Chennai Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vijaya Ammal Vs. Ramalinga Naidu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :- . 03.2013 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU C.R.P.(NPD) No.4158 of 2010 M.P.No.1 of 2010 Vijaya Ammal ... Petitioner Vs.1. Ramalinga Naidu 2. Illangovan .. Respondents Civil Revision Petition filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 4.8.2010 made in E.A.No.251 of 2009 in E.P.No.2 of 2004 in O.S.No.166 of 2002 on the file of the Additional Sub Court No.1, Cuddalore. For Petitioners :- Mrs.Chitra Sampath Senior Counsel for M/s. T.S.Baskaran For Respondents :- Mrs.Manjula Bhaskar for R.Gururaj ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is filed against an order made in E.A.No.251 of 2009 in E.P.No. 2 of 2004 in O.S.No. 166 of 2002 on the file of the Additional Sub Court No.1, Cuddalore allowing the application filed by the respondents herein under Section 28 of the Specific Relief Act.2. The petitioner herein as the plaintiff filed a suit in O.S.No. 166 of 2002 on the file of the Sub- Court Cuddalore for specific performan...
Manikannan Vs. Sambandam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :- .03.2013 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.RAVICHANDRABAABU C.R.P.(PD) No. 885 of 2011 and M.P.No. 1 of 2011 Manikannan ... Petitioner Vs Sambandam ... Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed against the fair and decreetal order dated 21.1.2011 made in I.A.No.13 of 2011 in O.S.No.549 of 2007 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Cuddalore. For Petitioner :- Mr.P.Mani For Respondents :- No appearance ORDER The Plaintiff in a suit for declaration and for permanent injunction is the petitioner before this Court. He is aggrieved against the order passed by the Court below in condoning the delay of filing certain documents by the respondent herein.2. The claim of the petitioner as the plaintiff in O.S.No.549 of 2007 on the file of the District Munsif Court is that the suit properties are the joint family properties and in pursuant to a partition deed dated 11.6.1979, the plaintiff is in possession and enjoyment of the propertie...
M.Thilagavathi Vs. Government of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :01. 03.2013 Coram THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA W.P.No.14421 o1. M.Thilagavathi 2. M.Prathiba, Minor, rep. by her Mother & Natural Guardian M.Thilagavathi. .. Petitioners .. Vs ..1. Government of Tamilnadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Health Department, Secretariat, Chennai.2. Tamilnadu State Aids Control Society, rep. by its Managing Director/Chairman, 417, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai.3. Corporation of Chennai, Aids Prevention & Control Society, rep. by its Chairman/ Managing Director, Thiru-vi-ka Road, Mylapore, Chennai.4. M/s.Shashi Advertising Agency 100, Montieth Road, I Floor, Queens Court, Egmore, Chennai. (R-4 impleaded as per Court order dt. 11.04.2011 in M.P.No.1/2011) ...Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to forbear them from displaying the petitioners' photographs in their ...
Balaselvi Vs. Adhimoolam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :01. - 03 - 2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. VENUGOPAL Civil Revision Petition (PD) No. 2615 of 2011 and M.P. No. 1 of 2011 Balaselvi .. Petitioner/Respondent/Plaintiff Vs. Adhimoolam Rep. by Power agent Mrs. Dhanavalli .. Respondent/Petitioner/First Defendant Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decretal order of the learned 1st Additional District Munsif, Vridhachalam, in I.A. No. 96 of 2010 in O.S. No. 152 of 2006 dated 05.01.2011. For Petitioner : Ms. AL. Ganthimathi For Respondent : Mr. S. Arun for Mr. R. Thirumoorthy ORDER The Revision Petitioner / Respondent / Plaintiff has preferred the instant Civil Revision Petition as against the order dated 05.01.2011 in I.A. No. 96 of 2010 in O.S. No. 152 of 2006 passed by the Learned 1st Additional District Munsif, Vridhachalam.2. The Learned 1st Additional District Munsif, Vridhachalam, while passing the impugned order in I.A. No. 96 of...
D.Somasundaram Vs. Director General of Prisons
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :01. 03.2013 Coram THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA W.P.No.14422 of 2009 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2009 D.Somasundaram .. Petitioner .. Vs ..1. The Director General of Prisons, Tamil Nadu, Chennai.2. The Superintendent of Prisons, Central Prison, Salem. .. Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 1st respondent in connection (1) with the impugned panel issued in Pro.No.4331/Ew1/2009 dated 18.02.2009 to the limited extent of non inclusion of the name of the petitioner therein and (2) the order of rejection passed by the second respondent in Pro.not Po.1/9486/2008 dated 04.07.2009 and to quash the same and issue consequential directions to include the name of the petitioner at Sr.No.16 in the Panel for promotion as Grade I Warder for the year 2008-2009 as approved on 18.02.2009 and to promote him as ...
The Divisional Manager, Vs. 1.Pushpam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:01. 03/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A(MD) No.592 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2012 The Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited, 108, T.P.K.Road, Madurai. .. Appellant vs 1.Pushpam 2.Reegan Durai 3.Minor.Rajarajeswari (Minor 3rd respondent through her Guardian 1st respondent Pushpam) 4.V.Madasamy .. Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 28.07.2008, made in M.C.O.P.No.121 of 2007, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Ramanathapuram. !For Appellant ... Mr.K.Bhaskaran ^For Respondent ... Mr.S.Ramesh for R1 and R3 (R3-minor represented by R1) Mr.K.Suresh for R2 Mr.K.Kumaravel for R4 :JUDGMENT The appellant/2nd respondent has preferred the present appeal in C.M.A.(MD)No.592 of 2012, against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.121 of 2...
The Management, Vs. 1.Shanthi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:01. 03/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A(MD) No.1118 of 2011 and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2011 The Management, Vinayakam Chalk Industries, 137/14, Arunjunai Nagar, Avaniapuram, Madurai 012. .. Appellant vs 1.Shanthi 2.Minor.T.Ramya 3.Minor.T.Manikandan (2nd and 3rd minor respondents through the 1st respondent who is their mother and natural guardian) .. Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, against the Judgment and Decree dated 07.03.2011, made in W.C.No.77 of 2009, on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of Labour for Workmen's Compensation, Madurai, as amended by the erratum order dated 14.07.2011 . !For Appellant ... M/s.R. Sivamanogaran ^For Respondent ... M/s.V.Kannan for R1 :JUDGMENT The appellant/1st opposite party has preferred the present appeal in C.M.A.(MD)No.1118 of 2011, against the order passed in W.C.No.77 of 2009, on the file of the Deputy Commiss...
Geetha Vs. S.Subramaniam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE :01. 03.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M. VENUGOPAL C.R.P.(PD) No.2843 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 o1. Geetha 2.Kaveriammal 3.Parimala @ Mani 4.K.Raj .. Petitioners/Petitioners/Petitioners/Defendants 9 to 12 Vs S.Subramaniam .. Respondent/Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India against the Order passed by the Learned Additional District Judge, Namakkal, in I.A.No.75 of 2012 in I.A.No.48 of 2012 in O.S.No.322 of 2004 dated 25.04.2012. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Marudhachalamurthy For Respondent : Mr.A.Valliappan ORDER The Petitioners/9 to 12 Defendants has filed the present Civil Revision Petition as against the Order dated 25.04.2012 in I.A.No.75 of 2012 in I.A.No.48 of 2012 in O.S.No.322 of 2004 passed by the Learned Additional District Judge, Namakkal. 2.The Learned Additional District Judge, Namakkal, while passing orders in I.A.No.75 of 2012 in I.A.No.48 of 20...
Commissioner of Income Tax I Vs. Armour Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:1. -03-2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU Tax Case (Appeal) No.2 of 2010 Commissioner of Income Tax I Chennai. .... Appellant Versus M/s.Armour Consultants P.Ltd., No.2A PrakasamRoad T.Nagar Chennai 17. .... Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal "D" Bench, dated 26.6.2009, in I.T.A No.736/Mds/2008, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 2004-05. For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar Sr.Standing Counsel for I.T. For Respondent : Mr.R.Sivaraman JUDGMENT K.RAVICHANDRABAABU,J.The assessee is on appeal as against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in respect of the assessment year 2004-2005, by raising the following substantial question of law:- 1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that that the assessee w...
The Branch Manager, Vs. 1.Velappan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:01. 03/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A(MD) No.817 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 The Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Limited, Anguvilas Building, North Car Street, Nagercoil. .. Appellant vs 1.Velappan 2.Henry 3.The Branch Manager, Oriental Insurance Company, Vadaseri Bus Stand, Nagercoil. .. Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 23.12.2011, made in M.C.O.P.No.17 of 2010, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Court, Padmanabhapuram. !For Appellant ... Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan ^For Respondent ... Mr.H.Thayumanasamy for R1 Mr.T.Hajapathiroy for R2 Mr.S.Murugan for R3 :JUDGMENT The appellant/2nd respondent has preferred the present appeal in C.M.A.(MD)No.817 of 2012, against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.17 of 2010, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Subordin...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »