Chennai Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P.Karuppana Gounder Vs. 1.Mr.M.Krishnamurthy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:18.12.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petition No.20626 of 2014 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2014 P.Karuppana Gounder ..Petitioner versus 1.Mr.M.Krishnamurthy Deputy General Manager (Telecom) Power Grid Corporation of India Limited, SRTS-II RHQ, Pragati Mahalakshmi South Block (2nd and 3rd floor) No.62, 3rd cross, MEI Road, Industrial, Yeshwantpur, Bangalore-560 022 Suburb, Karnataka. 2.The Chief Manager, Power Grid Corporation of India Limited, 3rd Main Road, Thiru Nagar, Madurai. 3.D.Pitchumany 4.The Commissioner, Horticulture Department, Chepauk, Chennai. 5.The Deputy Director of Horticulture, Collectorate Campus, Dindigul..Respondents Prayer Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 not to cut and remove the trees before valuation being done by the proper competent authority and to before compensation being paid. !For...
P.Jothi ... Petit Vs. N.T.R.Maragadam(Died
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :18. 12.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY C.R.P.(MD)(NPD).Nos.1297 of 2009 and 2102 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 of 2009 and 1 of 2013 C.R.P.(MD)No.1297 of 2009 P.Jothi ... Petitioner/Appellant/Respondent/ Tenant Vs. N.T.R.maragadam(died) ... Respondent/Respondent/ Petitioner/Landlady 1. Suresh 2. Somasundaram 3. S.Ushadevi ... Respondents/Legal heirs of petitioner/Landlady Prayer: Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Section 25 of the Rent Control Act 18 of 1960 to set aside the judgment and decree dated 07.07.2009 passed in R.C.A.No.46 of 2006 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Madurai by confirming the judgment and decree dated 29.11.2005 in R.C.O.P.No.76 of 2003, on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Madurai Taluk. !For Petitioner : Mr.R.Janakiramulu ^For Respondents : Mr.T.R.Subramanian C.R.P.(MD)No.2102 of 2013 P.Jothi ... Revision Petitioner/Appellant/ Tenant Vs. S.T.R.Suresh Kumar ......
C.Jagan Vs. The District Manager,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.12.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petition (MD).No.18677 of 2014 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 and 2 of 2014 C.Jagan ..Petitioner versus The District Manager, TASMAC Limited, Konam, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.Respondent Prayer Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent in connection with the impugned order of rejection passed by him in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.045/B/2014 dated 13.11.2014 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to extend the licence period as one year based on Clause 46 of the Agreement. !For Petitioner :Mr.G.Thalaimutharasu ^For Respondent :Mr.M.Muniasamy Standing Counsel for TASMAC Orders reserved on : 11.12.2014 Orders delivered on: 17.12.2014 :ORDER Heard both sides. 2.The petitioner has preferred the instant writ of certiorarified Mandamus...
Mohamed Niyas Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional officer,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:17. 12.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA Criminal Revision Case (MD)No.477 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 Mohamed Niyas : Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aranthangi, Pudukkottai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Mimisal Police Station, Pudukkottai District. 3.Jayinambukani : Respondents Prayer: Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, praying to call for the records of the first respondent, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Aranthangi, by its order dated 15.11.2014 in Na.Ka.A2/2513/2014 and set aside the same. !For Petitioner : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan ^For Respondents 1&2 : Mrs.S.Prabha, Government Advocate (Crl.side) For Respondent No.3 : Mr.A.Velan For M/s.Ajmal Associates :ORDER Challenging the impugned order passed by the first respondent dated 15.11.2014 in Na.Ka.A2/2513/2014, the present revision has been filed.2. Heard the submissions made on either side....
Palani Arulmighu Dhandayuthapani Vs. 1.G.Ragavan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :17. 12.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Tr.C.M.P.(MD)No.418 of 2014 Palani Arulmighu Dhandayuthapani Swamy Thirukkoil represented by its Deputy Commissioner / Joint Commissioner / Executive Officer, Adivaram, Palani. ... Petitioner / D-1 in O.S.No.345/2014 Vs. 1.G.Ragavan 2.N.Allirani 3.G.Sithanathan ... R-1 to R-3 / Plaintiffs in O.S.No.345/2014 4.The Assistant Commissioner, H.R. & C.E., (Administration), Dindigul. 5.The Joint Commissioner, H.R. & C.E., (Administration), Madurai. ... R-4 & R-5 / D-2 & D-3 in O.S.No.345/2014 Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure to withdraw the suit in O.S.No.345 of 2014 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Palani and transfer the same to the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Dindigul. !For Petitioner : Mr.K.Govindarajan :ORDER The petitioner herein is the first defendant in O.S.No.345 of 2014 on the file of the learned Subor...
Mohamed Niyas Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional officer,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:17. 12.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA Criminal Revision Case (MD)No.477 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 Mohamed Niyas : Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Aranthangi, Pudukkottai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Mimisal Police Station, Pudukkottai District. 3.Jayinambukani : Respondents Prayer: Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, praying to call for the records of the first respondent, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Aranthangi, by its order dated 15.11.2014 in Na.Ka.A2/2513/2014 and set aside the same. !For Petitioner : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan ^For Respondents 1&2 : Mrs.S.Prabha, Government Advocate (Crl.side) For Respondent No.3 : Mr.A.Velan For M/s.Ajmal Associates :ORDER Challenging the impugned order passed by the first respondent dated 15.11.2014 in Na.Ka.A2/2513/2014, the present revision has been filed.2. Heard the submissions made on either side....
Mayilathal Vs. 1. Kaliappan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :16. 12.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY C.R.P.(MD)(PD).No.2301 of 2014 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2014 Mayilathal ... Petitioner/Respondent/Plaintiff Vs.1. Kaliappan 2. Senthilkumar 3. Kuppusamy(died) ... Respondents/Petitioners/Defendants Prayer Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to call for the records and set aside the same fair and decreetal order dated 08.08.2014 in I.A.No.268 of 2011 in O.S.No.18 of 2011, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ottanchatram. !For Petitioner : Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar ^For Respondents : Mr.R.Vijayakumar * * * * :ORDER Aggrieved over the fair and final order passed in I.A.No.268 of 2011 in O.S.No.18 of 2011, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ottanchatram, the plaintiff has filed the above Civil Revision Petition.2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the respondents.3. The plaintiff filed the s...
1.Mohamed Umaray Barook Vs. 1.Alimal Beevi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:16.12.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY C.R.P.(MD)No.1494 of 2012 & M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2012 & M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2014 1.Mohamed Umaray Barook 2.Mohamed Usman ..Petitioners -vs- 1.Alimal Beevi 2.Sulaima Nazeema 3.Ajeeza 4.Sheik Barith Mohideen 5.Abdul Rahman 6.S.Ramasay Pattar 7.Shunmugam 8.Kirutina Latha 9.Komalavalli. ..Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 28.06.2012 passed in I.A.No.8 of 2012 in O.S.No.43 of 2006 on the file of the IV Additional District Court, Tirunelveli. !For Petitioners :Mrs.N.Krishnaveni ^For Respondents:Mr.H.Arumugam :ORDER The civil revision petition arises against the fair and final orders passed in I.A.No.8 of 2012 in O.S.No.43 of 2006 on the file of the IV Additional District Judge, Tirunelveli.2. The Plaintiffs filed the suit in O.S.No.43 of 2006 for specific performance. After the filin...
K.Ayyadurai Vs. 1.Raja Ramanathan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:16. 12.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA Crl.R.C.(MD)No.675 of 2008 K.Ayyadurai : Petitioner Vs. 1.Raja Ramanathan 2.Rajasekaran 3.Dr.Parckavan Panchamuthu 4.P.Suresh 5.S.Viswanathan 6.S.Mohanraj 7.P.Prabhakaran 8.M.Swaminathan 9.T.Raju 10.State Represented by Inspector of Police, Thogaimalai Police Station, Karur District. : Respondents Prayer : Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to set aside the judgment passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Kulithalai in C.C.No.39 of 2007, dated 12.06.2008. !For Petitioner :: Mr.Veera.Kathiravan ^For Respondents 1,2,6to9 :: Mr.B.Saravanan For Respondent No.3 :: Mr.T.K.Gopalan For Respondents 4&5 :: Mr.V.Sitharanjandas For Respondent No.10 :: Mrs.S.Prabha, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) :ORDER This Revision is directed against the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kulithalai, i...
State Rep. By Vs. Respondent
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.12.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE R.MALA Criminal Appeal (Md.No.1208 of 2003 State rep. By The Sub Inspector of Police, Karaikudi Police Station (Crime) Crime No.3 of 1995 ..Appellant versus %Subramanian ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 378 of Cr.P.C., to set aside the judgment of acquittal passed in C.C.No.55 of 1999 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai dated 27.11.2002. %For Appellant : Mr.S.Shanmugavelayutham, P.P.Assisted by Mrs.S.Prabha, G.A ^For Respondent : Mr.D.Ramesh Kumar :JUDGMENT Judgment Reserved : 12.12.2014 Judgment Pronounced : 16.12.2014 The Criminal Appeal is directed against the judgment of acquittal dated 27.11.2002 passed by the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Madurai in C.C.No.55 of 1999 for the offence under Section 411 of I.P.C.2.The prosecution case in brief is as follows: (i) P.W.1 Kanagaraj was residing at Karaikudi New Town and running a hotel in Kovilur Road i...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »