Chennai Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Maheswari Vs. T.Ramesh
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
Cont.Petition No.111 of 2013 VINOD K.SHARMA,J.The petitioner is engaged in the business of hiring equipments for shooting of films. Respondent No.1 is the producer of Cinematographic Films, whereas, Respondent No.2 is their laboratory, wherein, the negatives of the Cinematography film, "SAMAR" were processed and kept in custody on behalf of Respondent No.1.2. The practice followed in the film industry is that the assignment of copyright over the film is intimated to the laboratory concerned and the laboratory acts in accordance with the instructions of the present copyright holder and gives effect to the transfer of rights to the new copyright holder.3. Respondent No.1 approached the petitioner for hiring of equipments. The petitioner agreed to supply equipments on the agreed terms and conditions for production of the film originally titled as "SAMARAN" and subsequently changed to "SAMAR".4. The petitioner continued to supply equipment, requisitioned by th...
Palaniammal Vs. Pappathi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS DATED:25. 4.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA S.A.Nos.745 o471. of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 (in SA.745 of 2011) 1.Palaniammal 2.Kandaswami .. Appellants in S.A.No.745 of 2011 Vs. 1.Pappathi 2.Vadivel 3.Palaniswami 4.Sivakami 5.Vijayalakshmi @ Vijaya 6.Sudha 7.P.Moorthy .. Respondents in S.A.No.745 o1. Paooathi 2.Vadivel 3.Palaniswami 4.Sivakami .. Appellants in S.A.No.471 of 2013 Vs. 1.Palaniammal 2.Kandasamy 3.Vijayalakshmi @ Vijaya 4.Sudha 5.P.Moorthi .. Respondents in S.A.No.471 of 2013 Second appeals against the common judgement and decrees dated 23.9.2008 passed by the First Additional District Court, Erode, in A.S.No.80 of 2007 and Cross Appeal in A.S.No.80 of 2007, respectively, confirming the judgement and decree dated 24.3.2005 passed by the First Additional Sub Court, Erode, in O.S.No.272 of 1999. For appellants : Mr.N.Manokaran in S.A.No.745 of 2011 Mr.P.Valliappan in S.A.No.471 of 2013 For Respondents : Mr.P.Vallia...
The New India Assurance Company Limited, Vs. 1.Premavathi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:25. 04/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.1070 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 The New India Assurance Company Limited, Catholic Centre 903, Main Road, Kovilpatti. ... Appellant Vs 1.Premavathi 2.Mahesh 3.K.Singaraj ... Respondents (the third respondent was the first respondent before the Tribunal and he remained ex-parte before the Tribunal. Hence, notice to the third respondent may be dispensed with. PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, to set-aside the award and decree dated 08.03.2012 in M.C.O.P.No.379 of 2010, on the file of Principal District Judge, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Thoothukudi. !For Appellant --- Mr.B.Vijay Karthikeyan ^For Respondents --- Mr.Thirugnanan for R-1 and R-2 Exparte (R-3) :JUDGMENT The short facts of the case are as follows:- The claimants have filed claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.379 of 2010, on the file of Principal Distric...
M.Sampath Vs. Secretary to the Govt. of Tamilnadu for Dept. of Revenue
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :25. 04.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. VENKATARAMAN Writ Petition No.28930 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 of 2012 and 1 of 2013 M.Sampath .. Petitioner Vs.1. The Secretary, Department of Revenue, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.2. The Principal Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Reforms, Ezhilagam, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai-5.3. The Commissioner (ULC) and Director (ULT), Ezhilagam, Chennai-5.4. The Competent Authority (Urban Land Ceiling) cum Assistant Commissioner (Urban Land Ceiling), Alandur, Chennai. .. Respondents Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of declaration declaring that the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of Tamil Nadu Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 Act No.20 of 1999 insofar as the land measuring 14,600 sq.meter situated in Survey No.514, Perumbakkam Village, Sholinganallur, Kancheepuram Distr...
Notavailable Vs. Not Available
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
Application Nos.5315 and 5316 of 2013 VINOD K.SHARMA, J.These applications, under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 have been filed for interim direction to the respondent to forthwith release all payments against invoices raised by the applicant from commencement of commercial operations since 25th July 2010 to 30th October 2012, and to continue to make payments on the stipulated due date in the BWPA against the invoices raised in future by the applicant.2. Paragraph 25(iii) of the affidavit reads as under:- "As up to October 2012, the Respondent owes the Applicant a sum of Rs.522,505,799.06 towards water charges as summarized below:- S.No Invoice No. Date of the Invoice Invoiced Amount Amount Paid Shortfall in Paymen001. 05/08/2010 16,616,311.00 7,461,009.25 9,155,301.7002. 04/09/2010 73,594,173.65 67,570,136.82 6,024,036.5003. 06/10/2010 85,241,412.00 71,950,707.69 13,290,705.2004. 02/11/2010 91,998,000.00 82,718,161.74 9,279,838.2005. 02/12/2010 91,998,00...
Chairman Pondicherry Institute of Post Matric Technical Vs. Dr.S.Bhuva ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :25. 4-2013 CORAM The Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.K.AGRAWAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and The Hon'ble Mr.Justice N.PAUL VASANTHKUMAR W.A.No.306 o1. The Chairman, Pondicherry Institute of Post-Matric Technical Education, Puducherry.2. The Member Secretary, Pondicherry Institute of Post-Matric Technical Education, Puducherry.3. The Principal, Karaikal Polytechnic College, Varichikudy, Karaikal. .. Appellants Vs 1. Dr.S.Bhuvaneswari 2. The Registrar, Pondicherry University, Puducherr014. .. Respondents Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 7.6.2011 passed in W.P.No.3771 of 2011. For Appellants : Mr.T.P.Manoharan For 1st Respondent : Mr.Bharatha Chakravarthy for M/s.Sai, Bharath & Ilan For 2nd Respondent : Mr.A.V.Bharathi R.K.AGRAWAL, A.C.J., & N. PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR, J.This writ appeal is preferred against the order made in W.P.No.3771 of 2011 dated 7.6.2011, which was filed by the first respondent here...
D.Manickam Vs. Periya Veerasangili Panchayat
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:25. 04.2013 Coram: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR S.A.No.1101 of 2010 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2010 D.Manickam S/o.Deveirakkam ... Appellant ..vs.. 1.The President Periya Veerasangili Panchayat Vijayamangalam P.O., Perundurai Taluk Erode District 2.The District Collector District Collector Office Perundurai Road Erode 3.The Tahsildhar Taluk Office Perundurai Erode District ... Respondents Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.88/2008 dated 08.03.2010 on the file of Principal District Court, Erode, Erode District confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.135/1999 dated 25.07.2005 on the file of District Munsif Court-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Perundurai, Erode District. For Appellant ... Mr.V.Bharathidasan For Respondents ... Mr.N.Manokaran The plaintiff in the original suit is the appellant in the second appeal. The appellant filed the suit on the...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Vs. 1.D.Gurunathan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:25. 04/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.559 of 2009 AND C.M.A.(MD)No.880 of 2009 C.M.A.(MD)No.559 of 2009 The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Divisional Office, not E/12A, S.N.High Road, Tirunelveli. ... Appellant Vs 1.D.Gurunathan 2.G.Hemalatha 3.C.Sivasubramanian 4.K.T.V.Oil Mills, Arulnagar Salai, Kodangaiyoor, Chennai. 5.The New India Assurance Company Limited, No.45, vth Floor, Moor Street, Chennai. ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the award and decreetal order dated 02.02.2009 made in M.C.O.P.No.101 of 2006, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Tuticorin. !For Appellant .. Mr.P.Ramani ^For Respondents .. Mr.S.Ramachandran for R-1 and R-2 R-3 and R-4 given up No appearance for R5 C.M.A.(MD)No.880 of 2009 The New India Assurance Company Limited, No.45, vth Floo...
Baby Ammal Vs. V.Srinivasan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:25. 04.2013 Coram: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR S.A.No.1206 o1. Baby Ammal 2.V.Senthil Vel ... Appellants ..vs.. 1.V.Srinivasan 2.V.Annamalai ... Respondents Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and decree of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Pondicherry dated 21.04.2010 made in A.S. No.27 of 2008 reversing the judgment and decree of the I Additional District Munsif, Pondicherry dated 08.04.2008 made in O.S.No.696 of 2004. For Appellants ... Mr.K.Sukumaran For Respondents ... Mr.P.Rabindran The defendants 1 and 2 in the Original Suit O.S.No.696/2004 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif, Pondicherry are the appellants in the second appeal. The first respondent V.Srinivasan as plaintiff filed the said Original Suit against the appellants 1 and 2 herein and the second respondent Annamalai, arraying them as defendants 1 to 3 respectively. A house bearing old door No.79, new d...
Jaganathan Vs. K.Sulochana
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25. 04.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.PALANIVELU A.S.No.568 o1. Jaganathan 2.R.Rathinasamy .. Defendants/Appellant vs. 1.K.Sulochana 2.V.Geetha 3.P.Banumathi .. Plaintiffs/Respondents Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree passed by the Learned Sub-judge, Udumalpet, in O.S.No.346 of 1997 dated 08.10.2002. For Appellants ... Mr.M. Krishnappan Senior counsel for M/s. R. Swarnalatha For Respondents ... Mr.K. Sukumaran JUDGMENT 1 The following are the averments contained in the plaint filed in O.S.No.346 of 1997:1. (a) The defendants entered into an Agreement for Sale on 22.7.1992 with one U.R.Kuppuraj, whereupon they agreed to sell the suit property for a total sale consideration of Rs.8,50,000/- and a sum of Rs.6,50,000/- has been received on the same date as advance. The balance sale consideration was agreed to be received by the defendants in proposition from the said Kupp...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »