Chennai Court March 2014 Judgments
M/S. JaIn Housing Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided on: Mar-17-2014
P.K. Das, J. 1. By Stay Order No. 41959 to 41961/2013 dated 29.7.2013, the appellant was directed to predeposit Rs.4.5 crores out of confirmed tax amount of about Rs.11.28 crores and interest and penalties. 2. The learned counsel submits that they have challenged the stay order by way of writ petition before the Honble Madras High Court. She submits that the writ petition was disposed of by the Honble High Court by order dated 30.10.2013 directing the appellant to file a fresh CMA before the Honble High Court within a period of three weeks. She further submits that they have filed the CMA within the stipulated period and the matter was heard twice by the Honble High Court. In the meantime, the appellant filed a modification application of the stay order. By Miscellaneous Order No. 40412 to 40414/2014 dated 27.1.2014, this Tribunal disposed of the miscellaneous applications and extended the period of compliance by two weeks and directed the appellant to report compliance on 11.2.2014. S...
Tag this Judgment!Maruthathal Vs. Ramathal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-14-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :14. 03.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH S.A.No.1819 of 2001 1. Maruthathal 2.Bagiyalakshmi 3.Kanchana .. Appellants Vs. Ramathal .. Respondent Prayer:- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the Decree and Judgment dated 26.10.1999 made in A.S.No.13 of 1999 on the file of Principal District Court, Coimbatore, confirming the Decree and Judgment dated 04.09.1998 made in O.S.No.424 of 1998 on the file of II Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore. For Appellants 1 and 2 : Mr.S.Krishnan, Senior Counsel for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates For 3rd appellant : Mr.A.Rajakumar for Mr.T.R.Rajaraman For Respondent : Mr.B.Ramamoorthy JUDGMENT The appellants, who are the defendants in the suit filed this Second Appeal against the Decree and Judgment dated 26.10.1999 made in A.S.No.13 of 1999 on the file of Principal District Court, Coimbatore, confirming the Decree and Judgment dated 04.09.1998 made in O.S....
Tag this Judgment!Mookan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-14-2014
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:14. 03.2014 Coram :- THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Habeas Corpus Petition No.829 of 2014 Mookan S/o.Kattaiyan No.2, MGR Nagar 1st Street, Vyasarpadi, Chennai-600 039. ... Petitioner -vs- 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-9.2. The Director General of Prison, Egmore, Chennai-600 008.3. The Superintendent of Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai-600 066. ... Respondents Prayer: Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed, praying for a direction to the respondents to grant 3 days parole to the detenu Chandrasekar @ Sekar, S/o.Mookan to attend the Death Cerimony of his brother Periyasamy, died on 14.03.2014 and his death ceremony to be held at Vyasarpadi Burial Ground on 15.03.2014 morning at 9.00 a.m., who is Now confined at the central prison, Puzhal, Chennai. For petiti...
Tag this Judgment!Chang Foods Pvt.Ltd Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-14-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :14. 03.2014 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM Tax Case (Revision) Nos.57 to 60 of 2013 and connected MPs. --- Chang Foods Pvt.Ltd WR-1, Northern Avenue Ambattur Industrial Estate Chennai-600 058 ... Petitioner in all the above TC(Revisions) -vs- The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By the Deputy Commissioner (CT) Chennai (South) Division Chennai-600 108 ... Respondent in all the above TC(Revisions) Tax Case Revisions filed under Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 against the order of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Main Bench) Chennai-104 in S.T.A.Nos.149, 151, 150 and 585 of 2006 dated 13.12.2012. For petitioner : Mr.N.Sriprakash For respondent : Mr.P.H.Aravind Pandian, Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.N.Cibivishnu, AGP (Taxes) Mr.Manokaran Sundaram, AGP (Taxes) Mr.V.Haribabu, AGP (Taxes) COMMON ORDER (The Judgment of the Court was made ...
Tag this Judgment!R.Balasubramanian Vs. 1.Kuppusamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-14-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:14. 03.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN SECOND APPEAL No.1617 of 2000 R.Balasubramanian ... Appellant -vs- 1.Kuppusamy 2.Ganesan ... Respondents PRAYER Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the Judgment and Decree dated 16.02.1999 and made in A.S.No.98 of 1994, on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Karur, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 23.11.1993 and made in O.S.No.23 of 1993, on the file of the learned District Munsif, Karur. !For Appellant : Mr.V.Sanjeevi ^For Respondents : No appearance for R1 Ex parte-R2 :JUDGMENT This second appeal has been directed against the Judgment and Decree dated 16.02.1999 and made in A.S.No.98 of 1994, on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Karur, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 23.11.1993 and made in O.S.No.23 of 1993, on the file of the learned District Munsif, Karur.2. The plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.23 of ...
Tag this Judgment!State Industries Promotion Corporation Vs. Singapore Reality Private L ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-14-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :14. 03-2014 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR and The Honourable Mr.Justice P.DEVADASS Writ Appeal Nos.1546, 1547, 2179 and 2180 of 2013 & Connected Miscellaneous Petitions W.A.No.1546 & 1547 of 2013: The State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Limited, rep. By the Managing Director, No.19-A, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. ... Appellant. vs. M/s.Singapore Reality Private Limited, Plot K1, Singapore IT Park, Siruseri, Navaloor Post 603 103 rep. By its Director. The Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. By the Secretary to Government, Industries (IT) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 0009. ... Respondents. W.A.Nos.2179 & 2180 of 2013:1. The Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. By the Secretary to Government, Industries (IT) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.2. The State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Managing Director, 19-A, Rukmani Laksh...
Tag this Judgment!K.Sadasivam Vs. S.Rangaswamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-14-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :14. 03.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH C.R.P.(PD).No.3018 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 K.Sadasivam ... Petitioner Vs. S.Rangaswamy .. Respondent Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.283 of 2007 in O.S.No.181 of 2005 on the file of Principal Subordinate Court, Erode dated 17.11.2008. For Petitioner : M/s.V.Bharathidasan For Respondent : Mr.N.Manokaran ORDER The defendant in the original suit filed this revision petition challenging the order passed in I.A.No.283 of 2007 in O.S.No.181 of 2005 on the file of Principal Subordinate Court, Erode dated 17.11.2008.2. For the sake of convenience, the defendant in the suit is referred as revision petitioner and the plaintiff in the suit is referred as respondent hereafter.3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for both sides and perused the materials available on records.4. The revision petitioner...
Tag this Judgment!V.Geetha Rani Vs. D.Dhamodahr
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-14-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.03.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM Crl.O.P(MD)No.20108 of 2013 and Crl.O.P(MD)No.20109 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)Nos.2,2,3 and 3 of 2013 V.Geetha Rani ..Petitioner/Accused versus D.Dhamodahr ..Respondent/Complainant Petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to to call for the records pertaining to S.T.C.Nos.27 and 840 of 2011 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, (Fast Track Court).Karur and quash the same. !For Petitioner ..Mr.M.Bindran ^For Respondent ..Mr.RMS.Sethuraman :COMMON ORDER These petitions have been filed to call for the records in STC Nos.27 and 840 of 2011, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, (Fast Track Court).Karur and quash the same. 2.The brief facts of the case are as follows:- The petitioner/accused approached the complainant on 18.04.2010 and 22.08.2010 and borrowed a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- and Rs.4,50,000/- respectively for her husband's business, agree...
Tag this Judgment!Subbarayan Alias Subramani Vs. Rengasamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-14-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.03.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.CHOCKALINGAM S.A.(MD)No.14 of 2006 and MP(MD)No.1 of 2012 Subbarayan alias Subramani ..Appellant/Plaintiff vs Rengasamy ..Respondent/Defendant Prayer This second appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC against the decree and judgment of the Sub Judge, Karur, dated 22.07.2005 passed in A.S.No.58 of 2004 confirming the decree and judgment of the Additional District Munsif, Karur, dated 26.03.2003 passed in O.S.No.674 of 1999. MP(Md.No.1 of 2012 is filed to receive additional evidence. !For Appellant ..Mr.V.Bharathidasan ^For Respondent ..Mr.K.Govinda Rajan :JUDGMENT Challenge in this second appeal is to the judgment and decree, dated 22.07.2005 passed in A.S.No.58 of 2004 by the Subordinate Judge, Karur, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.674 of 1999 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Karur, dated 26.03.2003. 2.The appellant herein as plaintiff has instituted Origi...
Tag this Judgment!M.Ravichandran Vs. Director of Adi Dravidar Department
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-14-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :14. 03.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI Writ Petition Nos.11571, 18541 and 21273 of 2007 and M.P.Nos.2 of 2007 and 1 of 2008 1.M.Ravichandran 2.P.Murugan 3.P.Illango Pandian 4.P.Gurusamy 5.C.Ramachandran 6.A.Natraj 7.S.Subbuthai 8.P.Valliammal 9.R.Madathi 10.K.Muthusamy 11.P.Perumal 12.P.Rajaiya 13.S.Perumal 14.S.Kalaimani ... Petitioners in WP.11571/2007 1.P.Nandanasigamani 2.R.Mookkammal 3.V.Muniyandi 4.C.Balasundaram 5.S.Alagammal 6.C.Gurusamy 7.B.Malarvannan 8.G.Innasi 9.L.Jeyashankar 10.A.Latha ... Petitioners in WP.18541/2007 1.M.P.Parthiban 2.D.Thilagavathy 3.M.Rajasekaran 4.K.Palani 5.T.Sakthivelayudham 6.K.Asalappan ... Petitioners in WP.21273/2007 vs. The Director of Adi Dravidar Department, Chepauk, Chennai-5. .. 1st Respondent in all the WPs. The District Adi Dravidar Welfare Officer, Tuticorin District. ... 2nd Respondent in WP.11571/2007 The District Adi Dravidar Welfare Officer, Tirunelveli District. ... ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »