Chennai Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Thiagarajan Vs. Capital Film Works
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25. 02/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.M. AKBAR ALI Application.No.5178 of 2012 in C.S.No.93 of 2012 THIAGARAJAN vs. CAPITAL FILM WORKS FOR PETITIONER : ANANTH FOR RESPONDENT : KAVITHA ORDER: G.M. AKBAR ALI,J., 1.The present Petition is filed to reject the plaint in C.S.No.93 of 2012 as per Order VII Rule 11 (a) of the Civil Procedure Code.2. Brief facts of the case to decide the issue on hand are narrated below: The respondent claims that he is the Author of the script, stated to have been written in the year 2006, and he approached the applicants/defendants to make a film based on the Script authored by him. Petitioners-1 and 2, being the Film Making Company and its CEO respectively, agreed for production and cinemotgraph of the film "Aarnaya Kaandam". The respondent/plaintiff directed the film himself and he was paid certain amount for the script and direction. The film was released on 10.6.2011. Though the movie did not ...
Pullaiah Gounder Vs. Anandhayammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-25-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25.02.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA S.A.No.21 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 Pullaiah Gounder .. Appellant Vs. 1.Anandhayammal 2.Chithayammal 3.Sarasu 4.Athayammal 5.Palaniyammal 6.Anai Gounder 7.Mallika 8.Idumba Gounder .. Respondents This second appeal is filed against the judgement and decree dated 19.1.2006 passed by the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Salem, confirming the judgment and decree dated 14.3.2005 passed by the learned Principal District Munsif, Salem, in O.S.No.1147 of 2004. For Appellant : Mr.I.C.Vasudevan For Respondents : Mr.T.Murugamanickam JUDGMENT This second appeal is focussed by the first defendant, inveighing the judgement and decree dated 19.1.2006 passed by the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Salem, confirming the judgement and decree dated 14.3.2005 passed by the learned Principal District Munsif, Salem, in O.S.No.1147 of 2004, which is one for partition.2. The parties, for the sa...
Ex Rect. M. Perumal Raj Vs. Union of India, Ministry of Defence, Rep. ...
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai
Decided on: Feb-25-2013
L.t. Gen. (Retd) Anand Mohan Verma, Member-Administrative: 1. The petitioner seeks disability pens ion from the date of his discharge fromthe Army. 2. The petitioner was enrolled in Madras Engineering Group (MEG) on 14 December 2001. His date of birth is 12 July 1983. During training at the MEG, Bangalore he fell unconscious and was taken to Command Hospital Air Force(CHAF) Bangalore on 04 September 2002 where he was diagnosed as a case of Generalised Seizure Disorder 345 G 40 Y . He was referred to Command Hospital, Pune for opinion of the specialist who opined that the petitioner suffered from the above mentioned disease and was unfit to drive, not to handle firearms and not to go near moving machinery. He was brought before Invaliding Medical Board on 15 February 2003 and his medical category was lowered to S1H1A1P5E1. His disability was assessed to be 20% for life and not connected to service being a Constitutional Disorder. The petitioner was discharged from Army on 17 March 2003 ...
Kasthuri Ammal Vs. G.Sampath
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:22.02.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA S.A.No.1308 o1. Kasthuri Ammal 2. Thiruvenkata Naidu (Deceased) 3. Narayanan 4. Venkatesan 5. Manjula 6. Lakshmi 7. Priya ... Appellants [Appellants 5 to 7 brought on record as L.Rs. of the deceased 2nd appellant vide order of court dated 3.8.2012 made in CMP Nos.146 to 148 of 2012 in S.A.No.1308 of 2001] vs. G.Sampath ... Respondent This second appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 28.03.2001 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Tiruvannamalai in A.S.No.129 of 2000 in reversing the judgment and decree dated 20.09.2000 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Cheyyar in O.S.No.35 of 1999. For Appellants : Mr.S.Balasubramanian for Mr.P.G.Padmanabhan For Respondent : Mr.V.Raghavachari JUDGMENT This second appeal is focussed by the defendants, inveighing the judgement and decree dated 28.03.2001 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Tiruvannamalai in...
S.Manogaran Vs. Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:22. 2.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA W.P.No.1446 of 2009 S.Manogaran .. Petitioner Vs.1. The Secretary to Government Agriculture Department Fort St. George Chenna009. 2. The Additional Director of Agriculture Chepauk, Chenna005. 3. The Joint Director of Agriculture Villupuram, Villupuram District.4. The Assistant Director of Agriculture Tindivanam, Villupuram District. .. Respondents PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the fourth respondent in connection with the order passed by him in A.2721/99, dated 8.11.2001, to quash the same and to direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner in the Agriculture Department in any one of the suitable post in accordance with the educational qualification of the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Chandrasekaran For Respondents : Mr.R.Ravichandran Additional Governmen...
1.N.Banumathi Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-22-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:22. 02/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA W.P(MD)No.16339 of 2012 W.P(MD)Nos.13299 to 13303, 14422 to 14431, 16768, 15497 and 16491 of 2012 and 352, 353 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)No.2 of 2012 in W.P.(MD)No.16339, 1 of 2012 in W.P.(MD)Nos.13299 of 2012 to 13303 of 2012 and 1 of 2012 in W.P.(MD)Nos.14422 to 14431 of 2012, 2 of 2012 in W.P.(MD)No.16768 of 2012, 2 of 2012 in W.P.(MD)No.15497 of 2012, 1 of 2012 in W.P.(MD)No.16491 of 2012 and 1 of 2013 in W.P.(MD)Nos.352 and 353 of 2013. W.P.(MD)No.16339 o1. N.Banumathi 2.S.Vanavalli 3.C.Ganesan 4.P.Rani 5.S.Chandrasekar 6.R.Sivakumar 7.N.Muthukumaran 8.N.Mugamath Beebi 9.M.Duraisamy 10.S.Ganageswari 11.P.Gandhimathi 12.K.Ravikumar 13.P.Amirtham 14.J.Uma 15.V.Awaiyar 16.G.Naheswari 17.Evanjelin Thangarani 18.B.Ramesh 19.S.Revathi 20.N.Indra 21.M.Muthamil Selvi ... Petitioners Vs 1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Home (Cou...
Vikaasa Higher Secondary School Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :22. 02.2013 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI and THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU Writ Petition No.34978 of 2012 The Correspondent, Vikaasa Higher Secondary School, Madurai-625 016. ... Petitioner vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary, Department of School Education, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Director of Matriculation Schools, College Road, Chennai-600 006. 3.The Chairman, Private Schools Fee Determination Committee, DPI Complex, College Road, Chennai-600 006. ... Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 3rd Respondent Committee for the Petitioner school vide Proceedings dated 03.06.2011 and quash the same and direct the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to collect the fees in terms of the statement of fees as submitted by the P...
K.Shankar Vs. Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:22. 2.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA W.P.Nos.9654 to 9656 of 2009 K.Shankar .. Petitioner in WP.9654/2009 N.Subramanian .. Petitioner in WP.9655/2009 P.Junayagan .. Petitioner in WP.9656/2009 Vs.1. The Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Chenna006. .. 1st Respondent in all WPs.2. The Deputy Director of Health Services Tiruvallur. .. 2nd Respondent in WP.9654/2009 3. The Deputy Director of Health Services Thanjavur. .. 2nd Respondent in WP.9655/2009 4. The Deputy Director of Health Services Perambalur. .. 3rd Respondent in WP.9655/2009 5. The Deputy Director of Health Services Villupuram. .. 2nd Respondent in WP.9656/2009 PRAYER in W.P.No.9654 of 2009: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the second respondent relating to the order issued in Na.Ka.No.147-E1-09, dated 9.1.2009, to quash the same and to...
R.K.Ramasamy Vs. Presiding Officer of Labour Court at Salem
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :22. 02.2013 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice M.JAICHANDREN and The Honourable Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH Writ Appeal Nos.1904 & 1905 of 2011 & M.P.No.1 of 2011 R.K.Ramasamy .. Appellant in both appeals -vs- 1.The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Salem. 2.The Management, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Salem Division-I) Ltd., 12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem-7. .. Respondents in both appeals Writ Appeals filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the common order dated 07.09.2011 made in W.P.No.28553 of 2003 and 28071 of 2005. For appellant : Mr.S.Periyasamy for in both WAs. Ms.S.Girija For respondents : Mr.P.Paramasivadoss for R2 in both WAs. R1-Labour Court COMMON JUDGMENT (The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.JAICHANDREN,J) The above writ appeals arise out of the common order passed by the learned single Judge, dated 07.09.2011, in W.P.Nos.28553 of 2003 and 28071 of 2005. The above writ petitions, in W.P.Nos.28553 ...
V.Umapathy Vs. Santha Sivagnanam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:22. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Civil Revision Petition (PD) No.788 of 2013 Mr. V.Umapathy, S/o.M.Venkatesan .. Petitioner Vs.1. Mrs. Santha Sivagnanam, W/o. Late.Mr.V.Sivagnanam 2. Mr. Yuvaraj, S/o. Late.Mr.V.Sivagnanam 3. Mrs. Mahalakshmi, D/o.Late.Mr.V.Sivagnanam 4. Miss. Gowri, D/o.Late.Mr.V.Sivagnanam .. Respondents Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Principal District Court, Thiruvallur, to number the suit in O.S.SR.No.6301 of 2012. For Petitioner : Mr. V.Lakshminarayanan - - - O R D E R Invoking the jurisdiction of this Court, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who is the plaintiff, in the suit in O.S.SR No.6301 of 2012, has come up with this Civil Revision Petition, seeking a direction to the learned District Judge, Thiruvallur, to take on file and number the said suit.2. The above suit has been filed by the petitio...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »