Chennai Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Arumugam Vs. Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-04-2014
IN THE H IGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:04. 03.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.Nos.16231, 16267 and 30820 of 2008 M.Arumugam ... Petitioner in W.P.No.16231/2008 M.S.Muthukumaraswami ... Petitioner in W.P.No.16267/2008 K.A.Padmavathi ... Petitioner in W.P.No.30820/2008 Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. .... Respondent in all writ petitions 2.The Managing Director, Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Chennai 600 002. ... Respondent in W.P.Nos.16267 & 30820/08 2.The Managing Director, Tamil nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram Division- I) Limited, Villupuram 605 602. ... Respondent in WP.No.16231/2008 PRAYER IN W.P.No.16231 OF2008 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent relating to G.O.Ms.No.42, Transport Department, dated 27.05.2005, and to quash the condition in para 5(...
J.Seeni Mohamed Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-04-2014
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Date:04. 03.2014 Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Dhanapalan and The Hon'ble Mr. Justice G. Chockalingam H.C.P.No.2294 of 2013 J.Seeni Mohamed ... Petitioner -vs- 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, (Home) Department of Prohibition and Excise, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.2. The Commissioner of Police, Egmore, Chennai 8. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus to call for the connected records in Memo No.1098/BDFGISSV/2013, dated 23.09.2013 on the file of the second respondent herein and quash the same as illegal and direct the respondents to produce the detenu Thameem Ansari, Son of Seeni Mohamed, now confined at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai. For Petitioner - Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For Respondents - Mr.P.Govindarajan Addl. Public Prosecutor ***** ORDER (Judgment of the Court was delivered made by V. Dhanapalan, J.) Petitioner is the fa...
Periyasamy Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-04-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :04. 03.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B. RAJENDRAN Writ Petition Nos. 6451 to 6456, 6523 to 6527, 6530 to 6534, 6566 to 6572 and 6710 to 6718 of 2014 --- WP No.6451 of 2014 Periyasamy .. Petitioner Versus State by The Sub-Inspector of Police Devur Police Station Devur, Sankari Taluk Salem District .. Respondent WP No.6451 of 2014:- Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent police to permit the petitioner to conduct the cultural program on 06.03.2014 at Gandhi Nagar, Vatta Malai, Katheri Village, Sankari Taluk, Salem District For Petitioner : Mr. S. Lakshmanasamy in WP No.6451 of 2014 For Respondent : Mr. R. Vijayakumar Additional Government Pleader in WP No.6451 of 2014 COMMON ORDER In all these cases, the petitioners seek for a direction to the respective respondent (s) to permit them to conduct the cultural/dance programme by considering their respective...
M. Natarajan Vs. Union of India, Rep. by Secretary to the Government a ...
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
L.T. Gen. K. Surendra Nath, Member-Administrative: 1. This Original Application has been filed under Section-14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, whereby the petitioner has claimed the following reliefs :- a) To call for the records pertaining to Order in L.No.7/653/95/D dated 24.12.96, on the file of the first respondent and quash the same; b) To direct the first respondent to continue the payment of disability pension, with effect from 8.5.1987. 2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the applicant was enrolled in the Indian Army on 2.11.1983 as a Sepoy after duly passing all necessary examinations and physical tests and relevant recruitment procedures in the Engineers. While undergoing training in Timber Bridge Crossing in the Regimental Centre, he slipped and fell down and in the said accident he had his right little finger crushed and it became useless. He was admitted in Command Hospital, Air Force, Bangalore, for treatment. He was placed in medical category EEE permane...
Tamil Nadu Power Finance Vs. Department of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
Vikas Awasthy, Judicial Member: 1. The appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-III, Chennai dated 07-02-2013 relevant to the Assessment Year (AY) 1999-2000. 2. The assessee is a Government company and a State Financial Investment Corporation. The assessee filed its return of income for the AY.1999-2000 on 31-12-1999 admitting a total income of `13,30,63,520/-. The return of income of the assessee was processed u/s.143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (herein after referred to as 'the Act') on 17-07-2000. Subsequently, re-assessment proceedings were initiated and assessment u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act was completed on 18-03-2002. The case of the assessee was remitted back by the Tribunal to verify whether the business activities of the assessee claimed as long term financing activities would come under explanation (e) of section 36(1)(viii) of the Act. The set aside assessment was completed on 29-12-2008. Again the case of the...
Cce, Chennai Iv Vs. M/S. Radiant Steel Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
1. The relevant facts of the case, in brief, are that the respondents/assessees is engaged in the conversion of black bars / coils into bright bars classifiable under Chapter 72 of the Schedule to the CETA, 1985. A show-cause notice dated 16.7.2004 was issued alleging that their activity of conversion of black bars / coils to various thickness of bright bars did not amount to manufacture and proposed to recover irregular CENVAT credit of Rs.22,36,512/- during the period 1.6.2003 to 30.6.2004. The notice was issued on the basis of that the decision of the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Technoweld Industries 2003 (155) ELT 209 (SC) held that drawing of wire from wire rods do not amount to manufacture. The adjudicating authority ordered recovery of CENVAT credit of Rs.22,36,512/- along with interest and also imposed penalty of Rs.5,000/- under Rule 13 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002. By the impugned order, the Commissioner (Appeals) has set aside the adjudication order and allowed the a...
M/S. Integra Software Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce, Pondicherry
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided on: Mar-03-2014
1. A common issue involved in these appeals and therefore all are taken up together for disposal. 2. After hearing both sides at length, I find that the appeals may be decided at the stage of stay petition hearing itself. Accordingly, after disposing of the stay applications, I proceed to dispose of the appeals. 3. Heard both sides and perused the records. 4. The appellants are 100% EOU engaged in providing pre-publishing services namely E Publishing of Books. The appellants are exporting output service namely information technology software service, covered under Section 3(iii) of Export of Service Rules, 2005. They availed input service credits which were used in rendering export of service. The appellant filed refund claims under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 on the amount of input service credit utilized for export of service. The adjudicating authority sanctioned the refund claims under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 r/w Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 to be...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›