Chennai Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Narasus Coffee Company Vs. R.P.Sarathy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATRE AT MADRAS DATED:17. 04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.TAMILVANAN C.R.P.(PD).No.2379 of 2012 & M.P.No.1 of 2012 1. M/s. Narasu's Coffee Company a partnership Firm, by its Partner, P.Sivanandam No.16, Court Road, Johnsonpet, Salem - 636 007.2. P.Sivanandam 3. Lalitha 4. Srudeep .. Petitioners vs.1. R.P.Sarathy 2. Jayashree 3. Latha .. Respondents Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal order, dated 18.08.2011 made in I.A.No.865 of 2009 in O.S.No.106 of 2009 on the file of the Additional District Judge / FTC No.I, Salem. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Prabhakaran for Mr.I.Arokiasamy For Respondents : Mrs.Hema Sampath, Senior counsel for Mrs.R.Meenal for R1 and R2 Mr.D.Shivakumaran for R3 ORDER This Civil Revision has been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the fair and decretal order, dated 18.08.2011 made in I.A.No.865 of 2009 in the suit in O.S.No.10...
National Cooperative Sugar Mills Staff Union Vs. State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated ::17. 04.2014 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T. RAJA W.P. Nos.33280 of 2005, 8842, 11535, 13940 to 13943 of 2008 and W.P. (MD) No.10267 of 2008 and M.P. Nos. 1/2008 in W.P.8842/2008, 2/2008 & 1/2009 in W.P.11535/2008 & 2/2008 in W.P.13940/2008 W.P. No.33280 of 2005: The National Cooperative Sugar Mills Staff Union rep. By its General Secretary Mr. K.R. Kumaresan .. Petitioner Vs. 1 STATE OF TAMILNADU REP BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT. INDUSTRIES DEPT. SECRETARIAT CHENNAI9 2 THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT. FINANCE DEPT. FORT. ST. GEORGE CHENNAI - 9 3 THE DIRECTOR OF SUGAR NO.690 ANNA SALAI NANDANAM CHENNAI35 4 THE SPECIAL OFFICER THE NATIONAL COOP. SUGAR MILLS B. METTUPATTI ALANGANALLUR VILLAGE MADURAI DT. 5 L.R. NEELAKANDAN2226 KATHIRVEL1T STREET VILLAPURAM MADURAI - 625 012 6 P. VELAYUTHAM36MUTHALAMMAN KOVIL STREET KALAIVANAR NAGAR ALANGANALLUR MADURAI - 625 501 7 R. ALAGARSAMY7469 SOLAVANDAN ROAD SANKULAM EAST T...
Kavitha Vs. 1.Nallaponnu ..
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:17. 04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN C.R.P.(PD) (MD) No.1089 of 2013 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2013 Kavitha ... Petitioner/Petitioner/1st Respondent -vs- 1.Nallaponnu ... 1st Respondent/1st Respondent/ Petitioner 2.The Secretary Koovanoothu Village Panchayat Kurumbapatti Pirivu Nilakottai Post and Taluk Dindigul District 3.The Commissioner Nilakottai Panchayat Union Nilakottai Post and Taluk Dindigul District 4.The Commissioner Tamil Nadu State Election Commission Chennai 5.The District Collector Dindigul District Velunachiyar Campus Dindigul Post and Taluk Dindigul ...Respondents 2 to 5/Respondents 2 to5 /Respondents 2 to 5 PRAYER Civil Revision Petition is filed, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decretal orders dated 17.04.2013 and made in I.A.No.2027 of 2012 in El.O.P.No.104 of 2011, on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Dindigul. !For Petitioner : Mr.R.Subramanian ^...
A.Murugesan Vs. Smt.Jamunarani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:17-4-2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN C.R.P.(NPD)No.1202 of 2014 A.Murugesan ... Petitioner Versus SMT.Jamunarani ... Respondent This Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 CPC against the order and judgement of Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court No.1) Chidambaram in C.M.A.No.15 of 2009 dated 13.7.2010 confirming the order of the Subordinate Court, Chidambaram in I.A.No.117 of 2009 in O.S.No.92 of 1997 dated 30.6.2009, which dismissed in the above I.A. Petition to set aside the exparte decree passed in O.S.No.92 of 1999 on 16.3.2009.. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Krishnaswamy ORDER Instead of taking a view in isolation, the conduct of the petitioner in toto throughout the proceedings needs to be seen in this case. This is a classic case, by which anyone could understand as to how a person viz. respondent herein, who approached the Court with a fond hope that she would get justice, has been driven from pillar to p...
1.The State of Tamil Nadu Vs. 1.M.Seeniammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:17. 04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.A.(MD)No.1157 of 2013 and W.A.(MD)Nos.992 to 994 of 2013, 1015 of 2013, 1054 of 2013, 1116 of 2013, 1110 of 2013, 1107 of 2013 and 1151 to 1156 of 2013 and Writ Appeal (MD) Nos.1356 to 1369 OF2013 Cont. P.(MD) Nos.1359 to 1368 of 2013, W.A.(MD) No.1178 of 2013, 440 to 446 of 2014 and W.A.No.842 of 2013 and Review Applications:88. of 2013 and 28 of 2014, Cont.P.(MD) No.26 of 2014 W.A.No.1157/2013 1.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By Secretary to Government School Education Department Fort St. George, Chennai. 2.The Director Department of Social Welfare Chepauk, Chennai. 3.The District Social Welfare Officer, Madurai District, K.K.Nagar,Madurai. ... Appellants Vs. 1.M.Seeniammal 2.M.Vijayalakshmi 3.P.Valarmathy 4.K.Vijayakumari 5.C.Muthulakshmi ... Respondents PRAYER Writ appeal filed under Section 15 of Letters Patents Act against ...
L.Narayana Reddy Vs. Inspector General of Registration
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-17-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.04.2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI Writ Petition No.22345 of 2005 and WP.MP.No.24359 of 2005 L.Narayana Reddy ..Petitioner versus 1.The Inspector General of Registration, Chennai. 2.The Special Deputy Collector, Stamp Duty, Salem. 3.The Sub Registrar, Kelamangalam, Krishnagiri District..Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the fiRs.respondent in proceedings Mu.Mu.46807/N3/2003 dated 30.7.2003 and quash the same as illegal, incompetent and without jurisdiction and further direct the 3rd respondent to return the document no.1677/2004 dated 16.6.2004. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Guruprasad for Mr.K.S.Karthikraja For Respondents : Mrs.M.E.Rani Selvam, AGP ORDER The main grounds on which the entire proceedings initiated under section 47-A of the Stamp Act was challenged by the petitioner herein, ...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shri Madurai Chettiyar Karthikeyan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :16.04.2014 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM Tax Case (Appeal) No.898 of 2013 The Commissioner of Income Tax Chennai. ... Appellant -vs- Shri Madurai Chettiyar Karthikeyan No.64, 4th Trust Cross Street Mandavelipakkam Chennai 600 028. ...Respondent Prayer: Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras ".B". Bench dated 28.01.2011 passed in I.T.A.No.723/Mds/2010 for the assessment year 2007-08. For appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department JUDGMENT (The Judgment of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN.J.,) Revenue seeks admission of the Tax Case (Appeal) relating to the assessment year 2007-08 raising the following question of law: ".Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income Tax Tribunal was right in law in holding th...
V.L.Ramanathan Vs. Salem Nagarathar Sangam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :16. 04.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH C.R.P.(PD).No.3467 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 V.L.Ramanathan ... Petitioner Vs.1. Salem Nagarathar Sangam, represented by its President Mr.M.S.P.Subramaniam, having business place at Chetty Nadu Thirumana Mahal, Santhi Nagar 4th Street, Yercaud Road, Salem-636 008.2. M.S.P.Subramanian 3. RM.Palaniappan 4. M.S.O.Chockalingam 5. T.Chidambaram Chettiar 6. M.A.Kalairasan 7. S.Senthil Nathan .. Respondents Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India against the judgment and decree dated 03.08.2009 made in I.A.No.1083 of 2009 in O.S.No.816 of 2005 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Salem. For Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Ramesh Kumar For 1st Respondent : Mr.A.K.Kumarasamy For Respondents 3 and 4 : Mr.A.Gouthaman For Respondents 2,5,6 and 7 : No Appearance ORDER The revision petitioner, who is the plaintiff in the original suit in O.S.No.816 of 2...
S.Kannan Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:16. 04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.(MD)No.9845 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2012 S.Kannan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Uthamapalayam, Theni District. 2.The District Treasury Officer, Theni. 3.The Sub Treasury Officer, Uthamapalayam, Theni District. .. Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to charge memo made in Na.Ka.No.1221/2012/A4, dated 21.03.2012 as well as the consequential order made in Roc.No.1221/2012/A4, dated 30.03.2012 passed by the first respondent and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondents to sanction and release the following benefits: (i) Pension; (ii) Commuted value of pension, to the petitioner within a stipulated time. !For Petitioner : Mr.Pala Ramasamy ^For Respondents : Mr.R.Velmurugan, Government Advocate **********...
C.Rajagopal Vs. 1.Union of India,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-16-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:16. 04.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.(MD)No.3513 of 2010 C.Rajagopal : Petitioner Vs. 1.Union of India, Rep by its Secretary to Government, Department of Home Affairs, New Delhi. 2.The Director General, CISF Headquarters, No.13, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110 003. 3.The Deputy Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Force, South Zone Headquarters, D-Wing, Rajaji Bhawan, Basant Nagar, Chennai 600 090. 4.The Commandant, CISF Unit, Tuticorin Port Trust, Tuticorin 628 004. : Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the order passed by the third respondent, dated 27.01.2010, in his order No.V-11014/32/2009/L&R[SZ].139, modifying the final order passed by the fourth respondent, dated 15.09.2009, in his order No.V-15014/CISF/TPT/Disc/MAJ- 05/CRG/2009/3971 and quash th...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »