Chennai Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
N.Jebarathinam Vs. R.Ramar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:17. 06/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.ARUMUGHASWAMY Crl.A(MD)No.75 of 2007 N.Jebarathinam ... Appellant/ Complainant Vs R.Ramar ... Respondent/Accused PRAYER Criminal appeal is filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, against the order, dated 05.12.2006, passed in S.T.C.No.12 of 2006 by the learned Special Judicial Magistrate cum Principal District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli. !For appellant .. Mr.R.Anand ^For Respondent .. Mr.K.Gokul :JUDGMENT The complainant is the appellant. This appeal is filed by the complainant, challenging the order of acquittal passed by the trial Court.2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused has borrowed money to the tune of Rs.74,800/- from the complainant, for which the accused has given a cheque and when the cheque has been presented in the bank, the same has been returned by the bank with an endorsement 'insufficient fund' and after due notice, the complainant has filed a p...
G.Anburaj Vs. Government of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.06.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.No.15359 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 G.ANBURAJ S/O.GNANAMUTHU DISTRICT REGITRAR (LEGAL) O/O. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION128SANTHOME HIGH ROAD, MYLAPORE CHENNAI-28 .PETITIONER versus 1 GOVERNMENT OF TAMILNADU REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT COMMERCIAL TAXES AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT SERETARIAT CHENNAI-9 2 THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION128SANTHOME HIGH ROAD CHENNAI-28.RESPONDENTS PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ in the nature of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records on the file of the 1st respondent herein in G.O.(D) No.501 Commercial Taxes & Registration (H) Department dated 16.11.2012 and the proceedings of the file of the 2nd respondent in Letter NO.63045/A1/2011 dated 23.3.2013 and quash the Government orders only to the limited extent of the direction to fix the pay of the p...
K.K.Karthikeyan Vs. C.R.Deivasigamony Chetty
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :17. 06.2013 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice M.JAICHANDREN and The Honourable Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH Original Side Appeal No.344 of 2008 1.K.K.Karthikeyan 2.K.K.Kabaleewaran 3.K.K.Gowriammal 4.K.K.Poombavai (Declared as Major as per order in Appln. No.2496/98 dated 10.08.1998 and amendment carried out as per order in Appln.No.12/2000 dt.3.2.2000 by His Lordship karpagavinayagam,J.) ... Appellants V. 1.C.R.Deivasigamony Chetty 2.G.Sivaramakrishna Chetty 3.N.S.Loganatha Chetty 4.N.Damodara Naidu 5.A.V.Kanniah Naidu 6.Kalavai Narayanaswamy Chetty Charities rep. by its Managing Trustees K.K.Karthikeyan ... Respondents Original Side Appeals filed under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of the O.S. Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 05.03.2008 passed in Civil Suit No.523 of 1983. For appellants : Mr.K.P.Gopalakrisnan For respondents : No appearance 1, 3 to 6 For 2nd respondent : Mr.M.K.Hidayathullah JUDGMENT (Judgment of the ...
K.Ganesamurthy Vs. Commissioner Director of the Department of Sericult ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.06.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJ.W.P.No.6096 of 2008 K.Ganesamurthy .Petitioner -versus 1. Commissioner/Director Department of Sericulture Bakus Complex Anaimedu, Salem 2. Assistant Director of Sericulture (Regular) Thinnoor S.O., Hosur Krishnagiri District .Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 2nd respondent in Se.Mu.No.2113/B/2004 dated 29.1.2005, quash the same and further direct the respondents to pay the salary of the petitioner for 500 days (i.e., from 28.2.1995 to 11.7.1996).For Petitioner :: Mr.M.V.Venkataseshan For Respondents :: Mrs.M.E.Raniselvam Additional Government Pleader ORDER This writ petition has been filed by Mr.K.Ganesamurthy seeking a prayer for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records on the file of the second respondent, the Assistant Director of ...
State Bank of India Vs. R.Shankar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :17. 06.2013 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.(NPD) Nos. 1214 and 1215 of 2013 and M.P.Nos. 1 and 1 of 2013 State Bank of India Represented by its Authorised Officer No.4, Teacher's Colony Indira Nagar Chennai. .. Petitioner Vs. R.Shankar .. Respondent Civil Revision Petitions filed against the fair and decretal order dated 6.3.2013 made in I.A.Nos.18174 and 18175 of 2012 in O.S.No.2726 of 2012 on the file of the VI Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. For Petitioner :- Mr.M.L.Ganesh For Respondent :- Mr.L.P.Balajiram ORDER Both these Civil Revision Petitions are filed by the petitioner against the common order made in I.A.Nos.18174 and 18175 of 2012 in O.S.No.2726 of 2012 on the file of the VI Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai, wherein and whereby the applications filed by the petitioner seeking for setting aside the exparte orders passed in the suit as well as in the interim injunction application, were rejected....
M.Balasubramanian Vs. K.Nandakishore
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:17.06.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL Contempt Petition Nos.1164 and 1165 of 2010 1.M.Balasubramanian 2.S.Palanisamy ..Petitioners in Cont.P.1164/2010 1.N.Chinnappa 2.V.Pushpalingam 3.P.Palani 4.V.Rajendran 5.P.Murugadoss ..Petitioners in Cont.P.1165/2010 versus K.Nandakishore Secretary to Government Agriculture Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009 ..Respondent in Cont.P.1164/2010 S.Kosalaraman The Director of Agriculture, O/o. Director of Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai 600 005..Respondent in Cont.P.1164/2010 Prayer: Petitions filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act praying to punish the Respondents for committing contempt of Court by wilfully disobeying the order passed in W.P.No.23148 and 23147/2004 dated 26.02.2010. In both Cont. Petns. For Petitioners : Mr.J.Rajmohan For Respondents : Ms.V.M.Velumani Special Government Pleader M.VENUGOPAL,J. Sgl COMMON ORDER Ms.V.M.Velumani, Learned Special Gover...
R.Sekar Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :12. 06.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN Writ Petition No.15539 of 2013 & M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2013 R.Sekar .. Petitioner v 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By the Director of Co-op. Audit, Directorate of Co-op. Audit, Ezhilagam, Chennai 5. 2.Joint Director of Co-op. Audit, Chennai, Directorate of Co-op. Audit, Ezhilagam, Chennai 5. 3.The Assistant Director of Co-Op. Audit, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the Order Na.Ka.No.27006/2012/Po.Ni.3 dated 01.03.2013 issued by the second respondent and quash the same as being illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional in so far as it omitted to include the name of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Senior Co-Op. Auditor and consequently issue a direction to the first and second respondents to consid...
M.S.Padmanabhan Vs. S.Arumugam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:12. 06-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH Review Application Nos.84 to 88 of 2013 Review Application No.84 of 2013: -------------------------------- 1.M.S.Padmanabhan 2.R.Vijay Raghavan 3.M.R.G.Appa Rao 4.V.S.Vikram 5.R.Madhavan 6.Mr.Srinivasan Balakrishnan .. Applicants Versus 1. S.Arumugam 2. Madras Gymkhana Club, A registered Society under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, Central Act and now deemed to be registered under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975, Rep. By its Honorary Secretary, The Island, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.2. Arvind Ramarathnam 4. P.V.S.Venkatasubramaniam 5. Ishwar Achanta 6. S.B.P.Anand Mohan 7 S.T.Gouthaman 8. Mr.V.Murali 9. Mr.R.L.Nerula 10.SBS.Raman 11.A.P.Sureshkumar 12.C.Venugopal .. Respondents Prayer: Revision Application filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patents Act read with Section 114 and Order 47 Rule 1 of...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Chandra
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :12. 06.2013 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.1357 of 2010 and Cross Objection No.52 of 2013 C.M.A.No.1357 of 2010: The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., No.3217, East Main Road, Pudukottai-622 001. .. Appellant. vs. 1.Chandra 2.Kanagesan 3.K.Elamathi 4.K.Komathi 5.S.Rathna 6.Suhantha 7.The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., No.74, GST Road, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. .. Respondents. Cross Objection No.52 of 2013:1. Chandra 2. Kanagesan 3. K.Elamathi 4. K.Komathi .. Cross Objectors vs.1. The Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Branch Office: No.3217, East Main Road, Pudukottai-622 001.2. S.Rathna 3. Suhantha 4. The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., No.74, G.S.T. Road, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. .. Respondents. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Order dated 24.10.2009 made in M.C.O.P.No.641 of 2008 on the ...
National Small Industries Corporation Limited Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-12-2013
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:12. 06.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Ms.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI TC (Revision).No.34 of 2010 and MP.No.1 of 2010 M/s. National Small Industries Corporation Limited No.615, Anna Salai Chennai 600 006 .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by the Joint Commissioner (CT) Chennai (Central), Chennai .. Respondent Tax Case Revision to revise the order of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Addl Bench) Chennai dated 5.1.2009 passed in TA.No.499/2002. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Rajkumar For Respondent : Mr.Haribabu Addl. Govt. Pleader ORDER (Order of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN,J.) The above Tax Case Revision is filed at the instance of the assessee as against the order of Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal in respect of assessment year 1991-92. The above Tax Case Revision was admitted on the following substantial questions of law:- ".(1) Whether in admitted facts of the case and ...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »