Chennai Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Ravi Sankar Vs. Skyline Financial Services Madras Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25.06.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.(NPD) No.97/2010 R.Ravi Sankar .Petitioner ..vs.Skyline Financial Services Madras Pvt Ltd., Rep. by its Assistant Manager, N.Ranganathan, W-124, 3rd Avenue, Anna Nagar, Chennai-40.Respondent Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C.against the order dated 24.04.2009 passed in I.A.No.21070/2008 in O.S.No.3798/2007 on the file of the XIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Balakrishnan For Respondent : Mr.B.S.Jothiraman ORDER This civil revision petition is filed against the order made in I.A.No.21070 of 2008 in O.S.No.3798 of 2007 on the file of the XIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai wherein and whereby the application filed by the petitioner herein under section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking to condone the delay of 350 days in filing the set aside petition came to be rejected. 2.The petitioner before t...
P.Perumal Vs. Additional Commissioner Revenue Administration
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :25. 06.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.12323 of 2009 P.Perumal .. Petitioner -vs- 1. The Additional Commissioner (Revenue Administration) Chepauk Chennai 600 005 2. The District Collector Dharmapuri 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Dharmapuri 4. Mrs.S.Manimegalai Former Tahsildar Palacode 5. Mr.Kuppan Former Revenue Inspector Palacode (Petition dismissed as withdrawn as against R5 vide order of Court dt. 31.1.2012) .. Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.Mu.Mu.Pani.No.5(2) 11194/08 dated 5.3.2009 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the third respondent to declare that the petitioner has already retired from service and to direct the third respondent to release all the retirement benefits entitled for the petitioner. For Petitioner ::...
V.Saravankumar Vs. M.Parameshwari
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-25-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:25. 06/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DEVADASS Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (MD)No.152 of 2012 V.Saravankumar ... Appellant/Petitioner Vs M.Parameshwari ... Respondent/Respondent Civil Miscellaneous appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 against the order, dated 29.06.2010, made in HMOP No.156/2007 on the file of the Family Court, Madurai. !For Appellant ... Mr. PT.S.Narendravasan ^For Respondent ... Mr. V.Bharathidasan :JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was made by P.DEVADASS, J.]. Since the Family Court, Madurai, refused divorce, the husband is before us with this appeal.2. The appellant/husband wants to bid farewell to his wife permanently, since, according to him, she has caused him cruelty and also deserted him. Thus, he has structured his petition under Section 13(1)(i-a) and (i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The charge against his wife is that she kept ...
R.Vasudevan Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :25. 06.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.No.16999 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2013 R.Vasudevan .. Petitioner Vs.1. The Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010.2. The Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Dharmapuri Region, 2nd Cross Street, Appavu Nagar, Dharmapuri District.3. The Dharmapuri District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd., Head Office, rep by its Special Officer, Salem Bye pass Road, Dharmapuri. .. Respondents This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order made in Na.Ka. 2998/ 2010/ Sa. Pa. dated 17.5.2011 by the 2nd respondent, order made in Na. Ka. No.1609/2001(2) U. May (Nee), dated 27.1.2012 passed by the 3rd respondent and the order made in Na.Ka. 11530/2012/Sa.Pa.1, dated 7.2.2012 passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same a...
Santhoshkumar Vs. Sub-inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:25. 06-2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH H.C.P.No.706 of 2013 Santhoshkumar ... Petitioner Vs.1. The Sub-Inspector of Police Kumarapalayam town Police Station Kumarapalayam Namakkal District.2. S. Perumal 3. Nagarathinam ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of habeas corpus by directing respondents 2 and 3 to produce the petitioner's wife namely Indumathi, aged about 25 years before this Court who is under the illegal detention of 2 & 3 respondents and hand over the custody of petitioner's wife to the petitioner and pass orders. For petitioner :: Mr. A. Gouthaman For respondents :: Mr. A.N. Thambidurai, A.P.P.for R1 Mr. C. Ram Kumar for RR2 & 3 ORDER (Order of the Court is made by M.JAICHANDREN,J.) This habeas corpus petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and...
1.V.Narasimma Naidu Vs. 1.Thirumalaisamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-25-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:25. 06/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM SA(MD)No.90 of 2010, and Cross Obj(MD)No.23 of 2010 and MP(MD)No.1 of 2010 SA(MD)No.90 of 2010 1.V.Narasimma Naidu 2.N.Sathish Kumar 3.N.Jagadesh Kumar 4.N.Amulraj .. Appellants/Appellants/Defendants Vs. 1.Thirumalaisamy 2.Sasikala 3.Manjula 4.Saravanan .. Respondents/Respondents/Plaintiffs Second Appeal filed under section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and decree dated 23.04.2009 passed in Appeal Suit No.36 of 2008 by the Additional District Court/Fast Track Court, Dindigul modifying the Judgment and decree dated 15.07.2008 passed in Original Suit No.95 of 2005 by the Principal Sub Court, Dindigul. Cross Objection No.23 of 2010:1. Thirumalaisamy 2.Sasikala 3.Manjula 4.Saravanan .. Cross Objectors/Respondents/ Respondents/Plaintiffs vs 1.V.Narasimma Naidu 2.N.Sathish Kumar 3.N.Jagadesh Kumar 4.N.Amulraj .. Respondents/Appellants/ Appellants/Defendants Cross Objection filed under O...
Chinnaponnu Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:25. 06-2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH H.C.P.No.659 of 2013 Chinnaponnu @ Chinna Pillai .. Petitioner Vs.1. State rep. by The Sub-Inspector of Police All Women Police Station Mettur Dam Salem District.2. Chinnathambi 3. Palaniyammal .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of habeas corpus directing the first respondent to secure the petitioner's minor daughter Vennila (aged 15 years) D/o. Chinnathambi, who under the illegal custody of the 3rd respondent Palaniyammal and produce before this Court and hand over to the petitioner. For petitioner :: Mr. B. Vasudevan For respondents :: Mr. A.N. Thambidurai, A.P.P.for R1 Mr. M.R. Jothimanian for RR2 to 4 ORDER (Order of the Court is made by M.JAICHANDREN,J.) This habeas corpus petition has been filed by the mother of the detenue stating that her minor daughter, namely, Vennil...
C.Balakrishnan Vs. Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.06.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.No.10848 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 1.C.Balakrishnan 2.M.Manoharan .Petitioners versus 1.The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9. 2.The Director of Town Panchayat, Kuralagam Buildings, Chennai-108. 3.The Executive Officer, Thingal Nagar Town Panchayat, Thingal Nagar, Kanyakumari District.Respondents This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 27.7.2006 issued in Na.Ka.No.3051/ 2006/A3 and the proceedings of the 3rd respondent dated 23.8.2006 issued in Na.Ka.No.171/ 2006 and quash the same restricting the date of bringing the Petitioners into time scale with effect from 23.06.2006 onwards alone and to issue consequenti...
Tamilarasan Vs. Pavayammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25.06.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.(NPD) No.2968 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 Tamilarasan .Petitioner ..vs.1.Pavayammal 2.Anbalagan 3.The District Collector, Namakkal District. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mohanoor Road, Namakkal. 5.The Thasildar, Thasildar Office, Koneripatti, Rasipuram-5. 6.The Superintending Engineer (Maintenance and Operation).Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Salem-6. 7.The Assistant Engineer (Maintenance and Operation).Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Tho.Jaderpalayam, Rasipuram.Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to entertain the unnumbered Appeal of 2009 pending on the file of the Principal District Court, Namakkal filed against the judgment and decree dated 20.10.2008 in O.S.No.210 of 2000 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Rasipuram without insisting the petitioner herein to pay the court fee of the original suit in th...
A.P.Gopal Vs. K.Abdul Majid
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25.06.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA S.A.No.555 of 2008 1. A.P.Gopal (deceased) 2. Anusha 3. P.G.Vidyasagar 4. Ranganayaki 5. Srinivasan .Appellants Appellants 2 to 5 are brought on record as legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant vide order of the court dated 7.03.2011 passed in M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2011. vs K.Abdul Majid .Respondent This second appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 04.01.2008 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Salem in A.S.No.21 of 2007 in confirming the judgment and decree dated 16.12.2006 passed by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem in O.S.No.531 of 2002. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondent : Ms.S.Suganthi for Mr.D.Nagasaila JUDGMENT When the matter was taken up on 21.06.2013, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ".for dismissal.". 2. Even to...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »