Chennai Court December 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.Murugan Vs. 1.The Special Director General/
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-18-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18/12/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI W.P(MD)No.9756 of 2011 A.Murugan .Petitioner Vs 1.The Special Director General/ Airport Sector cum the Inspector General Central Industrial Security Force, (Ministry of Home Affairs).13, CGO's Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-13. 2.The Deputy Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Force, (Ministry of Home Affairs).SSG.CISF, Greater Noida, Utter Pradesh - 201306.Respondents PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to impugned order issued by the 1st respondent Inspector General, vide proceedings No.V-11014/APS/46/AM/LS/2010-6798, dated 17.06.2011, confirming the order of termination issued by the 2nd respondent Deputy Inspector General, vide proceedings No.E-29023/CISF/SSG/DOC/ Prob/10-4483, dated 07.09.2010, quash the same and further direct the respondent...
Yasodha Vs. V.G.P.Housing Private Limited
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.12.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM C.R.P.(PD).1507 of 2010 Yasodha ..Petitioner versus 1.V.G.P.Housing (Private Limited).A company having registered Office, at V.G.P.Square No.6, Dharmaraja Kovil Road, Saidapet Post, Chennai-600 015, rep.by its Managing Director, Thiru G.Santhosam 2.Thiru G.Santhosam 3.V.G.Selvaraj 4.V.G.P.Ravidas 5.V.G.P.Rajadas 6.V.G.P.Babudas 7.R.Nallamuthu 8.Smt.Rajammal 9.Smt.Parimala ..Respondents Civil revision petition preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the order dated 9.2.2010 passed by the Sub Judge, Perundurai, in I.A.No.91 of 2009 in O.S.No.127 of 2009. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mohammed Azaad for M/s.S.T.S.Murthi For Respondents : Mr.K.Balamurali for R1 to R6 for M/s.Shivakumar and Suresh ORDER This civil revision petition is directed against the order dated 9.2.2010 passed by the Sub Judge, Perundurai, in I.A.No.91 of 2009 in O.S.No.127 of 2009. 2.The petit...
K.Rajendran Vs. 1.The Senior Regional Manager,2.S.Velayutham
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.12.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.A.(MD)No.851 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013, W.P.(MD)No.8828 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2013 and W.P.(MD)No.11650 of 2013 and M.P.(MD)No.1 of 2013 W.A.(MD)No.851 of 2013 K.Rajendran ..Appellant Vs 1.The Senior Regional Manager, The Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Thanjavur Region, Thanjavur. 2.S.Velayutham ..Respondents W.P.(MD)No.8828 of 2013 K.Rajendran ..Petitioner Vs 1.The Senior Regional Manager, The Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Thanjavur Region, Thanjavur. 2.The then Senior Regional Manager (Incharge).The Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Thanjavur Region, Thanjavur. 3.N.Chellappan (Retd.) 4.S.Lakshmanan ..Respondents 0W.A.(MD)No.11650 of 2013 K.Rajendran ..Petitioner Vs 1.The Senior Regional Manager (i/c).The Tamil Nadu Civil Supplies Corporation, Thanjavur Region, Thanjavur. 2.S.Velayutham ..Re...
i.Sheik Mathar Vs. Tamilnadu Electricity Board
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:17. 12.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR W.P.No.34121 of 2013 I.Sheik Mathar .. Petitioner Versus 1.Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Rep. by Assistant Engineer, Thirumullaivoyal, Chennai 62 2.N.Selvaraju .. Respondents Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a writ of mandamus, directing the first respondent to furnish electricity connection to the petitioner's shop at No.52, MTH Road, Thirumullaivoyal, Chennai 62. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Bhiman For Respondents : Mr.G.Vasudevan (for R1) Standing counsel for TNEB ORDER As per the supporting affidavit to this writ petition, the petitioner is a tenant in respect of a shop at Door No.51, MTH Road, Thirumullaivoyal, Chennai 62. According to the petitioner, when the landlord attempted to evict him forcibly, he has filed, O.S.No.53 of 2013 and obtained an interim injunction on 13.02.2013, on the file of the learned District Munsi...
Valarmathi Vs. the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:17. 12.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.DHANAPALAN W.P.No.34145 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2013 1. Valarmathi 2. Savithri 3. Pushpathal 4. Jayamani 5. Kamalam 6. Sumathi Petitioners vs.1. The District Collector, Tiruppur, Tiruppur District.2. The Special Tahsildar, Adi-Dravidar Welfare, Kangayam, Kangayam Taluk, Tiruppur District. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records of the second respondent culminating in and by his proceedings No.LA21/90A dated 24.7.2007 pertaining to the petitioners and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Dyaneswaran For Respondents : Mr.R.A.S.Senthilvel, Govt. Advocate ORDER With consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for disposal at the admission stage.2. The case of the petitioners is that they belong to Schedule Caste Community and are daily wage workers and they do not own any house. ...
K.N.Shanmugaramasamy Vs. District Collector of Erode District
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATE:17. 12.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR W.P.No.34207 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 1. K.N.Shanmugaramasamy 2. K.P.Thulasimani 3. C.Chandrasekaran 4. V. Anbalagan 5. N.Deivasigamani 6. K.Gunasekaran 7. T.Balasubramani 8. K.Gomathi .. Petitioners Versus 1.The District Collector, Erode District, Erode. 2.The Assistant Director of Geology & Mining, Erode District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Erode Taluk, Erode District. .. Respondents Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the records of the first respondent comprised in and by his proceedings RC Na.Ka.No.37611/2012/X.1 dated 31.10.2013 and quash the same consequently direct the respondents 1 to3 not to grant lease to the 4th respondent to quarry stone in S.F.No.172/13 and 172/14 in Thuyampurnthurai Village Erode District. For Petitioners : ...
S.Syed Ahamed Vs. Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.12.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE M. VENUGOPAL Writ Petition No.21451 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 S.Syed Ahamed ..Petitioner versus 1.The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai -9. 2.The Director, Local Fund Audit, 4th Floor, Kuralagam, Chennai 108. 3.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, 6th Floor, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-5. 4.The Commissioner, Mettur Municipal Office, Mettur..Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus, to direct the fiRs.respondent to calculate the half of the non pensionable services rendered by the petitioner in Tamil Nadu Steels Limited, Arakkonam along with the pensionable service in the 4th respondent for calculating the pension as per G.O.Ms.No.118 Finance (Pension) Department dated 14.2.1996 and pay the pensionary benefits to the petitioner from the date of retirem...
D.Yesupatham Vs. Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-17-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.12.2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE M. VENUGOPAL Writ Petition No.21452 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 D.Yesupatham ..Petitioner versus 1.The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, Fort St. George, Chennai -9. 2.The Director, Local Fund Audit, 4th Floor, Kuralagam, Chennai 108. 3.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, 6th Floor, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-5. 4.The Commissioner, Tiruvallur Municipal Office, Tiruvallur..Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus, to direct the fiRs.respondent to calculate the half of the non pensionable services rendered by the petitioner in Tamil Nadu Steels Limited, Arakkonam along with the pensionable service in the 4th respondent for calculating the pension as per G.O.Ms.No.118 Finance (Pension) Department dated 14.2.1996 and pay the pensionary benefits to the petitioner from the date of ...
M.Packrisamy Vs. Arbitrator for the Land Acquisition for N.H.67
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-12-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 12.12.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M. VENUGOPAL W.P.No.28584 of 2012 M.Packrisamy ..Petitioner Vs 1) The Arbitrator/The District Collector, Land Acquisition for N.H.67, Tiruvarur District, Tiruvarur. 2) The Competent Authority, Special District Revenue Officer (L.A.) National Highways-67, No.12, Thamizhnagar, Vilamal, Tiruvarur, Tiruvarur District. 3) The Deputy Tahsildar, (Head QuarteRs.Nidamangalam Taluk, Tiruvarur District..Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a writ of Mandamus, directing the FiRs.Respondent to determine the compensation as per the market value of the lands acquired and to determine the Additional Compensation sought as per the Application dated 23.08.2012 in accordance with the provisions of the National Highways Act, 1956. For Petitioner : M/s.M.Jayapalrajan For Respondents : Mr.S.Navaneethan, Additional Govt. Pleader ORDER The Petitioner has filed the ...
Mani Mesthri Vs. Nataraj Kiramani
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-12-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:12. 12.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR C.R.P.No.4724 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013 1. Mani Mesthri 2. Mannu 3. Ramudu alias Ramajayam 4. Sankar ... Petitioners vs Nataraj Kiramani ... Respondent Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 30.11.2012 passed in I.A.No.793 of 2011 in O.S.No.21 of 2010 by the learned Principal District Munsif, Cheyyar, Thiruvannamalai District. For Petitioners : Mrs.Manjula for M/s.Ashok Menon ORDER The arguments advanced on behalf of the revision petitioners are heard. The grounds of revision and the materials produced in the form of typed set of papers are also perused.2. The respondent herein filed a suit O.S.No.21 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Cheyyar, against the revision petitioners 1 to 4 herein and one Ramajayam, son of Govindaraji Pillai for permanent injunction restraining them not...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »