Skip to content

Chennai Court December 2013 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Dec 10 2013

S.Kantilal Prakash Chand JaIn Vs. M.Suvee Raja

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-10-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:10. 12.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR C.R.P.No.4292 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 S.Kantilal Prakash Chand Jain ... Petitioner vs M.Suvee Raja ... Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 against the order and decreetal order dated 14.09.2013 passed by the learned VII Judge (Rent Control Appellate Authority), Court of Small Causes, Chennai, in M.P.No.523 of 2013 in RCA.(SR).No.11150 of 2013 filed for condoning the delay in filing the said appeal against the order and decreetal order dated 04.08.2009 made in M.P.No.346 of 2008 in RCOP.No.1000 of 2007 by the learned XVI Judge (Rent Controller), Court of Small Causes, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.K.P.Ashok For Respondent : Mr.G.Jehanathan ORDER This revision petition has been filed under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 against the order of the Rent Co...


Dec 10 2013

Lingasamy Vs. R.Philips

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-10-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:10. 12.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN C.M.A.No.2734 of 2010 1. Lingasamy 2. Kannammal Appellants vs.1. R.Philips 2. The Managing Director, TNSTC (Coimbatore Division II), Chinnamalai Road, Erode. Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the award passed in M.C.O.P.No.201 of 1998(F.T.C. No.64 of 2001) dated 14.6.2002 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional District and Sessions Judge), Erode at Dharapuram. For appellants : Mrs.R.Meenal For R2 : Mr.A.Babu JUDGMENT This is an appeal filed by the claimants, who are parents of the deceased Anandan, seeking enhancement of compensation awarded to the tune of Rs.2,02,000/= as against the claim of Rs.24,00,000/=.2. It was contended by the claimants/appellants that their son was riding a TVS Suzuki Motorcycle bearing registration No.TN37 5087 at Thiruppur-Dharapuram Main Road on 8.6.1997 at about 6.15 pm and at that time, the bus bearing registration No.TN...


Dec 10 2013

Elumalai Vs. Secretary to Government

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-10-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :10. 12.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.11525 of 2013 Elumalai .. Petitioner -vs- 1. The Secretary to Government Finance (Pension) Department Secretariat, Chennai-9 2. The Secretary to Government P & AR Department Secretariat, Chennai-9 3. The Secretary to Government Public Works Department Secretariat, Chennai-9 4. The Executive Engineer (Electrical) Division-I Public Works Department Chepauk, Chennai-5 .. Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to implement the G.O.Ms.No.371 Finance (Pension) Department dated 30.04.1986 by treating the Dearness Allowance sanctioned upto 01.10.1987 as Dearness Pay for the purpose of calculating pension/family pension to the petitioner herein in the light of the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (Civil Appeal) Nos.8848-8849 of 2012 dated 17.1.2013. For Petitioner :: Mr....


Dec 10 2013

Bilkish Begum Vs. Govindan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-10-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:10.12.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH S.A.Nos.189 & 190 of 2005 and CMP.Nos.2684/2005 in S.A.No.189/2005 and CMP.No.2685/2005 in S.A.No.190/2005 Bilkish Begum ...Appellant in both the appeals Vs. Govindan ..Respondent in both the appeals PRAYER in S.A.No.189 of 2005: The Second Appeal is filed by the Appellant against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.18 of 2003, on the file of Subordinate Court, Tirupattur dated 30.07.2004 reversing the judgment and decree in O.S.No.79/1999, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Ambur, dated 28.03.2002. PRAYER in S.A.No.190 of 2005: The Second Appeal is filed by the Appellant against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.67 of 2003, on the file of Subordinate Court, Tirupattur dated 30.07.2004 reversing the judgment and decree in O.S.No.89/1999, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Ambur, dated 28.03.2002. For Appellant : M/s. V. Ragavachari in both...


Dec 10 2013

P.Ramachandran Vs. Senior Commandant of Disciplinary Authority for Cis ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-10-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:10. 12.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.26898 of 2010 P.Ramachandran ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Senior Commandant, Disciplinary Authority, CISF, Unit CISA, Mumbai. 2.The Deputy Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Force, C-301, CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai 614. 3.The Inspector General, Lodi Road, Block No.:15, New Delhi. 4.The Union of India, Rep. by the Home Secretary, New Delhi. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of certiorarified mandamus to quash the order of removal of the petitioner from service passed by the first respondent vide order No.V-15014/CISF/CSIA (M)L&R(PR)06-3623, dated 15.06.2006 and appellate order No.V-11014/AP-W/(PR)/L&r/2007-1804, dated 26.04.2007 of the second respondent and the revision petition order No.V-11014/09/APS/LS/2007/12522, dated 08.11.2007 and to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner to ...


Dec 10 2013

A.Suga Vs. Principal Secretary to Government

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-10-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10.12.2013 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL W.P.No.33421 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 1.A.Suga 2.M.Bagyalakshmi 3.S.Kamalakannan 4.K.Selvarani 5.V.Balakrishnan 6.K.Rajamanickam 7.S.M.Annadurai 8.A.Rama 9.G.Karthikeyan 10.R.Karpagavalli 11.K.Sivakumar 12.T.M.Kalpana 13.L.Lyonisus Jaya Suji 14.D.Mahalakshmi 15.R.Venkatesan 16.S.Srinivas 17.T.Shanmugasundaram 18.C.Umamaheswari 19.R.Lakshmanan 20.V.Vaithiyanathan 21.R.Mahalakshmi 22.R.Kumuthalakshmi 23.R.Sivakumar 24.S.Banumathi 25.S.S.Kumaravel 26.O.Karthikeyan 27.S.Prabha .Petitioners versus The Principal Secretary to Government, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to convert the temporary list for promotion to the post of Assistant Section Of...


Dec 10 2013

P.Sethulakshmi Vs. 1.Bala Saroja,d/O.Dharmartheni, theni Distri

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-10-2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.12.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN Writ Appeal (MD)No.800 of 2012 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2012 P.Sethulakshmi .Appellant/4th Respondent vs 1.Bala Saroja,D/o.Dharmaraj .Respondent-1/Petitioner 2.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep.by its Commissioner, Department of Adi Dravidar & Tribal Welfare, Chepauk, Chennai-5. 3.The District Adi Dravidar Welfare Officer, Theni District, Theni. 4.The Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare Department, Collectorate Building, Theni, Theni District.Respondents 2 to 4/Respondents 1to 3 Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, against the order of the learned Single Judge, dated 14.09.2012, made in W.P.(MD)No.8580 of 2012. !For Appellant .Mr.K.Appadurai ^For Respondent-1 .Mr.T.Lajapathiroy For Respondents .Mr.N.Manoharan, 2 to 4 Spl.Govt.Pleader. :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SUDHAKAR,J.This writ appeal has been filed by the 4...


Dec 06 2013

M.Senthil Kumar Vs. District Collector of Kancheepuram District

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-06-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :06. 12.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.Justice CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.NO.33650 of 2012 M.P.No.1 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 M.Senthil Kumar ... Petitioner -vs- 1. District Collector, Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram District, 2. The Thasildar, Chengalpet Taluk, Kancheepuram District, 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chengalpet Taluk Kancheepuram District 4. The Revenue Inspector, Guduvanjerry Chengalpet Taluk Kancheepuram District 5. The Village Administrative Officer Kelampakkam village, Chengalpet Taluk, Kancheepuram District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for the relief of issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the 2nd respondent passed in Na.Ka.No.719/2011.A2 dated 3.12.2012, quash the same and direct the respondents to provide alternative place or give compens...


Dec 06 2013

K.Manoharan Vs. 1.The Presiding Officer,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-06-2013

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:06. 12.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD)No.1395 of 2011 K.Manoharan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, District Court Complex, Mellur Road, Madurai-20. 2.The Management, M/s. V.V.Vanniyaperumal & Sons, 13, East Masi Street, Madurai-625 001. ... Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent in I.A.No.166 of 2005 in I.D.509/1990 quash the order dated 14.06.2010. !For Petitioner ... Mr.T.Ravichandran ^For Respondents ... Mr.G.Muthu Kannan, Government Advocate for R1. :ORDER The petitioner/workmen has originally filed the writ petition for the following relief: ...... a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent in I.D.No.509 of 1990 and quash the award dated 08.10.1996 passed in I.D.509/1990 and also quash the consequential order date...


Dec 06 2013

Medical Council of India Vs. Tamil Nadu Dr.Mgr Medical University

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-06-2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06.12.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.R.K.AGRAWAL, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU W.A.No.2364 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1, 2 and 3 of 2013 Medical Council of India, presently under Board of Governors in Supersession of Medical Council of India, Through its Chairman, Pocket 14, Sector-8, Dwarka, Phase-1, New Delhi.Appellant ..vs.1.The Registrar/Returning Officer, Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R.Medical University, Rep. By its Registrar, No.69, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai 600 032. 2.Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R.Medical University, Rep. By its Registrar, No.69, Anna Salai, Guindy, Chennai 600 032. 3.Dr.L.P.Thangavelu 4.The Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi 110 115...Respondents Prayer:Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in M.P.No.7 of 2013 in W.P.No.23914 of 2013 dated 19.11.2013. For Appellant : Mr.V.P.Ram...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial