Chennai Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.Manoharan Vs. Karunamurthy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :27. 06.2013 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.(NPD) No.2557 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 S.Manoharan ... Petitioner Vs. Karunamurthy ... Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed against the fair and decretal order dated 27.2.2012 made in I.A.No.12 of 2012 in A.S.No.161 of 2012 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.III, Coimbatore. For Petitioner :- Ms.P.T.Asha for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates For Respondent :- Mr. V.Venkatasamy ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is filed against an order made in I.A.No.12 of 2012 in A.S.No.161 of 2012 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.3 Coimbatore, wherein and whereby the said application filed by the respondent herein, under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, seeking for amendment of the plaint, was allowed.2. The respondent herein filed a suit in O.S.No.1507 of 2001 on the file of the Sub Court, Coimbatore against the petitioner herein s...
Polaris Financial Technology Limited Vs. Corporation Bank
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27.06.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S. RAJESWARAN W.P.No.2869 of 2013 and M.P.No.2 of 2013 Polaris Financial Technology Limited Represented by its Group Chief Financial Officer Mr.Natarajan Narayanasamy ".POLARIS HOUSE"., 244, Carex Center, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 006.Petitioner versus Corporation Bank, Mangaladevi Temple Road, Mangalore 575 001.Respondent Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the RFP Reference Number 12/2012-2013 dated 12.12.2012 for Core Banking Solution and other application implementation dated 12.12.2012 including addendum and corrigendum-1 to RFP for Core Banking Solution and other application implementation dated 12 January 2013 and quash the same as illegal and unconstitutional. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ramakrishnan For Respondent : Mr.M.Muthukumarasamy Senior Counsel for Mr.S.Sethur...
K.Sengottuvel Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:27. 06.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN Writ Petition No.17281 of 2013 K.Sengottuvel .. Petitioner VS1The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By the Principal Secretary to Government, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The District Collector, Salem District, Salem. 3.The Commissioner, Sankari Panchayat Union, Sankari, Salem District 4.The District Treasury Officer, Salem District, Salem. .. Respondents Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 2 and 3 to fix the selection grade of pay as per the Letter No.63305/ Pay cell/ 2010-1 dated 8.11.2010 and G.O.Ms. No.65 Finance (Pay Cell) Department dated 26.2.2011 issued by the 1st respondent and also to pay the arrears at the rate of 9300-34800+4200 with effect from 1.3.2011 to the petitioner by considering his representation dated 18.3.2013. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Manokaran For Respondents : Mr.V....
Ponnammal Vs. M.Harikrishnan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:27. 06.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA S.A.No.75 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 Ponnammal (died) 1. J.Devadasan 2. J.Gopu 3. J.Punniyakotti 4. J.Manoharan 5. R.Kumaravel .. Appellants vs. M.Harikrishnan .. Respondent This second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 26.08.2010 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Kanchipuram in A.S.No.41 of 2009 in confirming the judgment and decree dated 09.07.2009 passed by the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumbudur in O.S.No.524 of 2008. For Appellants : Mr.M.Ramamoorthy for Mr.M.D.Thirunavukkarasu For Respondent : Mr.M.Venkatachalapathy Senior counsel for Mr.Y.Jyothish Chander JUDGMENT This second appeal is focussed by the defendants, inveighing the judgment and decree dated 26.08.2010 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Kanchipuram in A.S.No.41 of 2009 in confirming the judgment and decree dated 09.07.2009 passed by the learned Distr...
Dr.S.Snekalatha Vs. Department of Public Health
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :27. 06.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN Writ Petition No.17332 of 2013 Dr.S.Snekalatha .. Petitioner v 1.The Director, Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine DMS Campus, Teynampet, Chennai 6. 2.The District Collector, Perambalur. 3.The Deputy Director, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Perambalur. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to proceedings RC.No.1868/NRHM-2/2012, dated 15.06.2012 issued by the 3rd respondent and proceedings R.c.No.A1/8971/2012, dated 08.01.2013 passed by the 2nd respondent herein, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents herein to reinstate the petitioner as a Dental Surgeon on hired basis within a period stipulated by this court. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Seenivasan For Respondents : Mr.V.Subbiah, S.G.P. ORDER Heard both sides.2. The...
V.Ramaiah Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :26. 6.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ELIPE DHARMA RAO AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. VENUGOPAL Tax Case (Appeal) No.123 of 2005 V.Ramaiah .. Appellant Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai. .. Respondent Tax Case Appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench 'C' dated 24.5.2004 in I.T. (S.S.)A.No.72/MDS/1997. * * * For Appellant : Mr. Firoze.B. Andhyarujina Senior Counsel Assisted by Mr.J.Balachander for Ms.R.Vidhya For Respondent : Mr.T. Ravi Kumar Standing Counsel for Income Tax * * * JUDGMENT ELIPE DHARMA RAO, J.The appellant Ramaiah is carrying on real estate business as a property developer in the name of M/s.Barath Building Constructions. He is also the Managing Director of M/s.BBC Associates Limited. On 15.3.1996, a search action under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ".the Act".) was cond...
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Vs. Bharti Airtel Ltd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:26. 06.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Ms.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI Writ Appeal Nos.854 and 855 of 2013 & M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2013 Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, Mahanagar Door Sanchar Bhawan, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Next to Dr.Zakir Hussian College, New Delhi 110 002 .... Appellant in the above W.As Vs. Bharti Airtel Ltd., rep. by its Legal Manager, Mr.Harish Rangarajan .... Respondent in W.A.No.854/2013 Tata Communications Ltd., Through Assistant Manager (HR) V.Geetha .... Respondent in W.A.No.855/2013 APPEALs under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 03.04.2013 extending order dated 24.1.2013 made in M.P.No.2 of 2013 in W.P.No.1875 of 2013; dated 03.04.2013 extending order dated 21.2.2013 made in M.P.No.2 of 2013 in W.P.No.3652 of 2013. For Appellant: Mr.P.Wilson Additional Solicitor General of India II Assisted b...
State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Sitheshkumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :26. 06.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.(PD).No.4637 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its District Collector Salem 2. The District Revenue Officer Salem 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Salem 4. The Tahsildar Salem .. Petitioners Vs. Sitheshkumar .. Respondent Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code against the decreetal order dated 05.02.2010 in R.E.P.No.91 of 2008 in O.S.No.900/1999 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Salem. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Pattabiraman Govt. Advocate (CS) For Respondent : M/s.N.Murali ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order made in R.E.P.No.91 of 2008 in O.S.No.900 of 1999 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Salem wherein and whereby the Court below has granted 30 days time to rectify the mistake committed by the petitioners herein in cancelling the 'D' Card Patta da...
Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd. Vs. Chief Commissioner of Central E ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :26. 06.2013 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM Writ Petition Nos.225, 1008, 1116, 2137, 2643, 2648, 2946, 3948, 3949, 4903, 5899, 5901, 5903, 5905, 6219 and 11346 of 2012 and 1776 of 2013 W.P.No.225 of 2012: ------------------ Mediaone Global Entertainment Ltd., A company registered under the Companies Act 1956 having its registered office at No.59, Vijayaraghava Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017 rep. by its Managing Director, Surya Rajkumar. .. Petitioner vs. 1.The Chief Commissioner of Central Excise, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai-600 034. 2.The Under Secretary, (Tax Research Unit), Central Board of Excise and Customs, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, 153, North Block, New Delhi. 3.The Union of India, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, (Central Board of Excise and Customs) North Block, New Delhi. 4.The President, Tamil Nadu Ci...
M.K.Palanichamy Vs. 1.The Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-26-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26/06/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN WP(MD)No.10225 of 2013 M.K.Palanichamy Union Secretary, Democratic Youth Federation of India (DYFI) Rajapalayam Union, Virudhunagar District .Petitioner vs 1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhungar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District. 3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Keelarajakularaman Police Station, Virudhunagar District.Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorafied Mandamus, to call for the records of the 3rd respondent, in his proceedings No.Nil, dated 21.06.2013 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of law and further direct the 2nd respondent to grant permission to conduct demonstration on 28.06.2013 at Ambedkar Thidal, S.Ramalingampuram, Rajapalayam Taluk, Virudhunagar District. !For Petitioner .Mr.G.Marimut...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »