Skip to content

Chennai Court April 2014 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Apr 16 2014

V.Chandrasekaran Vs. Principal Secretary for Department of Differently ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-16-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16.04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.NO.13060 OF2012AND M.P.NO.1 OF2012V.Chandrasekaran .Petitioner versus 1.The Principal Secretary Department of Differently Abled Fort St. George, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The State Commissioner for the Differently Abled Jawaharlal Nehru Inner Ring Road, K.K.Nagar, Chennai - 600 078.Respondents PRAYER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 2nd respondent in his proceedings Proc No.10661/SS1/2011 dated 08.02.2012 and quash the same and direct the respondents to promote the petitioner to the post of Post Graduate Assistant (Tamil).For Petitioner : Mr.P.Chandrasekar For Respondents : Mr.I.Arockiasamy Government Advocate ORDER Heard both sides. With the consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 2.Though counter a...


Apr 16 2014

Ranganathan Vs. State of Tamilnadu

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-16-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:16. 04/2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DEVADASS Crl. O.P. No.9136 of 2014 P-1 RANGANATHAN S/O.KALIYAPPAN MANAGER KPR PROCESSING COMPANY SIPCOT INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, PERUNDURAI, ERODE P-2 RAMANAN S/O.BALASUBRAMANIYAM PERSONAL OFFICER, KPR PROCESSING COMPANY, SIPCOT INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, PERUNDURAI, ERODE P-3 NAGENDRAN S/O.MATHU INCHARGE ETP PLANT, KPR PROCESSING COMPANY, SIPCOT INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, PERUNDURAI, ERODE VS R-1 THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUNDURAI POLICE STATION, ERODE CR.NO.159 OF2014ORDER Crl.O.P.No.9136 of 2014 P.DEVADASS, J.Petition for bail.2. Offences alleged are under Sections 304(ii) and 337 of IPC.3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, a tragedy took place inside the factory, 7 persons have lost their lives and 11 persons sustained injuries. Petitioners are Factory Manager, Personnel Officer and ETP Plant Incharge respectively.4. Learned counsel for the petitioners further con...


Apr 16 2014

M.Ramamurthy Vs. State Level Scrutiny Committee

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-16-2014

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:16.04.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.P.No.1378 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 *** M.Ramamurthy ..Petitioner V. 1.The State Level Scrutiny Committee, Rep. By its Chairman and Principal Secretary to Government, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai. 2.The General Manager, BSNL, Tuticorin 628 003..Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records connected with the impugned order bearing Proceedings No.11043/CV-II/2012-7, dated 03.01.2014, issued by the 1st Respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mrs.S.Kala For 1st Respondent : Mrs.P.Rajalakshmi Government Advocate For 2nd Respondent : Mr.S.Udayakumar Senior Counsel for Central Govt. ORDER (Order of the Court was made by M.VENUGOPAL,J.) The Petitioner challenges the impugned order, in Proceedings No.1...


Apr 16 2014

1.Revathi Vs. 1.Nanammal

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-16-2014

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:16. 04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN SECOND APPEAL No.729 of 2005 & SECOND APPEAL No.730 OF2005and C.M.P.(MD) No.4804 OF2005and M.P.(MD) No.1 OF20131.Revathi 2.Suganya Ratha 3.Nithiya Ratha ... Appellants in both appeals -vs- 1.Nanammal 2.Pappathiammal 3.Rajeswari 4.The District Registrar of Audit Madurai North Taluk, Madurai ... Respondents in both appeals PRAYER (in S.A.No.729 of 2005) Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the Judgment and Decree dated 29.09.2004 and made in A.S.No.225 of 2002, on the file of the learned II Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 02.07.2002 and made in O.S.No.205 of 2000, on the file of the learned District Munsif, Madurai. PRAYER (in S.A.No.730 of 2005): Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the Judgment and Decree dated 29.09.2004 and made in Cross O...


Apr 16 2014

K.Nirmala Vs. Sellamuthu

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-16-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:16. 4.2014. CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR S.A.No.1180 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008 K.Nirmala Appellant vs. Sellamuthu Respondent Second Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 21.8.2007 in A.S.No.308 of 2003 on the file of the Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Namakkal as against the judgment and decree dated 30.9.2003 in O.S.No.54 of 1996 on the file of the Sub Judge, Namakkal. For appellant : Mr.S.Mukunthan for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates For respondent : Mr.T.Dhanyakumar JUDGMENT Defendant in O.S.No.54 of 1996 on the file of the Sub Court, Namakkal is the appellant in the second appeal.2. Sellamuthu, the respondent herein filed the abovesaid suit for the relief of specific performance based on an agreement for sale dated 23.2.1993 executed by the appellant herein containing recitals to the effect that she had agreed to sell the suit property to the respondent herein for a sum of Rs.1,10,000/= and received ...


Apr 15 2014

Shanmugam Vs. State by Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-15-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:15. 04.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE ARUNA JAGADEESAN Crl.A.No.1075/2006 Shanmugam Appellant Vs State by Inspector of Police Polur Police Station, Tiruvannamalai Respondent Prayer:- This Criminal Appeal is filed against the judgement dated 31.07.2006 made in SC.No.58/2005 by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai. For Appellant : Mr.C.R.Malarvannan for V.Rajamohan For Respondent : Mr.VMR.Rajendran, APP JUDGMENT This Criminal Appeal is filed against the judgement dated 31.07.2006 made in SC.No.58/2005 by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Tiruvannamalai, thereby convicting and sentencing the Appellant for the offence under Section 307 of IPC to undergo seven years Rigorous Imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/-, in default to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for six months.2. The case of the Prosecution is as follows:- a. The deceased Saradha married on Selvam 12 years back and Selvam died 6 years back fro...


Apr 15 2014

Ziaullah Shariff Vs. Saffiullah Baigh

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-15-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 15.04.2014 CORAM: The Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.KARUPPIAH Civil Revision Petition No.2121 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008 1.Ziaullah Shariff 2.Shamiullah Shariff 3.Tajuddin Shariff 4.Sultan Sharill .Petitioners/Plaintiffs vs 1.Saffiullah Baigh 2.St.Mary's Church, Rep. By its Rev.Father Thalavadi. 3.A.Srinivasan .Respondents/Defendants Prayer: The Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 12.02.2008 passed in E.A.No.3 of 2008 in E.P.No.183 of 1989 in O.S.No.1227 of 1987 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sathyamangalam. For Petitioners ..Mr.I.C.Vasudevan For 1st and 2nd Respondents ..No Appearance For 3rd Respondent ..Mr.R.T.Doraisamy ORDER The revision petition has been filed by the revision petitioneRs.who are the plaintiffs in the original suit against the fair and decretal orders dated 12.02.2008 passed in E.A.No.3 of 2008 in E.P.No.183 of 1989 in O.S.No....


Apr 15 2014

S.Vijayalakshmi Vs. State by Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-15-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:15. 04.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE ARUNA JAGADEESAN Crl.A.No.651/2008 S.Vijayalakshmi Appellant Vs State by Inspector of Police Vigilance and anti Corruption Kancheepuram Respondent Prayer:- This Criminal Appeal is filed against the judgement dated 14.8.2008 made in Special Case No.6/2000 by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate (Special Judge), Chengalput. For Appellant : Mr.V.Gopinath, SC For Respondent : Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, APP JUDGMENT This Criminal Appeal is filed against the judgement dated 14.8.2008 made in Sepecial Case No.6/2000 by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate (Special Judge), Chengalput, thereby convicting and sentencing the Appellant for the offence under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act to undergo one year Rigorous Imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/-, in default to undergo six months Simple Imprisonment and for the offence under Section 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corr...


Apr 15 2014

Super Auto Forge Ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-15-2014

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:15. 04.2014 Coram The Honourable Mrs.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM Tax Case (Appeal) Nos.207 and 208 of 2008 Super Auto Forge Ltd., 82/2, Mettu Street, Ekkatuthangal, Chennai 600 097. .... Appellant in the above T.Cs Vs. Additional Commissioner of Income-Tax Company Range VI ".Ayakar Bhavan". 121, M.G.Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. .... Respondent in the above T.Cs APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 17th August, 2007 made in I.T.A.Nos.769 & 1805/Mds/2005 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai Bench 'C' for the assessment year 2001-02. For Appellant : Mr.G.Sarangan, SC for Mr.G.Baskar For Respondent: Mr.N.V.Balaji Standing counsel for Income Tax ---------- C O M M O N JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN,J.) The assessee has preferred the above Tax Case (Appeals) as against the common...


Apr 15 2014

Kaliyappan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-15-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.Nos.10654 & 9764 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 in W.P.Nos.10654 & 9764 of 2014 1 KALIYAPPAN2MANIKANDAN3JEYAKUMAR4JOHNSON THANGAPLESHING5AAIYANAR6ISAKKIMUTHU7ANBALAGAN8AYYAPPAN9VELLINGIRI10MANIKANDAN11JEYAKKODI12SELVARAJ13MUTHUKUMAR14AYYAKUTTY15M.PRAVEEN KUMAR16VELAYUTHAM17ASHOKAN S/O.KRISHNARAJ18MURUGAN S/O.MARIMUTHU19SIVALINGAM S/O.NARAYANAN20RAJENDRAN S/O.NALLAKAMATCHI21MAYANDI S/O.VEERANA THEVAR22RAMAN S/O.VEERANAM23KARTHIK S/O.AYYASAMY24GOPALAKRISHNAN25NAGARAJ S/O.LASKHMANAN26KARTHIK S/O.KARUPPAIAH27ASHOKKUMAR S/O.SUNDARANKANI28JEYAKUMAR S/O.MATHIKAANI29P.KARUNAKARAN30VIMALRAJ31MANIKANDAN S/O.SUNDRAVEL32PETCHIMUTHU S/O.PARAMASIVAN33MARIKANI S/O.CHANDRABOSE34MAHARAJAN S/O.SAMUTHIRAKANI35GOMATHIRAJAN S/O.PALAIYA36ARUMUGAM S/O.RAMASAMY37SARAVANAKUMAR38PALSAMY S/O.VELLAISAMY39MURUGAN S/O.SAPLI40SUDHARSAN S/O.REKU41MAHENDRAN S/O.SAMINATHAN42KARTHIK S/O.SUNDARAM43GUNASEKARA...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial