Chennai Court March 2013 Judgments
S.R.Sujith Vs. 1.The Director General of Police,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:26. 03/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN W.P(MD)No.474 of 2013 W.P(MD)Nos. 553, 12501994. 2076, 2089, 2096, 2184, 2194, 2203, 2244, 2275, 2299, 2309, 2326, 2358, 2367, 2403, 2430, 2496, 2504, 2523, 2530, 2544, 2706, 2784, 2864, 2908, 2913, 3051, 3056, 3257, 3313, 3371, 3448, 3514, 3732 and 3807 of 2013 & M.P.(MD)Nos.1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1, 2, 2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2, 3, 3 and 4 of 2013 S.R.Sujith ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. 2.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Service Recruitment Board, No.807, Second Floor, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. 3.The Inspector of Police, Arumamani Police Station, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. 4.The Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents Prayer in W.P.(MD)No.474 of 2013 Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Con...
Tag this Judgment!G.Jeffrey Vs. Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :26. 03.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. RAJASURIA S.A.No. 851 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 G.Jeffrey .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Ltd., rep.by its Power of Attorney Diwakaran Moorkath, Mudis, Valparai Taluk, Coimbatore District. .. Respondent This Second Appeal is focussed as against the judgment and decree dated 28.9.2007 passed by the Sub Court, Pollachi, in A.S.No.39 of 2006, confirming the judgment and decree dated 09.09.2006 passed by the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Valparai, in O.S.No.117 of 2001. For appellant : Mr.N.Manokaran For respondent : Mr.V.Achuthan JUDGMENT This second appeal is focussed by thedefendant, animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated dated 28.9.2007 passed by the Sub Court, Pollachi, in A.S.No.39 of 2006, confirming the judgment and decree dated 09.09.2006 passed by the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Valparai, in O.S.No.117 of 2001, which was one ...
Tag this Judgment!V.Jayaraman Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :26.03.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.7339 OF 2005.WPMP Nos.8025 and 8026 of 2005 and WVMP No.1128 of 2005 V.Jayaraman .. Petitioner Vs 1. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board rep.by its Chairman 800, Anna Salai Chenna002. 2. The Superintending Engineer TEDC/Tuticorin Office of the Superintending Engineer Tuticorin Electricity Distribution Circle Tamilnadu Electricity Board Tuticori3. Chief Internal Audit Officer Board Office/Audit Branch Tamil Nadu Electricity Board 800 Anna Salai Chenna002. .. Respondents Prayer: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the clarification issued by the first respondent in Memo No.53005/C1/98-11(Secretariat Branch) dt.2.2.1999 at S.No.1 and the consequential orders issued by the 2nd respondent in Memo No.01456/ /Admn-I/A2/2005 dt.3.2.2005 refixing the petitioner's basi...
Tag this Judgment!Arulmigu Velur Vaithiyanatha Swamy Vs. Vaithiyanathan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :26. 03.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. RAJASURIA S.A.No.549 of 2008 Arulmigu Velur Vaithiyanatha Swamy Devasthanam, Vaiteeswarankoil rep.by its Hereditary Trustee Sri-La-Sri Shanmuga Desiga Gnanasambanda Paramacharya Swamigal Adhinakarthar, Dharumapuram Madam Mayiladuthurai Nagapattinam District. .. Appellant vs.1. Vaithiyanathan 2. Ganesan rep.by Power Agent Kannan .. Respondents This second Appeal is focussed as against the judgment and decree dated 17.12.2007 passed by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Mayiladuthurai in A.S.No.67 of 2007 in confirming the judgment and decree dated 27.06.2007 passed by the learned District Munsif, Sirkali in O.S.No.27 of 2001. For appellant : Mr.S.Sounthar For respondents : Mr.M.V.Venkataseshan JUDGMENT This second appeal is focussed by the plaintiff, animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 17.12.2007 passed by the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Mayiladuthurai in A.S.No.6...
Tag this Judgment!Official Liquidator Vs. Collector of Vellore District
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:26. 03/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA Comp. A.No.1087 of 2008 in C.P.No.14 of 1997 THE OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS. AS THE LIQUIDATOR OF M/S.AKBER LEATHER LIMITED., (IN LIQUIDATION) VS THE COLLECTOR VELLORE DISTRICT. THASILDAR VANIAMBADI, NORTH ARCOT DISTRICT. THE HINDU EDUCATIONAL TRUST REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DR.M.R.KANTHIRAJ, AMBUR 802. CANARA BANK NO.5, GREAMS ROAD, MADRAS006. TIIC 692 ANNA SALAI, NANDANAM, MADRAS - 35. SIPCOT 5 AND 52.GREAMS ROAD, THOUSAND LIGHTS, CHENNAI -6. IRBI 769 ANNA SALAI, CHENNAI - 2. VIJAYA BANK NO.46,MOORE STREET, CHENNAI-1. ORDER This application under section 460(4) of the Companies Act, 1956 read with Rules 9, 11(b) of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 has been filed by the Official Liquidator to declare that the auction sale conducted by the District Collector and Thasildar, Vaniyambadi, Vellore District as null and void in view of section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956. I...
Tag this Judgment!N.Suresh Vs. Indian Bank
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:26.03.2013 Coram THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE ELIPE DHARMA RAO AND THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.P.No.5760 of 2013 N.Suresh .. Petitioner Vs. The Indian Bank, MICRO A R M Branch, Rep. By its Chief Manager, No.55, Ground Floor, Ethiraj Salai, Egmore, Chenna008. .. Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for an issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondent bank culminating in passing impugned communication dated 11.02.2013 and quash the same and consequently directing the bank to refund Rs.4.70 Lakhs wit interest @ 18% per annum to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Ram ORDER M.VENUGOPAL,J.The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the Respondent/Bank relating to the impugned communication dated 11.02.2013 and to quash the same. Further, the Petitione...
Tag this Judgment!A.Abdul Ajis Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:26. 03/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA W.P.(MD)No.553 of 2012 W.P.(MD)No.554 to 565 of 2012 W.P.(MD)No.553 of 2012: A.Abdul Ajis .. Petitioner Vs 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, through its Secretary, School Education Department, Chennai-9. 2.The Director of Public Libraries, 737, Anna Salai, Chennai-2. 3.The District Library Officer, Office of the District Library, Thanjavur. .. Respondents W.P.(MD)No.553 of 2012 filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularise the service of the petitioner from the date of his initial appointment i.e., as on 01.08.1997 along with all consequential service and monetary benefits. !For petitioner ... Mr.M.Gnanagurunathan ^For respondents... Mr.B.Pugalenthi, Special Government Pleader :COMMON ORDER (Order of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, J.) It is ...
Tag this Judgment!P.Venkatasamy (Retd Si 1090) Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:26. 03/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN W.P(MD)No.2642 of 2013 P.Venkatasamy (Retd SI 1090.... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chennai-600 004. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar. ... Respondents Prayer Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the third respondent in C.not A1(2)/14686/2011, dated 19.04.2011 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to revise and regularise the service seniority and give notional promotion with monetary benefits to the petitioner. !For Petitioner ... Mr.A.Rajaram ^For Respondents... Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohidheen Additional Government Pleader :ORDER The petitioner was...
Tag this Judgment!1.The Divisional Manager, Vs. 1.Gangadevi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:26/03/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A(MD) No.248 of 2011 and M.P(MD)No.1 o1. The Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited, Thallakulam, Madurai. (147, Salai Road, Ramanathapuram). .. Appellant vs 1.Gangadevi 2.Minor.Sathiyendra Stalin 3.Minor.Manoj Kumarasamy 4.Minor.Dinesh Babu 5.Velu 6.C.Illangovan .. Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.68 of 2007, dated 15.09.2009, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District and Sessions Court, Fast Track Court, Ramanathapuram. !For Appellant ... Mr.J.S.Murali ^For Respondent ... Mr.D.SrinivasaRaghavan for R1to R4 Mr.K.Rajkumar for R6 :JUDGMENT The appellant/2nd respondent has preferred the present appeal in CMA(MD).No.248 of 2011, against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.68 of 2007, on the file of the Motor Accident...
Tag this Judgment!B.K.Velu Vs. Mg. Director of Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Boar ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 26 03.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.24288 of 2005, W.P.M.P.No.26528 of 2005 and W.V.M.P.No.1680 of 2006 B.K.Velu .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board, Chepauk, Chenna005. 2.The Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Maintenance Division, Alandur, Chenna016. .. Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the second respondent in Proceedings No.3141-4/EA3/ALR/2004, dated 27.9.2004 and the consequential order of recovery issued by the second respondent in Proceedings No.3141-4/EA3/ALR/2004, dated 24.6.2005, quash the same and direct the second respondent to restore the pay fixation as existed prior to the issue of the impugned order and grant all consequential benefits to the petitioner. For Petitioner .....
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »