Chennai Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
1.R.Balamurugan Vs. 1.T.S.Perumal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:05. 06/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH C.M.A.(MD)No.177 of 2007 1.R.Balamurugan 2.P.Siva Priya .. Appellants Vs 1.T.S.Perumal 2.The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co Ltd., T.Nagar, Chennai. .. Respondents PRAYER This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988 against the Award and Decree, dated 31.07.2006 made in M.C.O.P.No.92 of 2003 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Fast Track Court - IV), Periyakulam, Theni District. !For Appellants .. Mr.K.Mahendran ^For Respondent-1 .. Ex-parte For Respondent-2 .. Mr.S.Natarajan :JUDGMENT This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the claimants as against the Award and Decree, dated 31.07.2006, passed in M.C.O.P.No.92 of 2003 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Fast Track Court - IV, Periyakulam, Theni District.2. The appellants herein / claimants in the O.P. have filed a claim petition, clai...
Kandhaiah Vs. Durairaj (Died)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :05. 06/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION(PD)(MD)No.821 of 2013 and MISCELLANEOUS PETITION(MD)No.1 of 2013 Kandhaiah .. Petitioner Vs Durairaj (died) 1.Edvid Ammal 2.Vini Priya 3.Josphin 4.Rani 5.Lilly Malar @ Razitha 6.Christumalar 7.Durairaj 8.Leelavathi 9.Bhagavathi .. Respondents Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the fair and decretal order dated 07.02.2013 passed in Interlocutory Application No.968 of 2011 in Original Suit No.651 of 1993 by the District Munsif Court, Ramanathapuram. !For Petitioner .. Mr.R.Saravanan :ORDER Arguments advanced by Mr.R.Saravanan, learned counsel for the petitioner, were heard.2. Kandhaiah, the first defendant in the Original Suit in O.S.No.651 of 1993 on the file of the District Munsif, Ramanathapuram, is the petitioner in the Civil Revision Petition. The said suit was filed by one Durairaj ...
Abdul Samad Vs. Thota Rajashree
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05.06.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.(NPD) No.1819 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 1.Abdul Samad 2.Abdul Gafoor .Petitioners ..vs.Thota Rajashree .Respondent Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the petition docket order in M.P.No.244 of 2013 in R.C.A.No.152 of 2013 on the file of the VIII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Madras (Rent Control Appellate Authority) dated 27.03.2013. For Petitioner : Mr.V.K.Sathiamuthy For Respondent : Mr.T.Velumani ORDER This civil revision petition is filed against the order made in M.P.No.244 of 2013 in R.C.A.No.152 of 2013 on the file of the VIII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Madras (Rent Control Appellate Authority) whereby the court below while granting interim stay directed the petitioners to deposit a sum of Rs.79,56,795/- to the credit of R.C.A.on or before 17.04.2013. 2.Mr.P.B.Balaji, learned counsel whose name printe...
Y.Anbalagan Vs. Government of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05.06.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.No.13395 of 2013 Y.Anbalagan .Petitioner ..Vs.The Government of Tamilnadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Deptt., Secretariate, Fort St. George, Chennai 9.Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the petitioner representation dated 23.01.2013 and regularize the appointment of the petitioner as Bill Collector or any other post based on his qualification and on par with similarly placed person as appointed vide G.O.No.407 dated 02.08.2001 and G.O.1499 dated 03.08.1989 from the date of initial appointment i.e.13.02.1997. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Shrenik Raj For Respondent : Mr.V.Subbiah Spl. Government Pleader [Writ].ORDER The petitioner was appointed as a Bill Collector in Dharmapuram Town Panchayat on 17.02.1997 in the pay scal...
V.C.Chandhira Kumar Vs. Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :05. 06.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.RAJESWARAN Writ Petition.No.10175 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 1.V.C.Chandhira Kumar Member of Legislative Assembly Erode East Constituency, Sri Captain Illam, 51, Kiramadai 2nd Street, Surampatti (P.O), Erode 638 009. 2.B.Parthasarthi Member of Legislative Assembly Virugambakkam Constituency, No.50, Egmore High Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008. 3.D.Murugesan Member of Legislative Assembly Chengalpet Constituency, No.6, NVN Street, Vinoba Nagar, Anagapaputhur, Chennai 600 070. 4.K.Nallathambi Member of Legislative Assembly Egmore Constituency, No.11, Thideer Nagar, Bricklin Road, Purasaiwalkam, Chennai 600 007. 5.S.Senthilkumar Member of Legislative Assembly Thiruverumbur Constituency, No.3/43, West Street, Thuvakudi, Trichy 15. 6.R.Arulselvan Member of Legislative Assembly Mayiladuthurai Constituency, Arasur Naidu Street, Velambudukkudi (P.O), Tharangambadi (Taluk), Nagapattinam District...
State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Plastic Craft Industries
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :05. 06.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Ms.Justice K.B.K.VASUKI Tax Case (Revision) No.334 of 2011 --- The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By the Deputy Commissioner (CT) now redesignated as Joint Commissioner (CT) Chennai (South) Division Chennai-6 ...Petitioner -vs- Tvl.Plastic Craft Industries Chennai-42 now at 144, Thambu Chetty Street Chennai-600 001 ...Respondent Tax Case Revision filed under Section 38 of TNGST Act, 1959 to revise the order of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Main Bench), Chennai dated 1st November 2007 passed in T.A.No.493 of 2003. For petitioner : Mr.Manoharan Sundaram, Government Advocate For respondent : Mr.S.Ramanathan ORDER (The Order of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, J.) The Revenue is on revision as against the order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal relating to the assessment year 1986-87 raising the following question of law :- ". Whethe...
indira Vs. Principal Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2013
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:05. 06.2013 Coram :- THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM Habeas Corpus Petition No.463 of 2013 Tmt.Indira .. Petitioner/Wife of Detenu -vs- 1. The Principal Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition & Excise Dept. Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.2. The District Collector and District Magistrate Nagapattinam District. Nagapattinam. .. Respondents Prayer: Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus calling for the records in connection with the order of detention passed by the second respondent dated 07.03.2013 in C.O.C.No.17 of 2013 against the petitioner's husband Agoramoorthy, S/o.Arumugam, aged about 45 years, who is confined at Central Prison, Tiruchirapalli, set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu before this Hon'ble Court and set him at liberty. For petitioner : Mr.V.Paarthiban For respondents ...
M.Marimuthu Vs. Kuppayammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:05.06.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA S.A.No.903 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 M.Marimuthu .. Appellant Vs.1. Kuppayammal 2. Thangappayyan @ Thangarasu 3. Sundarambal .. Respondents This second appeal is directed against the judgement and decree dated 22.09.2010 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Bhavani in A.S.No.10 of 2010 confirming the judgment and decree dated 18.12.2009 passed by the learned I Additional District Munsif, Bhavani in O.S.No.208 of 2007. For Appellant : Mr.T.Murugamanickam For Respondents 1 and 2 : Mr.N.Manokaran R3 : No appearance JUDGMENT This second appeal is focussed by the plaintiff, inveighing the judgement and decree dated 22.09.2010 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Bhavani in A.S.No.10 of 2010 confirming the judgment and decree dated 18.12.2009 passed by the learned I Additional District Munsif, Bhavani in O.S.No.208 of 2007.2. The parties, for the sake of convenience, are referre...
C.B.Vishnudasan Vs. D.Vijaya
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :05. 06.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.TAMILVANAN C.R.P. (NPD) No.2796 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 C.B.Vishnudasan .. Petitioner versus D.Vijaya .. Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order and decretal order, dated 18.06.2012 made in I.A.No.39 of 2012 in O.S.No.122 of 2011 on the file of the Principal District Court, Cuddalore. For Petitioner : Mr. N.Suresh For Respondent : Mr. P.Mani ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order and decretal order, dated 18.06.2012 made in I.A.No.39 of 2012 in O.S.No.122 of 2011 on the file of the Principal District Court, Cuddalore.2. The Interlocutory Application in I.A.No.39 of 2012 was filed by the respondent herein under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking an order to reject the plaint relating to the suit in O.S.No.122 of 2011 on th...
P.Suresh Kumar Vs. State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:05. 06.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.No.13852 of 2013 1. P.Suresh Kumar 2. M.Selvam 3. M.Kothandaraman .. Petitioners ..Vs..1. The State of Tamilnadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Food, Co-operation & Consumer Protection Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 9.2. The Commissioner of Civil Supplies & Consumer Protection, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai 5.3. The Joint Commissioner of Civil Supplies & Consumer Protection, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai 5.4. The Deputy Commissioner I, Civil Supplies & Consumer Protection Deptt., Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai 5. .. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to declare the probation of the petitioners in the post of Junior Assistant; include the petitioners in the panel of Junior Assistants fit for promotion to the post of Assistant in Civil Su...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »