Chennai Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Reliance Indusries Limited Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 26.06.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Ms.Justice K.B.K.VASUKI Tax Case (Revision) No.31 of 2010 --- Reliance Indusries Limited (Successors of Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Limited) A1 ToweRs.5th Floor 89, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai Mylapore, Chennai-600 004 ...Petitioner (Cause title accepted vide order of Court dated 28.04.2010 in M.P.1/2010 in TC.SR.No.9420/10) -versus The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Commercial Tax Officer Royapettah II Assessment Circle 46, Greenways Road Chennai-600 028 ...Respondent Tax Case Revision filed under Section 38 of TNGST Act, 1959 to revise the order of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Main Bench, Chennai dated 24.10.2009 passed in TA.No.114/2005. For petitioner : Mr.N.Chandirasekar for Mr.N.Prasad For respondent : Mr.V.Haribabu Addl.Govt.Pleader (Tax) ORDER (The Order of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, J.) The assessee is on ...
New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. P.R.Kuppusamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:26. /06 /2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.1132 of 2003 The New India Assurance Company Limited, Guindy Branch 71240, Race View Towers I Floor, 71, Mount Road, Guindy, Madras-30. .. Appellant Vs. 1.P.R.Kuppusamy (deceased) 2.J.Chockalingam 3.J.Shanthi 4.K.Senthilkumar 5.S.Saradha .. Respondents PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, to set-aside the decree and judgment dated 17.08.2001 passed in M.C.O.P.No.1885 of 1993, on the file of Second Judge of Small Causes Court, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chennai-1. For Appellant : Mr.K.Padmanabhan For Respondents : R-1 (died) R-2 (served) Mr.D.Veerasekaran for R-3 to R5 - - - JUDGMENT The brief facts of the case are as follows:- The respondent / claimant was travelling in an auto rickshaw on 28.06.1991, at about 6 p.m., on the Guindy Raj Bhavan Main Road and at that point of time, a van bearing registration No.TMO-4309...
Mariappa Nadar Vs. Dhalls India Corporation
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :26. 06.2013 Coram The Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.S.Ramanathan A.S.No.855 of 1994 M/s.Mariappa Nadar rep. by its Partner M.S.M.Thavamani .. Appellant Vs.1. M/s.Dhalls India Corporation 2. K.Ashokan 3. S.Nagarajan 4. M.Haniff 5. S.Amanullah 6. M.S.Mohideen .. Respondents This Appeal has been filed under Section 96 of C.P.C, against the judgment and decree dated 30.01.1991 passed in O.S.No.479 of 1988 on the file of the IV Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. For Appellant : Mr.L.Manjunath For Respondents 1 to 3, 5 & 6 : No appearance For Respondent- 4 : Mr.Sathish Parasaran JUDGEMENT The plaintiff in O.S.No.479 of 1988, on the file of the IV Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai, is the appellant herein. The plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.44,600/-. 02. The Trial Court, vide judgment dated 30.01.1991, granted decree for a sum of Rs.26,029.12 and refused to grant interest on the said amount from the date of transaction till...
Vasanthi Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :26. 06.2013 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE ELIPE DHARMA RAO AND THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.A.No.1279 of 2010 Vasanthi .. Appellant / Petitioner VS.1. The Life Insurance Corporation of India, Rep. By its Chairman, LIC of India, Central Office, ".Yogaksha, a"., Mumbai 400 021.2. The Zonal Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Southern Zone, Chennai 600 002.3. The Senior Divisional Manager, Vellore Division, L.I.C. of India, Vellore. .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 26.04.2010 in W.P.No.21109 of 2000 passed by the Learned Single Judge. For Appellant : Mr.R.Singaravelan For 2nd Respondent : Mr.V.Parthiban For 1st & 3rd Respondents : Served No appearance JUDGMENT M.VENUGOPAL,J.The Appellant/Petitioner has projected the present Writ Appeal as against the order dated 26.04.2010 in W.P.No.21109 of 2000 passed by the Learned Single Judge in...
S.Muthu Vs. Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :26. 06.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.No.17214 OF2013AND M.P.No.1 of 2013 S.Muthu .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu School Education Department Secretariat, Chennai 9 2. The Director of Elementary Education Chennai 6 3. The District Elementary Educational Officer Virudhunagar 4. The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer Sivakasi Virudhunagar District .. Respondents Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the 2nd respondent herein in Na.Ka.No.04404/E1/2012 dated 05.06.2012 and quash the same insofar as the petitioner is concerned and to issue consequential direction to the respondents herein to promote the petitioner as Assistant Elementary Educational Officer as per seniority construing his 2 years Diploma in Teacher Education as ...
Ganesa Gounder Vs. Chakkaravarthy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :26. 06.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.(PD).No.751 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Ganesa Gounder .. Petitioner Vs.1. Chakkaravarthy 2. Tamilmani 3. Balakrishnan .. Respondents Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 28.07.2011 made in I.A.No.116 of 2010 in A.S.No.4 of 2010 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Gingee. For Petitioners : Mr.N.Mala For Respondents : No appearance ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order made in I.A.No.116 of 2010 in A.S.No.4 of 2010 on the file of Sub-Court, Gingee, wherein and whereby the application filed by the petitioner herein seeking for an appointment of Advocate Commissioner to note down the physical feature of the suit property, was rejected. This Court, on 22.02.2013, issued notice to the respondents in this Civil Revision Petition. Though notice was served on them, both t...
R.Chitrambarathany Pillai Vs. Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED2606.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE T.RAJ.WP.No.6733/2008 R.Chitrambarathany Pillai .Petitioner Versus 1.The Secretary to Government Rural Development Department Fort St. George, Chennai. 2.The Director of Rural Development Saidapet, Chennai-15.Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in its Proc.RC.No.11804/05 EE3 dated 03.05.2007 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondent to fix the petitioner's seniority at the appropriate place by reckoning his absorption in the Rural Development Department from the date of his deputation in 1999. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Stalin Muthu For RR1& 2 : Mr.R.Vijayakumar,AGP ORDER This writ petition is filed by Mr.R.Chitrambarathanu Pillai, challenging the correctness of the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent / Director of Rural Development, Chen...
Tvl.Karthikeyan Mills Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :26. 06.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Ms.Justice K.B.K.VASUKI Tax Case (Revision) No.194 of 2011 --- Tvl.Karthikeyan Mills rep. By its Proprietor Mr.V.Karthikeyan No.12/1, Bye-Pass Road Arcot, Vellore District ...Petitioner -vs- The State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes Vellore Division Vellore ...Respondent Tax Case Revision filed under Section 38 of TNGST Act, 1959 to revise the order of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench, dated 30.04.2008 passed in STA.No.1545/2000. For petitioner : Mr.K.Soundararajan For respondent : Mr.V.Haribabu Addl.Govt.Pleader (Tax) ORDER (The Order of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, J.) The assessee is on revision as against the order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal relating to the assessment year 1996-97 raising the following questions of law :- ".1. Whether the Appellate Tribunal ...
State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Tvl.Bagmull and Co
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :26. 06.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Ms.Justice K.B.K.VASUKI Tax Case (Revision) No.182 of 2011 --- The State of Tamil Nadu rep. By the Deputy Commissioner (Commercial Taxes) Salem Division Salem ...Petitioner -vs- Tvl.Bagmull & Co., 135, Appu Chetty Street Shevapet, Salem ...Respondent Tax Case Revision filed under Section 38 of TNGST Act, 1959 to revise the order of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Additional Bench, Coimbatore dated 27.06.2002 passed in CTA.No.65/2001. For petitioner : Mr.V.Haribabu Addl.Govt.Pleader (Tax) For respondent : Mr.R.Senniappan ORDER (The Order of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, J.) The Revenue is on revision as against the order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal relating to the assessment year 1996-97 raising the following questions of law :- ".1. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is rig...
P.Sakunthala Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-25-2013
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25. 06.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE Mrs.JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.M.AKBAR ALI Rev.Application No.17 of 2013 in C.M.A. No.1976 of 2003 1. P.Sakunthala 2. Minor Deepankumar 3. Minor Prabhu 4. A.Ramasamy Gounder 5. R.Subbathal .. Petitioners Vs.1. The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd., 11 E, V.N.Road, II Floor, Parimalam Complex, Erode.2. Imman Singh 3. R.Palanisamy .. Respondents Review petition filed under Order 47 Rules 1 and 2 of C.P.C. r/w 114 of C.P.C., to review the order made in C.M.A.No.1976 of 2003 dated 26.08.2010 passed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.R.S.Anandan For Respondents : Mr.N.Vijaya Raghavan ORDER G.M. AKBAR ALI,J., The Review petition is filed under Order 47 of Rules 1 and 2 r/w 114 of C.P.C., by the claimants to review the order made in C.M.A.No.1976 of 2003 dated 26.08.2010 passed by this Court.2. The claimants have filed a claim petition before the Tribunal, claiming compensation for the death of one Pala...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »