Chennai Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Government of Tamil Nadu Vs. M.Varadarajan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :08. 02.2013 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR and The Honourable Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH Writ Appeal No.912 o1. Government of Tamil Nadu, rep. by Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Chennai-600 009.2. The Commissioner/Director of Survey and Settlement, Chennai-600 005. .. Appellant -vs- M.Varadarajan 204, K.K.Road, Villupuram. .. Respondent Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 02.07.2009 made in W.P.No.6811 of 2007. For appellants : Mr.K.V.Dhanapalan, Special Government Pleader For respondent : Mr.Ravi JUDGMENT M.M.SUNDRESH, J.This writ appeal has been preferred by the appellants, who were the respondents in the writ petition in W.P.No.6811 of 2007, being aggrieved against the order of the learned single Judge, by which, the said writ petition filed by the respondent herein was allowed in part.2. The respondent herein was initially working as Inspector of Survey and Land ...
Venkatachalam Vs. District Revenue Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:8. 2.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR W.P.No.13885 o1. Venkatachalam 2.Sivaraj Karthikeyan .. Petitioners Vs.1. The District Revenue Officer Land Tribunal, Chepauk Chenna005. 2. The Authorised Officer cum Assistant Commissioner No.54, Thangaperumal Street Anoor Complex, Erode Erode District. .. Respondents PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of a writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent culminated in and by its proceedings in LTCMA 6 2002, dated 12.4.2004 and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.V.Bharathidasan For Respondents : Mr.M.S.Ramesh Additional Government Pleader ORDER The petitioner seeks issuance of a writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent culminated in and by its proceedings in LTCMA 6 2002, dated 12.4.2004 and quash the same. By the order under challenge, the first respondent rejected the claim of the petitioners seekin...
Dhanraj Vs. Govindasamy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :- 08.02.2013 Coram The Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.RAVICHANDRA BAABU C.R.P.(PD) Nos.277 and 278 of 2011 M.P.No.1 o1. Dhanraj 2. Rajalakshmi ... Petitioners Vs.1. Govindasamy 2.Ganesan .. Respondents Civil Revision Petitions filed against the fair and decretal order dated 17.8.2010 made in I.A.Nos.308 and 401 of 2010 respectively in O.S.No.2 of 2009 on the file of the District Munsif, Sirkali. For Petitioners :- Mr.A.Muthukumar For Respondents :- No appearance for R1 Mr.S.Sounthar for R2 ORDER C.R.P.(PD) No. 277 of 2011 is filed against the order in allowing the application filed by the second respondent herein. The prayer therein was not to consider the documents which were filed in the main suit while considering the interim application filed by the petitioners herein seeking for temporary injunction.2. C.R.P.(PD) No. 278 of 2011 is filed against the order dismissing the application filed by petitioners herein seeking for considering the docu...
D.Thomas Franco Rajendradev Vs. Disciplinary Authority Sbi
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :08. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.Nos.33731 and 33732 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1,1 and 2 of 2012 D.Thomas Franco Rajendra Dev .. Petitioner in W.P.No.33731 of 2012 D.Suresh Kumar .. Petitioner in W.P.No.33732 of 2012 Vs. 1.The Disciplinary Authority and Circle Development Officer, State Bank of India, Circletop House, Aparna Complex, 16,College Lane, Chennai-600 006. 2.State Bank of India, rep by its Chairman, having corporate office at Madam Cama Road, Mumbai-400 021. .. Respondents in both writ petitions Both writ petitions are preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the proceedings of the first respondent in DIS/CON/102 and DIS/CON/101 respectively, dated 27.09.2012 and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.K.M.Vijayan, SC for M/s.K.M.Vijayan Asso. For Respondents : Mr.A.L.Somayaji, SC for Mr.P.D.Audikesavalu - - - - COMMON ORDE...
Kennel Club of India Vs. Union of India
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:08. / 02 / 2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN W.P.NO.1750 OF 201.AND CONNECTED MISCELLANEOUS PETITIONS The Kennel Club of India Represented by its Secretary C.V.Sudarshan Having office at No.51, 7th Cross Street, Shenoy Nagar, Chenna030. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Union of India Represented by its Secretary The Government Department of Environment and Forest New Delhi. 2.The Animal Welfare Board of India Represented by its Chairman New Delhi. 3.The Veterinary Council of India Represented by its Secretary A Wing, August Kranthy Bhawan, Bikaji Cama Place, New Delh066. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for records of the 3rd respondent dated 11.11.2011 in F.No.8-20/2008-VCI/4094 and quash the same and direct the respondents to refrain from interfering with the practice of ear cropping and tail dockin...
B.Mariamma Vs. O.Anthony Ammal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :08. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA Second Appeal No.84 of 2006 B.Mariamma .. Appellant -vs- 1. O.Anthony Ammal 2. O.Abraham 3. O.Subash Chandra Bose .. Respondents Memorandum of Grounds of Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 20.07.2004 made in A.S.No.81 of 2003 passed by the learned VI Additional City Civil Judge, Chennai, confirming the judgment and decree dated 23.10.2002 made in O.S.No.2718 of 1992 passed by the learned V Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai. For Appellant :: Mr.Srinath Sridevan For Respondent :: Mr.R.Thanjan for R1 & R2 R3-appeal abated JUDGMENT The present second appeal is directed against the judgments and decrees of the Courts below, raising the following substantial questions of law:- "(i) Whether the boundaries mentioned in Ex.A1 will not prevail over the extent, where there is discrepancy? (ii) Whether a joint reading of Ex.A...
P.Rajesh Vs. Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :8. 2-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN WRIT PETITION No.16623 of 2012 P.Rajesh .. Petitioner vs 1.The Secretary to Government Municipal Administration and Water Supply Secretariat, Chenna009. 2.The Commissioner for Municipal Administration Ezhilagam Annex Building VI Floor, Chepauk, Chenna005. (R1 & R2 deleted as per order dated 2.7.2012) 3.The Block Development Officer No.1, Chitlapakkam 1st Main Road, Near Chromepet Bridge Chitlapakkam, Chenna064. 4.The President Vengaivasal Panchayat Union Chenna302. 5.M.G.Sundaraj (R5 impleaded as per order dated 2.8.2012 in M.P.No.1/2012) .. Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the fourth respondent to consider and provide water connection to the petitioner's premises at Door No.17/B, 4th Street, V.G.P. Veerabhathran Nagar, Vengaivasal, Chenna302. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mohanavadivelan ...
M.Govindasamy Vs. S.Sulochana
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :08. 02.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY A.S.No.795 of 2008 and C.M.P.No.1 of 2008 and Cross Obj. No.133 of 2010 A.S.No.795 of 2008: M.Govindasamy ... Appellant Vs. 1.S.Sulochana 2.T.Iyyammal ... Respondents Cross Obj. No.133 of 2010:1. S.Sulochana ... Cross Objector Vs. 1.M.Govindasamy 2.T.Iyyammal ... Respondents First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree dated 03.01.2008 made in O.S.No.34 of 2007 on the file of the Additional District Court cum Fast Track Court No.1, Erode. Cross Objection filed under Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.34 of 2007 dated 03.01.2008 on the file of the Additional District Court cum Fast Track Court No.1, Erode, insofar as it relates to the finding at para 37 of the judgment that Schedule 3 and 4 properties are joint family properties. For Appellant : Mr.D.Krishna Kumar (A.S....
S.Arunkumar Vs. the Chairman Tnpsc
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :08. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.1131 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2013 S.Arunkumar .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Chennai. 2.The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Chennai. .. Respondents This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the entire records relating to the notification dated 31.12.2012 in Advertisement No.337 passed by the second respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Raghavachari for Mr.S.Gunalan For Respondents : Mr.N.S.Nandakumar - - - - ORDER This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to challenge the notification, dated 31.12.2012 issued by way of an advertisement No.337 by the respondents Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission (for short TNPSC). 2.By the aforesaid notification, the TNPSC announced the change of scheme of exa...
Azeezhur Rahman Vs. Aysa Begam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 08 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU CIVIL REVISION PETITION (NPD) No.1314 of 2011 Azeezhur Rahman .. Petitioner vs 1.Aysa Begam 2.Venmathi 3.Deivasigamani .. Respondents The Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the decreetal order dated 01.11.2010 passed in I.A.No.301 of 2009 in I.A.No.655 of 1998 in A.S.No.347 of 1997 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Erode. For Petitioner ... Mr.S.Nambi Arooran For Respondents ... Mr.A.K.Kumarasamy O R D E R This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order passed in I.A.No.301 of 2009 in I.A.No.655 of 1998 in A.S.No.347 of 1997 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Erode, whereby the Court below dismissed the application filed by the petitioner under Order 41 Rule 3(a) r/w Section 151 of Civil Procedure Code to condone the delay of 3931 days in filing an application to restore I.A.No.655 of 1998, whi...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »