Chennai Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Narmada Devi Vs. Joint Commissioner Hrce
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:21. 2-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH Writ Appeal No.2004 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 o1. Narmada Devi 2. Eswara Moorthy 3. Kalathi 4. Roop Kumar 5. Girija 6. Tripurasundari 7. Ramanadhan 8. Gopinath 9. Arumugham 10.Manonmani all are represented by their Power of Attorney Agent V.Durairaj .. Appellants. Versus 1. The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Vellore.2. The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religions and Charitable Endowments Department, Sholinghur, Vellore District.3. The Tahsildar, Arakkonam, Vellore District.4. K.S.Dhamodhara Pillai .. Respondents. Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act, against the order of the learned single Judge, made in W.P.No.3984 of 2010, dated 20.7.2011. For Appellants : Mr.W.C.Thiruvengadam for Mr.G.Jeremiah For Respondents : Mr.T.N.Rajagopalan (R1) Mr.A.S.Kailasam and Associates (R2) Mr.M...
Ramachandran Vs. Vaidyanathan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:21.02.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA S.A.No.949 of 2001 Ramachandran ... Appellant vs. 1.Vaidyanathan 2.Ramalingam 3.Kaliyaperumal ... Respondents This second appeal is filed against the judgement and decree dated 27.3.2000 by the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Mayiladuthurai, in A.S.No.40 of 1999 confirming the judgement and decree dated passed by the District Munsif, Sirkali, in O.S.No.433 of 1995. For Appellant : Mr.A.Muthukumar For Respondents : Mr.S.Sounthar JUDGMENT This second appeal is focussed by the plaintiff, inveighing the judgement and decree dated 27.3.2000 passed by the learned Additional Subordinate Judge, Mayiladuthurai, in A.S.No.40 of 1999 confirming the judgement and decree dated passed by the District Munsif, Sirkali, in O.S.No.433 of 1995, which is one for permanent injunction.2. The parties, for the sake of convenience, are referred to here under according to their litigative status and ran...
Chinnaperumal Vs. Periaperumal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :21. 02.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. RAJASURIA S.A.No.717 of 2011 Chinnaperumal .. Appellant vs.1. Periaperumal 2. Raja .. Respondents This Second Appeal is focussed under Section 100 CPC as against the judgment and decree dated 09.03.2011 in A.S.No.18 of 2010 on the file of the Sub Court, Vaniyambadi, Vellore District confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.110 of 2005 dated 27.01.2010 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Court, Vaniyambadi. For appellant : Mr.P.A.Sudesh Kumar For Respondent : Mr.T.R.Rajaraman JUDGMENT This Second appeal is focussed by the plaintiff animadverting upon the judgment and decree dated 09.03.2011 passed in A.S.No.18 of 2010 by the Sub Court, Vaniyambadi, Vellore District, confirming the judgment and decree of the Additional District Munsif, Court, Vaniyambadi in O.S.No.110 of 2005.2. The parties are referred to hereunder according to their litigative status and ranking before...
Kotteeswari Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :21. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA Writ Petition Nos.41235 & 41506 of 2002 Mrs.Kotteeswari .. Petitioner in W.P.No.41235 of 2002 Mr.Sampath .. Petitioner in W.P.No.41506 of 2002 -Vs- 1. State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Secretary to Government Housing and Urban Development Department Fort St.George Chenna009. 2. The Special Tahsildar (LA) Tamil Nadu Housing Board Scheme Thirumangalam Chenna101. 3. The Executive Engineer and Administrative Officer Vellore Housing Unit Tamil Nadu Housing Board Vellor009. ( R3 impleaded vide order of Court dt. 26.9.12 in WPMP Nos.334 and 335 of 2012 in WP Nos.41235 and 41506 of 2002 ) .. R1 to R3 in both the writ petitions Petitions under Article 226 of The Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari, to quash the 4(1) Notification published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Part II, Section 2 on 26.02.1992 in G.O.Ms.No.49 and Section 6 declaration published on 2...
Ceedeeyes Standard Towers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Chennai
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :21. 02.2013 Coram:- The Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.Raja Writ Petition Nos.39261/03, 4341/04 & 26794/04 & WPMP Nos.47516/03, 24630/05, 22631/05, 5109/04 & 408/10 and WVMP Nos.902/05 & 897/05 M/s.CeeDeeYes Standard Towers (P) Ltd., rep. by its Managing Director, No.42, Second Main Road, Gandhi Nagar, Adyar, Chenna020. .. Petitioner in all Writ Petitions. Vs. The Collector of Chennai, First Line Beach Road, Chenna001. .. R1 in all WPs. The Special Tahsildar (LA), Highways, Mambalam-Guindy Taluk, Taluk Office Complex, Ashok Nagar, Chenna078. .. R2 in all WPs. Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, rep. by its Chairman-cum-Managing Director. .. R3 in WPs.39261/03 The Commissioner (ULC), Alandur, Chennai-16. .. R3 in WP.26794/04 The State of Tamilnadu rep. by its Secretary, Public Works Department, Fort St. George, Chenna009. .. R4 in WP.39261/03 The Executive Engineer (PWD), Kancheepuram. .. R4 in WP.26794/04 The Chief Enginee...
A.Anbazhagan Vs. Govt of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:21. 02.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA W.P.No.22461 o1. A. ANBAZHAGAN 2 N. GANAPATHY 3 M. GANAPATHY 4 M.S.KANNAN 5 M . DURAIPANDIAN 6 GNANASEKAR 7 B. BALASUBRAMANIAN 8 M. ARUNACHALAM 9 A. MADASAMY 10 O. BALASUBRAMANIAN 11 C. RAMASUBBU 12 R. AYYANAR 13 S. MUTHU 14 M. PANDIAN 15 R. CHANDRASEKARAN 16 A. SINGARAJ 17 S. MEENAKSHISUNDARAM (RETD.) 18. S. NARAYANAN (RETD) ... Petitioners -vs- 1. THE GOVT. OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT., RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT., FORT ST. GEORGE, CHENNAI-600 009.2. THE DIRECTOR OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, PANAGAL BUILDING, SAIDAPET, CHENNAI-600 015.3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT, THOOTHUKUDI ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to count the services rendered by the petitioners in the post of Part Time Panchayat Clerk in the Village Panchay...
Management of Thirumalaipatty Primary Agricultural Coopbank Vs. Presid ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 20 02.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH W.A. NO.515 OF 201.AND M.P.NO.1 OF 201.The Management Thirumalaipatty Primary Agricultural Co-operative Bank Ltd. S.241 Thirumalaipatty Namakkal District. .. Appellant Versus 1. The Presiding Officer Labour Court, Salem.2. R.Subramaniam Thirumalaipatty Post Namakkal District. .. Respondents Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act against the order made in W.P.No.1623 of 2008 dated 29.06.2010. For Appellant : Mr.K.Selvaraj For Respondent-2 : Mr.N.Manokaran * * * * * (Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.Sundresh, J.) This Writ Appeal has been filed by the appellant, who is the second respondent in the writ petition, challenging the order passed by the learned single Judge made in W.P.No.1623 of 2008, dated 29.06.2010, by which, the award passed by the first respondent has been set aside by reinstating the respondent No.2...
G.Sekar Vs. Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:20. 2-2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH Writ Appeal No.1365 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 G.Sekar .. Appellant Versus 1. The Commissioner of Police, The Commissioner of Police Office, Appellate Authority, Egmore, Chennai-600 008.2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Armed Police, The Deputy Commissioner of Police Office, Pudupet, Chennai-600 002. .. Respondents. Prayer: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act, seeking to set aside the order dated 20.12.2010, made in W.P.No.2733 of 2008. For Appellant : Mr.K.Jayaraman For Respondents : Mr.M.S.Ramesh Additional Government Pleader JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by M.Jaichandren,J.) This writ appeal has been preferred against the order of the learned single Judge, dated 20.12.2010, made in W.P.No.2733 of 2008, confirming the order passed by the respondent management dismissing the appellant from service, by th...
Thiyagarajan Vs. Muthusamy Gounder
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:20.02.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA S.A.No.880 of 2004 Thiyagarajan .. Appellant Vs. 1.Muthusamy Gounder 2.Krishnan 3.Dhanam .. Respondents This second appeal is filed against the judgement and decree dated 21.9.2001 passed by the learned III Additional District Court, Salem, in A.S.No.57 of 2000 reversing the judgement and decree dated 31.1.2000 passed by the Sub Court, Namakkal, in O.S.No.69 of 1995 For Appellant : Mr.N.Manokaran For Respondents : Mr.P.Jagadeesan for R1 and R2 JUDGMENT This second appeal is focussed by D3, inveighing the judgement and decree dated 21.9.2001 passed by the learned III Additional District Court, Salem, in A.S.No.57 of 2000 reversing the judgement and decree dated 31.1.2000 passed by the Sub Court, Namakkal, in O.S.No.69 of 1995, which is one for partition.2. The parties, for the sake of convenience, are referred to here under according to their litigative status and ranking before the t...
C.Sundara Vadivel Vs. Government of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:20. 02.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA W.P.No.27377 of 2008 C.Sundara Vadivel .. Petitioner -vs- 1. The Government of Tamilnadu, Rep. By its Secretary, Industries Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-9.2. The Commissioner of Sugars, 696, Annasalai, Nandanam, Chennai-35.3. The Special Officer, Dharmapuri District Co-operatives Sugar Mills Ltd., Palakode-636 802. Dharmapuri District. .. Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari, calling for the record of the 2nd respondent in RC No.22324/SL 2/2008-1 dated 26.09.2008 and quash the same and direct the second and 3rd respondent to revise and re-fix the petitioner's scale of pay on par with other "C" grade supervisors working in the 3rd respondent sugar mil enabling the petitioners to receive the scale of pay and allowance as that of the holders of other "C" cat...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »