Chennai Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Perumal Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:03. 01.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P(MD)No.10372 of 2008 R.Perumal ... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector, Karur District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur District. 3.The Tahsildar, Karur - 639 001. 4.The Management, Karur Transport Private Ltd., 16, Kovai Road, Opposite to Kongu Thirumana Mandapam, Karur. 5.S.Jeyanthi, Managing Director, Karur Transport Private Ltd., 3, 2nd Cross K.R.R.Layout, Mangalam Road, Near Diamond Theatre, Karuvampalayam, Thiruppur. ... Respondents Prayer Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to immediately recover the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) along with interest payable thereon from the respondents 4 and 5 and pay the same to the writ petitioner within the period stipulated by this Court. !For Petitioner ... Ms.J.Maria Roseline ^For Respondents ... Mr.A.K.Baskarapandia...
icmc Corporation Ltd Vs. Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :03. 01.2014 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.208 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 M/s.ICMC Corporation Ltd., No.36, Ambattur Industrial Estate Chennai 600 058. ... Appellant -vs- 1. The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench Shastri Bhavan 26, Haddows Road Chennai 600 006.2. The Commissioner of Central Excise II Commissionerate Chennai 600 035.3. The Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai II Division Chennai II Commissionerate Chennai ... Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the Final Order No.260 of 2012 dated 15.03.2012 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench in Appeal No.E/254/2011. For Appellant : Mr.S.Jaikumar For Respondents : Mr. K.Mohana Murali Central Government Standing Counsel for RR2 and 3 R1-Tr...
Sivagamasundari Vs. K.S.Varadarajan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :03. 01.2014 THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH Application Nos.2266 and 2267 of 2013 in O.P.No.892 of 2010 1.Sivagamasundari 2.S.Girija 3.A.Rajendra Prasad 4.A.Rajasekar 5.V.Rajakumari 6.R.Geethalakshmi ... Applicants in both the applications. vs. 1.K.S.Varadarajan 2.S.Kalaiselvi ... Respondents in both the applications The application in A.No.2266 of 2013 has been filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S. Rules and r/w Section 263 (b) of the Indian Succession Act, 34 of 1925, to revoke the probate granted in O.P.No.892 of 2010 dated 23.3.2011 and a direction to surrender the original probate into this Court forthwith. The application in A.No.2267 of 2013 has been filed to pass an order of interim stay of operation of the probate granted in O.P.No.892 of 2010 on 23.3.2011, pending disposal of the revocation application. For applicants : Mr.M.S.Mani, in both the applications. For Respondents : Mr.T.Muruga Manickam, for R.1 Mr.S.Nageswaran, f...
K.S.Abubucker Vs. Prl.Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :03. 01.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH Writ Petition No.27793 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2013 K.S.Abubucker ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2.K.Senthilvel, Regional Deputy Director, Motor Vehicles Maintenance Department, Salem. ... Respondents Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceeding of the impugned order issued by the first respondent in G.O.(D) No.67, Transport (H1) Department dated 1.10.2013 and quash the same and consequently allow the petitioner to comply the requisite period of service in the post of Works Manager and to grant promotion to the post of Director of Motor Vehicles Maintenance Department. For Petitioner : Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, SC for Mr.G.Sankaran For Respondents : Mr.P.H.Aravind P...
P. Ganesan and Others Vs. Cc, Chennai
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2014
Per: Mathew John, J. 1. Stay petitions in respect of the above four appeals filed by different persons, in matters arising out of the same impugned order are being considered in the present proceedings. The facts of the case are broadly that the first applicant Shri P. Ganesh, sent a consignment from Singapore to Chennai Airport. The customs officers had intelligence that there would be an attempt to remove this consignment from customs area without filing Bill of Entry and paying customs duty and therefore they kept surveillance. The officers intercepted the consignment just outside the gate of the Air Cargo Complex when the goods were actually removed without filing Bill of Entry and paying duty. The goods were seized. On investigation, the DRI found that the goods were sent by Shri P. Ganesh describing it as Auto spare parts. On examination of the goods the consignment was actually found to contain various electronic goods like Handy cam, Video camera, Battery charger, USB port ...
Commissioner of Customs, Chennai Vs. M/S. Century Woods Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2014
Per Mathew John, J. 1. There is a miscellaneous application filed by the respondent for early hearing of the appeal since the matter related to de-bonding of a hundred Percent EOU which should have happened in 2005. Because of the pending of the dispute the respondents have not been able to dispose of their assets and settle with their creditors. After hearing both the sides we found that this matter involves more than Rs. 1 crore demand and quite old and hence the application for early hearing was allowed. Since it was found that the matter was a narrow campus both the parties were heard for disposal of merits. 2. The respondent was granted green card to set up an 100% EOU and undertook operations. They imported capital goods and raw materials and started operation. The total export obligation cast on them was Rs.1143.85 lakhs. After operation of a few months they were able to discharge obligation to the extent of Rs.143.85 lakhs and they were not able to continue their operations. Si...
Lt Col Sanjeet S. Sahai Vs. Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry ...
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2014
V. Periya Karuppiah, Member-Judicial: 1. This application has been originally filed before the Regional Bench of Armed Forces Tribunal at Chandigarh in O.A.No.1143 of 2011 for the reliefs: (1) to summon the original records of the Selection Board No.3 held in May 2009, December 2009 and December 2010 wherein the applicant was considered along with his batch mates for promotion to the rank of Col and declared unfit; (2) to summon the applicants ACR for the period from 18th January 2007 to 31st May 2007 and ICR for the period commencing from 1st June 2007 to 27th October 2007; (3) if on scrutiny of the records, the applicants eligibility for grant of promotion to the rank of Col in the above said Selection Boards had been barred because of the impugned counselling dated 4th September 2007 operating against him as a permanent bar, to quash the impugned counselling dated 4.9.2007 and to declare the applicant as duly empanelled provided it is found that OAP was superior or equal to the offi...
C.Ravi Vs. Deputy Chief Inspector of Factories at Erode
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 02.01.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJ.W.P.No.13192 of 2010 C.Ravi .Petitioner -versus 1. The Deputy Chief Inspector of Factories Erode 2. The Chennimalai Weavers Co-operative Society Limited, K.885 Chentex Mill, Post Box No.32 Chennimalai, Erode District rep by its Special Officer .Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to implement the order in No.E/6492/2001 dated 1.7.2002 of the fiRs.respondent in so far as the petitioner is concerned in the event of failure by the second respondent, to direct the fiRs.respondent to initiate penal action under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act against the second respondent all within a time frame. For Petitioner :: Mr.J.Muthukumaran For Respondents :: Mr.R.Govindasamy Additional Government Pleader for R2 Petition dism...
M.Manickam Vs. Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02.01.2014 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.P.Nos.17705 & 17706 of 2012 M.Manickam .Petitioner in both WPs. versus 1.The Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes & Registration (H) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai-600 028.Respondents in both WPs. Prayer in W.P.No.17705/2012: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the Second Respondent in his proceedings Memo No.32483/V3/2012 dated 28.06.2012 and quash the same. Prayer in W.P.No.17706/2012: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the FiRs.Respondent in his proceedings G.O.(2D) No.129 d...
Karunakaran Vs. M.Sundaraadivelu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:02. 01.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR C.R.P (NPD) No.4497 of 2013 1.Karunakaran 2.B.Leela ...Petitioners vs. 1.M.Sundaraadivelu 2.M.Vijayalakshmi ...Respondents Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code against the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.1003 of 2012 in O.S.No.438 of 2012 dated 11.12.2012 on the file of Additional District Munsif Court at Alandur, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.G.V.Sridharan For Respondents : Mr.V.Sukumar ORDER This petition has been filed invoking the supervisory powers of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the learned Additional District Munsif, Alandur dated 11.12.2012 made in I.A.No.1003 of 2012 in O.S.No.438 of 2012 on the file of the said Court. The said Interlocutory Application came to be filed by the defendants in the said suit for the rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The...