Chennai Court September 2013 Judgments
Union of India Vs. S.Subramani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :30. 9-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.P.No.24535 of 2013 M.P.No.1 of 2013 1. Union of India, rep.by the Chief Postmaster General, Tamil Nadu Circle, Chennai 600 002.2. The Superintendent of Post Offices, Dindigul Division, Dindigul 624 001. ... Petitioners Vs.1. S. Subramani 2. The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Chennai 104. ... Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a writ of Certiorari calling for the records in respect of the impugned order dated 30.11.2012 passed by the second respondent Tribunal in O.A.No.1311 of 2010 and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Sureshkumar ORDER N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR, J.This writ petition is filed by the Postal Department of Government of India, challenging the order made in O.A.No.1311 of 2010, dated 30.11.2012, giving direction to...
Tag this Judgment!Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute Vs. Union of Ind ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 09.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P.No.22241 of 2013 & M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2013 Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute Rep. by its Chairman Pillaiyarkupam Pondicherry-607 402. ... Petitioner versus 1. The Union of India rep. by its Secretary to Government Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Department of Health and Family Welfare New Delhi- 110 001.2. Medical Council of India Rep. by its Secretary Pocket 14, Sector 18 Dwaraka Phase I New Delhi 110 077. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondents pertaining to the orders of the 2nd respondent vide its E-Mail in Proc. No.MCI-258 (22)/2012- Med/101029-33 and Proc. No.MCI-258(22)/ 2012-Med/101055-59 dated 14.7.2013 (Sunday) rejecting the Application of the petitioner dated 12.9.2012 for increase of intake by one seat e...
Tag this Judgment!D.Kutti Vs. Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 09.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.1881 of 2008 1.D.Kutti 2.Kanniappan ... Appellants Vs. The Union of India owning Southern Railways rep.by it's General Manager Chennai ... Respondent PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 23 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, against the Order dated 01.02.2008, in O.A.No.52 of 2005, on the file of the Railways Claims Tribunal, Chennai Bench. For Appellants : Mr.T.Rajamohan For Respondent : Mr.M.Udayakumar - - - JUDGMENT The appellants / applicants have preferred the present appeal against the Order dated 01.02.2008, in O.A.No.52 of 2005, on the file of the Railways Claims Tribunal, Chennai Bench .2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The appellants, who are the wife and father of the deceased K.Devan, had filed a claim application in O.A.No.52 of 2005, on the file of the Railways Claims Tribunal, Chennai Bench, claiming a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- as com...
Tag this Judgment!M.Shyamala Vs. Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 09.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.2050 of 2008 1.M.Shyamala 2.Minor.M.Abirami 3.Minor.M.Anusuya 4.Minor.M.Arthi 5.R.Ponnamma ... Appellants (Appellants 2, 3 and 4 rep.by their mother and natural guardian first appellant) Vs. The Union of India owning Southern Railways rep.by it's General Manager Chennai ... Respondent PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 23 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, against the Order dated 25.04.2008, in O.A.No.71 of 2004, on the file of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Chennai Bench. For Appellants : Mr.T.Rajamohan For Respondent : Mr.M.Udayakumar - - - JUDGMENT The appellants / applicants have preferred the present appeal against the Order dated 25.04.2008, in O.A.No.71 of 2004, on the file of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Chennai Bench .2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The appellants, who are the wife, three minor daughters and mother of the deceased R....
Tag this Judgment!Kumar Vs. Dhanapal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:30. 09.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN S.A.No.769 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 1. Kumar 2. Nallu Padaiyachi .. Appellantss/ Defendants Vs. Dhanapal .. Respondent/ Plaintiff Prayer:- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 27.6.2012 made in A.S.No.73 of 2010 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Kallakurichi, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 14.7.2010 made in O.S.No.53 of 2009 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sankarapuram. For appellants : Mr. T. Dhanyakumar For Respondent : Mr. P. Valliappan J U D G E M E N T The defendants are the appellants.2. The respondent/ plaintiff filed the suit in O.S.No.323 of 2005 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Kallakurichi for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 14.9.2004 and the suit was decreed and the appeal filed by the appellants in A.S.No.73 of 2010 on the file of the Subordinate C...
Tag this Judgment!N.Kalidas Vs. K.P.Subbaiyan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 09.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH C.R.P (PD) Nos.1593 and 1594 of 2010 and M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2010 N.Kalidas ... Petitioner in both the petitions. vs. K.P.Subbaiyan ... Respondent in both the petitions. Civil revision petitions have been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the orders and decree passed in I.A.Nos.84 and 83 of 2009 in R.C.O.P.No.21 of 2007 respectively dated 10.3.2010 in R.C.O.P.No.21 of 2007 on the file of the learned Rent Controller (Principal District Munsif), Erode. For petitioner : Mrs.P.Veena, in both the petitions. For respondent : Mr.K.S.Jeyaganeshan, in both the petitions. COMMON ORDER These civil revision petitions have been filed as against the dismissal of the applications filed by the petitioner / landlord in I.A.Nos.83 and 84 of 2009 in R.C.O.P.No.21of 2007 to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to note down all the relevant features of the petition mentioned building ...
Tag this Judgment!K.Gunasekaran Vs. Nilgiris Dist. Plantation Workers Coop. Credit Socie ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :30. 9-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.A.No.1178 & 1179 of 2011 K. Gunasekaran ... Appellant in both writ appeals Vs.1. The Management of the Nilgiris, District Plantation Worker's Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd., rep.by its Secretary, Coonoor, The Nilgiris.2. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore. ... Respondents in both writ appeals W.A.No.1178 of 2011 is preferred under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order of the learned single Judge dated 15.9.2009 made in W.P.No.13094 of 2002. W.A.No.1179 of 2011 is preferred under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order of the learned single Judge dated 15.9.2009 made in W.P.No.11 of 2003. For Appellant : Mr.M. Sreedhar for Mr.A.Bobblie For 1st Respondent : Mr.R.Ramesh for M/s.Srinath Sridevan 2nd Respondent : Labour Court COMMON JUDGMENT N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR, J.W.A.No.1178 of 2011 is prefe...
Tag this Judgment!P.Navarathnam Lalwani Vs. the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :30. 09.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN Writ Petition No.6204 of 2009 P.Navarathnam Lalwani .. Petitioner Vs.1. The District Collector Krishnagiri District Krishnagiri 2. The Commissioner and Director of Geology and Mining Guindy Chennai 32 3. The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu Industries Department Fort St.George Chennai 9 .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records of the Third Respondent in pursuance of the GO (2D) No.7 Industries (MME-2 ) Department dated 22.01.2009 and quash the said order consequently direct the Respondents 1 and 2 to release the vehicle bearing No.TN58B9394to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Dr.G.Krishnamurthy For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Dhanapalan, A.G.P ORDER The Writ Petitioner is said to be a Lorry owner bearing Registration No.TN58B9394 While his lorry was transportin...
Tag this Judgment!K.A.Gurusekar Vs. Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :27. 09.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN Writ Petition No.14036 of 2009 and M.P.No.2 of 2009 and M.P.No.3 of 2011 K.A.Gurusekar ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, Co-operatives, Food and Consumer Protection (CL2) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Registrar of Co-operative Societies, N V Natarajan Maligai, Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010. 3.The Joint Registrar, O/o of the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. 4.The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, (PDS) Sivagangai, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Certiorari, to call for the entire records pertaining to the G.O.(D)No.163 dated 29.05.2009 made by the first respondent in confirming the order made in Lr.No.13281 CL207-4 dated 27.11.2007 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner :...
Tag this Judgment!T.M.Prakash Vs. the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:27. 09.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. MANIKUMAR W.P.No.17608 of 2013 M.P.No.1 of 2013 1.T.M.Prakash 2.A.Amudha 3.R.Anbarasu 4.V.Ananthi 5.S.Boopathi Ammal 6.A.Elumalai 7.N.Kuppu 8.K.Pushpaveni 9.K.Shanthi 10.Kuppu 11.S.Uma Shankar ... Petitioners Versus 1. The District Collector, Tiruvannamalai District, Tiruvannamalai.2. The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Tiruvannamalai. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writs of Mandamus, directing the respondents to provide electricity connection to the petitioners, based on Indemnity Bond submitted by the petitioners immediately. For Petitioners .. Mr.G.Pari For 1st respondent .. Mr.Vijayakumar, Addl. Govt. Pleader For 2nd respondent .. Mr.G.Vasudevan ORDER The petitioners have sought for a Mandamus, directing the respondents to provide electricity connection to them, based on Indemnity Bond.2....
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »