Chennai Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sulochana Vs. Prakash
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:21. 06/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR C.R.P.(PD)(MD).No.765 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013 Sulochana .. Petitioner/Plaintiff Vs Prakash .. Respondent/Defendant Prayer Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair order and decreetal order dated 05.08.2011 made in I.A.No.269 of 2011 in O.S.No.7 of 2008, on the file of the learned District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate, Lalgudi. !For Petitioner .. Mr.S.Ramesh ^For Respondent .. Mr.M.Siddharthan :ORDER The arguments advanced by Mr.S.Ramesh, learned counsel for the petitioner and by Mr.M.Siddharthan, learned counsel for the respondent are heard.2. The plaintiff in the Original Suit in O.S.No.7 of 2008 on the file of the learned District Munsif -cum- Judicial Magistrate, Lalgudi is the petitioner herein. The defendant in the said suit is the respondent in the Civil Revision Petition. The revision petitioner filed ...
Senthilkumar Vs. the Inspector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:21. 06/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.RAJESWARAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN Criminal Appeal No.9 of 2013 Senthilkumar ... Appellant Vs The Inspector of Police Uppiliapuram Police Station Trihy District ... Respondent Prayer Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, against the Judgment dated 09.03.2012 and made in S.C.No.47 of 2011, on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No.I), Trichy. !For Appellant .. Mr.W.Peter Ramesh Kumar ^For Respondent .. Mr.C.Ramesh Addl. Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by T.MATHIVANAN, J.) This memorandum of criminal appeal is directed against the Judgment dated 09.03.2012 and made in the Sessions Case in S.C.No.47 of 2011, on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No.I), Trichy finding the appellant/accused guilty under Section 302 I.P.C., co...
D. Muthupandi, Vs. 1. the Superintendent of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:21. 06/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR And THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DEVADASS W.P.(MD)No.2524 of 2008 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2008 D. Muthupandi, S/o. M. Durairaj, Grade I Constable, M.Kallupatti Police Station, Madurai District. .. Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.2. The State Human Rights Commission, Tamil Nadu, Chennai.3. Bathirakali, W/o. Muniasamy, Irulappa Kovil Street, Pasumpon Nagar, Keeraithurai, Madurai.4. The Secretary to Government, Home Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai - 9.5. Uma Maheswaran, The Inspector of Police, Chekkanoorani Police Station, Madurai District. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the order and records made in SHRC case No.2440 of 2006 dated 11.01.2008 passed by the second respondent viz., the State Hum...
National Insurance Company Limited Vs. B.Anandammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:21. 06.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.2636 of 2009 & M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2009 National Insurance Company Limited, Anna Salai, Chennai-2. .. Appellant Vs. 1.B.Anandammal 2.B.Jayakumar 3.B.Pavithra 4.B.Praveen Kumar (3 and 4 minors rep by their mother & natural guardian B.Anandammal first respondent herein) All are residing at No.27/11, 12th Lane, Indira Nagar, Adyar, Chennai-20. 5.R.Dhakshinamoorthy .. Respondents PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the award and decree dated 31.12.2008 made in M.C.O.P.No.3391 of 2003, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, VI Small Causes Court, Chennai. For Appellant : Mr.D.Bhaskaran For Respondents : Mr.K.L.Nanthakumar for R-1 to R-4 - - - JUDGMENT The appellant / second respondent has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.3391 of 2003, on the file of the...
Arivuselvi Vs. M.Selvakumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:21.06.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.117 of 2005 1.Arivuselvi 2.Minor Jebansi 3.Minor Sudhan (Minors are rep. by the Natural guardian / Mother Arivuselvi) 4.Pottayal .Appellants vs 1.M.Selvakumar 2.M.Nataraja Moorthy 3.The New India Assurance Co.Ltd., Parimalam Complex, Muthur Road, 11-E.V.N.Road, II Floor, Erode - 638 011. Erode District.Respondents (Notice to the 1st respondent is not necessary in this C.M.A.) Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, for enhancement of the compensation amount awarded in the Judgment and Decree dated 19.01.2004 made in M.C.O.P.No.247 of 2003, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Additional District Court/ Fast Track Court No.I, Erode. For Appellants : Mr.N.Manokaran For Respondents: Mr.N.Vijayaraghavan (for R3) R1 Notice dispensed with R2 - served JUDGMENT The appellants / claimants have filed M.C.O.P.No.247 of 2003, against...
S.M.V.Kalaiyarasu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:21. 6-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.6767 of 2010 S.M.V.Kalaiyarasu .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. By Secretary to Government Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.2. The Commissioner of Technical Education, Guindy, Chennai 600 025.3. The Commissioner of Treasuries and Accounts, Saidapet, Chennai 600015.4. The Principal, Institute of Textile Technology, Taramani, Chennai 600 113. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed seeking for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records culminating with the impugned order cum letter made by the second respondent No.3276/B5/2002 dated 8.1.2010 quash the same and direct the second and third respondents to pay the reimbursement of medical claim of petitioner as per the sanction made in proceedings No.3276/B5/2002 dated 13.5.2002 by the second respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.K.N.Pandian For Respondents : Mr.M.L.Mahendran Government Ad...
Dr.M.Ramula Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED2106.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJ.W.P.No.13110 of 2009 Dr.M.Ramula .Petitioner versus 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Director of Medical and Rural Health Services, DMS Compound, Teynampet, Chennai 600 006. 3.The Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, DMS Compound, Teynampet, Chennai 600 006. 4.The Director of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010. 5.Dr.Fareedashirin, M. 6.Pushpa .Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the concerned records relating to the charge sheet dated 15.07.2001 bearing reference Memo.R.No.1708/PHC3/1993 issued by the third respondent, Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, vindictive and in violation of principles of...
Padamchand JaIn Vs. P.K.Sundaram Mudaliar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.06.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN Appeal Suit No.518 of 1999 1. Padamchand Jain 2. K.L.Jain .Appellants/Plaintiffs /versus P.K.Sundaram Mudaliar .Respondent/Defendant Prayer:- This Appeal has been filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.17 of 1998 dated 22.12.98 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Maduranthakam. For Appellants : Mr.K.Bajai Sundar For Respondent : Mr.P.C.Ramesh for Mr.S.Kanniah JUDGMENT The plaintiffs in O.S.No.205 of 1995 are the appellants herein. 2.The plaintiffs filed a suit in O.S.No.205 of 1995 on the file of the Sub Court, Chengalpattu for recovery of money on the basis of simple mortgage and that suit was dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal is filed. 3.The case of the plaintiffs as seen in the plaint is as follows: The defendant/respondent herein borrowed a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- from the plaintiffs, executed a...
Shanmugaraj Vs. the Special Officers, Tucs Limited and Others
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
(This complaint dt.10.4.2013 is filed by the complainant, praying for a direction to shift the TASMAC shop situated at Old No.231, New No.90, R.K. Mutt Road, Mylapore, Chennai- 4, and for a direction to pay compensation of Rs.25 lakhs towards mental agony, alongwith 5% value of the goods sold by the 2nd and 3rd opposite parties, to pay Rs.20,00,000/- towards deficiency in service.) R. Regupathi, President In the consumer complaint filed before this Commission, the complainant Shanmugaraj submitted that he is the resident of Mylapore, Chennai for the past fifteen years and that he was purchasing provisions from the ration shop at No.ICO 14 located at door No.90 R.K.Mutt Road, Mylapore , Chennai 4. He further stated that there are about 800 ration card holders receiving their ration articles every month from the said shop which is running during day time. A licence has been issued in the same premises for running a TASMAC outlet and both the ration shop as well as the TASMAC are situated...
K.Murukesan Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:20. 06.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.No.16535 of 2013 K.Murukesan ... Petitioner Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvallur Thiruvallur District. ... Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondent to release the seized lorry bearing Registration No.TN20BF3485 seized on 11.06.2013 by the respondent to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Marin Jeyakumar For Respondent : Mr.V.Jaya Prakash Narayanan Special Government Pleader ORDER Since the prayer in the writ petition lies in a narrow compass, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.3. The lorry of the petitioner was seized while it carried unauthorized sand on 11.06.2013. The petitioner is said to have sent a represen...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »