Chennai Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Ramasamy Vs. R.Subramani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED2307.2013 CORAM:- THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE K. RAVICHANDRABAABU Civil Revision Petition (NPD)NO.909 of 2007 and M.P.No.1 of 2007 .........R.Ramasamy @ Srinivasan .Petitioner Vs.R.Subramani .Respondent Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C.To set aside the order passed in E.P.No.58 of 2006 in O.S.No.294 of 2001, dated 5.2.2007 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Dharapuram. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondent : M/S.V.N.S.Law Firms ........ORDER This civil revision petition is filed against the order of arrest made by the Executing Court in E.P.No.58 of 2006 in O.S.No.294 of 2001 on the file of the Sub Court, Dharapuram. 2. The petitioner is the judgment debtor. The respondent herein filed a suit against the petitioner in O.S.No.294 of 2001 seeking for recovery of money based on a promissory note. The said suit was decreed on 14.6.2005. Thereafter, the decree holder filed an execution petition in E.P.No.58 of 2006 on 07.7.2006. ...
Dolly Deniese Vs. Don Bosco Matriculation Higher Secondary School
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:23. 7-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH O.S.A.No.24 of 2010 Dolly Deniese .. Appellant Versus 1. Don Bosco Matriculation Higher Secondary School Rep. By its Principal, Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai.2. Mr.Packia Raj Rayan Rector and Correspondent, Don Bosco Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai.3. S.Suja Women Christian College, College Road, Chennai-34. .. Respondents Prayer: Original Side Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order, dated 5.10.2009, passed in C.S.No.116 of 1999. For Appellant : Mr.N.D.Bahety For Respondents : Mr.A.Immanuel (R1 and R2) JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by M.Jaichandren,J.) This Original Side Appeal, in O.S.A.No.24 of 2010, had been filed against the judgment and decree, dated 5.10.2009, passed by the learned single Judge of this C...
Government of Tamil Nadu Vs. N.Ravichandran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:23. 07/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH Writ Appeal No.2032 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2011 1. The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. By the Secretary, Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly Secretariat Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.2. The Secretary to Government, Finance Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. .. Appellants Versus N.Ravichandran .. Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act, seeking to set aside the order dated 18.3.2011, made in W.P.No.16381 of 2009. For Appellants : Mr.P.H.Arvind Pandian, Additional Advocate General V Assisted by Mr.P.Karthikeyan For Respondent : Mr.Balan Haridas JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by M.Jaichandren,J.) This writ appeal has been filed against the order of the learned single Judge, dated 18.3.2011, made in W.P.No.16381 of 2009. The petitioner in the said writ petition is the respondent in the...
Eatman Foods India Private Limited Vs. Savorit Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 23.07.2013 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice M.JAICHANDREN and The Honourable Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH Original Side Appeal Nos.419 & 420 of 2012 & M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2012 1. Eatman Foods India Private Limited, rep. by its Managing Director Mr.P.Subramanian, 264, Gandhi Nagar, Chinniampalayam Post, Erode-638 104. 2. Veg Trading Company, represented by its Managing Partner, Mr.P.Subramaniam, No.105E, Prakasam Street, Erode-638 001.Appellants in both OSAs. versus M/s Savorit Ltd., rep. by its Managing Director, No.2, S.N.Street, Tollgate, Chennai-600081.Respondent in both OSAs. Original Side Appeals filed under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules, 1956, read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the common order dated 06.07.2012 passed in O.A.No.411of 2012 and O.A.No.412 of 2012 in C.S.No.325 of 2012. For appellants in both OSAs. : Mr.Perumbulavil Radhakrishnan For respondent in both OSAs. : Mr.K.Rajasekaran COMMON JU...
Mala Vs. Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:23. 7.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM H.C.P.No.2620 of 2012 Tmt.Mala .. Petitioner Vs.1. The Inspector of Police, Bagalur Police Station, Krishnagiri District, (Cr.No.15/1998).2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Vellore. .. Respondents Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to direct the respondents to produce the corpus of the detenu, by name A.Ravikumar @ Kutti Ravi, son of Annaiappa, now lodged at Central Prison, Vellore, before this Court and set him at liberty as per the amended provision of Section 4 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Amendment Act, 2006 as Juvenile at the time of commission of offence, dated 15.1.1998. For petitioner : Mr.S.Doraisamy For respondents: Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, Addl.P.P. ORDER (The order of the Court was made by V.Dhanapalan,J) The Habe...
Malliah Vs. Kaluveeraiah
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23.07.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.(NPD) No.301 of 2007 Malliah .Petitioner ..vs.1. Kaluveeraiah 2. Badrammal 3. Kenchappa 4. Rudramma 5. Basamma 6. Girijamma 7. Madevamma 8. Parvathamma 9. Sadasivam .Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C.to set aside the fair and decretal order dated 09.10.2000 in I.A.No.260/1999 in O.S.No.35/1993 on the file of the District Munsif, Denkanikottai, Dharmapuri District. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Selvakumar For Respondents : Mr.K.Selvarajan for R2 No Appearance for R1 and R9 Not prepared for R3 to R8 ORDER It is represented that the above civil revision petition has become infructuous in view of the subsequent development. An endorsement is also made to that effect. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. vri To The District Munsif Denkanikottai Dharmapuri District...
1.Mariammal Vs. 1.Subbuthai3.Chellathi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:22. 07/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM SA(MD)No.255 of 2010 and MP(MD)No.2 of 2010 1.Mariammal 2.Ramakrishnan .. Appellants/Respondents 3 & 4 /Defendants 3 & 4 Vs 1.Subbuthai .. Respondent/Appellant/Plaintiff 2.Ayyammal 3.Chellathiah .. Respondents/Respondents 1 & 2/ Defendants 1 & 2 Second Appeal filed under section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and decree dated 20.01.2009 passed in Appeal Suit No.70 of 2007 by the Sub Court, Kovilpatti reversing the Judgment and decree dated 12.03.2007 passed in Original Suit No.86 of 2005 by the District Munsif Court, Kovilpatti. !For Appellant ... Mr.B.Rajesh Saravanan ^For R - 1 ... Mr.T.V.Sivakumar For RR - 2 & 3 ... No appearance :JUDGMENT This Second Appeal has been directed against the Judgment and decree dated 20.01.2009 passed in Appeal Suit No.70 of 2007 by the Sub Court, Kovilpatti, wherein the Judgment and decree dated 12.03.2007 passed in Original Sui...
Meerabai Vs. S.R.Sadasivam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 22.07.2013 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.Nos.2611 & 2612 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2013 C.R.P.No.2611/2013 ------------------ Meerabai (since deceased Represented by LR daughter) D.Nagamallika Devi .Petitioner -versus 1.S.R.Sadasivam 2.S.Sagajanandham 3.S.Muthukumar 4.S.Shanmugam 5.S.Santhanam 6.S.Ramanadham .Respondents (Cause title accepted vide order dated 10.07.2013 made in M.P.No.1/2013 in C.R.P.S.R.No.46841/2013) Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the judgment and decree dated 28.02.1990 passed in O.S.No.54 of 1986 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ponneri and allow the Civil Revision Petition. C.R.P.No.2611/2013 ------------------ Meerabai (since deceased Represented by LR daughter) D.Nagamallika Devi .Petitioner -versus 1.S.R.Sadasivam 2.S.R.Sankaralingam (Deceased) Rep. By L.R S.Kumar 3.S.R.Sankaralingam (Deceased) Re...
G.Chandrasekar Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :- 22.07.2013 Coram The HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.No.19273 of 2013 G.Chandrasekar ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Chennai 600 104. 2.Union of India Owning Southern Railway, Rep. by its FA & CAO (Revising Authority), Southern Railway, Chennai 600 003. 3.Union of India Owning Southern Railway, Rep. by its Senior A/FA&CAO/S&W/PER, Ayanavaram, New Joint Office, Southern Railway, Chennai 600023. ... Respondents Prayer : The Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the first respondent in O.A.No.970 of 2012, dated 28.06.2013 and quash the same as illegal and unlawful besides unsustainable in law or facts and consequently, direct the respondents to reinstate the applicant into service with all such pecuniary benefits service ...
R.Parvathi Vs. V.Mohan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 22.07.2013 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.No.2156 of 2013 R.Parvathi .Petitioner -versus 1. V.Mohan 2. The Executive Officer, Anandapuram Town Panchayat, Gingee Taluk, Villupuram District.Respondents Prayer : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code against the order dated 28.03.2012 made in I.A.No.486 of 2012 in I.A.No.2125 of 2011 in O.S.No.291 of 2009 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Gingee. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Bhiman ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order refusing an adjournment. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 3.A perusal of the impugned order dated 28.03.2012 shows that the Court below has refused to adjourn the case on the reason that the petitioner is trying to drag on the proceedings. Whether the petitioner is trying to drag on the proceedings or not, the fact remains that such refusal to grant adjournment...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »