Chennai Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V.Ravi Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-12-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:12. 03.2013 THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA W.P.No.3702 o1. V.Ravi 2. M.Sukumar .. Petitioners -vs- 1. The Government of Tamil Nadu Rep. By the Principal Secretary to the Govt., Transport Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.2. M.S.Kandavel 3. S.Thiyagarajan 4. P.Shanmugam .. Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 1st respondent in his proceedings in G.O.Ms.No.31, Transport (D) Dept., dated 10.02.2012, quash the same and direct the 1st respondent to promote the petitioners to the post of Manager (Finance & Accounts) as per the Common Service Rules. For Petitioner : Mr.Vijaya Narayanan, S.C., For Mr.R.Parthiban For R1 : Mr.R.Govindaswamy For R2 : Mr.V.Udaya Kumar For R3 & R4 : Mr.S.Sairaman ***** O R D E R The petitioner has approached this Court with the prayer for issuance of a writ in the...
The Branch Manager, Vs. 1.T.Robinson
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-12-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:12. 03/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.729 of 2012 & M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2012 The Branch Manager, M/s.United India Insurance Company Limited, Nagarcoil. ... Appellant Vs. 1.T.Robinson 2.Philip 3.Gurpersing Surjitsing Bajawasing ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the judgment and decree dated 28.11.2005 made in M.C.O.P.No.21 of 1999, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sub Court, Padmanabapuram. !For Appellant ... Mr.B.Rajesh Saravan ^For Respondents... No appearance for R-1 R-2 and R-3 (given up) - - - :JUDGMENT The appellant / third respondent has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.21 of 1999, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sub Court, Padmanabapuram.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The petitioner has filed the claim in M.C.O.P.No.21...
Oveyam Ranjan Vs. Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-12-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:12. 3.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ELIPE DHARMA RAO AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE ARUNA JAGADEESAN Writ Petitions No.28303 of 2010 and 11910 of 2011 W.P.No.28303 of 2010: -------------------- Oveyam Ranjan, President, Namadhu Dravida Iyakkam, S.C.C.Anthony Pillai Labor Union, S.C.C.Anthony Pillai Illam, New No.41, Old No.18, 7th Cross Street, West Shenoy Nagar, Chennai-600030. .. Petitioner Vs.1. Union of India, Represented by Secretary to Government, Ministry of Civil Aviation, Rajiv Gandhi Bhavan, Safdarjung Airport, New Delhi-110003.2. The Airport Authority of India, (An Authority constituted under the Airport Authority Act), Rajiv Gandhi Bhavan, Safdarjung Airport, New Delhi-110003, represented by its Executive Director (Commercial) 3. Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (Known as 'BCAS'), Ministry of Home Affairs, 'A' Wing, 1-3rd Floor, Janpath Bhavan, New Delhi-110001, represented by its Commissioner 4. Research Analyst Wing...
M.K.V.K.Palrajan Vs. 1.S.Perumal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-12-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:12. 03/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.77 of 2012 & M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 M.K.V.K.Palrajan ... Appellant Vs. 1.S.Perumal 2.S.Veeraputhiran 3.A.Sermaraj ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, to set-aside the judgment and decree in M.C.O.P.No.200 of 2005, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Additional Sub Court, Tenkasi, dated 08.10.2010. !For Appellant ... Mr.S.Meeakshi Sundaram ^For Respondents... Mr.M.Vinoth Sing Mishra for R-1 - - - :JUDGMENT The appellant / first respondent has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.200 of 2005, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Additional Sub Court, Tenkasi.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The petitioner has filed the claim in M.C.O.P.No.200 of 2005, claiming compensation of a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- from the resp...
R.Thiyagarajan Vs. Secretary to the Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-12-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:12. 03.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR W.P.No.1898 of 2007 and M.P.No.1 of 2007 R.Thiyagarajan .. Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Secretary to the Government (Commercial Taxes) Appellate Authority under the Chit Funds Act Fort St. George Chennai-602. The Registrar of Chits District Registrar Office Kumbakonam 3.Iyya Chits Pvt., Ltd., 18, 19, Ramasamy Koil Sannathi Street Kumbakonam .. Respondents Writ petition filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order passed in G.O.(D).No.591 Commercial Taxes and Registration (K) Department dated 1.12.2006 on the file of the 1st respondent herein confirming the award dated 5.4.2004 passed in A.R.C.No.108 of 2000 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein and to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Raja For Respondents : Mr.I.Arogyasami, Govt. Advocate for R1 and R2 Mr.S.Thiruvenkataswamy for R3 O R D E R The a...
K.Ramakrishnan Vs. 1.A.Babu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-12-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:12. 03/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.977 of 2012 K.Ramakrishnan ... Appellant Vs. 1.A.Babu 2.National Insurance Company Limited, Represented by its Branch Manager, Tallakulam, Madurai. ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, to modify the fair order and Ex-order dated 15.09.2006 made in M.C.O.P.No.1060 of 1999, on the file of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-III, Madurai. !For Appellant ... Mr.S.Suriyanarayanan ^For Respondents... Mr.K.C.Ramalingam for R-1 M/s.P.Malini - - - :JUDGMENT The appellant / petitioner has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.1060 of 1999, on the file of Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-III, Madurai.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The petitioner has filed the claim in M.C.O.P.No.1060 of 1999, claiming compens...
C.V.Balaji Vs. Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-12-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :12. 03.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA W.P.No.12851 of 2009 and M.P.No.2 of 2009 C.V.BALAJI S/O.C.T.VENKATASWAMY, 18 SWAMI RAMDASAR SALAI, PARASAKTHI NAGAR, THIRUVERKADU, CHENNAI-77. .. PETITIONER Vs. 1 THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT EDUCATION DEPARTMENT FORT ST. GEORGE CHENNAI-9. 2 THE DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION DPI COMPLEX CHENNAI-6. 3 THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER PONNERI. 4 THE HEAD MASTER SRI DEVI KARUMARIAAMMAN DEVASTHANM JEEVARATHINAAMMAL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL THIRUVERKADU CHENNAI 60007 .. RESPONDENTS PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the impugned order of the second respondent passed in Na.Ka.No.2866/D1(1)/03 dt.1.3.2005 and the order of the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.3979/A3/2002 dt.26.5.2005 so far as non-approval of the petitioner from 1.9.1999 to 19.2.2004 alone and consequently direct...
R.Muthukrishnan Vs. Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-12-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :12. 3-2013 CORAM: The Honourable Mr.R.K.AGRAWAL, Acting Chief Justice and The Honourable Mr.Justice N. PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR Writ Petition No.4854 of 2013 M.P.No.1 of 2013 R. Muthukrishnan .. Petitioner Vs. Union of India, rep.by 1. The Secretary, Ministry of Information & Broadcasting, Government of India, Shastri Bhawan, Dr.Rajendra Prasad Marg, New Delh001. 2. The Director General, All India Radio, Prasar Bharati, (Broadcasting Corporation of India), Akashwani Bhawan, Parliament Street, New Delh001. 3. The Additional Director General, All India Radio, Prasar Bharati, (Broadcasting Corporation of India), Kamarajar Salai, Mylapore, Chenna004. .. Respondents This writ petition is filed with a prayer to issue a writ of declaration that broadcasting of paid commercials by the respondents in All India Radio is illegal and unconstitutional, (1) for its being repugnant to the law with respect to broadcasting, (2) for it infringes the fundame...
C.Kumar Vs. President of Iyyappanthangal Town Panchayat
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-12-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:12. 03.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR W.P.No.21709 of 2007, W.P.No.15318 of 2007 & W.P.No.12001 of 2007 W.P.No.21709 of 2007 -------------------- 1.C.Kumar 2. C.Chandrasekar 3.R.Pachaiammal 4.R.Murugan 5.V.Dharmalingam 6.N.Haridoss 7.S.Rani 8.V.Shantha 9.Ashok Kumar 10.P.Kameswari 11.P.V.Pullamma 12.N.Pencilliah 13.M.Vengamma 14. C.H.Seenivasalu 15.M.Pencillamma 16. V.Kannan 17.Sakthivel 18.Basheer Mohamed 19.V.Arumugam 20. C.Pencilliah 21.Andal 22. G.Leela Rajeswari 23. K.Murugesan 24. P.Shanthi 25. K.Durai 26. K.Arunprasath 27. E.Perumal 28. N.Thirugnanasundaramoorthy 29. K.Shahjahan 30.K.Kannan 31.K.Russel 32.T.Thomas 33.T.Arul 34.T.Dinakaran 35.T.Kumar 36.K.Krishnamurthy 37.K.Palani 38.K.Shanmugam 39.Swarthammal 40.V.Kasturi 41.Kumaradas .. Petitioners -Vs- 1. The President Town Panchayat Iyyappanthangal Chenna056. 2. The Tahsildar Sriperumbudur 3. The District Collector Office of Collectorate Kancheepuram .....
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corpo ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-11-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:11. .03.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU T.C.(A) NO.974 OF 201.Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai .. Appellant Vs. M/s.Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation Limited, 19-A, Rukmani Lakshmipathy Road, Egmore, Chenna008. .. Respondent Prayer: Tax Case Appeal is filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the Order dated 2.3.2010 made in I.T.A.No.48/Mds/2010. For Appellant : Mr.J.Narayanasamy Standing Counsel for Income-tax. For Respondent : Mr.S.Sridhar JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU,J.) The revenue is on appeal aggrieved against the Order passed by the Tribunal dated 3.3.2010 in I.T.A.No.1192/Mds/09 in respect of the assessment year 2004-2005.2. Brief facts are that the assessee is a Government Tamil Nadu Enterprise engaged with the main object of promotion of Industries in the State of Tamilnadu by participating in Equit...