Chennai Court February 2014 Judgments
P.Paramasivam Vs. Director General of Central Industrial Security Forc ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:24 .02.2014 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.S. SIVAGNANAM W.P. Nos24777 of 2011 & 7496 of 2012 P.Paramasivam ... Petitioner in W.P.24777/2011 Aravind Kumar ... Petitioner in W.P.7496/2012 Vs 1.The Director General Central Industrial Security Force Block no.13, CGO's Complex Lodhi Road, New Delhi 110 003. ..1st respondent in W.P.No.24777/2011 2nd respondent in W.P.N o.7496/2012 2.The Deputy Inspector General Central Industrial Security Force South Zone, Head Quarters Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar Chennai 600 090. ..2nd respondent in W.P.No.24777/2011 ..4th respondent in W.P.No.7496/2012 3.The Group Commandant CISF Group Head Quarters Hyderabad 78. ..3rd respondent in W.P.No.24777/2011 ..5th respondent in W.P.No.7496/2012 4.The Deputy Commandant CISF Unit, Salarjung Museum Jubuli post, Hyderabad. ..4th respondent in W.P.No.24777/2011 5.The Union of India rep. by the Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs New Delhi. ..1st respondent in W.P.No....
Tag this Judgment!N.Ravikumar Vs. Chairman of Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewe ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24.02.2014 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.P.No.32388 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 N.Ravikumar .Petitioner versus 1.The Chairman, Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply & Sewerage Board, No.1, Pumping Station Road, Chintatripet, Chennai-2. 2.The Zonal Officer-4, Zonal Office-IV, CMWSS Board, No.35/19 Ramunuja Iyyer Street, Old Washermenpet, Chennai-21. 3.Moideen Kutty 4.K.V.Sundara babu @ K.V.S.Babu (R3 & R4 impleaded as per order dated 2.01.2013 by NPVJ in M.P.2/12 in W.P.No.32388/2012) .Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents 1 & 2 to receive and process the application of the Petitioner for restoration of metro water supply and consequently, to award metro water supply to the Petitioner's Hotel namely ".Hotel Kani Virudhunagar Briyani". located at Old No.336 New No.1025, Tiruvottiyur ...
Tag this Judgment!Loganayaki Vs. Rajeswari Ammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:24. - 02 2014 Coram The Hon'ble TMT. JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA Second Appeal No.734 of 2006 Loganayaki .. Appellant vs.1. Rajeswari Ammal 2. Vetrivel 3. Rajarajan 4. Gomathi 5. Mala 6. Mahalakshmi 7. Sudha kumari 8. Minor Akash 9. Minor Keerthana .. Respondents (R7 appointed as guardian of minors RR8and 9 as per order dated 30.12.2011 made in M.P. Nos. 1 to 7 of 2011. R2 recorded and RR4to 9 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased R1. RR7 to 9 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased R3 vide order of Court dt. 20.12.2011.) Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 03.02.2006 in A.S. No.7 of 2005 on the file of the Additional Subordinate Judge / District Judge (Trainee), Vellore, confirming the judgment and decree dated 29.10.2004 made in O.S. No.450 of 1995 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Vellore. For Appellants : Mr. P. Mani For Respondents : Mr. R. Su...
Tag this Judgment!D.B.Prakashchand JaIn Vs. Inspector General of Registration
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24.02.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.Nos.23618 and 25268 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1, 1 and 2, 2 of 2012 in W.P.Nos.23618 and 25268 of 2012 D.B.Prakashchand Jain .Petitioner in W.P.No.23618/12 R.Ramesh .Petitioner in W.P.No.25268/12 ..vs.1.The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai 600 028. 2.The Registrar, Cuddalore District. 3.The Sub Registrar, Vadalur..Respondents in both W.Ps. Common Prayer: Writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the fiRs.respondent relating to Order O.Mu.No.10390/C2/2012 dated 20.04.2012 and quash the same and direct the third respondent to complete the registration of document bearing P.Nos.26 of 2011 to 37 of 2011 and P.Nos.20 of 2011 to 37 of 2011 respectively. For Petitioner : Mr.S.R.Raghunathan in both W.Ps. For Respondents : Mr.S.P.Prabakaran in both W.Ps. Ad...
Tag this Judgment!T.Muthu Balu Vs. 1.The Inspector General of Registration,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:24. 02.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI WRIT PETITION (MD) No.58 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 T.Muthu Balu ... Petitioner vs 1.The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkm, Chennai-600 028. 2.The Sub-Registrar, Chokkikulam, Madurai. ... Respondents Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to release the document, bearing No.7211 of 2011, pending on his file, to the petitioner. !For Petitioner ... Mr.Pala.Ramasamy ^For Respondents ... Mr.T.S.Md.Mohideen, Addl. Govt. Pleader. ----- :ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.SUDHAKAR,J.) This writ petition is before us, consequent upon the order of reference made by a learned Single Judge, dated 02.02.2012, by issuing the following direction to the Registry. ".The Registry is, therefore, directed to place the ...
Tag this Judgment!Lakshmi Vs. K.Sekar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:24. 2.2014. CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN C.M.A.Nos.2459 and 3681 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 1. Lakshmi 2. M.Chellamuthu 3. C.Geethapriya Appellants in CMA24592013 & RR1to 3 in CMA36812013 vs.1. K.Sekar R1 in CMA24592013 & R4 in CMA36812013 2. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Fagun Chambers II Floor, 26, Ethiraji Salai, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. R2 in CMA24592013 & appellant in CMA36812013 Civil Miscellaneous Appeals against the award passed in M.C.O.P.No.2531 of 2010 dated 16.4.2013 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (II Judge, Court of Small Causes), Chennai. For appellant in CMA245913 & RR1 to 3 in CMA368113 : Mr.K.Varadha Kamaraj For R2 in CMA245913 & appellant in CMA368113 : Mr.S.Arunkumar COMMON JUDGMENT C.M.A.No.2459 of 2013 has been filed by the Claimants and C.M.A.No.3681 of 2013 has been filed by the Insurance Company challenging the award dated 16.04.2013 passed by the Motor Accide...
Tag this Judgment!D.Harilal Vs. K.Sampath
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24-2-2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN APPEAL SUIT No.305 of 1993 1.D.Harilal (deceased) 2.Santokben 3.Dakshayani 4.Manohar 5.Bhavesh Kumar (Appellants 2 to 5 brought on record as LRs of deceased 1st appellant vide order of Court dated 22.10.2013 made in CMP Nos.545 to 549/2013) .Appellants vs 1.K.Sampath 2.A.Apparaju 3.Boopathy Ammal (deceased) 4.V.Maharani 5.V.Kaliamurthy 6.V.Sankaralingam 7.V.Gunasekaran 8.E.Paritha 9.V.Nagamuthu 10.Yogeswaran (RR4 to 10 recorded as LRs of deceased R3 vide order of Court dated 22.10.2013 made in CMP Nos.545 to 549/2013 (vide memo SR53732013 dated 7.8.2013) (R9 declared as major and R10 declared dead vide order of Court dated 22.10.2013 made in CMP Nos.545 to 549/2013 (vide memo dated 22.10.2013) .Respondents Appeal suit preferred under Section 96(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 22.10.1991, made in O.S.No.64 of 1987, on the file of the Subordin...
Tag this Judgment!R.Radhakrishnan Vs. R.Nagarajan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :24. 02.2014 CORAM The Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.S.Ramanathan S.A.No.830 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2013 R.Radhakrishnan ...Appellant Vs. R.Nagarajan ...Respondent Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree, dated 28.09.2011 passed in A.S.No.203 of 1995 on the file of the Principal District Court, Coimbatore, in reversing the judgment and decree, dated 22.09.1995 passed in O.S.No.916 of 1986 on the file of III Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore. For Appellant : Mr.R.Bharath Kumar For Respondent : Mr.C.Deivasigamani JUDGEMENT The plaintiff in O.S.No.916 of 1986 on the file of III Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore/Trial Court is the appellant herein. He filed the suit i) for permanent injunction, ii) for recovery of possession of 'B' schedule property and iii) for mesne profits.2. The case of the appellant/plaintiff is as follows:- i) The suit property and the eas...
Tag this Judgment!R.S.A.Chandrasekar Vs. S.Rajalakshmi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:24. 02.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R. SHIVAKUMAR C.R.P.[NPD]. Nos.549 and 550 of 2014 R.S.A.Chandrasekar ... Petitioner in both C.R.Ps. .. Vs .. S.Rajalakshmi ... Respondent in both C.R.Ps. Prayer in both C.R.Ps.:- Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, pertaining to the docket order dated 07.11.2013 thereby numbering and ordering notice in M.P.Nos.424 and 425 of 2013 respectively in R.C.O.P.No.930 of 2012 on the file of the learned XV Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai. In both C.R.Ps. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Jayachandran - - - - - COMMON ORDER The arguments advanced by Mr.G.Jayachandran, learned counsel for the revision petitioner are heard.2. The landlord in R.C.O.P.No.930 of 2012 on the file of the XV Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai, is the petitioner in both the revision petitions. The revision petition No.549 of 2014 has been filed challenging the docket order dated 07.11.2013...
Tag this Judgment!K. Ramadurai Vs. M/S. Icici Bank Limited, Represented by Its Chairman ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Feb-20-2014
(The appellant is the complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum against the opposite parties praying certain relief. The District Forum dismissed the complaint. Against the said order, the appellant / complainant filed this appeal praying to setaside the order of the District Forum in CC.No.333/2005, dated 07.10.2010.) A.K. Annamalai, Judicial Member The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. 2. The complainant obtained a credit card from the 3rd opposite party bearing No.4474460009786007 and towards settlement of dues. The 3rd opposite partys representative collected a cheque dated 16.2.2004 for Rs.2750/- from the complainant drawn on Lakshmi Vilas Bank, Nunkambakkam, Chennai-34. The said post dated cheque was collected by the 3rd opposite partys representative has been sent for collection by correcting the date of the cheque as 11.2.2004 by the opposite partys person without the knowledge of the complainant and thereby the cheque was returned for œSignature di...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »