Chennai Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.Vaidehi Vs. Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-11-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :11. 02.2013 Coram THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA W.P.No.4932 of 2008 A.Vaidehi .. Petitioner .. Vs ..1. The Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai.2. The Special Commissioner and Commissioner for Revenue Administration, Chepauk, Chennai.3. The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.4. The Accountant General (A & E) Tamil Nadu, Chennai. .. Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the proceedings of the second respondent in Letter not R.A.3(1) 29516/2007, dated 06.10.2007 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to pay to the petitioners the arrears of pension payale to the petitioner husband from 22.02.1983 till the date of his death namely 23.04.2000 and family pension to the petitioner from 24.04.2000 till 23.09.2006. For Petitioner : Mr...
The Branch Manager, Vs. 1. D.Dinesh
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-11-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:11. 02/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.1299 of 2009 & M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2009 The Branch Manager, The United India Insurance Company Limited, 2nd Floor, Xavier Building, P.W.T. Office Road, Nagercoil Village, Nagercoil, Agatheeswaran Taluk, Kanyakumar District. ... Appellant Vs.1. D.Dinesh 2. A.Ponraj 3. The Secretary, Popular Educational Trust, Engineering College, Thiruchendur Road, Valliyur, Valliyur Village, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the judgment and decree made in M.C.O.P.No.41 of 2003, dated 03.04.2006, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum IInd Additional District Judge, Nagercoil. !For Appellant ... Mr.C.Jawahar Ravindran ^For Respondents... Mr.M.Suri for R-1 Mr.Isaac Mohanlal for R-3 R-2 - left India - - - :JUDGMENT The appellant / third respondent has pre...
M.P.Nalini Vs. R.Karthikeyan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-11-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :11. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal No.42 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 M.P.Nalini .. Appellant -Versus- R.Karthikeyan .. Respondent Appeal filed under Section 28 of The Hindu Marriages Act r/w Section 100 of CPC, praying to set aside the Judgement and Decree dated 17.02.20122 passed in C.M.A.No.27 of 2010 on the file of the learned District Judge, The Nilgiris at Udhagamandalam, reversing the fair order and decretal order dated 16.06.2010 passed in H.M.O.P.No.34 of 2007 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Udhagamandalam, The Nilgiris District. For Appellant : Mr.G.Sankar For Respondent : Mrs.Pushpa Sathyanarayana Amicus Curiae : Mr.N.Anand Venkatesh ORDER The appellant is the wife of the respondent. They are Hindus. The marriage between them was solemnized on 14.02.2001. After the marriage, there arose dispute between them. The appellant allegedly deserted the respondent an...
R.Anubama Vs. the Commissioner Cbe
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-11-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:11. 2.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.7849 of 2012 R.ANUBAMA [ PETITIONER ] Vs THE COMMISSIONER COIMBATORE CORPORATION TOWN HALL, COIMBATORE -1 [ RESPONDENT ] This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.02.2011 within a stipulated period. For petitioner : Mr.K.Govi Ganesan For respondent : Mr.Sathyanarayanaprasad O R D E R Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties concerned.2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the respondent is directed to dispose of the representation, dated 7.2.2011, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.4. ...
V.Ramanathan Vs. District Collector of Thiruvannamalai District
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-11-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :11. 02.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA W.P.No.8307 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 V.Ramanathan .. Petitioner Vs. 1 The District Collector Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai. 2 The Special Tahsildar (Adidravidar), Vandavasi Taluk, Vandavasi, Thiruvannamalai District. .. Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the impugned notice in Na.Ka.Aa.623/2007, dated 16.10.2007 issued under Sec.4(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Harijans Act, 1978. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Sivamani For Respondents : Mr.R.Ravichandran, A.G.P. ***** O R D E R The petitioner prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, to quash the impugned notice Na.Ka.Aa.623/2007, dated 16.10.2007 issued under Sec.4(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Harijans Act, 1978. 2 The only ground of cha...
1. Sethukutty Amma Vs. 1. Jayaraj
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-11-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:11. 02/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.2412 of 2002 & M.P.(MD)Nos.1, 2 and 3 o1. Sethukutty Amma 2. Sree Kumar 3. Girijia Kumari 4. Jalajakumari 5. Narayanan Nair 6. Kumari Sreekala 7. Kumari Jayasree ... Appellants Vs.1. Jayaraj 2. Ethel Mabel 3. United India Insurance Company Limited, Xavier Building, IInd Floor, Assissi Campus, P.W.Road, Nagercoil.4. Revankil ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the order and decreetal order of dismissal dated 02.04.2002 and made by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Sub Court, Kuzhithurai, in M.C.O.P.No.10 of 1995, on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kuzhithurai. !For Appellants ... Mr.K.N.Thampi ^For Respondents... Mr.S.Ramachandran for R-3 No appearance for R-1, R-2, R-4 - - - :JUDGMENT The appellants / petitioners have preferred the present appeal against the judgment and de...
P.Jaganathan Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :08. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.28295 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 P.Jaganathan, S/o.R.Palaniswamy, Proprietor, Sri Veni Industries, 110, Murugan Nagar, Peelamedu, Coimbatore-641 004. .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Managing Director, Tamilnadu Civil Supplies Corporation, 12,Thambuswamy Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. 3.Butterfly Gandhimathi Appliances, rep by its Proprietor, 143,Pudukuppam Village, Vandallur-Kelambakam Road, Kanchipuram-603 103. 4.Balaji Machine Works Private Ltd., rep by its Proprietor, No.86, Valli Tower Ground Floor, 100 Feet Road, Next to Bhimas Hotel, Vadapalani, Chennai-600 026. 5.Shree Saasthaa Grinders, rep by its Proprietor, 430,Kannuswamy Gounder Street, Rathinapuri, Coimbatore-641 027. 6.Mantra Grinders, rep by its Proprietor, SF No.249/1A(1) Kadathur, Kattampaty Village, ...
Saburath Begum Vs. Commissioner of Coimbatore City Municipal Corporati ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:08. 02-2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. DHANAPALAN W.P.No.5967 of 2010 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2010 Mrs. Saburath Begum .. Petitioner Vs.1. The Commissioner Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Town Hall, Coimbatore -1 2. The Asst. Revenue Officer, South Zone Coimbatore City Municipal Corporation Coimbatore 3. The Commissioner Municipal Administration Chennai 5 .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the 2nd respondent in Assessment No.247777 for the period from 01-04-2008 signed dated nil and quash the same and direct the respondents 1 & 2 to make the revisional assessment in accordance with the rules and recommended guidelines. For petitioner :: Mr. B. Nedunchezhiyan For respondents :: Mr. R. Sivakumar for RR1&2 Mr. N. Srinivasan, AGP for R3 ORDER The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition for a wr...
M.Krishnan Vs. R.M.Natrajan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 08 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.847 o1. M.Krishnan 2.Senthil Anandan 3.Karthi Mariappan 4.Arumugam 5.A.Selvaraj 6.A.Krishnamoorthy .. Petitioners vs 1.R.M.Natrajan 2.N.Tamil Mani 3.M.Sankaralingam 4.Gopalakrishnan 5.Sundararaj .. Respondents The Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 19.07.2010 passed in I.A.No.812 of 2008 in O.S.No.19 of 2008 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore. For Petitioners ... Mr.Sithirai Anandam For Respondents ... Mr.N.Manoharan O R D E R The Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order dated 19.07.2010 passed in I.A.No.812 of 2008 in O.S.No.19 of 2008 whereby the Court below allowed the respondents herein, who are the defendants in the suit, to file an additional written statement. 2.The plaintiffs in O.S.No.19 of 2008 are the revision petitioners and the defen...
C.Selvakumar Vs. State
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Date:08.02.2013 Coram THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. PALANIVELU CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.421 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 o1. C.Selvakumar 2. C.Parvathy 3. C.Selvaraj 4. P.Jayaraj ... Petitioners -Vs.- 1. State represented by The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station (Central) Coimbatore. (Cr.No.38 of 2007) 2. T.Vellai Vinayagam ... Respondents (Second respondent is impleaded as per the order of this Court dated 10.10.2012 made in M.P.No.2 of 2012) Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., against the order dated 07.03.2012 made in D.No.75 in S.C.No.121 of 2009 on the file of the Mahila Court, Coimbatore and to set aside the same. For Petitioners : Mr.C.S.Dhanasekaran For Respondent-1: Mr.C.Emilias Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For Respondent-2: Mrs.A.Malath Devapriyam ------- ORDER The petitioners are facing trial in S.C.No.121 of 2009 on the file of the Mahila Court, Coimbatore. The case has been reserved for judgment aft...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »