Chennai Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
E.Reshmi Irene Vs. Dd Medical College and Dd Hospitals
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:20. 01.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P.Nos.23089, 23090, 27366, 27367 and 28833 of 2013 and connected Mps W.P.Nos.23089 and 23090 of 2013 E.RESHMI IRENE .... PETITIONER Vs 1. DD MEDICAL COLLEGE AND DD HOSPITALS REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN DR.T.D.NAIDU NO.61, DD NAGAR BUS STOP KUNNAVALAM POST THIRUVALUR TALUK AND DISTRICT CHENNAI631210.2. THE MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA REP BY ITS BOARD OF GOVERNORS POCKET14 SECTOR8DWARAKA PHASE- I NEW DELHI110077.3. UNION OF INDIA REP BY ITS SECRETARY HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT NIRMAN BHAVAN, C - WING NEW DELHI - 110 001.4. TAMILNADU DR.MGR MEDICAL UNIVERSITY REP BY ITS REGISTRAR GUINDY CHENNAI 32. 5 . THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP BY ITS SECRETARY HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT FORT ST. GEORGE CHENNAI - 9. .... RESPONDENTS W.P.Nos.27366 and 27367 of 2013 DD MEDICAL COLLEGE20122013 MBBS STUDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION REP BY ITS PRESIDENT P.MANIKANDAN, HAVING OFFICE AT NO.59, ELAN...
K.N.Srinivasan Vs. Chennai City Municipal Corporation
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20.01.2014 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.P.No.34930 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 K.N.Srinivasan .Petitioner versus The Commissioner, Chennai City Municipal Corporation, Rippon Building, Chennai-3.Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to consider my representation dated 7.12.2012 and pass appropriate orders thereupon with reference to the G.O.(Ms)No.99 P & AR Department dated 26.2.1988. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sivakumar For Respondent : Mr.P.V.Selvakumar Standing counsel for Chennai City Municipal Corporation ------- ORDER The Petitioner has preferred the instant Writ of Mandamus praying for an issuance of an order by this Court in directing the Respondent to consider his representation dated 07.12.2012 and pass appropriate orders thereupon with reference to the G.O.(Ms)No.99 (P & AR) Department d...
P.Shanmugam Vs. State Coordinator
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :20. 01.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M. VENUGOPAL W.P.No.33985 of 2012 & M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2012 & 1 of 2013 P.Shanmugam ... Petitioner Vs 1. The State Coordinator (Tamilnadu and Pondicherry) & CPIO Retail Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, 1, Ranganathan Gardens, 11th Main Road, Annanagar West, Chennai-600 040.2. M.Kathiresan ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the First Respondent made in proceedings No.SCO(TN&P)/COMP/CBE dated 14.11.2012 and quash the same and consequently, direct the First Respondent to consider the Petitioner for selection to the petroleum retail outlet at Avinashi to Karuvalur Road, Tiruppur District pursuant to the notification dated 16.03.2012 issued at Daily Thanthi vide Serial No.361. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Umapathi For Respondents : Mr.O.R.Santhanakrishna for R1 M...
Saravana theatre Vs. Sri Moogambigai Financiers
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:20. 1.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR C.R.P. (NPD) No.4764 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 1. M/s.Saravana Theatre rep. by Partners K.M.Mahalingam, K.M.Krishnamoorthy, K.M.Durairaj, 23, Pillaiyar Koil Street, Kamatchiammanpet, Gudiyattam.2. K.M.Mahalingam 3. K.M.Krishnamoorthy 4. K.M.Durairaj Petitioners vs.1. Sri Moogambigai Financiers, Gudiyattam rep by Managing Partner P.Parameswari Congress House Road, Pudupet, Gudiyattam.2. V.V.Rajan K.B.Margabandhu Mudaliar (died) 3. K.M.Gopal 4. Indirani 5. K.M.Velumani 6. A.Jayalakshmi 7. D.Shanthi 8. M.Jothi 9. M.Usha Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition seeking direction to dispose of the unnumbered E.A. of 2007 in E.P.No.16 of 2003 in O.S.No.183 of 1999 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Gudiyatham, Vellore District within a period stipulated by this court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.A.Ravindran For R1 : Mr.D.Pradeepkumar For R2 : Mr.T.Dhanyakumar For RR4 to 9 : Mr.B.Gobi...
V.Saroja Vs. Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :20. 01.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M. VENUGOPAL W.P.No.34669 of 2012 & M.P.No.1 of 2012 V.Saroja ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Commissioner of Police, Egmore, Chennai.2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Washermanpet Range, Chennai.3. Mrs.Pattu Roja ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ Mandamus directing the Second Respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.12.2012 and provide the Police Protection to thePetitioner and her premises being Saloon at No.137, TH Road, Kaladipet, Thiruvottriyur, Chennai-600 019. For Petitioner : M/s.J.B.Solomon Peter For Respondents : Mr.S.Navaneetham Addl. Government Pleader for R1 & R2 No appearance for R3 ORDER The Petitioner has preferred the instant Writ of Mandamus praying for issuance of an order by this Court in directing the Second Respondent/the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Washermanpet Ra...
N.Kanchana Vs. A.K.K.Govindarajan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:20. 01.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R. SHIVAKUMAR C.R.P.[NPD]. No.1638 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 N.Kanchana ... Petitioner .. Vs .. A.K.K.Govindarajan ... Respondent Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition preferred under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, against the fair and decreetal order dated 08.09.2011 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Gudiyatham, Vellore District, in I.A.No.6 of 2011 in H.M.O.P.No.6 of 2008. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Harikrishna For Respondent : Mr.Avinesh Wadhwani for M/s.V.Raghavachari - - - - - ORDER Notice before admission was given and the respondent is also before this Court represented by a learned counsel. Since in the present revision, the order condoning the delay of 697 days in filing the application under Order 9, Rule 9 of C.P.C. to restore the H.M.O.P. filed by the respondent herein which had been dismissed for default on 09.01.2009 is under challenge, the learned counsel appearing for bo...
J.Anbutamilarasi Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:20. 01.2014 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.P.No.18209 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2013 W.P.No.19088 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2012 W.P.No.4879 of 2013 and M.P.No.2 of 2013 W.P.(MD)No.11129 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.2,3,4 and 8 of 2013 W.P.(MD)No.11324 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.2 & 4 of 2013 and W.P.No.20336 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2013 *** W.P.No.18209 of 2012: J.Anbutamilarasi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Government of Tamil nadu rep. By its Secretary, Commercial Taxes Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Department, Ezhilagam , Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. 3.M.Sekar 4.P.Meera 5.V.Vanathi 6.C.Krishnaveni 7.R.Jayalakshmi 8.S.Vijayakumar 9.V.Karthikeyan 10.K.Sudha 11.B.Radha 12.R.Bhuvaneswari 13.P.Johnsirani 14.A.Suhail Babu 15.V.Vijaya 16.D.Sumathi 17.M.Daruman 18.P.Sivasakthivel 19.S.Ganesh 20.A.Suresh 21.K.Rajendran 22.R.Mohanasundaram ... Respondents (R...
R.Duraisamy Vs. Chief Revenue Controlling Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:20. 01.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.PALANIVELU C.M.A.No.3573 of 2008 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2008 1. R.Duraisamy 2. R.Anandharaj 3. R.Mani @ Manoharan ... Appellants vs.1. The Chief Revenue Controlling Officer -cum- Inspector General of Registration 120, Santhome High Road Chennai 600 028.2. The District Revenue Officer Coimbatore (Stamps).3. The Joint Sub Registrar 1 District Registrar Office Erode. ... Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 read with Rule 9(5)(A) of the Tamil Nadu (Prevention of Under Valuation of Instruments) Rules, 1968 against the order dated 08.09.2008 made in Pa.Mu.No.23114/No.2/2006 on the file of the Tamil Nadu Chief Controlling Revenue Authority cum Inspector General of Registration, Chennai against order dated 10.04.2003 made in Mu.Pa.No.348/99 on the file of the District Revenue Officer, Coimbatore (Stamps). For appellants : Mr.N.Manokaran Fo...
Sree Infra Tech Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise Tiruchirapalli
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided on: Jan-17-2014
1. The appellant undertook maintenance and repair of roads during the period April 2008 to 31st March 2009. They were not collecting service tax on such activity and remitting to government during the said period. On audit of the books of accounts of the appellant in Aug 09, the departmental officers pointed out that such activities would attract service tax and an amount of Rs.11,74,726/- was due from them. Thereupon, the appellant collected the service tax amount from the customers to whom they rendered services and paid the service tax. However, no interest was paid. Therefore, the department issued show cause notice for recovery of tax not paid in time and also for appropriating tax subsequently paid and also demanding an interest amount of Rs.1,31,888/-. By the time of adjudication, Section 97 was inserted in Finance Act, 1994 exempting service tax in respect of management, maintenance and repair service retrospectively from 16-05-2005, by Finance Act 2012. Consequently at the tim...
B. Suresh Babu the Commandant Army Base Hospital and Another
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai
Decided on: Jan-16-2014
L.t. Gen Anand Mohan Verma, Member-Administrative: 1. The petitioner has filed this Review Application requesting for reviewing the order of this Tribunal dated 5th June 2013 in O.A.06 of 2013 by granting service element disability pension with 50% disability with effect from the date of discharge, i.e. 29.12.1977. 2. The petitioner in his Review Application would state that the points raised in this R.A. are those his legal counsel Mr. M.K. Sikdar should have raised in his Original Application No.6 of 2013 when it was in progress due to which his case failed. The petitioner would go on to state the facts of his enrolment and Invaliding Medical Board in April 1984. He would state that when he was examined by a Medical Board at Base Hospital, Delhi Cantt., he was told by the medical specialist that since he had come through Court order, his disability percentage had been increased adding that since the petitioner knew the rules well he should get pension from Court. The petitioner would...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »