Chennai Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.Subha Vs. Deputy Inspector General of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :04. 03.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.31503 of 2012 K.Subha .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Group Centre, Central Reserve Police Force, Avadi, Chennai Tamil Nadu. 2.The Inspector General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, Banjara Hills Southern Sector, Andhra Pradesh. 3.The Director General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, CGO Complex Lodhi Road, New Delhi. .. Respondents This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent to extend the child care leave from 30 days sanctioned on the first respondent's letter dated Nil 10.2012 not L.11.,16/2012 SRC-1-GC to one year. For Petitioner : Ms.Kovi Ramalingam For Respondents : Mr.S.Udayakumar, SCGSC for RR1 to 3 - - - - ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks for a direction to the respondents to extend the child care lea...
Maya Manikandan Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :04. 03.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.2546 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Maya Manikandan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu, rep by the Secretary to Government, Department of Law, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director of Legal Studies, Purasawalkam High Road, Chennai-600 010. 3.The Registrar, The Tamil Nadu Dr.Ambedkar Law University, Dr.D.G.S.Dinakaran Salai, Chennai-600 028. 4.The Secretary, Bar Council of India, Rose Avenue, New Delhi. 5.The Secretary, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu, Madras High Court Buildings, Chennai-600 104. 6.The Secretary, University Grants Commission, Bhadur Shar Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110 002. 7.S.Narayana Perumal, The Principal, Dr.Ambedkar Law College, Chennai-600 104. .. Respondents This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of quo warranto directing the 7th respondent to show cause by what authority he claim...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sakuntala Devi Khetan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:04. 03-2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU Tax Case (Appeal) Nos.59 to 63 of 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax , Central I, Chennai. .. Appellant in all the appeals Versus Smt.Sakuntala Devi Khetan .. Respondent in all the appeals Prayer: Appeals filed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal "D" Bench, dated 7.11.2008, in I.T.A Nos.2057/Mds/2006, 2750 to 2753 /Mds/2005 under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 1998-99 to 2002-2003 For Appellant : Mr.M.Swaminathan For Respondent : Mr.J.Balachander for M/s. S.Sridhar JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by K.RAVICHANDRABAABU J.) The Revenue is on appeal in respect of the assessment years 1998-1999 to 2002-2003. The following is the common substantial question of law raised in all these appeals :- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the App...
The Commissioner, Vs. 1.The Appellate Authority Under
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-04-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:04. 03/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.(MD) No.333 of 2007 W.P.(MD) Nos.334 to 344 of 2007 W.P/(MD).No.333 of 2007 The Commissioner, Trichirapalli Corporation, Trichirapalli. ... Petitioner vs 1.The Appellate Authority Under Payment of Gratuity Act and Joint Commissioner of Labour, Madurai - 20. 2.The Controlling Authority Under the Payment of Gratuity Act and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Kajamalai, Trichy - 20. 3.Marammal ... Respondents Prayerin W.P.(MD).No.333 of 2007 The Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the first respondent relating to the order dated 26.09.2006, made in I.A.No.1 of 2006, quash the same and consequently, direct the first respondent to number the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order of second respondent made in P.G.No.8 of 1999, dated 31.10.2001 and hear and dispose the s...
K.Kalaiselvi Vs. Chennai Port Trust
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :04. 03.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.8188 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2012 K.Kalaiselvi .. Petitioner Vs. Chennai Port Trust, rep by the Chairman, 1,Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001. .. Respondent This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the respondent pertaining to the impugned letter dated 5.12.2011, quash the same and consequently to direct the respondent to grant the petitioner herein maternity leave on equal footing with the leave granted under Rule 3A of the Madras Port Trust (Leave) Regulations, 1987, to adoptive mothers For Petitioner : Mr.Srinath Sridevan For Respondent : Mr.M.Devendran for Port Trust - - - - ORDER The short question that arises for consideration in this writ petition is whether a woman employee working in the Chennai Port Trust is entitled to avail maternity leave e...
Sree Balaji Medical College Hospital Vs. the State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:1. 3-2013 Coram: The Honourable Mr.Justice M.JAICHANDREN Review Application No.180 of 2012 in W.P.No.22679 of 2012 Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital No.7, Works Road Chrompet Chennai-600 044, Represented by Dean, Dr.S.Balakrishnan .. Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Tamilnadu Represented by its Secretary, Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.2. The Deputy Commissioner (CT) Enforcement South, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006.3. The Assistant Commissioner (CT) Tambaram-I, Assessment Circle, Chennai-600 045. .. Respondents. Prayer: Review Application filed under Order XLVJ Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Section 114 of Code of Civil Procedure, seeking to review the order of this Hon'ble Court, dated 11.9.2012, made in W.P.No.22679 of 2012. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sumitra For Respondents : Mr.R.Sivaraman O R D E R Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, as well as th...
Anand Cine Services Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:1. 03.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU T.C.(R) NOS.10 TO 1.AND 3.OF 201.M/s.Anand Cine Services, No.2, Sarangapani Street, T.Nagar, Chenna017. ... Petitioner in TC.(R) Nos.10 and 11 of 2010 M/s.Manorama Films NO.2, Sarangapani Street, T.Nagar, Chenna017. .... Petitioner in T.C.(R) Nos.12 and 13 of 2010 M/s.Ravishankar Films (P) Ltd., No.2, Sarangapani Street, T.Nagar, Chenna017. ... Petitioner in T.C.(R) No.38 of 2010 Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, rep.by Joint Commissioner (CT) Chennai, (Central) Division, PAPJM Building, Greams Road, Chenna006. .... Respondent in all Tax Cases Prayer: T.C.(R) Nos.10 to 13 of 2010 are filed under Section 38 of the T.N.G.S.T.Act, 1959 and Rule 30 of T.N.G.S.T.Rules, 1959 against the Order dated 25.8.2009 made in T.A.Nos.393, 402, 405 and 406 of 2002 respectively on the file of Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Main Bench), Chennai. T.C.(R)...
N.Rajasekaran Vs. District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:01. 03.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA W.P.No.5639 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 o1. N.Rajasekaran 2. Kanagasabai ... Petitioners -vs- 1. The District Collector, Kancheepuram District Kancheepuram 2. The Chief Educational Officer, Kancheepuram District Kancheepuram 3. The District Elementary Educational Officer, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram 4. The Assistant Director/District Employment Officer, Kancheepuram District Kancheepuram ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 1 to 4 from making any appointment to the post of Secondary Grade Teachers in the vacancies in Kancheepuram District for which certificate verification was fixed from 26.02.2008 and direct the respondents to publish the seniority list and notify the vacancies with details of breakups and after conducting an enquiry into the genuini...
M.Guruprasad Vs. Tamilnadu Transport Corpn
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :01. 03.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA Writ Petition No.34400 of 2005 M.Guruprasad .. Petitioner -vs- Tamil Nadu Transport Corporation (Kovai) Ltd., rep.by its General Manager Coimbatore-43 .. Respondent Petition under Article 226 of The Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent Corporation to consider the case of the petitioner also for the post of driver in pursuance of the interview called for by the respondent in his ref.No.547/E3A/51A/PTHU1/THAPOKA(KO)/05 dated 28.9.2005 for which an interview was conducted on 17.10.2005. For Petitioner :: Mr.M.Rajasekar for Mr.A.Muthuraman For Respondent :: Mr.S.Sairaman ORDER This writ petition was filed by M.Guruprasad seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent-Corporation to consider the case of the petitioner also for the post of Driver in pursuance of the interview called for by the respondent in his Ref.No.547...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rajalingam Lorry Transport
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :01. 03.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. VIJAYARAGHAVAN Second Appeal No.489 o1. The Oriental Insurance Co., Ltd., (Aided by General Insurance Co. of India) Coimbator018. 2. M/s.Sri Ramakrishna Mills (CBE) Ltd., rep., by its Power Agent, Sathymangalam Salai, Ganapathy. .. Appellants Vs. M/s.Rajalingam Lorry Transport, rep., by its Managing Officer, Thiruthani. .. Respondent Prayer:- Second Appeal is filed under Section100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree, dated 14.09.2004, passed in A.S.No.44 of 2004, on the file of the Principal District Judge, Erode, thereby, setting aside the judgment and decree, dated 5.4.2002, passed in O.S.No.210 of 2000, on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Gobichettipalayam. For Appellants : Mr.M.Venkataraman for M/s.Nageswaran & Narichania For Respondent : Mr.G. Rajagopal Senior Counsel for M/s.G.R.Associates JUDGEMENT This Second Appeal arises out of the judgment and...