Chennai Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kotak Mahindra Bank Vs. R.Subramanian
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :21. 02.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.ARUMUGHASWAMY Crl. O.P. Nos. 23732 to 23737, 23905 to 23910, 23787, 23788, 23916, 27137 to 27139, 27936, 27961 and 28084 of 2012 and connected Miscellaneous Petitions. Kotak Mahindra Bank 36-38A, Nariman Bhavan, 227, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 021,rep. by its Authorized signatory Mr.V.Bhaskaran. .. Petitioner/Accused in Crl.O.P.Nos.23732 to 23737 of 2012 Mr.V.Bhaskaran, Executive Vice President, Kotak Mahindra Bnak, 3rd Floor, "Ceebros Centre", No.39, Montieth Road, Chennai-600 008. .. Petitioner /Accused in Crl.O.P.Nos. 23905 to 23910/2012 Sambasivam Kailasam .. Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.23787/2012 and/Accused No.2 in C.C.No.189/2012 M/s Zash Investment and Trading Company Pvt. Ltd., rep. by its authorized representative Mr.Sambasivam Kailasam, Doddakannelli, Sarjapur Road, Bangalor035. .. Petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.23788/2012/Accused No.1 in C.C.No.189 of 2012 Ms.Renuka Ramnath .. Pe...
Ponniya Gounder Vs. Rajagopal
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 21 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. VIJAYARAGHAVAN S.A. Nos.280 and 281 of 2005 S.A. No.280 of 2005 ------------------- 1. Ponniya Gounder 2. Veerammal 3. Raja .. Appellants Versus Rajagopal .. Respondent Prayer : Second Appeal filed against the judgment and decree dated 31.7.2003 in A.S. No.432 of 2002 reversing the judgement and decree dated 29.10.1998 in O.S.No.516 of 1995 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Namakkal. S.A.No.281 of 2005 ------------------ 1. Ponniya Gounder 2. Veerammal .. Appellants Versus 1. Rajagopal 2. Savithri .. Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed against the judgment and decree dated 31.7.2003 in A.S. No.431 of 2002 partly reversing and partly allowing the judgment and decree dated 29.10.1998 in O.S.No.216 of 1996 on the file of Additional District Munsif, Namakkal. For appellants (in both appeals) : Mr.D.Shiva kumar For respondents (in both appeals) : Mr.C.Jagadish COMMON JUDGEMENT The...
Arulmighu Mannarswamy and Pachaiamman Temple Vs. Commissioner of Hr an ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:21. 02.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA W.P.No.3695 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 Arulmighu Mannarswamy and Pachaiamman Temple Gruhai, Salem-6 rep by its Hereditary Trustees P.Pachaimuthu, Son of Pachiappan Poosari S.Mani, Son of Swaminathan K.Sigamani, Son of Krishna T.Seetharaman, Son of Thiruvenkatan Sengodan, Son of Govindan .. Petitioners Vs.1. The Commissioner, HR & CE, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034.2. S.Malla Gounder 3. Vaithilingam 4. Muthu 5. Samikannu 6. Pachamuthu 7. Govindan 8. Kumar 9. Rajandran 10. Semban 11. Venkatachalam 12. Thangaraju 13. N.Raman 14. R.N.G.Vijayakumar .. Respondents Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ of certiorari calling for the records of the 1st respondent culminating with his order dated 12.12.2008 in RC No.12887/96 and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Vaidyanathan For Respondents : Mr.G.Kannan, Govt. Advocate (HR &...
S.Vanitha Vs. Tn Uniformed Services Recruitment
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :21. 02.2013 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice M.JAICHANDREN and The Honourable Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH Writ Appeal No.649 of 2011 S.Vanitha ... Appellant -vs- Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, represented by its Chairman, No.807, 2nd floor, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002. ... Respondent Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 09.03.2011 made in W.P.No.8177 of 2010. For appellant : Mrs.A.Arulmozhi For respondents : Mr.M.S.Ramesh, Additional Government Pleader JUDGMENT (The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.JAICHANDREN,J) At the stage of the hearing of the writ appeal, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant had submitted that the appellant had been selected and appointed to the post of Grade-II M.JAICHANDREN, J.and M.M.SUNDRESH, J.raa Police Constable, for the year 2008-2009, pursuant to the report submitted by the second Medical Board, on 30.01.2013, as directed by thi...
The Managing Director, Vs. 1.Murugesan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:21. 02/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.225 of 2012 & M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Pudukkottai. ... Appellant Vs. 1.Murugesan 2.Kalyani 3.Geetha ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, to set-aside the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.29 of 2010, dated 08.08.2011, on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal and Additional District and Sessions Judge cum Fast Track Court, Pudukkottai. !For Appellant ... Mr.M.Prakash ^For Respondents... Mr.N.Balakrishnan - - - :JUDGMENT The appellant / respondent has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.29 of 2010, on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal and Additional District and Sessions Judge cum Fast Track Court, Pudukkottai.2. The short facts of the case are as follows:- The petitioners,...
Dr.V.Ezhil Sundar Vs. Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:21. 02.2013 CORAM: THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.2456 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2013 Dr.V.Ezhil Sundar ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, Health and Family Welfare Department, Chennai. 2.The Directorate of Medical Education, Kilpauk, Chenna010. 3.The Director of Medical and Rural Health Services,D.M.S.Campus, Teynampet, Chenna018. 4.The Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, D.M.S.Campus, Teynampet, Chenna018. ...Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned circular Ref.No.71937/E3/1/2012 dated 21.01.2013 on the file of the Directorate of Medical Education, Chennai, the second respondent herein for the counselling dated 02.02.2013 for the second respondent department doctors alone and to quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.D.R.Sivakumar For Respondents : Mr.A.Navaneetha Krishnan Adv...
Muniyandi Nadavai Vs. M.Murugan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:21. 02/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.HARIPARANTHAMAN C.R.P.(PD)(MD).No.2154 of 2011 & M.P.(MD).No.2 of 2011 Muniyandi Nadavai .. Petitioner Vs. M.Murugan .. Respondent Prayer Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order passed in I.A.No.104 of 2009 in O.S.No.75 of 2008 on the file of District Munsif Court, Periyakulam. !For Petitioners ... Mr.K.Baalasundharam ^ :ORDER The Revision Petitioner is the Defendant in O.S.No.75 of 2008, on the file of learned District Munsif Court, Periyakulam. The Respondent/Plaintiff filed O.S.No.75 of 2008 praying for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the property shown in the Map attached with the plaint.2. The Respondent/Plaintiff filed I.A.No.104 of 2009 for amendment of plaint with regard to the measurements that is stated in the map. The application was allowed by the Trial Court by ...
Bolla Aruna Kumari Vs. Vijayakumari
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :21. 02.2013 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR and The Honourable Mr.Justice M.JAICHANDREN Original Side Appeal No.26 o1. Bolla Aruna Kumari 2.Kari Vijaya Saradhi ... Appellants -vs- 1.Vijayakumari 2.K.Pandurangan ... Respondents Original Side Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of the O.S. Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the order dated 25.06.2012 passed in A.No.2298 of 2012 in C.S.No.431 of 2011. For appellants : Mr.P.Subba Reddy For respondents : Mr.P.R.Balasubramanian JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH, J.) This Original Side Appeal has been preferred by the appellants, being aggrieved against the order of the learned single Judge in dismissing the application filed in Appln.No.2298 of 2012 in C.S.No.431 of 2011 seeking to transfer the suit pending between the parties in O.S.No.4031 of 2009 on the file of XVIII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, to be filed a...
M.Thiyagarajan Vs. Geetha
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:21. 02/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA C.M.S.A.(MD).No.52 of 2011 M.Thiyagarajan ... Appellant vs. Geetha D/o Ragavan ... Respondent Memorandum of Grounds of Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act read with Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 19.01.2010 made in H.M.C.M.A.No.6 of 2009 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, (Fast Track Court), Dindigul, confirming the judgment and decree dated 12.11.2008 in H.M.O.P.No.42 of 2004 passed by the learned Principal Sub Judge, Dindigul. !For Appellant ... Mr.S.Alagarsamy ^For Respondent ... Mr.V.Sankaranarayanan :JUDGMENT The present civil miscellaneous second appeal is directed against the concurrent findings of both the Courts below, refusing to grant a decree for dissolution of marriage between the appellant and the respondent.2. The facts in brief leading to the filing of the appeal are ...
1.The Manager, Vs. 1.C.Zophar Jothipaul
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-21-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:21. 02/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Writ Appeal(MD)No.76 of 2013 and Writ Appeal(MD)No.77 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 1 o1. The Manager, High Schools/Higher Secondary Schools, and Special Schools, CSI Tuticorin - Nazereth Diocese Caldwell Higher Secondary School compound, Tuticorin. 2.The Correspondent, Caldwell Higher Secondary School, Tuticorin. ...Appellants/ in both W.As. versus 1.C.Zophar Jothipaul 2.The Chief Educational Officer, Tuticorin, Tuticorin District. 3.D.Rajendran Gnanadurai CSI Tuticorin - Nazareth Diocese Caldwell Higher Secondary School compound Tuticorin. ..Respondents (Respondents - 3 and 4 are given up in these writ appeals) PRAYER Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the orders of the learned Single Judge, dated 08.01.2013, made in W.P.(MD)Nos. 9148 of 2007 and 5305 of 2008 on the file of the learned single Judge of this Co...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »