Skip to content

Chennai Court April 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Apr 26 2013

A.M.Selvaraj Vs. Managing Director of Metropolitan Transport Corporati ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-26-2013

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :26. 042013 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE ELIPE DHARMA RAO AND THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.A.No.2070 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2012 A.M.Selvaraj .. Appellant/Petitioner VS.1. The Managing Director, Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Pallavan House, Chenna002. 2. The General Manager, Administration, Metropolitan Transport Corporation, Pallavan House, Chenna002. .. Respondents Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 18.08.2011 in W.P.No.1606 of 2011 passed by the Learned Single Judge. For Appellant : Ms.G.Jayasri For Respondents : Mr.V.R.Kamalanathan Additional Government Pleader JUDGMENT M.VENUGOPAL,J.The Appellant/Writ Petitioner has filed the present Writ Appeal as against the order dated 18.08.2011 made in W.P.No.1606 of 2011 passed by the Learned Single Judge. 2.The Learned Single Judge, while passing the Common Order in W.P.No.1606 of 2011 on 18.08.2011 [filed by the A...


Apr 26 2013

Sreegnanakshi Chemicals Pvt Ltd Vs. Vindhya Spinning Mills Pvt Ltd

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-26-2013

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:26. 04.2013 Coram: The Honourable Mr.Justice M.Jaichandren and The Honourable Mr.Justice M.M.Sundresh O.S.A. Nos.201 and 202 of 2013 M/s.SreeGnanakshi Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., rep. by its Director Sriram Ashok .. Appellant in O.S.A.No.201 of 2013 M/s.Vindhya Spinning Mills Pvt. Ltd., rep. by its Director V.Ayyan Kodiswaran .. Appellant in O.S.A.No.202 of 2013 PRAYER: Appeals are filed under Order xxxvi, rule 9 of the O.S. Rules, read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent as against the judgment and decree, dated 22.4.2013, in C.A.No.443 of 2013 in C.A.No.343 of 2013 and C.A.No.444 of 2013 in C.A.No.344 of 2013. ----- For appellants : Mr.R.Murari, Senior Counsel for M/s.Thriyambak J.Kannan ----- COMMON JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.Jaichandren, J.] As the issues arising for the consideration of this Court, in the present Original Side Appeals, are similar in nature, a common order is being passed.2. The Original Side Appeal...


Apr 26 2013

G.Udhayan Vs. Tn Uniformed Services Recruitment Board

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-26-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :26. 04/2013 CORAM The Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.K.AGRAWAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and The Hon'ble Mr.Justice N.PAUL VASANTHKUMAR W.A.No.259 of 2013 G. Udhayan .. Appellant Vs The Member Secretary, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, No.807, P.T.Lee Chengalvaraya Naicker Maaligai, Anna Salai, Chenna002. .. Respondent Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 7.1.2013 passed in W.P.No.30952 of 2012. For Appellants : Mrs.Sudha Ravi for Mr.Ravi Shanmugam For Respondent : Mr.T.N.Rajagopalan, Additional Government Pleader N. PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR, J.This writ appeal is filed against the order of the learned single Judge made in W.P.No.30952 of 2012 dated 7.1.2013, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant herein, praying for a direction to provisionally select him for the post of Grade-II Police Constable for the year 2012, subject to police verification and medical examination.2. The case of...


Apr 26 2013

K.Chandrabose Vs. State

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-26-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:26. 04.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S. PALANIVELU Criminal Appeal Nos.806 of 2011 & 415 of 2012 K.Chandrabose .. Appellant/2nd Accused [in Crl.A.No.806/2011] Khader Mohideen .. Appellant/1st accused [in Crl.A.No.415/2012] Vs State rep.by Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau South Zonal Unit Chennai .. Respondent [in both Crl.Appeals] Criminal Appeals filed u/s.374 (2) of Cr.P.C. against the judgment passed in C.C.No.315 of 2004 dated 28.10.2011 on the file of Special Judge, I Additional Special Court under NDPS Act, Chennai-104. For Appellants : Mr.M.Shanmugavelu [for A2] [in Crl.A.No.806 of 2011] Mr.T. Muruganantham[for A1] [in Crl.A.No.415 of 2012] For Respondents : Mr. Kumar Special Public Prosecutor for NCB cases [in both appeals] COMMON JUDGMENT 1 The following is the graphical narration of the prosecution case:1. (a) P.W.1 working as Intelligence Officer in the Nargotic Crime Branch, South Zonal Unit, Chennai, ...


Apr 26 2013

C.Mathesu Vs. Secretary to Government

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-26-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :26. .04..2013 C O R A M The Honourable Mr. R.K. AGRAWAL, Acting Chief Justice, The Honourable Mr. Justice N. PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR and The Honourable Mr. Justice K. VENKATARAMAN Writ Appeal No.2017 of 2011 C. Mathesu .. Appellant versus 1. The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-9.2. The Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-5.3. The District Collector, Collectorate, Salem-636 001.4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mettur Taluk, Salem District.5. The District Revenue Officer, Collectors Office, Salem District.6. The Tahsildar, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. .. Respondents - - - - - Prayer : Writ Appeal filed under Section 15 of the Letters Patent Act against the order passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in Writ Petition No.21089 of 2011 dated 15.9.2011. - - - - - For Petitioner :: Mr. Elango For Respondent :: Mr. T.N. Rajagopalan, Addl. Govt. Pleader. - - - - - R.K. Agrawal, Ac...


Apr 26 2013

M.Thanaraj Vs. M.Alamelu

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-26-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :- 26.04.2013 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.(PD) No. 90 of 2011 and M.P.No. 1 o1. M.Thanaraj 2. T.Padmavathi .. Petitioners Vs 1. M.Alamelu 2. M.Swaminathan .. Respondents Civil Revision Petition filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 3.1.2011 made in I.A.No.7 of 2011 in O.S.No.4 of 2011 on the file of the 1st Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore. For Petitioners :- Mr.N.Anand Venkatesh For Respondents :- Mr. S.Silambanan Senior Counsel for M/s. Profexs Associates ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is filed against an exparte order of interim injunction granted in I.A.No.7 of 2011 in O.S.No. 4 of 2011 by the learned District Munsif, Coimbatore.2. The petitioners are the first and third defendants in the above said suit filed by the first respondent herein. The said suit is one for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the su...


Apr 26 2013

igate Global Solutions Ltd. Vs. K.C.P.Shivraman

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-26-2013

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:26. 04.2013 Coram: The Honourable Mr.Justice M.Jaichandren and The Honourable Mr.Justice M.M.Sundresh O.S.A. No.203 of 2013 M/s.iGATE Global Solutions Ltd., rep. by its Authorised Signatory Mukund Srinath .. Appellant Vs. K.C.P.Shivraman Justice K.Raviraja Pandian .. Respondents PRAYER: Appeal is filed under Order xxxvi, rule 9 of the O.S. Rules r/w. Clause 15 of the Letters Patent as against the order passed in O.P.No.357 of 2012, dated 1.11.2012. ----- For appellant : Mr.G.Balasubramanian For respondent : Mr.P.R.Raman ----- [Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.Jaichandren, J.] Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the appellant, as well as the 1st respondent.2. At this stage of the hearing of the appeal, the learned counsels, appearing on behalf of the parties concerned, had filed a joint memo. stating that a settlement had been arrived at between the parties concerned, and they had also filed a copy of the settlement ...


Apr 26 2013

1.K.C.Sukumar Vs. 1.Kodaikanal Golf Club,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-26-2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:26. 04/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.1141 of 2003 and C.M.P.(MD)No.7725 o1. K.C.Sukumar 2.A.Vamanan 3.J.Swamidoss ... Appellant (The plaintiffs / petitioners for themselves and as the representatives of the dissenting members of the Golf Club, Kodaikanal) Vs 1.Kodaikanal Golf Club, Rep.by hits Honorary Secretary, 2.The District Registrar of Registration of Dindigul. 3.N.Srinivasan 4.Rajanvarma (The defendants are for themselves and as the representatives of the Office Bearers and Committee Members of the first defendant) ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section XLIII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure Code, against the order and the decreetal order of the learned Principal District Judge, Dindigul passed in I.A.No.1240 of 2002 in O.S.No.1 of 2002, dated 29.04.2003. !For Appellant .. Mr.V.K.Elango ^For Respondents .. No appearance for R-1 Mr.R.Velumurugan for R-2 R-4 (dismis...


Apr 26 2013

Selvaraj Vs. Venkatraman

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-26-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :26. 04.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. RAJASURIA S.A.No.366 of 2003 Selvaraj .. Appellant Vs. Venkatraman .. Respondent This Second Appeal is focussed as against the judgment and decree dated 12.10.2001 passed in A.S.No.53 of 2001 passed by the Principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai, confirming the judgment and decree dated 22.03.2001 in O.S.No.833 of 1998 passed by the Principal District Munsif, Mayiladuthurai. For Appellant : Mr.S.Sounthar For Respondent : Mr.R.Mohamed Hidayathullah JUDGMENT This Second appeal is focussed animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 12.10.2001 passed in A.S.No.53 of 2001 by the Principal Sub Court, Mayiladuthurai, confirming the judgment and decree dated 22.03.2001 in O.S.No.833 of 1998 passed by the Principal District Munsif, Mayiladuthurai.2. The parties are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status and ranking before the trial Court.3. Compendiously and concisely, the germ...


Apr 26 2013

Kasthuri Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Technical Education,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-26-2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:26. 04/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.(MD).No.14808 of 2012 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 and 2 of 2012 Kasthuri .. Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner of Technical Education, Chennai-600 025. 2.The Principal, 3846, Mother Terasa College of Engineering and Technology, Mettusalai, Illuppur-622 102, Pudukkottai District. .. Respondents Prayer Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 1st respondent in his proceedings letter nO.41342/J2/2012 dated 05.10.2012 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner's son by name K.Anandh to attend classes in the 1st year B.E., Mechnical Engineering Course in the college of the 2nd respondent. !For Petitioner ...Mr.T.M.Madasamy ^For Respondents ...Mrs.S.Bharathi for R1 Government Advocate Mr.R.P.Ramachandran for R2 :ORDER The petitioner obtained 38%...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial