Chennai Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajapunnisa Vs. Meharajan Begum
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :26. 09-2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B. RAJENDRAN C.R.P. (PD) No.3759 of 2011 and M.P. No.1 of 2011 Rajapunnisa .. Petitioner Versus 1. Meharajan Begum 2. K. Narayanan .. Respondents Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of The Constitution of India against the Order dated 10.01.2011 passed in C.M.P. No.8 of 2009 in A.S. No.445 of 2008 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.IV, Chennai. For Petitioners : Mr. J.Kamaraj For Respondents : Mr. S.I. Samiullah for R1 Mr. J.Saravanavel for R2 ORDER The Plaintiff in O.S. No.339 of 2003 on the file of the learned XIV Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai is the revision petitioner herein. The suit was filed for the relief of declaration to declare that the plaintiff is the owner of the suit property and for a consequential injunction to restrain the defendants/ respondents herein from interfering with her possession. The suit was part...
Brahmaputra Valley Fertilizer Corpn Vs. Fenner India Ltd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:26. 09/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR APPLICATION.3735 OF2013BRAHMAPUTRA VALLEY FERTILIZER CORPN VS FENNER INDIA LTD FOR PETITIONER : ARUNKARTHIK FOR RESPONDENT : PREETIMOHAN ORDER: R.SUDHAKAR, J.APPLICATION NOS. 3735 & 3479 OF2013APPLICATION No.3638 OF2012IN C.S. No.557 OF2013Application No.3735 of 2013 is filed by the defendant in the suit under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying this Court to dismiss the present suit as not maintainable for want of jurisdiction.2. Application No.3479 of 2013 is filed by the defendant in the suit under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules read with Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying this Court to refer the present suit for arbitration.3. Application No.3638 of 2012 is filed by the plaintiff in the suit under Order XIV Rule 8 of the Ori...
Pavayee Vs. P.Mani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:26. 09.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.2868 of 2006 1.Pavayee 2.Govindaraj 3.Tamilselvan ... Appellants Vs. 1.P.Mani 2.The Branch Manager United India Insurance Co., Ltd., Sankari, Salem District ... Respondents PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 02.11.2005, made in M.C.O.P.No.139 of 2003, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sub Court, Sankari. For Appellants : Mr.N.Manokaran For Respondents : Mr.T.Ravichandran for R2 R1-served - - - JUDGMENT The appellants / claimants have preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree dated 02.11.2005, made in M.C.O.P.No.139 of 2003, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sub Court, Sankari.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The petitioners, who are the wife, sons and mother of the deceased Durai, had filed a claim petition in M....
R. Syamb Ananthan and Others Vs. Cox and Kings and Another
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
J. Jayaram, Judicial Member The case of the complainant is as follows: The 1st and 2nd complainants are husband and wife, the 3rd complainant is their son, the 4th complainant is their daughter, the 5th complainant is their close relative, and the 6th complainant is their family friend. The complainants had arranged a foreign tour covering Thailand and Singapore for a week in May, 2011 for which the complainants had paid an initial amount of Rs.1,20,000/-; and subsequently paid sums of Rs.1,00,000/- and Rs.3,41,000/-, and thus, a total sum of Rs.5,61,000/- was paid. The complainants were of 5 adults and one child who is the 4th complainant / daughter aged 11 years. The first opposite party instead of booking flight tickets and making arrangements for 5 adults and one child in a single group, they arranged 4 adults + 1 child in one group and another separate single ticket for one adult, thus they were divided into two groups, as a result of which right from the beginning when they board...
Master Jithu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25. 09.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DEVADASS Crl.O.P. Nos.24166 to 24169 of 2013 Master Jithu .. Petitioner in all Petitions Vs. State of Tamil Nadu By Inspector of Police, S-7, Madipakkam Police Station, Chennai .. Respondent in all Petitions Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the Judicial Magistrate, Alandur Court, to send the records of Crime Nos. 534, 1370, 1314 and 1289 of 2013 and also the Juvenile to the Juvenile Justice Board, Chengalpet and handover his custody to the Juvenile Justice Board, Chengalpet, for taking further action in accordance with law. *** For Petitioner in all the Petitions : Mr.M.L.Joseph for M/s.Chennai Law Associates For Respondent in all the Petitions: Mr.C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor C O M M O N ORDER Since the contentions are common in the four petitions, similar order is being rendered.2. Master Jithu, the petitioner is accused...
Thangammal Vs. Managing Director of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corpora ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25. 09.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA C.M.A.No.3472 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008 Thangammal .. Appellant ..Vs.. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, No.12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem 636 007 .. Respondent Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the award passed in MCOP No.1006 of 2005, dated 31.08.2006 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, I Additional District Judge, Salem. For Appellant : Mr. K.Kuppusamy For Respondent : Mr. M.M.Swaminathan - - - JUDGMENT The Court should not succumb to niceties, technicalities and mystic maybes said the Supreme Court in the decision reported in AIR1980SUPREME COURT1354(N.K.V.Brothers Private Limited v. M.Karumai Ammal). Despite the serene advice, the Tribunal has succumbed to the insignificant inconsistencies, contradictions and omissions and dismissed the claim petition. Aggrieved over the ...
Somalaiappan Vs. Palanisamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :25. 09.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DEVADASS Crl.O.P.No.22043 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Somalaiappan ... Petitioner Vs 1.Palanisamy 2.Kanthasamy 3.Dhandapani 4.Thangavel 5.Eswaramoorthy 6.Shanmugam 7.Stalin Murugesan 8.Ponnusamy 9.Sadakadai Subramani @ Balasubramaniam 10.Karikalan 11.Govinthammal 12.State rep. by Inspector of Police, Vellakoil Police Station. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to direct the District Magistrate/the District Collector, Tiruppur District, Tiruppur to appoint Mr.B.Mohan, Senior Advocate as desired by the petitioner/victim for conducting the prosecution in S.C.No.1 of 2013 on the file of the Special Judge(Principal Sessions Judge), Tiruppur. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Guruprasad For Respondents : Mr.C.Emalias for R-12 Addl. Public Prosecutor ORDER Somalaiappan, the defacto complainant in the special case in S.C.No.1 of 2013, pending before the Court o...
Jothi Engineering Works Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:25. 09.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM Tax Case (Appeal) No.2011 of 2008 Jothi Engineering Works No.55, Sulthanpet, Velur, Salem District. .... Appellant Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Namakkal (Rural). .... Respondent APPEAL under Section 37 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act filed before the Tamil Nadu Taxation Special Tribunal to revise the order dated 21.12.1998 made in Ref.No.MM1/25251/94 on the file of the Joint Commissioner (SMR), Commercial Taxes, Chennai for the assessment year 1988-89. After the abolition of the Tribunal, the matter has been transferred to this Court and re-numbered. For Appellant : Mr.R.Vasumithran for Mr.N.Inbarajan For Respondent: Mr.Manohar Sundaram, AGP (T) -------- JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN,J.) This Tax Case (Appeal) is filed by the assessee ...
Eurotherm India Private Limited Vs. Johnson Lifts Private Limited
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25.9.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR Application No.3316 of 2013 in C.S.No.36 of 2013 Eurotherm India Private Limited Tamarai Tech Park SP Plot # 16-19 & 20A Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate Inner Ring Road, Guindy Chennai 600 032 .Applicant Vs Johnson Lifts Private Limited No.1, East Main Road Anna Nagar West Extension Chennai 600 001.Respondent PRAYER: Application is filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Order XIV Rule 8 of the Original Side Rules to reject the plaint filed along with the suit in C.S.No.36 of 2013 pending on the file of this Court under the provisions/principles of Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. For Applicant : Mr.T.R.Rajagopalan, Sr.Counsel for M/s.M.Velmurugan For Respondent : Mr.Yashod Vardhan, Sr.Counsel for M/s.SPAN Associates Application No.3316 of 2013 in C.S.No.36 of 2013 R.SUDHAKAR,J. This application is filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the C...
Suresh Kumar Vs. Secretary to Govt.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25. 09.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P.No.15606 of 2013 & M.P.No.1 of 2013 Suresh Kumar ... Petitioner versus 1. The Secretary Public Department (SC) Government of Tamil Nadu Fort St.George Chennai-9.2. The District Collector Thiruvallur District Thiruvallur.3. The Tahsildar Poonamallee Taluk Poonamallee. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from transferring the inmates of Poonamallee Special camp including the petitioner to Trichy Camp and consequently direct the respondents to transfer them either to Gummidipoondi or Puzhal Camp. For petitioner : Mr.T. Kalaimani For Respondents : Mr.Aravind Pandian AAG Assisted by Mr.M.S.Ramesh AGP --------------- ORDER This writ petition at the instance of an inmate of a Special Camp at Poonamallee seeks a writ of Mandamus restraining the State of Tamil Nadu from transfe...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »