Chennai Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
C.Algammal Vs. 1.The District Collector,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:18. 03/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.(MD).No.2 of 2012 C.Algammal . . Petitioner 1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 2.The District Project Officer, Office of the Integrated Child, Development Programme, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai. 3.Child Development Project Officer, S.Pudur Block, Thiruppathur Taluk, Sivagangai District. . . Respondents Prayer Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Letter not Na.Ka.No.1873/A3/2011, dated ---11.2011 signed on 18.11.2011 on the file of the second respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the respondents to disburse the subsistence allowance during the suspension period of four months to the petitioner. !For Petitioner ... Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy ^For Respondents... Mr.S.Sadeshkumar AGP :ORDER ...
National Insurance Company Limited, Vs. 1.C.Ravichandran
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:18. 03/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.1308 of 2011 & M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 National Insurance Company Limited, No.92-F, Thevarpuram Road, Tuticorin. ... Appellant Vs. 1.C.Ravichandran 2.M/s.Diamond Sea Foods, No.3/52, Krishnarajapuram, Tuticorin. ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, to set-aside the judgment and decree passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Thoothukudi in M.C.O.P.No.325 of 2010, dated 29.03.2011. !For Appellant ... Mr.D.Sivaraman ^For Respondents... Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai for R-2 - - - :JUDGMENT The appellant / second respondent has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.325 of 2010, on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Thoothukudi.2. The short facts of the case are a...
The Branch Manager, Vs. 1.Dr.Mohandhas Gandhi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:18. 03/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.447 of 2007 & M.P(MD)No.1 of 2007 and Cross Objection (MD)No.23 of 2007 C.M.A.(MD)No.447 of 2007 The Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Limited, 140, Gandhi Kalaimanram Road, Rajapalayam Town, Virudhunagar District. ... Appellant Vs. 1.Dr.Mohandhas Gandhi 2.Murugansingh, (Ex-parte in Tribunal, notice dispensed with) ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, to set-aside the order and decree dated 05.01.2006 passed in M.C.O.P.No.58 of 2005, on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Virudhunagar District, Srivilliputur. !For Appellant ... Mr.S.Ramachandran ^For Respondents ... Mr.A.Sivaji for R-1 - - - Cross Objection (MD)No.23 of 2007 Dr.Mohandhas Gandhi ... Cross Objector Vs. 1.The Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Limited, 140, Gandhi Kalaimanram ...
The Manager, Vs. 1.Govindaraj
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:18. 03/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.142 of 2011 & M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2011 The Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, 23-E, E.V.R.Road, Puthur, Tiruchy. ... Appellant Vs. 1.Govindaraj 2.S.Ramu ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the judgment and decree in M.C.O.P.No.318 of 2003, dated 21.12.2006, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, District Additional Fast Track Court, Tiruchirappalli. !For Appellant ... Mr.J.S.Murali ^For Respondents... Mr.S.Muthukrishnan for R-1 - - - :JUDGMENT The appellant / second respondent has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.318 of 2003,on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, District Additional Fast Track Court, Tiruchirappalli.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The petitioner has filed the claim in M.C.O...
Saraswathi Vs. Malaiappa Gounder
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :18. 03.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. RAJASURIA S.A.No.58 of 2013 Saraswathi .. Appellant Vs.1. Malaiappa Gounder 2. Subramaniam 3. Nallasamy 4. Kaliappan 5. Pattayappa Gounder 6. Palanisamy 7. Thirumoorthy @ Appukutty .. Respondents This Second Appeal is focussed as against the judgment and decree dated 22.10.2007 in A.S.No.46 of 2006 on the file of the Subordinate Judge at Tiruppur reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.256 of 2003 dated 20.09.2006 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tiruppur. For appellant : Ms.D.Chitra Maragatham JUDGMENT This Second appeal is focussed by the first defendant animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 22.10.2007 passed in A.S.No.46 of 2006 by the Subordinate Judge at Tiruppur, reversing the judgment and decree of the District Munsif Court, Tiruppur in O.S.No.256 of 2003.2. The parties are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status and ranking before th...
Chennai Port Trust Vs. V.Adimulam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:18. 3-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH Writ Appeal No.958 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 The Chennai Port Trust Represented by its Chairman Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001. .. Appellant. Versus V.Adimulam .. Respondent. Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act, seeking to set aside the order dated 6.9.2010, passed in W.P.No.32869 of 2003. For Appellant : Mr.R.Karthikeyan For Respondent : Mr.R.Parthiban (R1) JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by M.Jaichandren,J.) This writ appeal has been filed against the order of the learned single Judge of this court, dated 6.9.2010, made in W.P.No.32869 of 2003. The appellant in the present writ appeal was the respondent in the writ petition, in W.P.No.32869 of 2003.2. The writ petition had been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to t...
J.Stanislaus Vs. Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 15 03.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.Nos.5378 and 5379 of 2005 J.Stanislaus .. Petitioner in both petitions Vs. 1.Union of India, Rep. By its Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Insurance and Personnel Wing, New Delhi. 2.The Chairman-cum-Managing Director, United India Insurance Co., Ltd., No.24, Whites Road, Chenna014. 3.The Assistant General Manager, Appellate Authority, Regional Officer, United India Insurance Co., Ltd., Silingi Building, No.40-42, Greams Road, Chenna006. 4.The Manager, Disciplinary Authority, Regional Office, United India Insurance Co., Ltd., Silingi Building, No.40-42, Greams Road, Chenna006. .. Respondents in both petitions Prayer in W.P.No.5378 of 2005: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the orders passed in proceedings bearing n...
1.The Branch Manager, Vs. 1.Esakkiraj
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-15-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:15. 03/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.140 of 2012 & M.P.(MD)No.1 o1. The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Tirunelveli-1. 2.The Branch Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Ambasamuthram. ... Appellants Vs. 1.Esakkiraj 2.Esakkiammal 3.Sankarapandian 4.Ganesan ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the judgment and decree dated 01.08.2011 passed in M.C.O.P.No.349 of 2006, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Principal Sub Judge, Tenkasi. !For Appellants ... Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai ^For Respondents... Mr.N.Vallinayagam for R-1 - - - :JUDGMENT The appellants / second and third respondents have preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.349 of 2006, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Principal Sub Judge, Tenkasi.2. The short facts of...
A.Elango Vs. R.Natarajan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :15. 03.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR C.M.A.No.2539 of 2012 A.Elango ... Appellant Vs. 1.R.Natarajan 2.The National Insurance Company Ltd., No. 751, Anna Salai, Chennai -2 ... Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988, against the decree and Judgment, dated 17.12.2007 made in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.747 of 2005, on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (III Court of Small Causes), Chennai. For Appellant : Mrs.M.Malar For 2nd Respondent : Mr.J.Chandran Being aggrieved by the quantum of compensation, the appellant-injured has preferred this appeal.2. Short facts leading to the appeal, are as follows: In the accident, which occurred on 30.12.2004, the appellant sustained a fracture in the thigh. He has also sustained injuries in the head and other parts of the body. According to him, he was initiallly treated in Chengalpattu Hospital and thereafter, taken treatment in Hindu...
1.Kalyani Vs. Prabu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-15-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:15. 03/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE ARUNA JAGADEESAN CRL.RC(MD)760 o1. Kalyani 2.P.Gajan ... Petitioners Vs Prabu ... Respondent Prayer This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the order dated 17.06.2008 made in Crl.RC.No.69/2006 by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTC II, Tiruchirappalli setting aside the order dated 20.3.2006 made in MC.No.233/2003 by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchirappalli. !For Petitioner... Mr.T.A.Om Prakash ^For Respondent... Mr.Veera Kathiravan :Order This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the order dated 17.06.2008 made in Crl.RC.No.69/2006 by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, FTC II, Tiruchirappalli, setting aside the order dated 20.3.2006 made in MC.No.233/2003 by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchirappalli.2. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate awarded maintenance to the Petitioners, who are the wife and minor son, at the ra...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »