Chennai Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Managing Director, Vs. Jayalakshmi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-07-2014
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated :07. 01.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN C.M.A.(MD)No.2033 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013 The Managing Director, M/s Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, Periyamilagparai, Tiruchirappalli. ... Appellant/Respondent Vs Jayalakshmi ... Respondent/Petitioner Prayer Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988, against the judgment and decree made in M.C.O.P.No.614 of 2009, dated 25.07.2012, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/II Additional District Court, Tiruchirappalli. !For Appellant ... Mr.P.Prabhakaran ^For Respondent ... Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj * * * * * :JUDGMENT This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellant Transport Corporation, aggrieved by the negligence and quantum of Rs.4,95,000/- awarded in M.C.O.P.No.614 of 2009, dated 25.07.2012, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/II Additional District Court, Tiruchirappalli for the death of respo...
Suresh Rajan Vs. the Registrar General
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:7. 1.2014 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.ARUMUGHASWAMY Writ Petition (MD) Nos.16368 and 19823 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 to 2 of 2013 Suresh Rajan ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD) 16368/2013 Bharathi ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD) 19823/2013 Versus 1. The Registrar General, The Madras High Court High Court Buildings, Chennai.2. The Registrar (Judicial), The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ... Respondents 1 & 2 in both W.Ps.3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Kanyakumari Detachment @ Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. ... 3rd Respondent in W.P.No.16368/2013 Prayer in W.P.No.16368 of 2013:- Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the second respondent in C.O. Letter No.174 of 2013 dated 23.07.2013 and quash the same as illegal. Prayer in W.P.No.19823 of 2013:- Petition filed...
G.Bhaskar Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07.01.2014 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.P.No.29212 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 G.Bhaskar .Petitioner versus 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretary, Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai. 2.The Directorate of Technical Education, Guindy, Chennai-600 026. 3.The Chairman, Teachers Recruitment Board, 4th Floor, EVK Sampath Maaligai, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai-600 006.Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certorarified Mandamus, in calling for the records on the file of the Third Respondent with respect to the provisional selection list of Chemistry lecturers in Government Polytechnic College for the year 2010-2011 published in website on 18.10.2012 pursuant to the advertisement dated 27.02.2012 in advertisement No.02 of 2012 and quash the same and consequently appoint the petitioner as Chemistry lecturer. For Petitio...
A.M.ibrahim Vs. Zigzag Solutions Pvt Ltd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:07. 01.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.PALANIVELU C.M.A.No.3803 of 2004 A.M.Ibrahim ... Appellant vs.1. M/s.Zigzag Solutions Private Limited No.11/20, 10th Avenue Ashok Nagar Chennai 600 083.2. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., No.45, Moore Street, Chennai 600 001. ... Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 against the award dated 29.06.2004 made in W.C.No.162 of 2003 by the Deputy Commissioner of Labour I (Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation I), Chennai 6. For appellant : Mrs.K.Vasanthamala for M/s.A.Shanmugaraj For respondent-1 : Mr.R.Murali For respondent-2 : Mr.V.Srikanth ----- JUDGMENT This appeal is filed by the workmen against the award dated 29.06.2004 made in W.C.No.162 of 2003 by the Deputy Commissioner of Labour I (Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation I), Chennai 6.2. The applicant in his application stated that he was a driver under the first...
Haroon Ismail Vs. Additional Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:07. 01.2014 Coram: The Honourable Mr.Justice S.RAJESWARAN AND The Honourable Mr.Justice A.ARUMUGHASWAMY Criminal Appeal Nos.161, 141, 171 and 312 of 2012 Haroon Ismail ... Appellant /Accused No.1 in Crl.A.161/2012 Rifayee ... Appellant/Accused No.2 in Crl.A.141/2012 Mohammed Kothbudeen... Appellant/Accused No.3 in Crl.A.171/2012 Zahir Hussain Abdul Azeez Appellants/Accused No.5&7 in Crl.A.312/2012 Versus State by The Additional Superintendent of Police, CB CID, Tiruchirapalli. (Cr.No.637/1995-Nagoor PS) (Cr.No.1297/1995-Myladuthurai PS) ... Respondent/Complainant in all the four Appeals Criminal Appeal Nos. 161, 141, 171 and 312 of 2012 have been filed under Section 374(2) of Criminal Procedure Code against the conviction and sentence imposed upon the appellants by the Court of Sessions for Exclusive Trial of Bomb Blast Cases, Poonamallee, Chennai in S.C.No.6 of 2004 dated 1.2.2012. Mr.A.Ramesh, S.C. for Mr.A.M.Venkatakrishnan .. For...
S.Sivakumar Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :07. 01.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.Nos.26816, 26817 of 2009 and 4801 and 5628 of 2010 W.P.Nos.26816 & 26817 of 2009: S.Sivakumar .. Petitioner in both the writ petitions -vs- 1. The State Transport Appellate Tribunal City Civil Court Buildings High Court Campus Chennai 600 104 2. The Regional Transport Authority Thiruvannamalai District Respondents in both 3. N.Thangavelu Mudaliar .. the writ petitions Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 1st respondent order dated 02.12.2009 in M.V.Appeal Nos.59 and 60 of 2009 and quash the same. For Petitioner :: Mr.M.Krishnappan Senior Counsel for Mr.R.Achuthan For Respondents :: Mr.N.Srinivasan Additional Government Pleader for R2 Mr.R.Singaravelan for R3 W.P.Nos.4801 and 5628 of 2010: N.Revathy .. Petitioner in both the writ petitions -vs- 1. Thangavelu Mudaliar 2. S.Sivakumar 3...
Federation of the Catholic Faithful Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED0701.2014 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.R.K.AGRAWAL, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN W.P.Nos.14734/2012, 15498/2013 and 16791/2012 and Connected M.Ps. W.P.Nos.14734/2012 and 15498/2013 The Federation of the Catholic Faithful, Rep. By its General Secretary, Having office at New No.53, Old No.21, Godown Street, Chennai-600 001. .. Petitioner in both W.Ps. Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary, Higher Education Dept., Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director of Collegiate Education, EVK Sampath Building, College Road, Chennai-600 009. 3.The Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education, (Govt. B.Ed., College Campus), Saidapet, Chennai-600 015. 4.The Governing Body of Loyola College, Rep. By its Chairman, St.Mary's Residence, Dindigul-624 001. 5.The Management of Loyola College, Rep. By its Principal, Chairman Admission Committee, Chennai-600 034. .. Respondent in both W.P.s W.P.No.16791 of 2...
S.Ragini Vs. the State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-07-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07.01.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.RAJESWARAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Criminal Appeal No.758 of 2013 S.Ragini ..Appellant versus The State by Deputy Superintendent of Police, Q Branch, Dharmapuri..Respondent Appeal filed under Section 34 of Prevention of Terrorism Act, against the order in Crl.M.P.No.216 of 2013 in Spl.C.C.No.1 of 2009, dated 29.10.2013, on the file of Sessions Court for trial of Bomb Blast and Pota Cases, Chennai @ Poonamallee, Chennai. For Appellant : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For Respondent : Mr.Shanmugavelayutham Public Prosecutor * * * * * JUDGMENT P.N.PRAKASH, J. This is an appeal under Section 34 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (in short 'POTA').against the order dated 29.10.2013 in Crl.M.P.No.216 of 2013 in Spl.C.C.No.1 of 2009, passed by the Special Court for POTA Cases, Poonamallee, Chennai, whereby bail was denied to the appellant / accused herein. 2.It is the specific case of the...
S. Hidayathullah @ Mannady Barakath Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Airpo ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided on: Jan-06-2014
Per Mathew John, J. 1. The appeals were heard at length through Senior Advocate Shri. B. Kumar on 29-07-2013. After hearing both sides Bench desired to know what was the source of certain documents relied upon by the appellant and furnished to the appellant while the appellant was detained under COFEPOSA. The matter was adjourned to 10-09-2013. While the matter came up for hearing on 10-09-2013 none appeared on behalf of the appellant. So revenue was heard on the short point which remained to be clarified and thereafter the matter was reserved for orders. 2. There are two appeals filed by the same appellant being considered together because the facts leading to the two adjudication orders happened almost concomitantly and are substantially the same. 3. The appellant in these appeals is adjudged to be involved in two instances of smuggling of 106 nos. each of foreign marked gold biscuits weighing 12366.596 gms in each consignment through International Air Cargo Complex, Chennai. The goo...
Areva T and D India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Ltu, Chen ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided on: Jan-06-2014
P.K. Das, J. 1. All these applications are arising out of a common order and therefore all are taken up together for disposal. After hearing stay applications at length, we find that the issue involved in this case is in a narrow compass, and therefore after disposing the stay applications, we take up the appeals for hearing. 2. After hearing both sides, and on perusal of the records, we find that the appellant raised supplementary invoices to their customer with retrospective increase of price of finished goods and paid duty at the time of issue of supplementary invoices on price revision. The issue involved in this case as to whether the appellant is required to pay interest on issue of supplementary invoices to the customers on price variation in respect of the goods sold earlier and penalty to be imposed. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of interest along with penalty. 3. Ld. AR on behalf of Revenue submits that in the appellant's own case on the same issue, this Tr...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »