Chennai Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V.Selvi Vs. Tangedco Assistant Engineer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:25. 09.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR W.P.No.13108 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 V.Selvi .. Petitioner Versus 1.The Assistant Engineer, Operation & Maintenance, TANGEDCO, Muthur 638 105. Tiruppur District. 2.Minor @ T. Palanisamy 3.The Executive Officer, Arulmighu Periyanayagiamman Thirukoil, Pappini, P.Pachapalayam Post, Kangeyam Taluk, Tiruppur District. .. Respondents Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings passed in U.Mi.Po/O&M/WMuthur/No.247 dated 05.01.2013 on the file of the 1st respondent herein, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents herein to grant Electricity Service Connection to the petitioner's house at Door No.2/181, Koolikadu, P.Pachapalayam Post, Pappini, Kangeyam Taluk, Tiruppur District. For Petitioners : Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For Res...
A.Rani Vs. Kumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25.09.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI Crl.R.C.No.198 of 2005 A.Rani .Petitioner versus 1.Kumar 2.Varadhan 3.Kamalam 4.State represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Namakkal.Respondents Criminal revision is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the judgement dated 6.10.2004 made in SC.No.193/2003 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Namakkal. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sankarasubbu For Respondents : Mr.Karunakaran -R1 to R3 Mr.C.Iyyapparaj, GA(Crl.Side) (R4) ORDER The complainant/PW1 is the petitioner herein. This Criminal Revision is filed against the order of acquittal of the respondents 1 to 3 herein from the charges under sections 498A and 304B IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in SC.193/2003. 2.The petitioner herein is none else that the mother of one Vijayakumari since deceased, who committed suicide at 9.30am on 8.9.2000 in her matrimonial house. The...
G.V.Ramesh Vs. P.Munusamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED2509.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.TAMILVANAN C.R.P. (PD) Nos.2607 & 2608 of 2013 and M.P. Nos.1 & 1 of 2013 1. G.V.Ramesh 2. Hemalatha ... Petitioners versus P.Munusamy ... Respondent Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 01.07.2013 made in I.A. Nos.5653 & 5654 of 2013 in O.S. Nos.12021 & 12022 of 2010 respectively on the file of II Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. For Petitioners : Mr.K.Ramu For Respondent : No appearance COMMON ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. In spite of service of notice, there is no representation for the respondent and the respondent is also called absent.2. The Civil Revision Petitions have been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 01.07.2013 made in I.A. Nos.5653 & 5654 of 2013 in O.S. Nos.12021 & 12022 of 2010 respectively on the...
T.Saroja Vs. K.M.Senthil
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25. 09.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.978 of 2007 1.T.Saroja 2.Minor T.Gayathri 3.Minor T.Pradeep 4.Pavayammal ... Appellants (Petitioners 2 and 3 are rep. by their next friend and guardian 1st petitioner T.Saroja) Vs. 1.K.M.Senthil 2.M/s.United India Insurance Co., Ltd., Coimbatore ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 07.11.2006, made in M.C.O.P.No.34 of 2005, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sub Court, Sankagiri. For Appellants : Mr.I.C.Vasudevan For Respondents : Mr.K.S.Narasimhan for R2 R2-Dispensed With - - - JUDGMENT The appellants / claimants have preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree dated 07.11.2006, made in M.C.O.P.No.34 of 2005, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sub Court, Sankagiri.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The p...
E.Seshan Vs. Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED2509.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.R.K.AGRAWAL, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN W.P.No.24189 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2013 E.Seshan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Union of India, Rep. By its Secretary, Department of Environment and Forest, Paryavaran Buildings, C.G.O. Complex, New Delhi. 2.The Chief Secretary to Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 3.The Principal Secretary to Govt., Environment and Forest Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. 4.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests and Chief Wildlife Warden, Panagal Maligai, Saidapet, Chennai-600 015. 5.The Additional Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (Project Tiger), Coimbatore Division, Coimbatore 641 011. .. Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 4th respondent...
A.Nagoor Pitchai Vs. State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25. 9.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU Writ Petition No.8449 of 2007 (T) O.A.No.4703 of 2002 A.NAGOOR PITCHAI [ PETITIONER ]. Vs 1 STATE OF TAMILNADU REP.BY THE DIRECTOR LAND SURVEY DEPARTMENT EZHILAGAM, CHEPAUK, CHENNAI-5. 2 THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS, DINDUGAL. 3 THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS MADURAI. [ RESPONDENTS ]. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the concerned records relating to the order No.Na.Ka.No.Aa2/12455/2000 dated 11.8.2001 passed by the 3rd respondent and quash the same and consequently and direct the 2nd respondent to reimburse the medical expenses of Rs.1,57,000/- under the Tamil Nadu Government Employees Health Fund Scheme. For petitioner : Mr.K.M.Ramesh for Mr.P.Anbazhagan For respondent : Mr.N.Sakthivel Government Advocate for R1 to R3 ORDE...
R.Radha Krishnan Vs. Mr.A.R.Murugadoss
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :25. 9.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Original Application Nos.710 and 711 of 2013 in C.S.No.639 of 2013 R.RADHA KRISHNAN SON OF LATE S.RAMASAMY IYENGAR NO.10, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU ST T.NAGAR, CHENNAI17... Petitioner ..vs..1. MR.A.R.MURUGADOSS9, 3RD BLOCK SHYAMALA GARDENS SALIGRAMAM, CHENNAI932. THE FILM AND TELEVISION PRODUCERS GUILD OF SOUTH INDIA REP.BY ITS SECRETARY HAVING ITS OFFICE NO.15/7, 6TH CROSS ST, LAKE AREA, CHENNAI34...Respondents For Petitioner : Mrs.M.Christella For Respondents : Mr.S.Vijayaraghavan Original Application Nos.710 and 711 of 2013 in C.S.No.639 of 2013 R.SUDHAKAR, J.O.A.No.710 of 2013 is filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 and Section 151 CPC praying to grant an order of interim injunction, restraining the first respondent, his heirs, legal representatives, agents and any other person authorized by him, from releasing the film Titled ".RAJA...
Revenue Divisional Officer Vs. Visvesvaran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:25. 9.2013. CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN A.S. No.734 of 2002 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Gobichettipalayam. Appellant vs.1. Visvesvaran 2. P.Nageswaran 3. S.G.Krishnan 4. Ramanathan Chettiar 5. M.Ramasamy 6. Sathyvel 7. Sahadevan 8. Senthilkumar 9. R.Palanichamy 10. Meenakshi 11. Jeyabharathi 12. Jeya 13. Eswari 14. S.K.Ganesan 15. Lakmiammal 16. The Managing Director, Jeeva Transport Corporation, Erode.17. V.C.Balakrishnan Respondents Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 30.4.2002 made in L.A.O.P.No.1 of 1997 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Gobichettipalayam. For appellant : Mr.S.Pasupatheeswaran, Special G.P.(AS) For RR2 to 7, 9, 13 & 15 : Mr.N.Manoharan For RR10 to 12 : Mr.R.T.Doraisamy For R16 : Mr.T.Chandrasekaran For RR1, 8, 14 and 17 : No appearance. JUDGMENT The Land Acquisition Officer, who is the respondent in L.A.O.P.No.1 of 1997 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Gobichettipal...
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. P.Selvarani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :25. 09.2013 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH Civil Miscellaneous Appeal Nos.3303, 3261 of 2010 and Cross Objection No.18 of 2011 in C.M.A.No.3261 of 2010 C.M.A.No.3303 of 2010 M/s.The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Post Box No.49, Pattanama Buildings, R.S. Road, Pump Junction, Alwaye, Kerala ... Appellant. vs. 1.P.Selvarani 2.V.G.Palanisamy 3.G.P.Sivakumar 4.V.Rama 5.Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Limited, Door No.4-A, IV Floor, Thirumalai Towers, No.723, Avinashi Road, Coimbatore-641 018. 6.Joseph ... Respondents. C.M.A.No.3261 of 2010: Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited, No.4A, 4th Floor, Thirumalai Towers, 723, Avinasi Road, Coimbatore-641 018. ... Appellant. vs.1. P.Selvarani 2. V.G.Palaniswamy 3. G.P.Sivakumar 4. V.Rama 5. The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Post Box No.49, Patamana Building, R.S.Road, Pump Junction, Alwaye, Kerala.6. Joseph. ... Respondents. Cro...
Renu Sood Vs. Chief Controller and Revenue Authority
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25. 09.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU W.P.No.24744 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.No.27100 of 2005 Mrs.Renu Sood ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chief Controller and Revenue Authority, Chennai 28. 2.The District Revenue Officer (stamps), 5th floor, M.Singara Velar maligai, 32, Rajaji Salai, Chennai 1. 3.The Sub-Registrar, Periamet, Madras 3. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent to collect the amount towards stamp duty and registration charges as per G.O.Ms.No.193, Commercial Taxes Department, dated 27.12.2004 and consequently direct the third respondent to return the document 2158/2003 to the petitioner and pass such further orders. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Lakshminarayanan For Respondents : Mr.N.Sakthivel, GA ORDER The prayer in the writ petition is to issue a direction to the first respondent / the Chief Controller ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »