Chennai Court October 2014 Judgments
M.Muniyandi Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-27-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 27.10.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN and THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Writ Appeal (MD)Nos.1264 of 2014 M.Muniyandi ..Appellant/ Petitioner versus 1.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Personal Assistant (General).to the Collector of Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram. 3.The Special Deputy Collector (R).Rameswaram, Ramanathapuram District. 4.The Assistant Director, Department of Land and Survey ReforMs.Virudhunagar..Respondents/Respondents Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order of the learned Single Judge, dated 19.08.2014, made in W.P.(MD)No.1449 of of 2014. !For Appellant : Mr.Nagarajan for Mr.V.Sitharanjandas ^For Respondents : Mr.A.K.Baskara Pandian, Spl.Govt.Pleader. :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by V.DHANAPALAN,J.This writ appeal is directed against the order, dated 19.08.2014, passed in W.P.(MD)No.1449 of 2014, by the Writ Court. 2.The said w...
Tag this Judgment!1.A.Muthu Vs. 1.P.Angammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-20-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATE OF DECISION :20. 10.2014 RESERVED ON :13. 08.2014 DATE OF DECISION :20. 10.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH S.A.(M.D.)No.257 of 2006 1.A.Muthu 2.A.Srinivasan 3.A.Sonaimuthu .. Appellants Vs. 1.P.Angammal 2.U.Perumal 3.P.Manoharan 4.The Government of TamilNadu represented by its District Collector, Sivaganga District. 5.The Tahsildar, Karaikudi. .. Respondents Prayer Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the decree and judgment dated 05.10.2005 made in A.S.No.41 of 2005 on the file of Subordinate Court, Devakottai, wherein allowed the appeal in part and modifying the decree and judgment dated 11.04.2005 passed in O.S.No.204 of 2004 on the file of Additional District Munsif Court, Karaikudi. !For Appellants : Mr.T.Srinivasaraghavan ^For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.D.Panneerselvam For Respondents 4 & 5 : Mr.R.Karthikeyan, Addl.Govt.Pleader :JUDGMENT The appellants who are the plaintiffs in t...
Tag this Judgment!Raman Vs. the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-20-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated:20. 10/2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petition (MD) No.17131 of 2014 Raman ... Petitioner Vs The Inspector of Police Valanadu Police Station Trichy District. ... Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission and protection for celebrating the ?.Kumbabishekam?. of Arulmigu Shree Sithi Vinayagar Temple at Chinnarakkampatti Village, Marungapuri Taluk, Trichy District and for conducting traditional 'Adal Padal dance' programme on 21/10/2014. !For petitioner ... Mr.A.Thiyagarajan ^For respondents ... Mr.V.Muruganandam, AGP :ORDER According to the Petitioner, he is the Member of Kumbabisheka Vizha 48th Mandagapadithar in Arulmigu Shree Sithi Vinayagar Temple at Chinnarakkampatti Village, Marngapuri Taluk, Trichy District and ?.Kumbabishekam?. of that temple was celebrated on 4/9/2014.2. The Villager...
Tag this Judgment!1.Jainab Beevi Vs. 1.The Secretary to Home Department,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-20-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :20. 10.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN Crl.O.P.(MD).No.17168 of 2014 & M.P(MD)Nos 1 to 3 of 2014 1.Jainab Beevi 2.S.H.Saleem 3.A.Abdul Bari 4.A.Jaffar 5.A.M.Raja 6.M.J.Noordeen 7.Dr.M.Jain Allaudin 8.A.K.Mohamed Moideen 9.Mohammed Musthafa : Petitioners -Vs- 1.The Secretary to Home Department, of Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort.St.George, Chennai-9. 2.The Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai. 3.The Inspector General of Police, South Zone, Madurai-625 007. 4.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 5.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Tallakulam Range, Tallakulam, Madurai. 6.The Inspector of Police, D-1, Thallakulam Police Station, Madurai City. 7.The Central Bureau of Investigation, Rep.by the Joint Director, Sasthiri Bhavan, Chennai-6. 8.The Government Rajaji Hospital, Rep.by its Dean, Gorippalayam, Madurai. 9.The Sub-Registrar, District Registrar Cadre, Madurai. 10.The ...
Tag this Judgment!1.Chokkalingam Vs. 5.Raman
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-17-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.10.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH S.A.(MD)No.272 of 2006 1.Chokkalingam 2.Natarajan 3.Paramasivam 4.Arumugam ..Appellants vs 5.Raman ..Respondent Prayer Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the decree and judgment passed by the District Judge, Sivagangai in A.S.No.100 of 2003, dated 29.08.2005 reversing the decree and judgment made in O.S.No.117 of 2000, dated 31.01.2003 on the file of the District Munsif, Thiruppathur, Sivagangai District. !For Appellants :M/s.K.Sulthan Allowdhin ^For Respondent :M/s.M.Mohanasundaram Judgment Reserved on:11.09.2014 :JUDGMENT This second appeal filed against the decree and judgment passed by the District Judge, Sivagangai in A.S.No.100 of 2003, dated 29.08.2005 reversing the decree and judgment made in O.S.No.117 of 2000, dated 31.01.2003 on the file of the District Munsif, Thiruppathur, Sivagangai District. 2.For the sake of convenience, the plai...
Tag this Judgment!N.Kumaresan Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-17-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:17. 10.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Writ Petition No.17064 of 2014 N.Kumaresan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai ?. 600 009. 2.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Vellore, Vellore District. ... Respondents Prayer Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to grant Parole to the Petitioner's Uncle namely Azhagar @ Pal Azhagar, Son of Chithiah Thevar, aged about 51 years life convict, now confined in Central Prison, Vellore as Prisoner No.24503 for a period of two weeks from 21.10.2014, to enable him to attend the 30th day ceremony of his mother Ariyammal to be held on 23.10.2014. !For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj For Respondents :Mr.V.Muruganandam Govt. Advocate :...
Tag this Judgment!1. Lakshmiammal Vs. 1.Saroja
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-17-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated :17. 10.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH S.A.(M.D.)No.1176 of 2006 and M.P.(M.D.)No.1 of 2006 1. Lakshmiammal 2. Thiruvona Raja .. Appellants Vs. 1.Saroja 2.Ulaganathan 3.Ramachandran 4.Poomaniammal 5.Suresh 6.Asha 7.Charulatha 8.Vallimayil 9.Kalyana Sundari 10.Krishnaveni .. Respondents Judgment Reserved on:12. 09.2014 Prayer Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the decree and judgment dated 21.08.2006 made in A.S.No.20 of 2005 on the file of Principal District Court, Tirunelveli confirming the decree and judgment dated 01.04.2005 made in O.S.No.41 of 2003 on the file of Principal Subordinate Court, Tirunelveli. !For Appellants : Mr.A.Thiyagarajan ^For 1st Respondent : Mr.T.R.Rajagopalan,Senior Counsel for M/s.N.Krishnaveni For Respondents 2 to 7 & 9 : Mr.K.Srinivasan, Senior Counsel for Mr.M.P.Senthil For Respondents 8 & 10 : No Appearance :JUDGMENT The appellants who are the ...
Tag this Judgment!Pechimuthu Vs. State Represented by
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-17-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.10.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI CRIMINAL APPEAL(MD)No.217 of 2014 Pechimuthu .Appellant/ Accused versus State represented by The Inspector of Police, Thanjavur East Police Station, Thanjavur District. (Crime No.530 of 2012).Respondent/Complainant Criminal appeal is filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the Judgment dated 04.07.2013 passed in Sessions Case No.54 of 2013 by the Principal Sessions Court, Thanjavur. !For Appellant : Mr.R.Venkatesan ^For Respondent : Mr.C.Ramesh, Addl. Public Prosecutor. :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.Challenge in this Criminal Appeal is to the conviction and sentence dated 04.07.2013 passed in Sessions Case No.54 of 2013 by the Principal District and Sessions Court, Thanjavur. 2.The conspectus of the case of the prosecution is that the accused viz., Pechimuthu is the husband of the dec...
Tag this Judgment!G.Venkatesa Vs. the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-16-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.10.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DEVADASS CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.16946 of 2014 G.VENKATESAN .Petitioner/Defacto complainant versus THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALANGANALLUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.Respondent/Complainant Prayer Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 praying to call for the entire records pertaining to the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti, Madurai District in Cr.M.P.No.6167/2014 vide his order dated 21.08.2014 and set aside the same and consequently direct the above said learned Judicial Magistrate to forward the complaint of the petitioner to the Inspector of Police, Alanganallur Police Station, Madurai District under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C so as to register an FIR. !For Petitioner : Mr.R.Anand ^For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) :ORDER On account of the refusal of the learned Judici...
Tag this Judgment!K.Balasubramani Vs. K.Subramani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-15-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:15. 10.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DEVADASS SECOND APPEAL (MD) No.635 of 2014 K.Balasubramani ... Appellant/Plaintiff -vs- K.Subramani ... Respondent/Defendant PRAYER Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the Judgment and Decree, dated 30.09.2013, passed in A.S.No.47 of 2013, on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul, confirming the the order and decreetal order, dated 08.02.2013, passed in O.S.No.197 of 2011, on the file of the learned District Munsif, Nilakottai. !For Appellant : Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar ^For Defendant : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar :JUDGMENT This Second Appeal has been directed as against the Judgment and Decree, dated 30.09.2013, passed in A.S.No.47 of 2013, on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Dindigul, confirming the Judgment and decree, dated 08.02.2013, passed in O.S.No.197 of 2011, by the learned District Munsif, Nilakottai.2. Th...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »