Skip to content

Chennai Court September 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Sep 23 2013

Prema Vs. the State

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-23-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:23. 09.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR W.P.No.6059 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Prema ... Petitioner ..Vs.. The State by:1. The Junior Electricity Engineer, E&P / TNEB, Guruvarajapet, Arakkonam Taluk, Vellore District.2. The Assistant Executive Engineer, E&P / TNEB, Gurvarajapet, Arakkonam Taluk, Vellore District.3. Ranjini 4. Pappi 5. Thara ... Respondents [R3 to R5 impleaded as per order dated 12.09.2013 by SMKJ in MP3/13 in WP605913]. Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a writ of certiorari, to call for the records of the 1st respondent impugned letter No.E.NPO/E&P/Guru.Pet/V.A.Ko.Ka/No.183/ 2012 dated 10.01.2013. [prayer amended as per Order dated 20.03.2013 by KVJ in M.P.No.2/13 in W.P.No.6059/13].. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gangadharan for Mr.C.Chokkalingam For Respondents : Mr.G.Vasudevan (For R1 & R2) Mr.A.Gowthaman (For R3 to R5) ORDER Record ...


Sep 23 2013

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Bannariamman Exports Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-23-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :23. 09.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM Tax Case (Appeal) No.962 of 2009 --- The Commissioner of Income Tax Coimbatore ... Appellant vs M/s.Bannariamman Exports Ltd. 252, Mettupalayam Road Coimbatore. ... Respondent Prayer: Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'D' Bench dated 25.11.2005 in ITA.No.1270/Mds/99 for the assessment year 1996-97. For Appellant : Mr.N.V.Balaji Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department For Respondent : Mr.Vijayaraghavan for M/s.Subbaraya Aiyar JUDGMENT (The Judgment of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, J.) The Revenue is on appeal as against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'D' Bench dated 25.11.2005 in ITA.No.1270/Mds/99 relating to the assessment year 1996-97 raising the following questions of law: ".1....


Sep 23 2013

Minor Vijay Vs. Vinayagam

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-23-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23.9.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR C.M.A.No.2982 of 2012 Minor Vijay rep. by his father Marimuthu ..Appellant versus 1 Vinayagam 2 Sasikala 3 The Branch Manager, The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd., No.75, Krishnan Street, Thiruvannamalai..Respondents Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 against the order, dated 25.6.2012 made in M.C.O.P.No.580 of 2007 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal Sub Judge).Tiruvannamalai. For Appellant : Mr.F.Terry Chellaraja For Respondent No.3 : Mr.S.Manohar ***** JUDGMENT This is an appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act challenging the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal Sub Judge).Tiruvannamalai, dated 25.6.2012 made in M.C.O.P.No.580 of 2007 on the file of the said tribunal. By the said award, M.C.O.P.No.580 of 2007 was dismissed in entirety without costs. Questioning the correctne...


Sep 18 2013

Abdul Munaf Vs. Union of India, Ministry of Defence, Rep By: the Defen ...

Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

V. Periya Karuppiah, Member Judicial: 1. This application has been filed by the applicant seeking for the grant of eligible Reservist Pension and benefits due after calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the respondent made in Air HQ/99798/3/SP/DAV dated 11.3.2013 and for other reliefs. 2. The facts of the case which are necessary for the purpose of consideration would be as follows :- The applicant was enrolled in the Indian Air Force as Combatant on 15.3.1962 on an engagement for the term of 09 years Regular service and 06 years Reserve service. The applicant ought to have been transferred to the Reserve List on 15.3.1971, but was retained in colour service itself due to Indo-Pakistan war in the year 1971. The applicant took part in 1965 and 1971 Indo-Pakistan wars. Despite the applicant opted for Reserve service, he was released from Air Force on 12.3.1973 on completion of 10 years and 363 days of Regular service due to disbandment of units and establishments and ...


Sep 18 2013

N.S.N.Matriculation Higher Secondary School Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:18. 09.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mrs. JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH W.P.No.21819 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 N.S.N.Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Road, Nehru Nagar, Chrompet, Chennai 44 rep. by its Correspondent .. Petitioner Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu rep. By its Secretary to Government, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai 9. 2.Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 6. 3.The Private Schools Fee Determination Committee, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 6. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the third respondent dated 23.04.2013 made in Order No.Nil in respect of the petitioner school and quash the same and consequently permit the writ petitioner to collect the fees in terms of the fee fixed...


Sep 18 2013

New Tirupur Area Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. K.Poomani

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:18. 09.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM Writ Appeal Nos.923 to 926 of 2009 W.P.Nos.23116 of 2006, 23896 to 23900 of 2006, 4711 of 2004 and 12375 of 2008 & Connected Miscellaneous Petitions Writ Appeal Nos.923 to 926 of 2009: New Tirupur Area Development Corporation Ltd., represented by its Authorised Signatory having its office at 'Anurag', No.15, Murray's Gate Road, Alwarpet, Chennai 600 018. .... Appellant in the above W.A.s Vs.1. Tmt. K.Poomani .... Respondent in W.A.Nos.923 & 924/2009 1. Sri.K.Paramasivam .... Respondent in W.A.Nos.925 & 926/2009 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruppur, Coimbatore District.3. The Inspector of Police, Tiruppur Rural Police Station, Coimbatore District.4. The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Public Works Department (Groundwater), Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. .... Respondents in W.A.Nos.923 to 926 of 2009 5. ...


Sep 18 2013

R.Raman Vs. Secretary to Government

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18.09.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.P.No.17315 of 2007 (O.A.No.1245 of 2003) R.Raman .Petitioner ..vs.1.The Secretary to Government, Home (Police VI) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Director General of Police, Chennai 600 004. 3.The Inspector General of Police, Armed Police, Chennai 600 010. 4.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Armed Police, Chennai 600 010. 5.The Commandant, Tamil Nadu Special Police, V Battlaion, Avadi, Chennai 600 109...Respondents Prayer :Writ petition having been transferred from the file of Tamilnadu Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.1245 of 2003 to call for records relating to the impugned order of dismissal from service passed by the fifth respondent herein in his proceedings in PR.No.63/2000 dated 05.06.2000 and confirmed by the fourth respondent herein in his proceedings C.No.B2/10083/2000, Appeal 32/2000 dated 18.08.2000 and further confirmed by the third res...


Sep 18 2013

N.Mohamed Kani Vs. Secretary of Tamil Nadu Electricity Board

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:18. 09.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. MANIKUMAR W.P.No.24536 of 2013 M.P.No.1 of 2013 N.Mohamed Kani ... Petitioner Versus 1. The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Annasalai, Chennai-2.2. The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, T.Nagar, Chennai-17. ... Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to assess the correct electricity consumption charges to the petitioner's electricity connection No.181-32-18, situated at No.23, Ranganathan Street, T.Nagar, Chennai-61, for the period from 20.03.2013 to May 2013, contemplated in Rule 11(2) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Regulation. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Vijendran For Respondents : Mr.G.Vasudevan ORDER The petitioner is running Garment business, at Door No.23, Ranganathan Street, T.Nagar, Chennai-61. Electricity Service Connection No.181-32-18, has been disconnected d...


Sep 18 2013

Ck School of Practical Knowledge Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:18. 09.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mrs. JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH W.P.No.23015 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2013 CK School of Practical Knowledge Matriculation Higher Secondary School, 11 A, Beach Road, Cuddalore 607 001. .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu rep. By the Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai 9. 2.The Private Schools Fee Determination Committee rep. By its Special Officer, PTA Building, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 6. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the Committee pertaining to the order of fixation dated 26.04.2013 on the file of the second respondent and quash the same, in so far as it relates to the petitioner school and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner school to follow the proposed fee structure...


Sep 18 2013

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. M.Pandian

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:18. 09.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.3400 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008 and M.P.No.2 of 2008 in C.M.A.SR.No.54493 of 2007 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Motor III Party Claims Office No.45, Moore Street, Chennai-1 ... Appellant in C.M.A.No.3400 of 2008 and R2 in C.M.A.SR.No.54493/ 2007 Vs. 1.M.Pandian @ Pologa Pandian ... R1 in C.M.A.No.3400 of 2008 and appellant in C.M.A.SR.No.54493/ 2007 2.M/s.Mahavir Motors Pvt., Ltd., No.105, G.P.Road, Chennai-2 ... R2 in C.M.A.No.3400 of 2008 and R1 in C.M.A.SR.No.54493/ 2007 PRAYER (in Both Appeals): Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 05.03.2007, made in M.C.O.P.No.240 of 2005, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District and Sessions Court (Fast Track Court-IV), Poonamallee. For Appellant : Mr.M.Krishnamoorthy for Appellant in C.M.A.No.3400/2008 and for ...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial