Chennai Court October 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chinnaiah Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-14-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.10.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI HABEAS CORPUS PETITION(MD)No.974 of 2014 Chinnaiah .Petitioner versus 1.The Secretary to Government, Public (Law and Order-F) Department, State of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai ?. 600 009. 2.The District Collector and District Magistrate, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 3.The Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Home AffaiRs.Department of Internal Security, North Block, New Delhi ?. 110 001. 4.The Superintendent of Prison, Madurai Central Prison, Madurai.Respondents Habeas Corpus Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus praying to call for the entire records connected with the detention order of the second respondent in Cr.M.P.No.2/NSA/2014, dated 11.08.2014 and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu by name Chinnaiah, Son of Muniyandi T...
K.Kamala Vs. the Principal Secretary,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-14-2014
BEFORE THE MADRUAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.10.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJ.Writ Petition(MD)No.15494 of 2014 K.Kamala ..Petitioner versus The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, St.George Fort, Chennai-9..Respondent Prayer Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to dispose of the representation given by the petitioner to the respondent on 04.07.2014. !For Petitioner : Mr.V.Vijayakumar For Respondents : Mr.Satheeshkumar, GA :ORDER The petitioner/K.Kamala has filed the present writ petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to dispose of her representation dated 04.07.2014. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted before this Court that the enquiry proceedings are over and the enquiry report has been submitted, pursuant thereto, the petitioner has also submitted his written representation on the findings o...
Ganesh Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-14-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.10.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI HABEAS CORPUS PETITION(MD)No.1124 of 2014 Ganesh ..Petitioner versus 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 2.The Inspector of Police, Nalattinputhur Police Station, Thoothukudi District, Madurai District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Subramaniyapuram Police Station, Madurai City, Madurai. 4.The Director, Vidiyal Home, No.21, Kennet Nagar, Muthupatti East, Near Palanganatham, Madurai ?. 625 003. 4.S.Paramasivan ..Respondents Habeas Corpus Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to produce petitioner's wife namely Muthuselvi, daughter of S.Paramasivan, aged about 18 years old and set her at liberty and pass such further or other ordeRs.!For Petitioner : Mr.R.Karunanidhi ^For Respondents : Mr.A.Ramar, 1 to 3 Addl. Public Prosecuto...
1.Nainar Mohammed, S/O.Jainudeen Vs. 1.The Special Commissioner and
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-14-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 14.10.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (MD)No.10518 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)Nos.2 and 3 of 2013 1.Nainar Mohammed, S/o.Jainudeen 2.Kalidoss, S/o.Kathiya 3.Arulsamy, S/o.Maria Arokiam ..Petitioners versus 1.The Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 2.The District Collector, Ramanaghapuram Collectorate Building, Ramangthapuram District. 3.The Tahsildar, Thiruvadani Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 4.The Executive Officer, Thondi Town Panchayat Grade-I, Thondi, Ramanathapuram District. 5.The Managing Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District..Respondents Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to allot the required lands for establishing a bus-depot in Surve...
Franchis Stephen Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-14-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.10.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN Crl.O.P.(MD).No.15027 of 2014 Franchis Stephen ...Petitioner -versus 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Medical College Police Station, Thanjavur, Thanjavur District...Respondents PRAYER Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to direct the second respondent herein to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 08.05.2014 and investigate into the same in accordance with law and to file final report at the earliest. !For Petitioner :Mr.K.Sundaran Moorthy For Respondents : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) :ORDER When the matter was listed on 09.10.2014 for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner and therefore, it was posted today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this petition is...
P.Nataraja Sundar Vs. 1.The Registrar-in-charge (K.Pitchumani)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-14-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 14.10.2014 Coram THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJ.Contempt Petition (MD)Nos.582 of 2013 Contempt Petition (MD)Nos.583 to 586 of 2013 in W.P.(md).Nos.2270, 2269, 736, 2271 and 2268 of 2012 P.Nataraja Sundaram .Petitioner in Cont.P.582/2013 P.Muthupandi .Petitioner in Cont.P.583/2013 M.Nagarajan .Petitioner in Cont.P.584/2013 C.Raja .Petitioner in Cont.P.585/2013 K.Rajendran .Petitioner in Cont.P.586/2013 -versus 1.The Registrar-in-charge (K.Pitchumani) Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai-20. 2.Mr.Muthumanickam, The Registrar-in-charge, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai-20. (R-2 suo motu impleaded as 2nd respondent vide order dated 29.10.2013 made in Cont.P.(MD).Nos.582 to 586/2013) . . Respondents in all Cont. Petitions Common Prayer Contempt Petitions are filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (70 of 1971) to punish the respondents for wilful and deliberate disobedience to the common order of this Court dated 29.01....
R.Kanagaraj Vs. Mr.S.Soma Pandian
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-14-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.10.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL CONT P(MD)No.1229 of 2014 in W.P.(MD)No.584 of 2014 R.Kanagaraj .Petitioner / Petitioner versus Mr.S.Soma Pandian The District Revenue Officer, Theni, Theni District.Contemnor / Respondent PRAYER Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the Contemnors / Respondents 1 to 3 for contempt for willfully and deliberately disobeying the order of this Court, made in W.P.(MD)No.584 of 2014, dated 10.01.2014. !For Petitioner : Mr.V.Perumal ^For Respondent : Mr.M.Raja Rajan Govt. Advocate :ORDER Mr.M.Raja Rajan, the Learned Government Advocate appearing for the Respondent brings it to the notice of this Court that the order passed by this Court, dated 10.01.2014 in W.P.(MD)No.584 of 2014, has been complied with by the Respondent / District Revenue Officer, Theni, through proceedings in Ref.Na.Ka.No.6982/2012/D4, dated 09.10.2014. In the said order...
Rani @ Raniamm Vs. V.Thamaraisel
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-14-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:14.10.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY C.R.P(PD)(MD)Nos.1973 of 2014 and C.R.P(PD)(MD)Nos.1974 of 2014 & M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2014 Rani @ Raniammal ..Petitioner/Respondent/Defendant in both the petitions -vs- V.Thamaraiselvi ..Respondent/Petitioner/Plaintiff in both the petitions PRAYER Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal orders dated 25.06.2014 in I.A.Nos.89 and 90 of 2014 in O.S.No.47 of 2008 on the file of Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam. !For Petitioner :Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar ^For Respondent :Mr.P.Arun Jayatram :COMMON ORDER Challenging the fair and final orders passed in I.A.Nos.89 and 90 of 2014 in O.S.No.47 of 2008, on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam, the defendant has filed the above Civil Revision Petitions.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent.3. The respondent/plaintif...
G.Rajapandian Vs. Tmt.Mageswari Ravi Kumar,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-14-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 14.10.2014 Coram THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJ.Contempt Petition (MD)No.1280 of 2014 in W.P.(md).No.4482 of 2012 G.Rajapandian . . Petitioner -versus Tmt.Mageswari Ravi Kumar, The Member Secretary, Medical Service Recruitment Board, 7th Floor, DMS Building, Anna Salai, Theynampet, Chennai-06. . Respondent Prayer Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (70 of 1971) to punish the respondent for wilful and deliberate disobedience to the orders of this Court dated 21.04.2014 in W.P.(md).No.4482 of 2012. !For petitioner :Mrs.V.Jeyarani ^For respondent :Mr.R.Anandharaj Government Advocate :ORDER when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.4482 of 2012 giving a direction to the third respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner in the light of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.2...
i.Jothi Gandhi Vs. the Director,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-14-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 14.10.2014 Coram THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJ.Writ Petition (MD)No.16069 of 2013 I.Jothi Gandhi . . Petitioner -versus The Director, The Social Welfare Development Office, Chennai-02. . Respondent Prayer Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to release the retirement benefits for the petitioner's service from 07/11/1981 to 31/03/2013. !For petitioner :Mr.S.Moorthy For respondent:Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen Additional Government Pleader :ORDER This writ petition has been filed by one Mr.I.Jothi Gandhi, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent, the Director, Social Welfare Development Office, Chennai to release the retirement benefits for his services rendered from 07.11.1981 to 31.03.2013. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit hat the petitioner being a Sri...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »