of 2011 S.Kannan ..Petitioner in W.P.No.4450 of 2011 -versus 1.Government of India rep. By the Secretary Ministry of Shipping No.1,Sansad Marg, New Delhi 110 002. 2.The Chennai Port Trust rep. By its Chairman Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600 001. 3.The Deputy Chairman Chennai Port Trust Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600 001.Respondents in both W.Ps. COMMON PRAYER Writ Petitions filed under Article 206 of Constitution of India for issuance of writ of certiorari to call upon the records of the 2nd respondent in Letter No.VI/Con.34/04/S dated 16.09.2008 and consequently the communication of the 3rd respondent in No.DY CPT/ Enquiry/GA/2011 dated 15.02.2011 and quash the same. For petitioners : Mr.Vijay Narayan, Sr.Counsel (in both Wps) for Mr.T.Gowthaman For Respondents : Mr...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »