Chennai Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G.Ebinazer Vs. Managing Director Tanhoda
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:22. 02.2013 CORAM: THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.18920 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 to 3 o1. G.Ebinazer 2.N.B.Nanjundan 3.B.K.Chandran ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The Managing Director, TANHODA, Chepakam, Chenna005. 2.The Joint Director Horticulture Department, Krishnagiri. 3.The Assistant Manager Horticulture Department, Nilgiri. ...Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records of the first respondent in No/FBM.887/DATED 26 11.2009 and quash the same in so far as it stipulates the date of retirement of farm employees as 58 years and consequently direct the respondent to permit the petitioners to continue in service till the petitioner attains the age of 60 years in accordance with law. For Petitioners : Ms.S.Esai Rani For Respondents : Mr.V.Subbiah, Spl.G.P. O R D E R The petitioners in this writ petition, seek to challenge a communication...
Dr.E.Kanniappan Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:22. 02.2013 CORAM: THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.10698 of 2012, M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 o1. Dr.E.Kanniappan 2.Dr.K.Paulraj 3.S.Paramasivam 4.Dr.K.Thandavamoorthy ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By its Secretary to Government, Higher Education, Fort St.George, Chennai. 2.Director of Collegiate Education, Chenna006. 3.The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Chenna006. ...Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to include the names of the petitioners in MBC/DC quota, recommend their names to the respondents 1 and 2 to the post of College Librarian as per the Advertisement No.233 dated 17.02.2010. For Petitioners : Mr.M.V.Venkataseshan For Respondents : Mr.V.Subbiah, Spl.G.P. For R1 and R2 Mr.N.S.Nandakumar for R3 O R D E R The four petitioners were aspirants for the post of College Li...
Management Needle Industries Ltd Vs. the Presiding Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:22. 02.2013 CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.No.3299 of 2003 & W.M.P.No.3662 of 2003 The Management of Needle Industries Limited Ketti, Coonoor Taluk, The Nilgiris. ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Coimbatore. 2.S.Stephen Daniel 3.Mr.A.D'souza 4.Mrs.Grace Charles 5.Mrs.J.Malathi 6.Mr.J.Rajkumar 7.H.Geetha 8.K.Revathi 9.C.Savithri 10.C.Meenakshi 11.B.Sasikala 12.S.Leela 13.Mr.M.Guruchit 14.J.Maria Fathima 15.A.R.Parveen 16.K.V.Sarala 17.R.Sumathi 18.K.P.Vijaya 19.D.Sivamal 20.D.S.Latha 21.N.Janaki 22.N.Sivagami 23.C.Chitra 24.P.Vijaya 25.A.Asia 26.B.Latha 27.REbekkal 28.M.Raji 29.B.M.Shanthi 30.J.Shereen 31.Soria Begum 32.D.Vanaja 33.R.Mary 34.R.Gomathi 35.A.Seetha 36.B.Uma Rani 37.L.Malathi 38.L.Sarasthi 39.K.Nirmala 40.H.Saraswathi 41.L.Saroja 42.R.Girija 43.R.Baby 44.C.Kasturi 45.Jebamalai Mary 46.H.Dharmaraj 47.M.Manjula 48.L.Parvathi 49.A.Shabeera 50.R.Revathi 51.Mr.B.Rajeshkumar ... Respo...
1.Murugesan Vs. 1.Deva Pitchai (Died)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-22-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :22. 02/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE.B.RAJENDRAN S.A.(MD).No.699 of 2001 and CMP.Nos.7269 and 10195 o1. Murugesan 2.Thavasu Perumal ... Appellants Vs 1.Deva Pitchai (died) (1st respondent died. Memo USR.No.4046/12 dated 17.12.2012 recorded and made in S.A.No.699 of 2001 by ASJ) 2.Daniel Thomas 3.Stephen 4.Jasiammal 5.Albert 6.Efisfa 7.Yesuda 8.Jenitta 9.Kalpana Devi 10.D.Selvakani 11.D.Dhamayanthi Athithan 12.D.Rajasekar 13.D.Kalyani 14.G.Indira 15.G.Kiruthika 16.G.Navin 17.G.Bala Keerthana (R.10 to R.17 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased R.1 vide order dated 11.12.2013 made in M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2013 in S.A.No.633 of 2001) ... Respondents This Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C. against the judgment and decree dated 21.08.2000 made in A.S.No.5 of 1999, on the file of the Additional District Judge cum CJM, Tuticorin, dismissing the appeal against the judgment and decree, dated 01.12.1995 in O.S.No.249 of 1992,...
Competent Authority Ulc Vs. Dr.S.Anandalakshmy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :22. 2-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.A.No.222 of 2011 M.P.No.1 o1. The Competent Authority (ULC) and Assistant Commissioner (ULT), Alandur, Chenna088. 2. The Tahsildar, Mylapore-Triplicane Taluk, Chenna028. ... Appellants Versus Dr.S.Anandalakshmy ... Respondent Prayer: This writ appeal is preferred under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order of the learned Single Judge of this Court made in W.P.No.12103 of 2007 dated 6.8.2009. For Appellants : Mr.M.S.Ramesh, Additional Government Pleader For Respondent : Mr.Kuberan for M/s.Rank Associates N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR, J.This writ appeal is preferred against the order made in W.P.No.12103 of 2007 dated 6.8.2009, wherein the learned single Judge allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent herein.2. The writ petition was filed with a prayer to issue a writ of mandamus forbearing the first respondent/first...
Siva Muthiah Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :22. 02.2013 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.TAMILVANAN W.P.No.8925 of 2006 Siva Muthiah .. Petitioner Vs.1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by the Secretary to Government Labour and Employment Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 9.2. The Director of Employment and Training Women ITI Campus, Guindy, Chennai 32.3. The Accountant General of Tamil Nadu (A & E) Teynampet, Chennai 18. .. Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking an order in the nature of writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records, pertaining to the impugned G.O (D) No.15, Labour and Employment (P1) Department, dated 10.01.2006 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to pay interest to all the terminal benefits of the petitioner from the date of his retirement till the date of actual payment is made, as per the Pension Rules. For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.Subramaniam For Respondents : Mr.S.Navaneetha...
Rajathi Vs. Principal Secretary and Commissioner of Land Administratio ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :22. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.R.K.AGRAWAL, The Acting Chief Justice and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.VENKATARAMAN Writ Petition No.1464 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 o1. Rajathi 2.T.Govindasamy .. Petitioners vs.1. The Principal Secretary & Commissioner of Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-5.2. The District Collector, Salem District, Salem. .. Respondents Writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of prohibition, prohibiting and forbearing the first respondent from conducting the suo motu revision proceedings enquiry initiated by him under its proceedings ROC not K1/2207/2004 dated 22.11.2012. For petitioners : Mr.P.Jagadeesan For respondents : Mrs.A.Srijayanthi, Spl.Govt.Pleader. O R D E R THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE AND K.VENKATARAMAN, J The petitioners have come up with the present writ petition for issuance of writ of Prohibition, prohibiting an...
Vivek Goenka Vs. Narendra Prasad
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :22. 02.2013 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR and The Honourable Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH Original Side Appeal Nos.7 to 9 of 2013 & M.P.Nos.1 & 1 o1. Vivek Goenka 2.Radhadevi Sonthalia 3.Saroj Goenka 4.Aarti Agarwal 5.Kavita Singhania .. Appellants in all the appeals -vs- 1.Narendra Prasad 2.Kishen Prasad 3.Lokendra Prasad 4.Savitri Bai 5.Indian Express(Newspapers) (Bombay) Private Ltd., Office at Express Towers, Nariman Point, Bombay. 6.Indian Express Newspapers(Madurai) Ltd., Express Estates, Mount Road, Madras-600 002. 7.Express Newspapers Private Ltd., Express Estates, Mount Road, Madras.8. Andhra Prabha Private Ltd., Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad.9. Traders Private Ltd., Express Towers, Nariman Point, Bombay-21. 10.Ramagopal Jhaver 11.Devkishan Jhaver 12.Jaikishen Jhaver 13.Vijai Kishen Jhaver 14.Mongibai Goenka Educational Trust, Registered Office at No.1,(New No.11), Ramanujam Iyer Street, George Town, Madras...
Anandan Vs. Lingam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:22. 02.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.MATHIVANAN CRP.(NPD). Nos.2057 and 766 of 2005 Anandan .... Petitioner in both revision petitions Vs. 1.Lingam 2.Thiyagarajan 3.Bhaskar .... Respondents in both revision petitions Prayer (C.R.P.(NPD) No.2057 of 2005) : This civil revision petition is filed under Section 6(B) of the Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955, against the Order dated 20.07.2004 and made in C.T.P.No.4 of 2000, on the file of the Presiding Officer (Special Deputy Collector), Revenue Court, Cuddalore. Prayer (C.R.P.(NPD) No.766 of 2005) : This civil revision petition is filed under Section 6(B) of the Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955, against the Order dated 22.12.2004 and made in C.T.P.No.4 of 2000, on the file of the Presiding Officer (Special Deputy Collector), Revenue Court, Cuddalore. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Muthukumar (in both revisions) For Respondents : Mr.A.Babu (in both revisions) ...
AllIndia Gen Ins Obc Employees Welfare Assn Vs. United India Insurance ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :22. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.33756 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.2 of 2012 and 1 of 2013 All India General Insurance OBC Employees Welfare Association, (Regd.203/1998) represented by its General Secretary S.Sivasubramaniyan, C/o.United India Insurance Co. Limited, No.24,Whites Road, Chennai-600 014. .. Petitioner Vs. 1.United India Insurance Company Ltd., represented by its General Manager, No.24,Whites Road, Chennai-600 014. 2.National Insurance Company Limited, represented by its General Manager, No.3,Middleton Street, Kolkatta-700 071. 3.New India Assurance Company Limited represented by its General Manager, No.84, M.G.Road, Fort, Mumbai-400 001. 4.Oriental Insurance Company Limited, represented by its General Manager, A/25-27, Asif Ali Road, New Delhi-110 002. 5.General Insurers' (Public Sector) Association of India (GIPSA), represented by its Chairman, 3rd Floor, Jeevan Vihar, Parliament Street, New Delhi-110 0...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »