Chennai Court July 2013 Judgments
P. Saravana Kumar, Vs. 1. the Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:25. 07/2013 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. MANIKUMAR Writ Petition (MD) No.11964 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013 P. Saravana Kumar, S/o. M. Pitchai (Late), Head Constable (2647), 20, Suyarajyapuram 5th Street, Cellur, Madurai - 2. .. Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.2. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the second respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.Aa4/2592/2009 dated 03.08.2012 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to give suitable appointment to the petitioner. !For Petitioner ... Mr. F. Deepak ^For Respondents ... Mr. S. Chandrasekar Government Advocate - - - - - - - - :ORDER Mr. S. Chandrasekar, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents.2. The petitioner has filed ...
Tag this Judgment!K.Venkatesan Vs. Director of Town Panchayat
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.07.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJ.W.P.Nos.8131 & 8132 of 2008 K.Venkatesan .Petitioner in W.P.No.8131 of 2008 M.Velmurugan .Petitioner in W.P.No.8132 of 2008 -versus 1. The Director of Town Panchayat Kuralagam, Chennai-108 2. The Executive Officer Kannamangalam Town Panchayat Kannamangalam, T.V.Malai District Respondents in both the W.Ps. Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the order passed by the fiRs.respondent issued in Na.Ka.No.18235/2007/A3 dated 19.11.2007 and quash the same and direct the respondents to grant regular time scale of pay to the petitioners with effect from 1.12.2000 and 1.5.2001 respectively as per the orders issued in G.O.Ms.No.84, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department dated 21.5.98 and on the basis of the proceedings of the fiRs.respondent issued in Na.Ka.No.21379/24715/97-...
Tag this Judgment!Sivaraman Vs. 1.M.Punithavathi2.R.Peranjiya Pillai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25/07/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH Appeal Suit No.271 of 1997 Sivaraman ..Appellant/ Plaintiff Vs 1.M.Punithavathi 2.R.Peranjiya Pillai ..Respondents/ Defendants Appeal suit has been filed under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, against the judgment and decree, dated 29.03.1993, passed in O.S.No.68 of 1981 by the Subordinate Judge, Thanjavur. !For appellant ..No appearance ^For 1st respondent ..Mr.T.V.Sivakumar For 2nd respondent ..M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates :JUDGMENT Though the appeal was adjourned to several occasions, the learned counsel for the appellant was not ready and therefore, this Court on 11.06.2013 directed the Registry to post the appeal ".for dismissal". on 20.06.2013. When the matter came up for hearing on 20.06.2013, learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo, reporting 'no instructions'. This Court, after recording the same, ordered notice to the appellant. Accordingly, n...
Tag this Judgment!Meganathan Vs. Vijayakumari
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25. 07.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA S.A.No.268 of 2013 Meganathan .. Appellant vs.1. Vijayakumari 2. The Commissioner Salem City Municipal Corporation Salem 636 001. .. Respondents This second appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 16.10.2012 passed by the learned II Additional Subordinate Judge, Salem in A.S.No.77 of 2012 in reversing the judgment and decree dated 01.02.2012 passed by the learned I Additional District Munsif, Salem in O.S.No.1290 of 2008. For Appellant : Mr.I.C.Vasudevan for Mr.R.Nalliyappan For Respondent : Mr.V.Sekar for R1 R2 No appearance JUDGMENT This second appeal is focussed by the plaintiff, inveighing the judgement and decree dated 16.10.2012 passed by the learned II Additional Subordinate Judge, Salem in A.S.No.77 of 2012 in reversing the judgment and decree dated 01.02.2012 passed by the learned I Additional District Munsif, Salem in O.S.No.1290 of 2008.2. The parties, for t...
Tag this Judgment!Krishnasamy Vs. Kannika
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25.07.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.(NPD) No.2883 of 2008 Krishnasamy .Petitioner ..vs.Kannika .Respondent Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article section 25 of the Pondicherry Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1969 against the judgment and decree dated 14.11.2007 made in R.C.A.No.5/2007 on the file of the Court of the Appellate Authority under Rent Control Act (Principal District Judge) at Puducherry, reversing the order dated 27.10.2006 made in H.R.C.O.P.No.45/2003 on the file of the court of the Rent Controller, Puducherry. For Petitioner : Mr.T.P.Manoharan For Respondent : Mr.R.Subramanian ORDER The revision petitioner is the landlord. The respondent is the tenant. The landlord is aggrieved against the judgment and decree made by the learned Rent Control Appellate Authority in dismissing his application for eviction sought on the ground of willful default. 2.The case of the landlord/pe...
Tag this Judgment!Marysharmila Vs. District Collector of Thiruvannamalai District
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:25. 07.2013 Coram The Honourable Mr. Justice M. VENUGOPAL W.P. No.1774 of 2010 Marysharmila .. Petitioner ..Vs..1. The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.2. Personal Assistant of the District Collector, Thiruvannamala District Collectorate Office, Thiruvannamala District, Thiruvannamala.3. The Commissioner, Arni Panchayat Union, Arni, Thiruvannamala District. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records in Na.Ka.Va.Aa.1/5293/08 on the file of the third respondent and to quash the order dated 25.6.2009 and may also pleased to issue writ of mandamus directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner as post of Noon Meal Organizer at Vettiyanthoyuvam Government Higher Secondary School, Arani, Thiruvannamalai District. For Petitioner : Dr. G. Krishnamurthy For Respondents : Mr. R. Lakshmi Narayanan, Addl...
Tag this Judgment!Dharani Ammal Vs. Ethiraju
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 25.07.2013 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.No.2760 of 2013 Dharani Ammal .Petitioner -versus 1. Ethiraju 2. Yogeswaran 3. Rukmangathan 4. Rajalakshmi 5. Yasodha .Respondents Prayer : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to allow the revision petition by directing the learned District Munsif, Chengalpattu not to grant repeated long adjournments and instead of that dispose of I.A.No.543 of 2012 in I.A.No.316 of 2000 in O.S.No.203 of 1986 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Chengalpattu at earliest within a time frame by this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.T.S.Sivakumar ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking for a direction to the Court below to dispose of I.A.No.543 of 2012 in I.A.No.316 of 2000 in O.S.No.203 of 1986 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Chengalpattu. 2.The petitioner herein has filed the said application under Section 5 of th...
Tag this Judgment!Dr.W.B.Vasantha Vs. Indian Institute of Technology
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25. 07.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.Nos.4256 of 1997, 4257 of 1997 & 3249 of 2000 and W.P.M.P.Nos.7105 of 1997, 7107 of 1997 & 2850 of 1998 W.P.No.4256 of 1997 Dr.W.B.Vasantha .. Petitioner - Vs - 1. The Chairman & Board of Governors, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras 600 036.2. The Director, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras 600 036.3. Dr.S.N.Majhi 4. Dr.S.A.Choudam 5. Dr.S.G.Kamath 6. Dr.A.Rangan 7. Dr.N.V.C.Swamy 8. The Registrar, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras 600 036. .. Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the selection held for the faculty positions pursuant to the Advertisement No.IITM/R/95, dated 06.01.1995, quash the same and direct the respondents 1 and 2 to select the petitioner as Associate Professor in a duly constituted Selection Comm...
Tag this Judgment!Darsana Bai Vs. C.Saroja
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25. 07.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU CRP.NPD.No.1974 of 2003 1.Darsana Bai(died) 2.Shanbagavalli 3.Ranjani ...Petitioners Vs. 1.C.Saroja 2.C.Lakshmanan 3.C.Damodaran 4.C.Purushothaman 5.C.Shankar 6.C.Shanthakumari 7.C.S.Hemavathi 8.C.Jamuna 9.C.Pushpa 10.C.Kumar 11.C.Kasthuri 12.C.Rani 13.Sridhar 14.Karthik 15.Panjalai 16.Mani 17.Sakunthala ..Respondents Respondents 13 to 17 are given up. . Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order passed by the learned VII Additional Judge,City Civil Court,Chennai in A.S.No.136 of 2001 against O.S.No.7273 of 1996 dated 10.10.2003 in Check slip No.66/XXVI/C.C.Ct. For Petitioners: Mr.S.Subbiah For Respondents 1 to 5,8,10 to 12: Mr.R.Selvakumar :Mr.S.Pattabiraman(Assisted the Court) Government Pleader(CS) ----- ORDER Petitioners are the defendants in O.S.No.7273 of 1996 on the file of City Civil Court, Chennai and appellants in A.S...
Tag this Judgment!V.Kuppusamy Vs. K.S.Nallathambi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :25. 07.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.SUDANTHIRAM Crl.A.No.743 of 2012 V.Kuppusamy .. Appellant/Complainant Vs. K.S.Nallathambi .. Respondent/Accused PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 378 of Cr.P.C., against the order of acquittal, dated 19.07.2012 made in C.C.No.21 of 2012 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track No.1, Erode. *** For Appellant : Mr.A.Thiyagarajan For Respondent : No appearance JUDGMENT The appellant herein filed a private complaint against the respondent for an offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act 1881. The learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track No.1, Erode, passed an order, dated 19.07.2012 dismissing the complaint under Section 256 of Cr.P.C., for the reason that the complainant was not present and accordingly acquitted the accused. Challenging the said order of acquittal, the Complainant had preferred this Criminal Appeal before this Court.2. Though notice has been served on the...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »