Chennai Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.Janardhanan Vs. Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:22. 07.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.NO.21655 OF2004A.Janardhanan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Union of India, rep.by Director General of Post, Department of Post, Dak Bhavan, New Delhi 110 011, 2.The Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Vellore Division, Vellore, 3.K.Jeeti, 4.The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Bench, High Court Campus, Chennai 600 104. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for the relief of issuance of writ of certiorari calling for the concerned records relating to the impugned order dated 29.6.2004 in O.A.NO.779 of 2002 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Bench and to quash the same. ORDER (Order of the Court was made by R.BANUMATHI,J.) Challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.779 of 2002 (dated 29.6.2004) in and by which the Tribu...
J.Muralidharan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Date:22. 07.2013 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice M.VENUGOPAL W.P. No.1861 of 2010 J.Muralidharan .. Petitioner ..Vs..1. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to Govt., Personnel and Administrative Reforms (B) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.2. The Commissioner of Social Welfare, Commissionerate of Social Welfare, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records of the first and second respondents in Letter No.40485/B1/ 2009-1 dated 8.9.2009 and Roc.No.10146/Admn.2(3)/2008 dated 5.6.2009 and quash the same and consequently direct the Respondents to promote the Petitioner to the post of Superintendent based on the passing of the Fundamental training and eligibility test conducted by the Government Officers training Institute, Bhavani Sagar and Account test part I without insisting for a pas...
S.Angamuthu Vs. Deputy Inspector General of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 22.07.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Ms.Justice K.B.K.VASUKI Writ Appeal No.970 of 2013 --- S.Angamuthu .Appellant -versus 1. The Deputy Inspector General of Police Salem Range, Salem 2. The Superintendent of Police Namakkal District Namakkal .Respondent Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letter Patent against the order dated 06.07.2012 made in W.P.No.17235 of 2012. For appellant : Mr.T.P.Prabakaran For respondents : Mr.R.Ravichandran Additional Govt.Pleader JUDGMENT (The Judgment of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, J.) Mr.R.Ravichandran, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the Writ Appeal itself is taken up for final disposal. 2. The present Writ Appeal is preferred by the writ petitioner against the order of the learned Single Judge, wherein, while dismissing the prayer of the writ petitioner for a writ of Mandamus to grant tempor...
Natarajan Vs. V.Chinnasami
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:22. 7.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN A.S. No.1006 of 1990 1. Natarajan (Deceased) 2. Shanthadevi 3. Jayanthi (Appellants 2, 3 and R6 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased sole appellant vide order dated 7.1.2010 in C.M.P.Nos.1973 to 1975 of 2008) .. Appellants Vs.1. V.Chinnasami 2. Sutharathnam 3. Maragatham (Deceased) 4. Manimekalai 5. Periyasami Naidu 6. N.Suganthi 7. V.Janakarajan 8. J.Murali 9. J.Sumathra (RR7to 9 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased R3 vide order dated 4.6.2013 in CMP No.604/2010) .. Respondents Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 18.11.1988 made in O.S.No.69 of 1985 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Ariyalur. For appellant : Mr.R.Thiyagarajan, Senior Counsel for Mr.K.Kuppusamy For RR1 & 3 to 5 : Mr.S.V.Jayaraman, Senior Counsel for Mr.S.Gopalaratnam For R2 : Mr.M.Sriram For R6 : Mr.Mukund R.Pandian For RR7 to 9 : Mr.Chandramouli JUDGMENT The plaintiff in O.S.No.69 of ...
Karuppan Chettiar Vs. Susheela Bai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED2207.2013 CORAM:- THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE K. RAVICHANDRABAABU Civil Revision Petition (NPD)NO.91 of 2006 and C.M.P.No.756 of 2006 ........Karuppan Chettiar, Prop. Of Huma Medicals, Old No.45, New No.133, Habibullah Road, T.Nagar, Chennai.17.Petitioner versus 1. MRS.Susheela Bai 2. Akheel Ali Jaddy .Respondents Petition filed under Section 25 of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control Act 18/1960 as amended Act 23/1973 and 1 of 1980) against the order dated 05.10.2005 in R.C.A.No.1065 of 2004 on the file of the VIII Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai, confirming the order dated 06.8.2004 passed in RCo.No.1607 of 2003 on the file of the XV Judge, Small Causes Court, Chennai. K.RAVICHANDRABAABU,J., ra For Petitioner : Mr.V.Suthakar For Respondents : No Appearance ........ORDER It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner/tenant had already vacated the premises and therefore, nothing survives fo...
Mrs.P.Malarkodi Vs. Inspector of Panchayats
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :22. 07.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.5897 of 2013 1. Mrs.P.Malarkodi 2. Mrs.Anuradha 3. Mrs.Thenmozhi 4. Mr.Shanmugam 5. Mr.Balakumar 6. Mr.Ramalingam 7. Mrs.Ramanthan .. Petitioners -vs- 1. The Inspector of Panchayats and District Collector Vellore District, Vellore 2. The Assistant Director (Panchayats) Vellore District, Vellore 3. The Block Development Officer Panchayat Union Katpadi, Vellore District 4. Mrs.Ramya Pandian .. Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 1st respondent bearing Na.Ka.A3/1627/2012 dated 18.12.2012 culminating in his impugned proceedings bearing Na.Ka.A3/1627/2012 dated 27.12.2012, quash the same and direct the 1st respondent to take action in accordance with law against the 4th respondent on the basis of the complaints and representations given by the petitioners. For Pet...
Tamilselvi Vs. K.Viswanathan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:22. / 07 /2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN Crl.R.C.Nos.894 of 2011 & 1239 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 1.Tamilselvi 2.Minor V.Sabarinath, S/o.Viswanathan, Rep. by his next friend, Mother Tamilselvi, Both at Door No.132, Muniappan Koil Street, Kunjankadu, Ammapet, Salem - 636 003. ... Petitioner in Crl.R.C.No.894 of 2011 & respondents in Crl.R.C.No.1239 of 2010 Vs. K.Viswanathan ... Respondent in Crl.R.C.No.894 of 2011 & petitioner in Crl.R.C.No.1239 of 2010 PRAYER in Crl.R.C.No.894 of 2011: Criminal Revision is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., against the order of the Family Court made in M.C.No.43 of 2006, dated 13.04.2010, ordering meagre amount for maintenance of the petitioners. PRAYER in Crl.R.C.No.1239 of 2010: Criminal Revision is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records of the order passed by the Family Court, Salem in M.C.No.43 of 2006, dated 13.04.2010 and set-as...
A.K.Balakrishnapillai Vs. Narasimhan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.07.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.(NPD) No.2098 of 2013 A.K.Balakrishnapillai .Petitioner ..vs.1. Narasimhan 2. Sivakumar 3. Chakkarapani 4. Dr.S.Subramanian 5. Prakash 6. M/s.Hindustan Plastic & Engineer Tools, ( 1 to 6 are not necessary party ) 7. N.Janakiraman .Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C.to direct X Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai to dispose of the E.A.No.4843 of 2006 in E.P.No.1848 of 2003 in O.S.No.2888 of 1973 within a stipulated time fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : M/s.F.X.A.F.Denny For Respondents : RR1 to R6-(not necessary party) Mr.R.Thiagarajan for R7 ORDER This civil revision petition is filed seeking for an early disposal of E.A.No.4843 of 2006 in E.P.No.1848 of 2003 in O.S.No.2888 of 1973. 2.The petitioner before this court is the petitioner in the said E.A.and decree holder in the said suit. The suit is one for partitio...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. New Ambadi Estates Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 22.07.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Ms.Justice K.B.K.VASUKI Tax Case (Appeal) Nos.1031 and 1032 of 2004 --- Commissioner of Income Tax Chennai-III .Appellant in both TC (Appeals) -versus M/s.New Ambadi Estates Pvt.Ltd Chennai-600 001 .Respondent in both TC (Appeals) Tax Case Appeals filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'B' Bench dated 23.04.2003 in ITA.No.278/Mds/97 & 1732/Mds/2000 for the assessment years 1993-94 and 1994-95. For appellant : Mr.N.V.Balaji Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department. For respondent : Mr.M.P.Senthil Kumar for M/s.Philip George COMMON JUDGMENT (The Judgment of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, J.) The following substantial questions of law are raised by the Revenue in the present Tax Case (Appeals) preferred as against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ch...
M.Veerakandan Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :22. 07.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.No.13730 of 2013 & M.P.No.1 of 2013 M.Veerakandan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.State Rep. By The Secretary, Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Secretariat, Chennai -9. 2.Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai 28. 3.District Registrar, Registration Department, West Shanmugapuram, Villupuram Town, Villupuram District. .. Respondents Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 2nd respondent in his Charge Memo No.16008/V1/2010-2 dated 08.03.2013 and to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Krishnamoorthy For Respondents : Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan, Special Govt. Pleader ORDER The petitioner is a night Watchman in the Sub-Registrar Office, Santhiamangalam, Gingee Taluk. Subsequently, he was transferred to serve in the same capacity of night watchm...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »