Chennai Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V.Pandaram Vs. 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.11.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.P(MD)No.18215 of 2014 V.Pandaram Son of Velchamy Pandiyan Panchayat President, Sundarapandiyapuram, Tenkasi Taluk, Tirunelveli District..Petitioner Vs 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Tenkasi, Tirunelveli District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Achanpudur Police Station, Achanpudur, Tenkasi Taluk, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Sampavarvadakarai Police Station, Sampavarvadakarai, Tenkasi Taluk, Tirunelveli District..Respondents Prayer Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned proceeding passed by the second respondent dated 9.11.2014 and to quash the same and consequently to direct the second respondent to grant permission and necessary protection to perform the Minnoli Kapadi Vilayattu Vizha Programmeon 22.11.2014 and...
1.A.Thirumoorthy Vs. S.Bastin
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:19. 11.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DEVADASS SECOND APPEAL (MD) No.1209 of 2011 1.A.Thirumoorthy 2.Joseph Wilfred ... Appellants/Defendants -vs- S.Bastin ... Respondent/Plaintiff PRAYER Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the Judgment and Decree, dated 21.12.2010, passed in A.S.No.97 of 2010, on the file of the learned II Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirapalli, confirming the Judgment and Decree, dated 17.12.2009, passed in O.S.No.791 of 2008, on the file of the learned I Additional District Munsif, Trichy. !For Appellants : Mr.N.R.Murugesan ^For Defendant : Mr.R.Nandakumar :JUDGMENT The defendants who have lost their case both before the trial Court as well as before the first appellate Court are the appellants herein.2. Plaintiff instituted the suit for recovery of money based on Ex.A.1 promissory note, stated to have been executed by the defendants in favour of Grace Mary...
M.Vetrivel, Minor, Vs. 1.The Regional Manager,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.11.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.P(MD)No.17313 of 2014 M.Vetrivel, minor, represented by his Father and natural guardian M.Veluchamy ..Petitioner Vs 1.The Regional Manager, Indian Bank Regional Office, No.100 and 101, FiRs.Floor, Near Talavai Agraharam and Old Market, East Avani Moola Street, Madurai HO, Madurai ?. 625 001. 2.The Branch Manager, Indian Bank, Koodal Nagar Branch, 158, Ashok Nagar, Koodal Nagar, Madurai ?. 625 018..Respondents. Prayer Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to sanction and disbuRs.the educational loan to the Petitioner's son Vetrivel by considering his representation, dated 29.09.2014 as per the guidelines issued in the Educational Loan Scheme framed by the respondent/Bank in a expedite manner within the time stipulated by this Court. !For Petitioner :M/s.N.Nallakannan For Respon...
Ramesh Vs. State Through
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 19.11.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI CRIMINAL APPEAL(MD)No.514 of 2008 Ramesh .Appellant/ Sole Accused versus State through The Inspector of Police, Pudhukkottai Town Police Station, Pudhukkottai. (Crime No.15 of 2008).Respondent/ Complainant Criminal appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the Judgment dated 25.09.2008 passed in Sessions Case No.88 of 2008 by the Additional District and Sessions Court (Fast Track Court).Pudhukkottai. !For Appellant : Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian (Legal Aid Counsel) ^For Respondent : Mr.T.Mohan, Addl. Public Prosecutor. :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.The convictions and sentences imposed in Sessions Case No.88 of 2008 by the Additional District and Sessions Court (Fast Track Court).Pudukkottai are being challenged in the present Criminal Appeal. 2.The schema of the case of the pro...
N.Meenakshi Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Srivaikundam Taluk,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:18. 11.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL CONT P(MD)No.394 of 2013 in W.P.(MD)No.499 of 2011 N.Meenakshi .. Petitioner / Petitioner Vs. 1.The Tahsildar, Srivaikundam Taluk, Srivaikundam, Tuticorin District. 2.The Sub-Registrar, Eral Sub-Registrar Office, Eral, Srivaikundam Taluk, Tuticorin District. 3.Mr.Nayinar Pillai, Sherestadar, Collectorate, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District. 4.Mr.Madasamy, Tahsildar (Election), District Collectorate, Tuticorin. 5.Mr.V.Selvakumar The Tahsildar, Srivaikundam Taluk, Srivaikundam, Tuticorin District.6. Mr.I.Sankaran, Sub-Registrar, Eral Sub Registrar Office, Eral, Srivaikundam Taluk, Tuticorin District. .. Contemnors / Respondents PRAYER Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the Respondents 3 to 6 for Contempt of Court for their wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.499 of 2011, dated 08.11.2011. !For P...
The Executive officer Vs. 1.Srinivasan .. .
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:18. 11.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DEVADASS SECOND APPEAL (MD) Nos.111 of 2011 and SECOND APPEAL (MD) Nos.173 of 2011 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2011 in S.A.(MD) No.173 of 2011 The Executive Officer A/M.Krishna Samy Koil Ambasamudram Tirunelveli District ... Appellant/3rd Defendant in S.A.(MD) No.111 of 2011 ... 2nd Respondent / 3rd Defendant in S.A.(MD) No.173 of 2011 1.Government of Tamil Nadu rep.by District Collector Vannarpetti, Tirunelveli 2.The Commissioner H.R.& C.E.Department Uthaman Gandhi Salai Chennai-34 ... Appellants/Defendants 1 & 2 in S.A.(MD) No.173 of 2011 -vs- 1.Srinivasan ... 1st Respondent/3rd Defendant in S.A.(MD) No.111 of 2011 ... 1st Respondent/3rd Defendant in S.A.(MD) No.173 of 2011 2.Government of Tamil Nadu rep.by District Collector Vannarpettai, Tirunelveli 3.The Commissioner H.R.& C.E.Department Uthaman Gandhi Salai Chennai-34 ... Respondents 2 & 3 / Defendants 1 & 2 in S.A.(MD) No.111 of 2011 PRAYE...
Pandi . Vs. State Rep. By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.11.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.MALA Criminal Appeal(MD)No.270 of 2014 Pandi ..Appellant Vs State rep. By Inspector of Police, C5, Karimedu Police Station, Madurai District Crime No.1216/2012 ..Respondent Prayer Criminal appeal filed under Section 374(2)of Cr.P.C., to set aside the judgment dated 04.09.2014 made in S.C.No.302 of 2013 on the file of the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Madurai. !For appellants : Ms.A.Rajini ^For Respondent : Mrs.S.Prabha, Govt.Advocate(Crl. Side) :JUDGMENT The Criminal Appeal has been filed against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 04.09.2014 made in S.C.No.302 of 2013 on the file of the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Madurai, wherein, the appellant/accused was convicted for the offence under Section 3(1) of Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damages and Loss) Act 1992, (T.N.Act No.59 of 1992) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1,...
A.Kavi @ Kavinathan Vs. State Represented By
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.11.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE R.MALA Criminal Appeal (Md.No.383 of 2006 A.Kavi @ Kavinathan ..Appellant Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police, Chekkanoorani Police Station crime No.1/2005 Madurai District..Respondent Prayer: Criminal appeal filed under Section 374 (2) Cr.P.C.To call for the records and set aside the order dated 23.08.2006 made in S.C.No.602 of 2006 on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Madurai and acquit the appellant/accused. !For appellant : Mr.M.Ramasubramanian ^For Respondent : Mr.S.Prabha, G.A.( Crl. Side) :JUDGMENT The Criminal Appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and sentence passed under Section 354 of I.P.C., dated 23.08.2006 rendered in S.C.No.602 of 2006 by the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Madurai for the offence under Section 354 of I.P.C.2.The case of prosecution briefly is as follows: i) P.W.1 Anbuselvi is the victim. The appellant/accused is h...
1.Ganja Pandi Vs. State Through
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.11.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms.JUSTICE R.MALA Criminal Appeal (Md.No.293 of 2007 1.Ganja Pandi 2.Krishnan 3.Palaniammal .Appellants versus State through The Inspector of Police Koodakovil Police Station Crime No.22 of 2006 .Respondent Prayer:Criminal Appeal filed under Section 374 Cr.P.C., against the judgment dated 11.06.2007 passed in S.C.No.493 of 2006 by the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.No.I, Madurai, to set aside the conviction and sentence and acquit the appellants. !For Appellants : Mr.N.Tamil Mani ^For Respondent : Mrs.S.Prabha, G.A.(Crl. Side) :JUDGMENT The Criminal Appeal is arising out of the judgment of conviction and sentence, dated 11.06.2007 passed in S.C.No.493 of 2006 by the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.No.I, Madura, whereby the accused were convicted and sentenced as follows: Name of Accused Charges Finding Sentence 1. Ganja Pandi 341 and 307 of I.P.C.Found guilty under Sec.341 and 307 of I.P.C.341: one ...
East Coast Constructions Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 30.09.2009 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.NO.36347 OF2006(O.A.NO.3731 OF1998 S.Vijayakumar .Petitioner versus 1.The Principal Commissioner and Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 2.The Commissioner/Director of Employment of Training, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 3.The Director of Co-operative Audit, Chennai-5.Respondents This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the order of the second respondent, dated 7.10.1996 issued in RC.No.77042/Estt 3/96 and to quash the same and to direct the respondents to alter the date of birth of the applicant from the existing date 3.11.1951 to the correct date 14.1.1953 and to award the consequential reliefs. For Petitioner : Ms.K.R.Sundarakantham For Respondents : Mr.R.Neelakantan, GA - - - - ORDER Heard both sides. 2.This writ petiti...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »