Chennai Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.Mahaveer Shivaji Vs. Secretary to the Medical Council of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:21. 03.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR W.P.No.17202 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008 S.Mahaveer Shivaji .. Petitioner -Vs- 1.The Secretary Medical Council of India Pocket-14, Sector-8 Dwaraka, New Delh077. 2.The Registrar Tamil Nadu Medical Council T.N.H.B. Complex Vadapalani, Chennai-603. The Inspector T-15, SRMC Police Station Porur, Chennai 4.Mr.S.Balagopal .. Respondents Writ petition filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to conduct detailed enquiry to the parties concerned and merely to take suitable disciplinary action under Section 24 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 or any other appropriate remedy. For Petitioner : Party-in-Person For Respondents : Mr.V.P.Raman for R1 Mr.Veera Kathiravan for R2 Mr.M.S.Rames, AGP for R3 Mr.Ravi Anantha Padmanabhan for R4 O R D E R The arguments advanced by Mr.S.Mahaveer Shivaji, who appears as a party-in...
Greenland Exports Pltd Vs. Assistant Commissioner
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:21. 03.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN W.P.No.4488 of 2011 & M.P.No.1 of 2011 M/s.Greenland Exports (P) Ltd., No.14, Sir Thyagaraya Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-17, Represented by its General Manager ... Petitioner vs. The Assistant Commissioner (CT) Nandanam Assessment Circle, No.46, Greenways Road, Chennai-600 028. ... Respondent Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in processing CST No.582558 / 1996-1997, dated 19.01.2011 relating the assessment year 1996-1997 on the file of the respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Ms.Mallika Srinivasan For Respondents : Mr.Manoharan Sundaram, Government Advocate (Tax) O R D E R Heard Ms.Mallika Srinivasan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Manoharan Sundaram, learned Government Advocate (Tax) appearing for the respondent.2. The petitioner-Company calls in quest...
A.Karthikeyan Vs. State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-21-2013
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated :21. 3.2013 Coram : The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN Writ Petition No.6864 of 2013 and MP.NO.1 of 2013 A.Karthikeyan .. Petitioner -Vs.- 1.State of Tamilnadu, rep.by its Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Chennai. 2.Tamilnadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, rep.by its Member Secretary, NO.807, P.T. Lee Chengavaraya Naickker Maligai Anna Salai Chennai-2. 3.The Superintendent of Police Cuddalore District. .. Respondents PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the third respondent in his impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.not A4/35540/ 2012 dated 24.12.2012, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents herein to appoint the petitioner herein for the post of Police Constable Grade II. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Ravichander For Respondents : Mr.V.Subbiah Spl. Govt. Pleader ------ ORDER The petitioner applied for appoin...
C.Sambasivam Vs. C.Ramakrishnan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :21. 03.2013 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice M.JAICHANDREN and The Honourable Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH Original Side Appeal Nos.462/2012 & 100/2013 & M.P.Nos.1/2012, 1 & 1 of 2013 C.Sambasivam .. Appellant in both appeals -vs- 1.C.Ramakrishnan 2.Pratap Pothen .. Respondents in OSA.No.462/2012 1.C.Ramakrishnan 2.C.Prasunna 3.Rakesh Malick .. Respondents in OSA.No.100/2013 Original Side Appeals filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of the O.S. Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the orders dated 10.12.2012 passed in Application No.1018 of 2012 in C.S.No.753 of 2012 and Application No.1027 of 2012 in C.S.No.789 of 2012 respectively. --------------------------------------------------------- For appellant : Mr.C.Umasankar for in both appeals M/s Srivatsava Associates --------------------------------------------------------- For 1st respondent : Mr.N.Nithyesh Natraj for in both appeals M/s Kriya Associates & 2nd responde...
P.Murugesan Vs. B.Gokila
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:21. 03.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.PALANIVELU Criminal Revision Case No.1262 of 2012 P. Murugesan .. Petitioner Vs. B. Gokila .. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Revision case filed under Section 397 & 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records in M.C.No.22 of 2007 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Mettupalayam, Coimbatore and set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.4334 of 2012 on 24.08.2012. For Petitioner : Mr.R. Murugesan Party in person For Respondent : Ms. Kavitha for M/s PVS Giridhar Associates ORDER The following are the allegations contained in the Protest Petition filed by the petitioner: The Court below has directed the Inspector of Police, Sirumugai Police Station, to investigate the private complaint filed by the petitioner. But the police did not file any report even though the petitioner sent two letters dated 19.6.2012 and 26.07.2012 which were received on 26.6.2012 and 28.7.2...
R.Palani Vs. A.P.Gopikrishna
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:21.03.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL C.R.P.PD.No.2618 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 o1. R.Palani 2.R.Rangan 3.R.George 4.R.Srinivasan 5.P.Kuppammal 6.M.Vasantha 7.Devaki 8.Jayanthi 9.Gaja 10.Jagan 11.Marry ... Petitioners/Respondents 1, 3 to 12/Defendants 1, 3 to 12 Vs. A.P.Gopikrishna ... Respondent/Petitioner/Plaintiff Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the Fair and Decretal Order made in I.A.No.171 of 2011 in O.S.No.23 of 2010 dated 18.04.2011 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Pallipattu. For Petitioners : M/s.A.Prabhakaran Mr.Dilip Kumar For Respondent : Mr.K.G.Senthilkumar ORDER The Petitioners/Respondents 1, 3 to 12/Defendants 1, 3 to 12 have filed the instant Civil Revision Petition as against the order dated 18.04.2011 in I.A.No.171 of 2011 in O.S.No.23 of 2010 passed by the Learned District Munsif, Pallipattu. 2.The Learned District Munsif, while passing the impugned ...
Ramalingam Vs. Kanchan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Date:- 21.03.2013 Coram The Honourable Mr. Justice M. VENUGOPAL C.R.P. PD. No.968 of 2011 and M.P. No.1 of 2011 Ramalingam ... Petitioner ..Vs.. Kanchan ... Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed against the order dated 2.12.2010 passed in I.A. No.514 of 2009 in O.S. No.63 of 2008 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Udhagamandalam. For Petitioner : Mr. A.U. Ilango For Respondents : Mr. N. Damodaran ` O R D E R The Revision Petitioner/Defendant has filed the instant Civil Revision Petition as against the order dated 2.12.2010 in I.A. No.514 of 2009 in O.S. No.63 of 2008 passed by the learned District Munsif, Udhagamandalam.2. The Learned District Munsif, while passing the orders in I.A. No.514 of 2009 in O.S. No.63 of 2008 on 2.12.2010 (filed by the Revision Petitioner/Defendant (as Petitioner), has among other things, observed that 'this Court is of the opinion that when this suit stands in a part heard stage, at this juncture, this app...
Summer India Textile Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer of Tir ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:21. 03.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN W.P.Nos.5258 and 5259 of 2009 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2009 in each W.P. M/s.Summer India Textile Mills (P) Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director Mr.A.R.Aasaithambhee, P.B.No.12, 176/2A, Kozhikkalnatham Road, Tiruchengode-637 211, Erode District. .. Petitioner in both the Writ Petitions vs. The Commercial Tax Officer, Tiruchengode Town, Tiruchengode, Erode. .. Respondent in both the writ petitions Writ Petitions have been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the file of the respondent in TIN No.33663182153/2007-08, dated 10.12.2008 (in W.P.No.5258 of 2009) and 16.09.2008 (in W.P.No.5259 of 2009), quash the same in so far as it restricts the claim of refund of ITC made by the petitioner as per the application filed in Form-W, dated 30.09.2008 and 20.06.2008. For Petitioner : Mrs.R.Hemalatha For Respondent : Mr...
Secretary for the Revenue Department Vs. V.Madhuraj
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:21. 03.2013 Coram: The Hon'ble Mr.R.K.AGRAWAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and The Hon'ble Mr.Justice N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR Writ Appeal No. 1117 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 --------- 1. The Secretary, Revenue Department, Fort.St.George, Chennai 6.2. The Principal Secretary/ Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chenna005. 3. The District Collector, Salem District.4. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. .. Appellants Vs. V.Madhuraj .. Respondent Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order passed in W.P.No.14672 of 2010 dated 12.08.2011 on the file of this Court. For Appellants ::: Mrs.A.Sri Jayanthi, Special Government Pleader For Respondent ::: Mr.M.Elango (The Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.Paul Vasanthakumar, J) This writ appeal has been filed against the order passed by the learned single Judge in W.P.No.14672 of 2010 dated 12.08.2011, whereby the learned single Judge issued...
Selvam Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :21. 03.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.BASHA AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DEVADASS CRIMINAL APPEAL No.716 OF 201.1.Selvam 2.Mani 3.Dakshina @ Dakshinamurthy 4.Selvi 5.Kasthuri 6.Baby Ammal @ Latha .. Appellants / Accused 1 to 6 Versus State by The Inspector of Police, Somangalam Police Station, Kancheepuram District. .. Respondent / Complainant Appeal filed under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, No.2, Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District dated 10.10.2011 made in SC.No.13 of 2010. For Appellants : Mr.M.G.Udhayashankar For Respondent : Mr.V.M.R.Rajendiran Additional Public Prosecutor JUDGMENT K.N.BASHA, J The challenge in this appeal is to the judgment made in SC.No.13/2010 by the learned Sessions Judge No.2, Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District dated 10.10.2011 convicting and sentencing the appellants / A1 to A6 which is as follows:- -------------------------------------...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »