Chennai Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shriram Chits Funds Pvt.Ltd Vs. V.Krishnamurthy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-14-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 14.03.2014 CORAM: THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI Crl.R.C.No.529 of 2010 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2010 1.The General Manager, Shriram Chits Funds PVT.LTD.Head Office: Greams Road, Chennai-6. 2.The Branch Manager, Shriram Chits Funds PVT.LTD.Branch Office, Commercial Complex, Circle -6, Neyveli.Petitioners versus V.Krishnamurthy S/o.Veerappa Padayachi .Respondent Criminal revision is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to call for the entire records in CC.No.231/2009 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Neyveli and set aside the order dated 15.3.2010 made in CMP.No.5501/2009 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Neyveli. For Petitioners : Mr.V.Bhiman For Respondent : Mr.Thanga Vadhanabalakrishnan ORDER The petitioners herein are arrayed as A1 and A2 in CC.No.231 of 2009 registered for the offences under sections 209, 210, 406 and 420 IPC on the basis of...
Vellaichamy Vs. Navaneethan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-14-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.03.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM S.A.(MD)No.104 of 2006 Vellaichamy : Appellant/Defendant versus Navaneethan : Respondent/Plaintiff Prayer This second appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree, dated 25.07.2005 of the II Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai in A.S.No.201 of 2004 reversing the judgment and decree of the District Munsif, Melur, dated 08.01.2004 in O.S.No.13 of 2003. !For Appellant : Mr.S.Subbiah ^For respondent : Mr.Mr.PT.S.Narendravasan :JUDGMENT Challenge in this second appeal is to the judgment and decree, dated 25.07.2005 passed in A.S.No.201 of 2004 by the II Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai, reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.13 of 2003 on the file of the District Munsif, Melur, dated 08.01.2004. 2.The respondent herein as plaintiff has instituted Original Suit No.13 of 2003 on the file of the trial Court for specific performance or in the...
V.S.Amirthalal Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-14-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14.03.2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI Writ Petition No.9760 of 2007 and M.P.No.1 of 2007 V.S.Amirthalal ..Petitioner versus 1.The State of Tamil Nadu represented by its Secretary to Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2.The Additional Director General of Prisons, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. 3.The Deputy Inspector General of Prison, Coimbatore Range, Coimbatore..Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the respondents 1 and 2 issued in G.O (GD) No.28 dated 5.1.2007 and No.14171/CS3/2006 dated 10.5.2006 confirming the punishment imposed against the petitioner by the 3rd respondent in proceedings No.441/Mu/98 dated 26.11.1999 and quash the same and consequently to award all consequential benefits arising out of the quashing of the above proceedings of the respondents. For Petitioner :...
A.K.Swaminathan Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-14-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 14.03.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI Crl.R.C.No.1427 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 A.K.Swaminathan .Petitioner versus State rep. by District Revenue Officer (DRO) Erode Collector Office, Erode.Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C.to call for the records from the respondent and set aside the order made in Na.Ka.No.13390/2013/C3 dated 30.9.2013 by the respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivakumar For Respondent : Mr.C.Iyyapparaj, GA (Crl. Side) ORDER What is challenged herein is the order of the respondent District Revenue Officer, thereby transferring the joint patta into one of the patta in the name of the temple by deleting the name of the individual. Such order is passed in the proceedings initiated under Section 147 Cr.P.C.on the basis of the representation dated 2.5.2013 of the Executive Officer, Selliandiamman Temple, Andithur Circle. 2.The subject matter of Section 147 Cr.P.C ...
S.Mani Vs. G.Ramesh Babu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-14-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:14. 03.2014 Coram: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR S.A. No.1139 of 2006 S.Mani ... Appellant ..vs.. G.Ramesh Babu ... Respondent Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Tirupattur dated 20.12.2005 made in A.S.No.67 of 2005 reversing the judgment and decree of the Principal District Munsif, Ambur dated 22.3.2995 made in O.S.No.161 of 2004. For Appellant ... Mr.G.Nagarajan For Respondent ... Ms.Sarah Abraham JUDGMENT The plaintiff in the original suit O.S.No.161 of 2004 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Ambur is the appellant in the second appeal. He filed the suit for recovery of money due under two promissory notes dated 27.05.2000 and 26.06.2000, allegedly executed by the respondent herein/defendant for Rs.10,000/- and Rs.20,000/- respectively, agreeing to repay the same with an interest at the rate of 24% per annum. The suit was re...
Palani Vs. K.Ganesan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-14-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 14.03.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI Crl.R.C.No.445 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 1.Palani 2.P.Babu 3.R.Guna 4.Nadanamayiolan .Petitioners versus K.Ganesan .Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Revision filed under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C.to set aside the order dated 9.3.2012 made in C.M.P.No.1325 of 2011 in CC.No.177/2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.2, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District. For Petitioners : Mr.A.Selvendhiran For Respondent : Mr.Ajmal Associates ORDER The petitioners herein are A1 to A4 in CC.No.177/2010 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Chidambaram, Cuddalore District, arising out of the FIR in Crime No.760/2009 for the offences under sections 147, 448, 363 and 384 IPC registered on the basis of the private complaint given by the respondent herein. 2.Few facts, which are relevant for consideration herein are as follows: The respondent herein filed a private complaint against the...
Cox and Kings India (P) Ltd. by Its Manager, Ceebros âandeuro;andoeli ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
(The Respondent is the complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum against the opposite party praying certain relief. The District Forum allowed the complaint. Against the said order, the appellant / opposite party filed this appeal praying to setaside the order of the District Forum in CC.No.297/2003, dated 08.03.2010. This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 13.02.2014, upon hearing the arguments on either side, perusing the documents, lower court records, and the order passed by the District Forum, this commission made the following order.) A.K. Annamalai, Judicial Member The opposite party is the appellant. 2. The complainant availed the service of the opposite party for the purpose of tour by paying Rs.10,970/- towards charges for stay of three days in the hotel-lodging (resort), pick-up-drop etc at Kumarakom in Kerala for their stay and the opposite party made arrangements for the stay of the complainant with Golden Waters for their stay and after staying i...
Fiit Jee, Rep.by Its Chairman and Another Vs. S.Balvignesh, Rep by His ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
(The Respondent is the complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum against the opposite parties praying certain relief. The District Forum allowed the complaint. Against the said order, the appellants / opposite parties filed this appeal praying to setaside the order of the District Forum in CC.No.121/2009, dated 01.03.2011. This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 14.02.2014, upon hearing the arguments on either side, perusing the documents, lower court records, and the order passed by the District Forum, this commission made the following order.) A.K. Annamalai, Judicial Member 1. The opposite parties are the appellants. 2. The complainant joined the pinnacle course with the 2nd opposite party institution for the purpose of IIT course by paying Rs.98,175/- as fees on 15.4.2008 and discontinued the same on 31.5.2008 due to his illness and not in a position to continue the course because of home sick and depression of mental condition and thereby he had requested...
Dr. S. Rajanikanth and Others Vs. S. Abdul Khadeer and Others
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
The complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum against the opposite parties praying for certain direction. The District Forum allowed the complaint. Hence appellants / opposite parties prefer an appeal in F.A.No.184/2007, F.A.No.541/2007 and F.A.No.544/2007 praying to setaside the order of the District Forum in CC.No.191/2003, dated 12.01.2007. These appeals coming before us for hearing finally on 05.02.2014, upon hearing the arguments on either side , perusing the documents, lower court records, and the order passed by the District Forum, this commission made the following order. A.K. Annamalai, Judicial Member The complainant S.Abdul Khadeer has come forward with the complaint against the opposite parties 1 to 3 namely Dr.A.Ahmed Ali, Dr.S.Rajanikanth, and Mehtas Nursing Home respectively alleging negligence and deficiency in service. 2. At the outset, it should be pointed out here that initially this complaint was filed by the complainant before the Honble State Consume...
State of Tamil Nadu Vs. A.Rajeswari
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :13. 03.2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN Writ Appeal No.1407 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9. 2.The Director of Elementary Education, Chennai-6. 3.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Namakkal. ... Appellants vs. A.Rajeswari ... Respondent Writ appeal filed against the order of this Court dated 29.11.2011 made in W.P.No.5855 of 2007 (O.A.No.6274 of 2002). For Appellants : Ms.A.Sri Jayanthi, Spl. Govt. Pleader For Respondent : Mr.A.R.Nixon JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR, J) The present writ appeal has been filed against the order of the learned Single Judge of this Court dated 29.11.2011 made in W.P.No.5855 of 2007 (O.A.No.6274 of 2002), wherein, the order of the Government issued in Letter No.24666/U1/2002-1, S...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »