Chennai Court September 2013 Judgments
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Vs. Saradha Tamilarasu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30.09.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH C.M.A.No.2951 of 2011 and Cross Objection No.94 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 C.M.A.No.2951 of 2011 Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co.Ltd., Sorrento Building, I Floor, 6, Lattice Bridge Road, Adayar, Chennai 20.Appellant vs 1.Saradha Tamilarasu 2.Minor Laknesh rep. By his mother/R1 3.Balasubramaniam 4.Saraswathy 5.P.Rajavel 6.D.Radhamani .Respondents Cross Objn. No.94 of 2013 1.Saradha Tamilarasu 2.Minor Laknesh rep. By his mother/1st Cross Objector 3.Balasubramaniam 4.Saraswathy .Cross Objectors versus 1.Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co.Ltd., Sorrento Building, I Floor, 6, Lattice Bridge Road, Adayar, Chennai 20. 2.P.Rajavel 3.D.Radhamani .Respondents (R2 and R3 remained exparte before the Tribunal) Appeal and Cross Objection against the judgment and decree dated 10.05.2011 in M.C.O.P.No.194 of 2010 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tri...
Tag this Judgment!K.Saravanan Vs. Icici Bank Limited
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 30.09.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH Crl.O.P.No.11195 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 1.Mr.K.Saravanan 2.Ms.Thilagavathi Saravanan 3.Mr.V.Kannappan 4.Mr.K.K.Govindamoorthy ..Petitioners versus M/s.ICICI Bank Limited, Having its office ICICI Bank Tower, 4th Floor, West Wing, Plot No.24, Ambattur Industrial Estate, Chennai-600 058, represented herein by its Chief Manager Mr.N.Anandakumar..Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to call for the records in C.C.No.1593 of 2010 pending on the file of the learned VII Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai, and to quash the same. For Petitioners :Mr.I.Alvin For Respondent :Mr.S.Vasudevan * * * * * ORDER This petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking to quash the complaint filed against the petitioners herein and the other accused under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, which is pending in C.C.No.1593 of 2010 ...
Tag this Judgment!Employees' Provident Fund Organization Vs. 1. the Inspector General of ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:30. 09/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.(MD)No.11726 of 2010 and W.P.(MD)No.8972 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2010 in W.P.(MD)No.11726 of 2010 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 to 6 of 2012 in W.P.(MD)No.8972 of 2012 Employees' Provident Fund Organization represented by Recovery Officer, Employees' Provident Fund Organization, LDC Road, Madurai. .. Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.11726 of 2010 M/s.Mahalakshmi Textile Mills Ltd., represented by its Director AL.Lakshmanan, S/o.Alagu Sundaram Chettiar, Door No.6A, Vallabai Road, Chokkikulam, Madurai - 625 002. .. Petitioner in W.P.(MD)No.8972 of 2012 vs.1. The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai - 600 028.2. The Sub-Registrar, Sub-Registrar Office, Kodaikanal.3. S.Vaigai Durai 4. P.Panchasheelagandhi 5. M.Sheik Dawood * 6. M/s.Mahalakshmi Textile Mills Ltd. represented by its Director AL.Lakshmanan, S/o.Alagu Sundaram Chettiar, Door No.6a, Vallabai Road...
Tag this Judgment!Gandhimathi Vs. P.Baby
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. .09.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH C.R.P (PD) No.1080 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 1.Gandhimathi 2.S.Duraisamy 3.S.Suresh Kumar 4.S.Govindasamy 5.Latha ... Petitioners vs. 1.P.Baby 2.R.Chinnasamy 3.R.Ponnusamy 4.R.Krishnakumar ... Respondents Civil revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 1.3.2010 in O.S.No.274 of 2007 on the file of the District Munsif's Court, Tiruppur. For petitioners : Mr.C.R.Prasanan For respondents : Mr.V.Nicholos ORDER Aggrieved over the suo motu additional issue framed by the Court below on 1.3.2010, with regard to the pecuniary jurisdiction to try the suit in O.S.No.274 of 2007 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Tiruppur, the present civil revision petition has been filed by the plaintiffs.2. The brief facts which are necessary to decide the issue involved in this civil revision petition, are as follows:- (i) The petitione...
Tag this Judgment!The Senior Regional Manager, Vs. 1.The Joint Commissioner of Labour,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30/09/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.(MD)No.16007 of 2013 W.P.(MD)No.16008 to 16011 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2013 The Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Sachidanandha Moopanar Road, Thanjavur Road, Thanjavur..Petitioner in W.P.(Md.Nos.16007 to 16010 of 2013 The Senior Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Thiruvarur..Petitioner in W.P.(Md.No.16011 of 2013 Vs 1.The Joint Commissioner of Labour, Trichy. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Trichy. 3.K.Swaminathan ..Respondents in W.P.(Md.No.16007 of 2013 1.The Joint Commissioner of Labour, Trichy. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Trichy. 3.K.Venkatanarasingam ..Respondents in W.P.(Md.No.16008 of 2013 1.The Joint Commissioner of Labour, Trichy. 2.The Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Trichy. 3.K.Ramalingam ..Respondents in W.P.(Md.No.16009 of 2013 1.The Joint Commissioner of Labour, Trichy. 2.The A...
Tag this Judgment!C.Paramasivam Vs. Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :30. 09.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN Writ Petition No.8285 of 2009 C.Paramasivam ... Petitioner vs. The Commissioner of Police, City Police Officer, Coimbatore City, Coimbatore -18. ... Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the order passed by the respondent herein in his CPO.579/2009, C.No.F3/39364/2008 dated 07.04.2009 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent herein to treat the out of employment period from 23.11.2005 to 14.12.2007 as duty with pay and allowances as Grade-I Police Constable and direct the respondent herein to treat the period from 15.12.2007 to 22.05.2008 as duty with pay and allowances as Head Constable with all consequential monetary and service benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.Ravi Shanmugam For Respondent : Mr.K.V.Dhanapalan, AGP ORDER The petitioner...
Tag this Judgment!Santhosh Tamilarasan Vs. Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 09.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P.No.18529 & 17346 of 2013 & connected Mps. W.P.No.18529 of 2013 1 SANTHOSH TAMILARASAN E. 2 DHANOUSH KUMAR (MINOR) REP. BY HIS FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MR. P.VELAYUTHAM3D.MANJUSHA (MINOR) REP. BY HER FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN MR.M.DHINADHAYALAN ...PETITIONERS Vs 1 THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE NEW DELHI. 2 JAWAHARLAL INSTITUTE OF POST-GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH (JIPMER) DHANVANTARI NAGAR PUDUCHERRY-605006 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR. 3 THE DEAN JAWAHARLAL INSTITUTE OF POST-GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH (JIPMER) DHANVANTARI NAGAR PUDUCHERRY-605006. 4 THE UNION TERRITORY OF PUDUCHERRY REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRY SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS PUDUCHERRY. 5 MONISHA PRIYA E. 6 SRUTHI P.J.7 MOUNIKA J.S. 8 G.SARAVANA KUMAR9RAGHAVI P. 10 T.KIRTHIKA ...RESPONDENTS W.P.N...
Tag this Judgment!Kongunadu Arts and Science College Vs. Gnanambigai Mills Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:30. 09.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA C.M.A.No.1526 of 2006 and C.M.P.No.6795 and 9195 of 2006 M/s.Kongunadu Arts and Science College, represented by its Secretary Dr.M.Aruchami. .. Appellant ..Vs.. M/s.Gnanambigai Mills Ltd., rep. by its Executive Director Senthil Chinnasamy, P.B.No.5307, Gnanambigai Mills Post, Coimbatore-641 029. .. Respondent Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 104 read with Order XLIIII Rule 1 (u) of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 7.11.2005 passed in A.S.No.130 of 2005 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore allowing the appeal thereby restoring the suit for fresh disposal (by open remand) by setting aside the fair and decreetal order dated 26.3.2004 passed in I.A.No.1165 of 2003 in O.S.No.940 of 2003 on the file of I Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore. For Appellant :Mr.S.Haridoss, Senior Counsel for Mr.Puran Khemka For Respondent : Mr.S.Mukun...
Tag this Judgment!G.Ramesh Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 30.09.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH Crl.O.P.No.17701 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 G.Ramesh ..Petitioner versus 1.State rep. By The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District, (Crime No.30/2012) 2.J.Sekar ..Respondents (R2 impleaded as per the order of the Court dated 27.07.2013 in M.P.3/13) Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to call for the records in charge sheet in C.C.No.1 of 2013 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II at Chidambaram and to quash the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned. For Petitioner :Mr.N.Chandrasekaran For Respondents :Mr.C.Emalias, APP (For R1) Mr.K.Rajasekaran (For R2) * * * * * ORDER This petition has been filed seeking to call for the records in C.C.No.1 of 2013 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II at Chidambaram and to quash the same, in so far as the petitioner he...
Tag this Judgment!Suryakant.V.Kanakia Vs. R.Purushotaman
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:30. 9.2013. CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN A.S. No.746 of 2002 Suryakant.V.Kanakia Appellant vs.1. R.Purushotaman (died) 2. P.Dhanalakshmi 3. P.Selvakumar (RR2 and 3 brought on record as LRs of the deceased sole respondent vide order dated 3.7.2009 in CMP No.1582 of 2008) Respondents Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 28.8.2001 made in O.S.No.8390 of 1996 on the file of the VIII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Madras. For appellant : Mr.Sandeep S.Shah For RR2 and 3 : No appearance. JUDGMENT Plaintiff in O.S.No.8390 of 1996 on the file of the VIII Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Madras is the appellant.2. The plaintiff filed the suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale and for permanent injunction or in the alternative, directing the defendant to pay a sum of Rs.1,95,937.50 and the Trial Court granted the alternative relief directing the defendant to refund a sum of Rs.1,00,000/= received as advan...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »