Chennai Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
E.Govindarajulu Vs. B.Rajeswari
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 19.07.2013 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.No.2616 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 E.Govindarajulu ..Petitioner -versus B.Rajeswari ..Respondent Prayer : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 as amended by Act 23 of 1973 and Act 1 of 1980 against the order dated 12.03.2013 made in R.C.A.No.159 of 2006 by VII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai confirming the decree and judgment dated 09.12.2005 in R.C.O.P.No.213 of 2005 by X Judge, Court of Small Causes, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arivazhagan For Respondent : Mr.G.Saravanan ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the tenant challenging the order of eviction passed concurrently by the Courts below. The respondent/landlady filed the eviction petition on the ground of onus occupation. 2.Today the petitioner filed an affidavit before this Court expressing his willingness to vacate t...
M.G.Mugunthakumar Vs. Registrar of Coop Societies
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :19. 7.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN Writ Petition No.19579 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2013 M.G.Mugunthakumar ... Petitioner vs.1. The Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Kilpauk, Chennai-10.2. The Manager, Kancheepuram Central Co-operative Bank, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram.3. E.Krishnamoorthy 4. The Inspector of Police, Melamaruvathur Police Station, Melamaruvathur, Kancheepuram District. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to accept the nomination of the 3rd respondent for the post of President of the Kancheepuram District Central Co-operative Bank and to conduct free and fair election for the same. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Gnanasekar For Respondents : Mr.P.H.Aravind Pandian, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram, Special Government Pleader (Co-op.) ORDER The petition...
C.Senthilkumar Vs. Secretary to the Govt
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :19. 07.2013 C O R A M : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.14880 of 2013 C.Senthilkumar .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Secretary to the Govt., Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Chennai. 2.The Registrar, Dr.Ambedkar Law University, Chennai. 3.The Principal, The Govt. Law College, Coimbatore. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to appoint the petitioner as Assistant Public Prosecutor Grade II in the Tamil Nadu General Service 2010-2011 vide Regn.No.00201241 by direct recruitment duly called for in Notification No.6 of 2012, dated 2.4.2012, under preferential basis for having studied in Tamil Medium. ----- For petitioner : Mr.D.Ashok Kumar For respondents : Ms.C.N.G.Niraimathi for R1. Mr.V.M.G.Ramakannan for R2 Mr.R.Ravichandran, AGP for R3. ----- ORDER This writ petition has been filed praying that thi...
Mangali Vs. Sakku Bai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:19.7.2013 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice G.RAJASURIA S.A.No.710 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 1.Mangali 2.Malliga ...Appellants versus Sakku Bai(deceased) 1.Paramanandam ...Respondent This second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 10.1.2013 passed by the XVI Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai, in A.S.No.436 of 2012 in confirming the judgment and decree dated 03.10.2012 passed by the X Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai, in E.A.No.9971 of 2010 in E.P.No.3492 of 1988. For Appellants : Mr.S.V.Jayaraman,Sr.Counsel for Mr.P.Devadas Associates For Respondent :Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath JUDGMENT This Second appeal is focussed by the defendants/judgment debtors animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 10.1.2013 passed by the XVI Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai, in A.S.No.436 of 2012 in confirming the judgment and decree dated 03.10.2012 passed by the X Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai, in E.A.No.9971 of 2010 i...
Subramani Gounder Vs. Meenatchi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 19.07.2013 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.No.3814 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 1.Subramani Gounder 2.Mrs.Rajathi ..Petitioners -versus Meenatchi ..Respondent Prayer : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code against the order and decreetal order dated 14.08.2012 passed in I.A.No.268/2012 in O.S.No.149/2010 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam & Taluk, Villupuram District. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Thanjan For Respondents : Mr.N.Paul Sundarsingh for M/s.Paul & Paul ORDER The present Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioners who are the proposed parties before the Court below. Their application seeking to condone the delay of 219 days in bringing them as proposed plaintiffs in the place of the decreased sole plaintiff was dismissed. Originally the suit in O.S.No.149 of 2010 on the file of the Sub Court, Tindivanam was filed by one Elangovan ag...
Kshatriya Vidhyasala Matriculation Higher Secondary School Vs. Governm ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :19. 07.2013 Coram The HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P. Nos. 1458 to 1463, 1821, 2422, 2826, 3283 to 3285, 3662, 4586, 4587, 4622, 4927, 4930, 5694, 5900, 5901, 5906, 7732, 9141, 9589, 9887, 10002 and 14731 of 2013 W.P.No.1458 to 1463 of 2013: --------------------------- Kshatriya Vidhyasala Matriculation Higher Secondary School, rep. by its Correspondent B.Ramkumar, Collectorate Post, Virudhunagar-626 002. .. Petitioner in W.P.1458/2013 Mepco Schienk Matriculation Higher Secondary School, rep. by its Correspondent D.Singaravel, Maravankulam, Thirumangalam-625 706 Madurai. .. Petitioner in W.P.1459/2013 Mepco Schienk Nursery and Primary School, rep. by its Correspondent D.Singaravel, 333/1, Madurai Road, Thirumangalam-625 706 .. Petitioner in W.P.1460/2013 T.S.T.Rajah Girl's Matriculation Higher Secondary School, (Managed by K.C.S.N.M.E.I. Committee) rep. by its Secretary & Correspo...
Union of India Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :- 19.07.2013 Coram The HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.No.32241 of 2012 1.Union of India, Rep. by its Divisional Railway Manager, Southern Railway, Salem. 2.Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Southern Railway, Salem. 3.Deputy Commercial Manager, (wrongly shown as Deputy Commercial Manager), Southern Railway, Salem. ... Petitioner vs. 1.The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Chennai 600 104. 2.M.Devan ... Respondents Prayer : The Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the entire records of the first respondent in O.A.No.672 of 2010, including the award dated 11.07.2012 and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.Mr.V.Radhakrishnan, Senior counsel for Mr.V.G.Sureshkumar For Respondents : Mr.Mr.Balan Haridas For R2 ***** ORDER R.BANUMATHI, J.& T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.The challenge in this writ p...
V.Periyasamy Vs. Director of School Education
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :19. 07.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.P.No.2737 of 2010 V.Periyasamy .. Petitioner Vs 1. The Director of School Education, Chennai 6.2. The Chief Educational Officer, Villupuram, Villupuram District.3. The Head Master, Government Boys Higher Secondary School, Chinna Salem, Villupuram District. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd and 3rd respondents to sanction the incentive increment based on the order of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.14341 to 14349 of 2007 dated 18.12.2008 immediately to the Petitioner. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.P.S.Shiva Shanmuga Sundaram No.1 to 3 Additional Government Pleader ORDER The Petitioner has focused the present Writ Petition praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamaus by this Court in directing the 2nd and 3rd Respondents to sanction incentive increment based on the orde...
Jeyam Vs. 1.Minor Rejimoon
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:19. 07/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM SA(MD)No.125 of 2010 and MP(MD)Nos.1 & 2 of 2010 Jeyam .. Appellant/2nd Respondent/2nd Defendant Vs 1.Minor Rejimoon 2.Minor Athira (rep.by father Dennis) 4.Dennis .. Respondents/Appellants 1 to 4/ Plaintiffs 1 to 4 5.Rajeswari .. Respondent/1st Respondent/ 1st Defendant Second Appeal filed under section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and decree dated 06.02.2009 passed in Appeal Suit No.50 of 2006 by the Sub Court, Kuzhithurai reversing the Judgment and decree dated 24.02.2006 passed in Original Suit No.376 of 2002 by the First Additional District Munsif Court, Kuzhithurai. !For Appellant ... Mr.A.Arumugam ^For RR - 1 to 4 ... Mr.K.N.Thambi For R - 5 ... No appearance :JUDGMENT This Second Appeal has been directed against the Judgment and decree dated 06.02.2009 passed in Appeal Suit No.50 of 2006 by the Sub Court, Kuzhithurai, wherein the Judgment and decree dated 24.02.2006 p...
Mrs. V. Nalini Kumari and Others Vs. Union of India, Rep. by â Mi ...
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
V. Periya Karuppiah, Member (Judicial): 1. This application has been filed by the applicants seeking for grant of maintenance allowance at 33% per month (22% for the wife and 11% each for both the children) of the pay and allowances of 4th respondent i.e. Rs.15,000/- per month with arrears with effect from December, 2009; to make endorsement of the name of the 1st applicant for family pension, and to grant other benefits like Canteen Smart Card, ECHS Card etc. and any other justifiable relief. 2. The case of the applicants as stated in the application would be as follows :- The 1st applicants husband is the 4th respondent. He was enrolled in the Indian Army, promoted as Subedar and was posted at 38 Assault Engineer Regiment (the 3rd respondent) and now the 4th respondent was at the verge of retirement from service at the time of filing this application. The marriage between the 1st applicant and the 4th respondent was solemnised on 13.12.1988 as per Christian customs and rites. They li...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »