Chennai Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.Antony Jayaraj Vs. State by Inspector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:21. 03/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN Crl.R.C.No.436 of 2012 M.P.No.1 of 2012 S.Antony Jayaraj ... Petitioner Vs. State by The Inspector of Police, CCIW CID, Coimbatore Rural Unit, Coimbatore. Cr.No.6 of 2005 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Revision is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the entire records in so far relates to the order passed in C.M.P.No.226 of 2008 in C.C.No.2 of 2006, dated 01.02.2011, on the file of Judicial Magistrate-IV, Coimbatore, Coimbatore District and set-aside the same in so far relates to the petitioner is concerned. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondent : Mr.C.Balasubramaniam Additional Public Prosecutor ******* O R D E R The short facts of the case are as follows:- The revision petitioner herein / third accused has filed C.M.P.No.226 of 2008, on the file of Judicial Magistrate not IV, Coimbatore to discharge him from the criminal proceedings in C.C.No.2 of 2006...
Metal Weld Electronics Vs. Cest Tax Appellate Tribunal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:19. 03/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR WP.24615 of 2012 METAL WELD ELECTRONICS vs CEST TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR PETITIONER : VENKATACHALAM FOR RESPONDENT : P.MAHADEVAN ORDER: W.P.Nos.24615, 13468, 23799 to 23801, 25303, 28613 to 28616, 22029, 17988, 11819, 28770, 28299 and 27425 of 2012 R.SUDHAKAR,J.A number of writ petitions have been filed challenging the interlocutory orders passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for brevity, "the CESTAT") regarding pre-deposit of duty/penalty pending the appeals, inter alia contending that the undue hardship and prima facie case have not been considered by the Tribunal while disposing of the applications/petitions filed under Section 35-F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for brevity, "the Excise Act") or Section 129-E of the Customs Act, 1962 (for brevity, "the Customs Act"), which are the two provisions relating to pre-deposit of...
K.Krishnamurthy Vs. K.Suresh Kumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :19. 03.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. RAJASURIA S.A.No.135 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 K.Krishnamurthy(deceased) 1.K.Padmavathy 2.K.Gopi 3.K.Raji 4.K.Yamuna ... Appellants Vs. K.Suresh Kumar ... Respondent This Second Appeal is focussed as against the judgment and decree dated 26.7.2012 passed by the First Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai in A.S.No.161 of 2011, reversing the judgment and decree dated 31.10.2007 passed by the XIII Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai, in O.S.No.4826 of 2003. For appellants : Mr.P.Sidharthan For respondent : M/s.Paul & Paul JUDGMENT This Second appeal is focussed by the legal heirs of the original plaintiff, namely, K.Krishnamurthy, animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 26.7.2012 passed by the First Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai in A.S.No.161 of 2011, reversing the judgment and decree dated 31.10.2007 passed by the XIII Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai, in O.S.No.4826...
S.Kavitha Vs. Government of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:19. 3-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH H.C.P.No.2397 of 2012 S.Kavitha .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Government of India Rep. By its Additional Secretary, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution (Department of Consumer Affiars, Room No.270, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi-110 001.2. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary to Government, Co-operation Food and Consumer Protection Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai-9.3. The District Collector and District Magistrate, Tirupur District, Tirupur. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the 3rd respondent herein in Cr.M.P.No.2/2012 (CS), dated 16.10.2012 and quash the same and produce the detenu Thiru.R.Saravanan, S/o.Ravi, now detained in Central Prison, Coimbatore, be...
Rajammal Vs. Rajagopal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:19. 03.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR C.R.P. NPD No.209 of 2011 AND M.P.No.1 of 2011 Mrs.Rajammal .. Petitioner ..vs.. 1.Rajagopal 2.The Executive Officer, Arulmighu Veeraraghava Perumal Temple, Tiruppur. 3.Marimuthu @ Mariappan .. Respondents Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order passed in I.A.No.530 of 2010 in O.S.No.46 of 2005 dated 21.10.2010 by the District Munsif Court, Tirupur. For Petitioner : Mrs.V.Usha Rani For Respondents : Mr.S.K.Rakhunathan for R1 O R D E R Being aggrieved by the dismissal of an application in I.A.No.530 of 2010 in O.S.No.46 of 2005 on the file of the District Munsif, Tirupur, refusing to condone the delay of 733 days in filing an application to set aside an exparte decree, passed on 28.04.2006, the revision petition has been filed. 2.The revision petitioner is the second defendant in the suit. Her husband, N.Mariapp...
The Regional Manager, Vs. 1.P.Maruthavanan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:19/03/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A(MD) No.342 of 2004 and C.M.P.No.2456 of 2004 The Regional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited, Namakkal. .. Appellant vs 1.P.Maruthavanan 2.P.Krishnan 3.M.Easwaran 4.The Administrative Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, Kumbakonam. 5.T.Swaminathan 6.The Branch Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited, Erode. 7.R.Amsavalli .. Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 19.05.2004, made in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.13 of 2001, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kumbakonam. !For Appellant ... Mr.C.Prabhu Rajadurai ^For Respondent ... Mr.D.Sivaraman for R4 No Appearance for R1, R3, R5 to R7 R2-Dispense with :JUDGMENT The 1st respondent herein/claimant has filed in M.C.O.P.No.13 of 2001, against the appellant and others claimed...
Lloyd Insulations India Ltd Vs. Makwuds India P Ltd
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :19. 03.2013 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice M.JAICHANDREN and The Honourable Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH Original Side Appeal No.5 of 2013 Lloyd Insulations (India) Ltd., No.5, Haddows lane, Off Haddows Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 006. rep., by its Additional General Manager-Credit Control/Authorized signatory Mr.N.K.Sateesh ... Appellant -vs- Makwuds India P Ltd., 10, Downing, 4B, 132, Greenways Road, R.A.Puram, Chennai-600 028, and having its factory at F-B, Sipcot Industrial Park, Sunguvarchatram, Sriperumpudur-602 016. ... Respondent Original Side Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules, 1956, read with Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act against the order dated 16.10.2012 made in Application No.2122 of 2012. For appellant : Mr.R.Murari, Senior Advocate for Mr.K.K.Muralitharan For respondent : Mr.Shivakumar Suresh JUDGMENT (The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.JAICHANDREN,J) This Origin...
Veetrag Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:19. 03.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN W.P.No.3135 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 M/s.Veetrag Enterprises Represented by its Partner Mr.Chetan Ranka, 39/5, Ekambareshwarar Agraharam, Park Town, Chennai-600 003. .. Petitioner Vs.1. The Commissioner of Customs (Exports) Custom House, No.60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001.2. The Additional Commissioner of Customs, DEPB, Custom House, No.60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai-600 001.3. The Assistant Director, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, No.25, Gopalakrishna Iyer Road, T.Nagar, Chennai017. .. Respondents Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents herein to Release the goods viz., 760 Packages viz., 3800 Packets of Coated Gummed Paper imported vide Bill of Entry No.8711998, dated 10.12.2012, which was finally assessed by the Proper Officer under the Customs Act and total duty of Rs.1,81,532/- was a...
V.Baskaran Vs. Manjula
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :19. 03.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. RAJASURIA S.A.No.76 of 2011 and M.P.Nos.1 and 3 o1. V.Baskaran 2.V.Mohan Doss ... Appellants vs. 1.Manjula 2/Varalakshmi 3.Vijaya Nirmala ... Respondents This Second Appeal is focussed as against the judgment and decree dated 21.9.2010 passed by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Chengalput, confirming the judgement and decree dated 23.9.2008 passed by the Principal Sub-Judge, Chengalput, in O.S.No.143 of 2000 For appellants : Mr.D.Mahesh For respondents : Mr.N.Manokaran JUDGMENT This Second appeal is focussed by the defendants 1 and 2 animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 21.9.2010 passed by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Chengalput, confirming the judgment and decree dated 23.9.2008 passed by the Principal Sub-Judge, Chengalput, in O.S.No.143 of 2000, which was one for partition.2. The parties, for the sake of convenience, are referred to hereunder accor...
N.Sundarababu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :19. 03.2013 Coram THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA W.P.Nos.43112 and 45386 of 2002, 21917, 32648, 32687, 34817 of 2003, 34480 of 2005, 15270 of 2007 and 16279 of 2008 and M.P.Nos.570 to 572 of 2010 in W.P.No.21917 of 2010 and 379 of 2007 & 365 of 2008 in W.P.No.34480 of 2005 W.P.No.43112 of 2002 N.Sundarababu .. Petitioner .. Vs ..1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Urban Land Tax Department, Fort St. George, Chennai.2. The Assistant Commissioner, Urban Land Tax, Madhavaram.3. Santhosh Devi Sarang ...Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondents from taking any further proceedings pursuant to the notice bearing RC.No.3401/92/P dated 25.09.1998 issued by the 2nd respondent to the 3rd respondent. For Petitioners in W.P.No.43112/2002 : Mr.Sunder Mohan WP.No.45386/2002 : Mr.V.Ramesh WP.No.21917/2003 : Mr...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »