Chennai Court February 2013 Judgments
N.Murugesan Vs. Commissioner of Rural Development and Local Administra ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:27. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA W.P.No.13780 of 2009 and M.P.No.2 of 2009 N.MURUGESAN 12 V ALAMPALAYAM POST, ANDHIYUR VIA BHAVANI TALUK, ERODE DISTRICT. .. PETITIONER -Vs- 1 THE COMMISSIONER OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND LOCAL ADMINISTRATION PANAGAL MAALIGAI CHENNAI-145. 2 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR ERODE DISTRICT ERODE. 3 THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER SATHIAMANGALAM ERODE DISTRICT. 4 P.SARAVANAN OVERSEER SATHIAMANGALAM PANCHAYAT UNION SATHIAMANGALAM ERODE DISTRICT. 5 THE DISTRICT EMPLOYMENT OFFICER EXCHANGE ERODE DISTRICT. .. RESPONDENTS PRAYER: Writ petitions have been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Certiorari, to quash the impugned order passed by the second respondent issued vide Na.Ka.No.64859/06/PE1 dt.15.12.2007 and quash the same in so far as petitioner and 4th respondent to appoint the petitioner as Overseer or an alternative issue a direction to the respondents to ap...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Taxi Vs. Sheela Christian Charitable Trust
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:27. 02.2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.BANUMATHI AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU T.C.(A) No.315 of 2010 Commissioner of Income Tax I, Salem. .... Appellant Vs. Sheela Christian Charitable Trust, 12-3/34, South Car street, New 12th Ward, Taramangalam P.O., Omalur Taluk, Salem District. .... Respondent Prayer: Tax Case Appeal is filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the Order dated 24.07.2009 made in I.T.A.No.339/Mds/09 on the file of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai Bench B, Chennai. For Appellant : Mr.J.Narayanasamy For Respondent : Mr.S.Sridhar JUDGMENT Being aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal holding that there was assumed registration for the Respondent Trust, the Revenue has preferred this appeal. The appeal was admitted on the following substantial questions of law:- 1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in holding t...
Tag this Judgment!M/S.The Divisional Manager, Vs. 1.Bushra Begam
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27. 02/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.201 of 2012 & M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 M/s.The Divisional Manager, The New India Assurance Company Limited, 242B, Rekha Towers, Kamarajar Salai, Madurai-9. ... Appellant Vs. 1.Bushra Begam 2.Hajim Sulthana 3.Ejas Shirin 4.Ejas Mohamed 5.Anwar Ali ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, to set-aside the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.133 of 2009, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Principal District Judge, Ramanathapuram, dated 26.08.2011. !For Appellant ... Mr.J.S.Murali ^For Respondents... Mr.K.Kumaravel for R-1 to R-4 No appearance for R-5 - - - :JUDGMENT The appellant / second respondent has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.133 of 2009, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Principal District Judge, Ramanathapuram...
Tag this Judgment!New India Assurance Company Limited, Vs. 1.S.Saroja
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27. 02/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.401 of 2010 & M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2010 New India Assurance Company Limited, Represented by its Divisional Manger, Jerome Building, Fort Station Road, Tiruchy. ... Appellant Vs. 1.S.Saroja 2.Minor Harikrishnan 3.Minor Gopikrishnan (Minor respondents are represented by mother and natural guardian first respondent All are residing at Sembiakudi Village, Kulamanickam Post, Ariyalur Taluk, Perambalur District.) 4. P.Sivalingam ... Respondents PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, to set-aside the judgment and decree dated 31.10.2006 made in M.C.O.P.No.2088 of 2003, on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, III Additional Sub Judge, Trichy. !For Appellant ... Mr.R.Srinivasan ^For Respondents... Mr.G.Thalai Mutharasu for R-1 to R-3 R-4 (Exparte) - - - :JUDGMENT The appellant / second respondent has preferred the present...
Tag this Judgment!Raju Vs. United India Insurance Company Limited
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE :27. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M. VENUGOPAL C.R.P.(PD)No.1128 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 Raju .. Petitioner/Petitioner/Respondent Vs United India Insurance Company Limited, Salem, Office at Divisional Office, 1170, Mettur Road, Erode -638 011. .. Respondent/3rd Respondent/Petitioner Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India against the order passed by the Learned Additional District Judge (Claims Tribunal), (Fast Track Court not IV), Bhavani, Erode District in I.A.No.549 of 2010 in M.C.O.P.No.418 of 2008 dated 21.12.2010. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Kulanthaivel For Respondent : Mr.K.S.Narasimhan ORDER The Revision Petitioner has focused the present Civil Revision Petition before this Court, as an aggrieved person, as against the order dated 21.12.2010 in I.A.No.549 of 2010 in M.C.O.P.No.418 of 2008 passed by the Learned Additional District Judge (Claims Tribunal), (Fast Track Court...
Tag this Judgment!S.P.Bhooma Vs. Indian Bank
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :27. 02.2013 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice M.JAICHANDREN and The Honourable Mr.Justice M.M.SUNDRESH Original Side Appeal No.60 of 2013 & M.P.No.1 o1. S.P.Bhooma 2.V.Goumi (2nd appellant is not necessary party in the above appeal) .. Appellants -vs- Indian Bank, Thiruvanmiyur Branch, represented by its Chief Manager, 7, West Tank Street, Tiruvanmiyur, Chennai-600 041. .. Respondent Original Side Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules, 1956, against the order dated 26.11.2012 made in Appln.No.291 of 2012 in I.P.No.46 of 2010. For appellants : Mr.S.Chandrasekharan For respondent : Mr.T.Sundarrajan JUDGMENT (The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M.M.SUNDRESH,J) This original side appeal has been preferred by the appellant challenging the order of the learned single Judge, by which, the application filed in Appln.No.291 of 2012 in I.P.No.46 of 2010 was dismissed.2. The appellant herein is the debtor. During...
Tag this Judgment!M.Venkatesan Vs. 1.Miss.C.T.Vijitha
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:27. 02/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN C.M.A.(MD)No.508 of 2007 M.Venkatesan ... Appellant Vs. 1.Miss.C.T.Vijitha 2.The New India Assurance Company Limited, Divisional Office, Thanjavur. 3.R.Raja 4.The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, 1858, South Main Street, Thanjavur. ... Respondents (R-1 and R-3 set exparte notice may be given up) PRAYER Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.586 of 2001, dated 21.10.2003, by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal cum District Judge, Thanjvur. !For Appellant ... Mr.M.Karunanithi ^For Respondents... Mr.K.Murugesan for R-2 Mr.K.Bhaskaran for R-4 - - - :JUDGMENT The appellant / petitioner has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.586 of 2001, on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal cum District Judge, Thanjvur.2. The short facts of the case a...
Tag this Judgment!R.Raghavan Vs. Dr.R.Venkitapathy
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:27. 2.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH O.S.A. No.103 of 2013 R.Raghavan .. Appellant VS 1.Dr.R.Venkitapathy Partner-Dinamalar not G-9, Parsn Paradise 109, G.N.Chetty Road T.Nagar, Chenna2. Dr.R.Krishnamoorthy Partner-Dinamalar No.219, Anna Salai Chenna002. 3. Dr.R.Lakshmipathy Partner-Dinamalar No.219, Anna Salai Chenna002. 4. Mr.R.Sathyamurthy Partner-Dinamalar not G-9, Parsn Paradise 109, G.N.Chetty Road T.Nagar, Chenna5. Honble Mr.Justice Somasundaram (Retd), Presiding Arbitrator No.1/688, 15th Street H Block, Anna Nagar Chenna040. 6. Honble Mr.Justice R.Jayasimha Babu (Retd), Arbitrator 612, RMV Extension 2nd stage, 3rd Block, Bangalor003. 7. Honble Mr.Justice S.S.Subramani (Retd) Arbitrator Plot No.2, Lakshmi Apartments No.28/481/2, Sasta Nagar Thiruvambadi, Trichur-25 Kerala .. Respondents This Original Side Appeal under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of Original Side Rules read with...
Tag this Judgment!Tmt.D.Rajini Vs. Tamil Nadu Electrician Licensing Board
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:27. 02.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR W.P.No.26116 o1. Tmt.D.Rajini 2.R.Varadharaju .. Petitioners -Vs- 1.Tamil Nadu Electrician Licensing Board rep. by its President Thiru.Vi.Ka.Industrial Estate Guindy, Chenna2. Tmt.S.Geetha Malini 3.C.Poornachandran .. Respondents Writ petition filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the order passed by the first respondent in proceedings not Vu.Vaaa.07/Pa ku/Mu Pa dated 30.05.2007 and quash the same and direct the first respondent to promote the petitioners as Assistant from the date on which the respondents 2 and 3 were given promotion and confer all the consequential benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mani For Respondents : Mrs.R.Varalakshmi Senior Counsel for TNEB for R1 Mr.G.Saravanan for R2 Mr.K.V.Balakrishnan for R3 ----- ORDER The petitioners are working as Junior Assistants in Tamil N...
Tag this Judgment!A.Natarajan Vs. Senior Divisional Manager of National Insurance Compan ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-27-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :27. 02.2013 Coram THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA W.P.No.8421 of 2009 A.Natarajan .. Petitioner .. Vs ..1. The Senior Divisional Manager, National Insurance Company Limited Division III, Ground Floor No.8, India Exchange Place, Kolkatta.2. The Assistant Secretary, O/o.The Insurance Ombudsman, Fathima Akhtar Court, 4th Floor, 453, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai. .. Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the first respondent vide No.10030/JPA dated 16.12.2008 and quash the same and in consequence to that direct the first respondent to consider the petitioner's application of claim dated 3.8.2007. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Ravikumar for Mr.M.Ariruthan For Respondents : Mr.K.S.Narasimhan for R-1 : No appearnce for R-2 * * * * * O R D E R The petitioner prays for issuance of ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »