Chennai Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.Nirmala Vs. State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :24. 06.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.Nos.1890 of 2009 and 25184 of 2007 M.Nirmala .. Petitioner in both the writ petitions -vs- 1. The State of Tamilnadu rep.by its Secretary to Government Handlooms, Handicrafts, Textiles and Khadi Department Secretariat, Chennai-9 2. The Director of Sericulture Salem, Salem District .. Respondents 1 & 2 in both the writ petitions W.P.No.1890 of 2009 is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records connected with the G.O.Ms.No.180, Handlooms, Handicrafts, Textiles and Khadi (G1) Department dated 15.12.2008 of the first respondent and quash the same and direct the respondents to promote the petitioner as Superintendent on par with the petitioner's juniors with effect from 1997 onwards and fix the seniority and pay arrears accordingly. W.P.No.25184 of 2007 is filed under Article 226 of the Cons...
R.Preethy Vs. Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:24. 06.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR W.P.No.21742 of 2007 R.Preethy .. Petitioner Vs.1. The Secretary to Government School Education Fort. St. George, Chennai 600 009 2. The Director of School Education College Road, Chennai 600 006 3. The Chief Educational Officer Vellore Collectorate Sathuvachari, Vellore 632 009 .. Respondents Writ petition filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to release to the petitioner the allowable Government Educational Concession/Merit Scholarship for the academic years 2003-2004, 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 and the succeeding years for pursuing the M.B.B.S Course in P S G Institute of Medical Sciences & Research, Coimbatore Government Quota (self-financing). For Petitioner : Mr.T.M.Hariharan For Respondents : Mr.V.Viswanathan ORDER The petitioner was the District topper of Vellore District in the Higher Secondary (XI...
Thiruvengadam Vs. M.Palani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:24.6.2013 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice G.RAJASURIA S.A.No.1 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008 1.Thiruvengadam(deceased) 2.Neelammal 3.Sekar 4.Selvam 5.Saraswathi 6.Jayalakshmi 7.Pachiappan Appellants 2 to 7 brought on record as Lrs of the deceased sole appellant vide order of Court dt.8.12.2009 in M.P.No.3/09 in S.A.o.1 of 2008 ..Appellants versus M.Palani ...Respondent This second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 18.9.2006 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge Fast Track Court-V, Chennai, in A.S.No.551 of 2005 reversing the judgment and decree dated 31.12.2003 passed by the III Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai, in O.S.No.1235 of 2000. For Appellants : Mr.G.Surya Narayanan For Respondent : Mr.S.Sadasham JUDGMENT This Second appeal is focussed animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 18.9.2006 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge Fast Track Court-V, Chennai, in A.S.No.551 of 2...
Hindustran Petroleum Corporation Limited Vs. V.Rajendran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:24. 06.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR S.A.No.102 of 2008 M/s.Hindustran Petroleum Corporation Limited APR Arcade 3rd Floor, Singapore Plaza 333, Cross-Cut Road Coimbatore 12 (Presently at 18/3, Big Bazaar Street Coimbatore 641 001) ... Appellant -Vs- 1.V.Rajendran 2.Balaji Service Station rep. By its Partner P.Janarthanam Dr.Nanjappa Road Coimbatore ... Respondents Second Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C to set aside the decree and judgment dated 16.03.2006 in O.S.No.979 of 2004 passed by the Hon'ble II Addl. District Munsif Court, Coimbatore as against the appellant which was confirmed in A.S.No.89 of 2006 by the Sub-Court, Coimbatore on 09.11.2006 and to direct the 1st respondent/plaintiff to pay the costs. For appellant : Mr. B.Raghunatha Reddy for M/s.King & Partridge For Respondents : Mr.T.R.Rajaraman for R1 M/s.V.Shanmugasundar for R2 ----- JUDGMENT The first defendant in the original suit is the a...
Subbu Gounder Vs. P.Kalimuthu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :24. 06.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. RAJASURIA S.A.No.248 of 2009 1. Subbu Gounder 2. Pavayee .. Appellants vs.1. P.Kalimuthu 2. Kandasamy 3. K.Palaniappan 4. K.Murugesan .. Respondents This Second Appeal is directed as against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.84 of 2008 dated 30.10.2008, on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.409 of 1997 dated 31.01.2006 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tiruchengode. For Appellants : Mr.S.Mukund For Respondents : Mr.N.Manokaran for R2 to R4 JUDGMENT This Second appeal is focussed animadverting upon the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.84 of 2008 dated 30.10.2008, on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tiruchengode, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.409 of 1997 dated 31.01.2006 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tiruchengode.2. The parties are referred to hereunder according to their l...
A.M.A.Rawoof Vs. Saifuddin
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:24. 06/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE ARUNA JAGADEESAN A.No.1930/2013 in CS.No.858/2010 A.M.A.RAWOOF AND ANOTHER543, G.N.T.ROAD, ERUKKENCHERRY, CHENNAI-118. VS1SAIFUDDIN NO.4227,D-2, K.K.R.TOWN, MADHAVARAM, CHENNAI-60. 2 MR. JOHN RAJA PROP GOLDEN TIMBERS543 GNT ROAD ERUKANCHERRY CHENNAI118ORDER This application is filed by the applicant/1st Defendant in CS.No.858/2010 to receive the counter claim filed by him in the suit.2. The 1st Respondent/plaintiff has filed the suit to declare the agreement dated 10.05.2008 entered into between the Plaintiff and the 1st Defendant as null and void and not binding on the Plaintiff and consequently, to direct the Defendants to quit and deliver vacant possession of the suit property on the 1st Defendant receiving Rs.2,50,000/- from the plaintiff and for damages.3. The brief facts culled out from the application filed by the 1st Defendant are stated below:- The 1st Respondent/ Plaintiff is the owner o...
T.Raman Vs. A.Devaraj
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :24. 06.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR S.A.No.41 of 2008 1.T.Raman 2.R.Davamani .. Appellants -Vs- 1.A.Devaraj 2.Kandhammal .. Respondents Second Appeal filed under section 100 of C.P.C to set aside the decree and judgment passed by the learned Additional District Judge, (Fast Track Court), Kallakkuruchi dated 09.10.2007 made in A.S.No.109 of 2004 reversing the decree and judgment passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Kallakkurchi dated 02.12.2003 made in O.S.No.114 of 1998. For appellant : Mr.V.Bhiman For Respondents : Mrs Mythili Suresh for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates ----- JUDGMENT The defendants 1 and 3 in the original suit are the appellants in the second appeal. The plaintiff is the first respondent and the second defendant is the second respondent. Devaraj, the first respondent /plaintiff filed the suit O.S.No.114 of 1998 on the file of Sub-Court, Kallakkuruchi against the appellants and the second responden...
N.S.Raj Vs. Venkatesan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24.06.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.No.558 of 2001 and C.M.P.No.7188 of 2001 1.N.S.Raj (deceased) 2.S.Vijayalakshmi 3.S.Vijayakumar (rep. by its Guardian and next friend Smt.Vijayalakshmi 4.Barani .Appellants (Appellants 2 to 4 brought on record as Lrs of the deceased sole Appellant vide order of Court dated 21.12.2006 and made in CMP.Nos.14721 to 14723 of 2005) Vs 1.Venkatesan alias Venkatesh 2.Sivasankaran 3.The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Nagapattinam Branch, Nagapattinam Post & District.Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against that part of the judgment (Award) and Decree dated 11.09.2000 of the Motor Vehicles Accidents Claims Tribunal (1st Additional Subordinate Judge).Coimbatore, in disallowing the Major portion of the claim in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.583 of 1996. For Appellants : Mr.V.Raghupathi For Respondents : R1 Notice Dispensed With R2 & R...
K.Vasanthakumari Vs. K.Nagappan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :24. 06.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. RAJASURIA S.A.No.645 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 K.Vasanthakumari .. Appellant vs. K.Nagappan .. Respondent This Second Appeal is directed as against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.68 of 2011 dated 23.12.2011, on the file of the IV Additional Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.1363 of 2007 dated 28.04.2011 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore. For Appellant : Mr.V.G.Suresh Kumar JUDGMENT This Second appeal is focussed animadverting upon the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.68 of 2011 dated 23.12.2011, on the file of the IV Additional Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.1363 of 2007 dated 28.04.2011 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore.2. The parties are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status and ranking ...
Raghavan Vs. Kalanithi Maran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-24-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:24. 6-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH O.S.A.No.226 of 2013 Raghavan .. Appellant Versus Kalanithi Maran .. Respondent Prayer: Original Side Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order, dated 14.9.2012, made in A.No.3998 of 2012, in C.S.No.141 of 2012. For Appellant : Mr.S.R.Rajagopal, Senior Advocate for Mr.T.S.Baskaran For Respondent : Mr.Raja Kalifullah, Senior Advocate JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by M.Jaichandren,J.) This Original Side Appeal, in O.S.A.No.226 of 2013, had been filed against the order and decree, dated 14.9.2012, passed by the learned single Judge of this Court, in A.No.3998 of 2012, in C.S.No.141 of 2012.2. The application, in A.No.3998 of 2012, has been filed by the defendant, seeking to revoke the leave granted on 23.2.2012, in Application No.891 of 2012, stating that th...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »