Chennai Court January 2014 Judgments
Dr. P.K. Reddy and Others Vs. K.R. Desinguraja and Others
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2014
(These two Revision Petitions coming before us for final hearing on 20.12.2013 and on hearing the arguments of petitioners counsel and upon perusing the material records, this Commission made the Common Order: These two Revision Petitions pertain to the same issue arising in the same complaint viz. C.C. No.241 / 2010 on the file of the District Forum, Chennai [South], dated 3-1-2012 and hence Common Order is passed. R.P. 26 / 2012 is filed by the 2nd opposite party against the order in C.M.P. No.444 / 2010, and R.P. No. 27 / 2012 is filed by the opposite parties 1 and 3 against the order in CMP No. 537 / 2010, of the District Forum dismissing the petitions seeking dismissal of the complaint as barred by limitation.) J. Jayaram, Judicial Member The complainant has filed a complaint in C.C. No.241 / 2010, before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Chennai [South] claiming compensation for the negligence and deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties 1 to 3 who ...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Rangarajan Memorial Hospital, Sundaram Medical Foundation Vs. Kala ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2014
J. Jayaram, Judicial Member This appeal is filed by the 1st opposite party against the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Chennai [North] in C.C.243/2005, dated 12-10-2010, allowing the complaint. 2. The case of the complainant is that one Ramesh, son of the 1st complainant, and husband of the 2nd complainant and father of the 3rd complainant “ met with road accident on 13-01-2005 and sustained injuries; and he was taken to the 1st opposite party hospital for treatment and in spite of the treatment given to him in the 1st opposite party hospital, he died on 14-1-2005 at about 3-15 pm due to the negligence and deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. Hence the complaint praying for direction to the opposite parties to pay a sum of Rs.15 Lac as compensation and to pay costs. 3. According to the opposite parties, the deceased Ramesh was admitted in their hospital on 13-1-2005 at about 11-35 pm who had sustained injuries in a road accident and ...
Tag this Judgment!N. Ravindranath Vs. the Executive Engineer and Administrative Officer ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2014
J. Jayaram, Judicial Member This appeal is filed by the complainant against the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Chennai [South] in C.C.539/2006, dated 9-3-2011, dismissing the complaint. 2. The case of the complainant is that the complainant was allotted a flat by the 1st opposite party and he paid a sum of Rs.3,000/- as Earnest Money and the tentative value was fixed at Rs.1,57,000/- and as instructed by the 1st opposite party he paid the total amount of Rs.3,06,708/- including the last payment of Rs.69,876/- on 30-1-2003 and the sale deed was executed on 4-10-2004 and he has paid a sum of Rs.1,49,078/- in excess, over and above the total cost. In spite of repeated demands, the excess amount collected from him has not been refunded by the opposite parties which amounts to deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. Hence the complaint for direction to the opposite parties to refund the sum of Rs.1,49,078/- being the excess amount collected from ...
Tag this Judgment!A. Araichiya Pillai Vs. Sbi Cards and Payment Services Pvt. Ltd. Repre ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2014
J. Jayaram, Judicial Member This appeal is filed by the complainant against the order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Chennai [North] in C.C.218/2007, dated 03-02-2010, dismissing the complaint. 2. The case of the complainant is that he had availed credit card facility with the 2nd opposite party and later he made request to the opposite parties to close his credit card account since he could not afford to maintain the card account and also requested some concession in the full and final settlement; but the opposite parties did not close his account and they adopted devious methods for collecting money from him and failed to issue no due certificate or letter acknowledging full and final settlement. This amounts to deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties and hence the complaint praying for direction to the opposite parties to issue no due certificate and to pay a sum of Rs.1 Lac as compensation towards deficiency in service and a sum of Rs.50,000/- ...
Tag this Judgment!Motor Sports Clubs of India Vs. Sportscraft Sporting Company
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :30. 01.2014 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN APPLICATION No.6184 OF2013in C.S.No.814 OF2013THE FEDERATION OF MOTOR SPORTS CLUBS OF INDIA REP.BY ITS SECRETARY A-25, KRISHNA TOWERS50 SARDAR PATEL ROAD, CHENNAI113... Applicants Vs. M/S. SPORTSCRAFT SPORTING COMPANY, REP.BY MR.SHRIKANT KARANI, CHITRA KUT BUILDINGS3D FLOOR, SIRI ROAD, CHOWPATY BANDSTAND, MUMBAI400006 For applicants : M/S.ANAND SASHIDHARAN For Respondents : M/S.S.R.RAJAGOPAL ORDER: R.S.RAMANATHAN, J The respondent/plaintiff filed the suit for declaration that the resolution altering the eligibility criteria for ordinary members in the Council Meeting which was held on 06th November, 2012 is ultra vires, void and ab initio, and for permanent injunction restraining the applicant/defendant from giving effect to the resolution and altering the status of the plaintiff from that of an ordinary member.2. The case of the respondent/plaintiff is that the applicant/defen...
Tag this Judgment!Sampath Shylaja Kumar Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :30. 01.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Crl. R.C.No.1149 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Sampath Shylaja Kumar .... Petitioner Vs. The State By The Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBI, SCB, Chennai, CBI Case Rc.13(S)2012/CBI/SCB, Chennai. ... Respondent Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Revision filed under Sections 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to set aside the order dated 30.08.2013 made in Crl.M.P.No.3043 of 2013 by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Chenglpattu. For petitioner : Mr.K.Selvakumaraswami For respondent : Mr.N.Chandrasekaran, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI Cases ORDER The petitioner is one of the accused in Crime No.204 of 2012 registered by the Inspector of Police, Vellavedu Police Station, Tiruvallur District for offences u/s.120(b) r/w 147, 148 and 302 of IPC. In connection with the said case, the petitioner was arrested on 20.04.2012 and thereafter, produced him before the lea...
Tag this Judgment!Bhargaviammal Vs. Peria Mariamman
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 01.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH S.A.No.1971 of 2000 1. Bhargaviammal(Deceased) 2. Thangammal alias Subhadra 3. Padmanabhan 4. Rajan 5. Manoharan 6. Vijaya Rani 7. Yamuna Devi ... Appellants/Defendants 4 to 10 in the suit (Appellants 2 to 7 recorded as Lrs of the deceased 1st appellant vide order of Court dated 10.01.2014 made in S.A.No.1971 of 2000 memo filed on 08.01.2014) Vs.1. Peria Mariamman & Chinna Mariamman Devasthanam Represented by its Executive Officer, Brough Road, Erode.2. Krishnankutty Nambiar ... Respondents/Plaintiff and 3rd defendant in the suit PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure code against the judgment and decree dated 29.06.2000 made in A.S.No.4 of 2000, on the file of II Additional District Court, Erode, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 30.11.1999 made in O.S.No.1168 of 1981 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Erode. For Appellants : Mr.K.S...
Tag this Judgment!Manivasagam Vs. 1.The Branch Manager,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30. 01.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR AND THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI W.A.(MD)No.956 of 2011 Manivasagam ... Appellant Vs. 1.The Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd., Branch Office - 1, 6, West Masi Street, Madurai - 625 001. 2.The Chief Executive Officer/ The Authorized Officer, Medi Assist India Private Ltd., No.797, Annapoorna, 10th main, 4th Block Jaya Nagar, Bangalore - 560 011. ... Respondents Prayer Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, against the order dated 01.08.2011 passed in W.P(MD)No.5254 of 2008. !For Appellant ... Mr.D.Saravanan ^For Respondents ... Mr.S.Ramachandran for R.1 No appearance for R.2 * * * * :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SUDHAKAR, J.) This writ appeal has been filed as against the order dated 01.08.2011 passed in W.P(MD)No.5254 of 2008, wherein the petitioner has sought for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the impugned or...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Sundaram Fasteners Limited
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 01.2014 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM C.M.A.NO.3477 OF2010The Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai IV Commissionerate 692, MHU Complex, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035 ... Appellant .vs. M/s.Sundaram Fasteners Limited, Plant III, Autolec Division, No.47-2, Poonamallee High Road, Velappan Chavadi, Chennai 600 077. ... Respondent Prayer: C.M.A.No.3477 of 2010 is filed under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 against the Final Order No.574 of 2010 dated 21.05.2010 on the file of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench. For Appellant : Mr.P.Mahaadevan Sr.Counsel for Customs & Excise & Service Tax For Respondent : Mr.P.R.Renganath for Mr.R.Raghavan JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J) This appeal by the revenue is directed against the final order No.574 of 2010 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appel...
Tag this Judgment!P.K.Nagarajan @ Meenakshisundara Vs. 1.N.Jeyarani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30.01.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Crl.R.C.(MD).No.570 of 2013 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 & 2 of 2013 And Crl.R.C.(MD)No.609 of 2013 *** Crl.R.C.No.570 of 2013 P.K.Nagarajan @ Meenakshisundaram ..Petitioner/Respondent Vs 1.N.Jeyarani 2.Minor P.K.N.Karuppasamy 3.Minor N.Jeyarajan ..Respondents/Petitioners (RR2& 3 are represented through 1st Respondent, the mother and natural guardian) Prayer Petition filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as against the order of Learned Family Court, Madurai dated 27.06.2013 made in Cr.M.P.No.47 of 2012 in S.T.C.No.1 of 2012. !For Petitioner ..Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu ^For Respondents ..Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai Crl.R.C.No.609 of 2013 1.N.Jeyarani 2.Minor P.K.N.Karuppasamy 3.Minor N.Jeyarajan ..Petitioners (Minor Petitioners 2 and 3 are represented through their mother and natural guardian 1st Petitioner) V. P.K.Nagarajan @ Meenakshisundaram .Respondent Prayer Pe...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »